logo
#

Latest news with #AgustinPaullier

Natural disasters caused $135bn in economic losses in first half of 2025: Swiss Re
Natural disasters caused $135bn in economic losses in first half of 2025: Swiss Re

IOL News

time5 days ago

  • Business
  • IOL News

Natural disasters caused $135bn in economic losses in first half of 2025: Swiss Re

A beach house is engulfed in flames as the Palisades Fire burns along Pacific Coast Highway in Malibu, California, on January 8, 2025. Natural disasters caused $135 billion (R2.4 trillion) in economic losses globally. Image: Agustin Paullier / AFP Natural disasters caused $135 billion (R2.4 trillion) in economic losses globally in the first half of 2025, fuelled by the Los Angeles wildfires, reinsurer Swiss Re said on Wednesday. Swiss Re, which serves as an insurer of insurance companies, said first half losses were up from the $123bn in the first half of 2024. The Zurich-based reinsurance giant estimated that of this year's first half losses, $80bn had been insured - almost double the 10-year average, in 2025 prices. The Los Angeles blazes in January constitute the largest-ever insured wildfire loss event by far, reaching an estimated $40bn, said Swiss Re. It said the "exceptional loss severity" of the fires was down to prolonged winds, a lack of rainfall and "some of the densest concentration of high-value single-family residential property in the US". Swiss Re said losses from wildfires had risen sharply over the past decade due to rising temperatures, more frequent droughts and changing rainfall patterns - plus greater suburban sprawl and high-value asset concentration. "Most fire losses originate in the US and particularly in California, where expansion in hazardous regions has been high," it said. Before 2015, wildfire-related insured losses made up around 1% of all natural catastrophe claims, but now account for 7%. Hurricane season approaching Insured losses from severe thunderstorms amounted to $31bn in the first half of 2025. The second half of the year is usually more costly for insurers due to damage during the North Atlantic hurricane season. If current loss trends continue, global insured losses from natural catastrophes in 2025 could exceed the Swiss Re Institute's projections of $150bn. "The strongest lever to increase the resilience and safety of communities is to double down on mitigation and adaptation. It's here that everyone can help reduce losses before they occur," said Swiss Re's group chief economist Jerome Haegeli.

Federal Disaster Tax Breaks Are Big, But Which Declarations Count?
Federal Disaster Tax Breaks Are Big, But Which Declarations Count?

Forbes

time10-06-2025

  • Business
  • Forbes

Federal Disaster Tax Breaks Are Big, But Which Declarations Count?

