logo
#

Latest news with #AdantePointer

Diddy's 'dream team' defense could cost him $15M: expert
Diddy's 'dream team' defense could cost him $15M: expert

Fox News

time3 days ago

  • Business
  • Fox News

Diddy's 'dream team' defense could cost him $15M: expert

Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team for his sex-trafficking and racketeering trial in New York is stacked with a high-profile group of lawyers. Marc Agnifilo, who represented NXIVM cult leader Keith Raniere, and Brian Steel, who recently represented rapper Young Thug, are among the team of lawyers listed on Diddy's court docket. The others include Teny Geragos, Anna Estevao, Jason Driscoll, Xavier R. Donaldson and Alexandra Shapiro. Since the musician has a hefty legal team, experts have estimated the price tag for his eight-week trial and months of pretrial motions and preparations will cost him a pretty penny. Civil rights and criminal defense attorney Adante Pointer told Fox News Digital that he believes Combs' legal tab will top $10 million. "When you consider the severity of the potential punishment Diddy is facing if convicted, including life in prison, and the sprawling indictment which alleges RICO charges along with the number of witnesses and locations of the conduct being prosecuted, it's easy to see the legal tab topping $10 million," Pointer said. "I'd suspect Diddy will end up paying at least $15 million for the entire package. This is literally a 'money is no object' defense." The lawyer claimed that Combs' legal tab began "well before" his indictment was made public. "You don't become a billionaire by being clueless and not preparing for a legal battle that will put your life, legacy and wealth on the line. His bill started growing the moment he began conversations with lawyers, their legal staff, private investigators, potential witnesses and all the pretrial preparation that goes into such a complicated case long before it ever went before a jury," Pointer said. Pointer said the group of eight lawyers are likely on Combs' "beck-and-call" with one goal: allowing Combs to walk out of the courtroom a free man. "And that costs a lot of money," Pointer said. Criminal defense attorney John Day compared Combs' case with Alec Baldwin's lawyer Alex Spiro's rate. "By comparison, Alec Baldwin's lawyer, Alex Spiro, was reportedly charging similar clients over $2,000 per hour or roughly about $80,000 a week. And Diddy is no regular client with his life and career on the line. "This kind of intensive work by lawyers on such a complicated case keeps them from taking on other high-paying clients, and I'm sure they're also paying for publicists since this is playing out in the court of public opinion, as well, and everyone is watching," Day said. He told Fox News Digital that he estimates Combs' trial will cost him $15 million "for the entire package." "This is literally a 'money is no object' defense," Day said. Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told Fox News Digital that Combs will drop eight figures when his trial is all said and done. "Top-tier criminal defense attorneys like Marc Agnifilo and Brian Steel may charge retainers of $1 million or more in complex federal cases like this. In addition to those two, Combs has a small army of lawyers working on the trial," Rahmani said. He estimated Combs' net worth at about $1 billion before his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, accused the rapper of rape in 2018 and domestic abuse. "Combs' life is literally on the line, so money is no object, and he has assembled his version of a 'dream team.'" "The trial is estimated to last up to two months, and the daily cost for all the lawyers, paralegals, assistants, experts and jury consultants may exceed $100,000 for each day of trial. That's not even counting the many months of pretrial work and preparation and the inevitable appeal to the Second Circuit, Supreme Court and lobbying President Trump for a pardon if Combs is convicted," Rahmani said. Combs' sex-trafficking trial began on May 12 with opening statements and is expected to last two months. The rapper is being charged with multiple counts of racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion, and transporting for prostitution in September.

9th Circuit: Oakland police can be held responsible for injuring bystanders in reckless pursuits
9th Circuit: Oakland police can be held responsible for injuring bystanders in reckless pursuits

Yahoo

time17-05-2025

  • Yahoo

9th Circuit: Oakland police can be held responsible for injuring bystanders in reckless pursuits

OAKLAND, Calif. - The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday ruled that Oakland police can be held responsible when bystanders are injured, or killed, during reckless pursuits. The ruling is a major victory for the family of Lolomanaia "Lolo" Soakai, who was killed in a freak accident in June 2022, when a motorcycle landed on top of him following an authorized police chase of another suspect while he was out with his mother at a taco truck. The family's attorneys, Adante Pointer and Patrick Buelna, filed a wrongful death suit on his behalf, and have been fighting the city of Oakland, ever since. Oakland attorneys, as well as the officers' lawyers, have argued that the city is not responsible for the officers' actions under the "qualified immunity" rule. Historically, it's been difficult to hold police accountable in court for high-speed chases because they have had strict legal protections. "This is a big deal because the court finally made it clear to the police and the public that if an officer engages in a reckless, high-chase pursuit, they can be held accountable for the person they injured, whether they are being pursued or an innocent bystander," Pointer told KTVU. What this means for the case is that this issue of qualified immunity was settled before the trial begins, which does not yet have a date. The city of Oakland could also appeal this ruling, which would delay a trial even further. The panel of appellate judges explained their decision in a 48-page opinion, which is precedent-setting in the western region. "Because the law was clearly established before the date of the car chase that defendants' conduct was unconstitutional, defendants were not entitled to qualified immunity," the judges wrote in their 48-page opinion. "This Circuit's precedent recognizes that an officer owes a duty to all those in the vicinity, including bystanders, to limit their intent to harm to legitimate law enforcement purposes." The judges said that in this case, Soakai's attorneys presented a reasonable argument that the Oakland police officers "affirmatively created danger by initiating a car chase that led to a crash and then acted with deliberate indifference to plaintiffs' worsening medical condition by failing to summon help." Judge Susan Graber went further, writing that this was a "highly unusual case," where it is plausible that the "officers intentionally caused harm for reasons unrelated to any legitimate law enforcement purpose connected to the chase, and that they witnessed the crash yet drove away and later stated that they hoped that the crash caused a fatality—we affirm." While the ruling is unprecedented in this appellate district, it is also quite limited. The ruling only applies to what is considered a reckless police pursuit. In this case, two rookie police officers, Walid Abdelaziz and Jimmy Marin-Coronel, were chasing Arnold Azael Linaldi of Oakland, then 19, in a Nissan 350Z who they said was coming home from a sideshow on International Boulevard. Three years ago, KTVU was the first to report from sources, which are now codified in the court record, that the officers were not authorized to chase the teen, caused the crash and then fled the scene, circling back later. They were also heard on body camera, court records indicate, laughing and saying "I hope he dies," referring to Linaldi. The two officers did not immediately arrest Linaldi, which, to the judges, proved wasn't an important pursuit. In fact, this particular chase was a violation of OPD policy, in what is called a "ghost chase," because Linaldi wasn't a suspected high-risk felon and the officers didn't call in to get a supervisor's permission. Linaldi ended up crashing his car into a row of parked cars and motorcycles. That chain reaction ended up killing Soakai, who was getting some food after attending a family graduation. His mother broke her back. Two cousins went to the hospital. Linaldi was eventually charged with vehicular manslaughter and his case is still pending. In September 2023, sources told KTVU that the police department moved to fire Abdelaziz and Jimmy Marin-Coronel. But their termination has not taken place as of December 2024. Oakland police said both were still employed by the department at that time. Neither OPD nor the city immediately responded for comment about the appellate court decision on Friday. The issue of police chases has been reinvigorated lately, especially in Oakland, where Gov. Gavin Newsom has publicly said he wants the department to loosen its rules on when police chase suspects. Critics point to Soakai's death as one of the key reasons they want to keep a tight rein on police pursuits.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store