TOPSHOT - A home burns during the Palisades Fire in Pacific Palisades, California, on January 8, ... More 2025. At least five people have been killed in wildfires rampaging around Los Angeles, officials said on January 8, with firefighters overwhelmed by the speed and ferocity of multiple blazes. (Photo by AGUSTIN PAULLIER / AFP) (Photo by AGUSTIN PAULLIER/AFP via Getty Images) Disaster victims get big tax benefits from federal disaster declarations. In fact, it can make your wildfire settlement tax free. As such, you might logically assume that it is always 100% whether your particular disaster gets the helpful federal nod from FEMA. But in the case of wildfires, is it always so clear? The tax law defines a Federally declared disaster as 'any disaster subsequently determined by the President of the United States to warrant assistance by the Federal Government under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act,' commonly known as the Stafford Act. It has three principal types of disaster relief declarations for wildfires: Only two wildfires appear to have obtained their FEMA disaster declarations as Declared Emergencies since 2019, the 2020 Oregon Wildfires (designated EM-3542-OR) and the 2021 California Caldor Fire (designated EM-3571-CA). Declared Emergencies are less common for wildfires, perhaps because there is a separate avenue for wildfires, Fire Management Assistance Declarations under Section 420 of the Stafford Act. Some wildfires are given Major Disaster Declarations, including the recent 2025 LA fires. Historically, so were the 2015 California Butte Fires (DR-4240-CA), the 2017 North Bay Fires (DR-4344-CA), and 2018 Woolsey Fire and Camp Fire (DR-4407-CA). Major Disaster Declarations qualify victims for the widest scope of direct federal assistance through FEMA via Any wildfire with a Major Disaster Declaration clearly qualifies as a Federally declared disaster for tax purposes. Section 1.165-11(b)(1) of the IRS Regulations says a Federally declared disaster 'includes both a major disaster declared under Section 401 of the Stafford Act and an emergency declared under section 501 of the Stafford Act.' These two types of declarations are specifically included within the definition of a Federally declared disaster for tax purposes. How about the third category? Section 1.165-11(b)(1) is silent about Fire Management Assistance Declarations, the third major type of declaration for wildfires. But the statutory language suggests that a Federally declared disaster means any declaration under the Stafford Act. Plainly, Section 420's Fire Management Assistance Declarations are federal relief so seem to be covered. Fire Management Assistance Declarations usually do not provide or authorize the same scope of direct federal assistance to wildfire victims as Major Disaster Declarations. However, Section 165(i)(5) of the tax code only requires that the disaster be determined by the President to 'warrant assistance by the Federal Government' under the Stafford Act. Providing money, equipment, supplies, and FEMA personnel to a State or local government to assist in wildfire containment and recovery efforts appears to fall within the definition of 'assistance by the Federal Government' under the Stafford Act. Many recent major wildfires received disaster declarations under Section 420's Fire Management Assistance provisions. The LA fires in 2025, including in Pacific Palisades were not originally Major Disaster Declarations, but Federal Management Assistance Declarations. However, on the day after they were granted relief under The Fire Management Assistance provisions of Section 420, they were then also the subject of a Major Disaster Declaration under Section 401. This supplemental disaster declaration is important for victims for non-tax reasons, but the Fire Management Assistance Declaration was arguably already sufficient to qualify the fire as a Federally declared disaster for tax purposes. Many wildfires remain disasters declared only under Section 420's Fire Management Assistance relief provisions without a Major Disaster Declaration, and this is arguably enough to unlock the tax benefits. Fire Management Assistance relief under Section 420 of the Stafford Act appears to often be granted for wildfires for the same purpose that a Declared Emergency declaration would be used outside of the wildfire context. There have only been two wildfires nationwide that have been identified as Declared Emergencies since 2019, compared to 305 fires that received a Fire Management Assistance Declaration. There are differences between the two types of declarations. However, both are usually granted to help state and local governments deal with emerging disasters that need to be contained, or to help with rescuing and immediate medical treatment of victims. The regulations under Section 165 of the tax code suggest that Declared Emergencies under Section 501 of the Stafford Act are considered Federally declared disasters for tax purposes, regardless of whether they later result in a Major Disaster Declaration. It would be unusual if similar federal assistance usually provided in the wildfire context, and also under the Stafford Act, would not be treated similarly as a Declared Emergency for income tax purposes. Some devastating wildfires are not designated as disasters by FEMA under any provisions of the Stafford Act. For example, the Mountain View Fire of 2020 burned for nearly a month, consuming nearly 21,000 acres in California, destroying 80 buildings (damaging many more) and killing at least one person. This fire was not large enough for FEMA to consider it outside of the combined capability of the California state and local governments and relief organizations to address without federal involvement. Therefore, the Mountain View Fire was designated by California as a state disaster, but not a federal disaster by FEMA. A disaster declaration by a state is NOT sufficient to qualify a disaster as a Federally declared disaster for federal tax purposes. It is easy to get confused, but no state-declared disaster that is not a federally declared disaster has a disaster description and designation on the FEMA website. There is no FEMA disaster declaration page for the 2020 Mountain View Fire, under the EM, DR, or FM prefixes. For state-declared disasters that are not Federally declared disaster, the main federal recognition of the disaster is not by FEMA. The SBA way offer relief, but that is not sufficient to make a state-declared disaster a Federally declared disaster for income tax purposes.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store