Latest news with #AilsaAnderson
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Entertainment
- Daily Mail
'Prince Harry should stop being the victim': Queen's press secretary urges 'impulsive' duke to 'write his own script' because people are 'tired' of how he thinks 'world is against him'
Prince Harry needs to stop painting himself as a victim because the public have had enough of hearing 'how awful his life is', a long serving aide to Queen Elizabeth II has warned. Ailsa Anderson was at the Queen's side for 12 years as her press secretary and worked 'very closely' with Her Majesty's grandson before he met Meghan Markle. Speaking to a new documentary about Harry's 'terrible' 2025, Ms Anderson has said he is a 'very warm, engaging and kind person' who has lost his way and needs to shed his victim mentality. In a message directed at the Duke of Sussex she said: 'Stop being the victim and start being the hero of the piece, start writing your own script. I think people are just getting a little bit tired of how Prince Harry thinks the world is against him and how awful his life is'. Ailsa, who worked for the Queen between 2001 and 2013, says that the exiled prince is 'too impulsive' and has also unwisely made public private matters about his family, including King Charles ' health. She said: 'I think trust is paramount in every walk of life, if you can't trust your family, who can you trust?'. Charles and William will fear that if they were to welcome Harry back, 'private information would then be leaked', she said. Channel 5's documentary Prince Harry: My Terrible Year was broadcast on Saturday night. On it experts have suggested that they believe that Harry does want reconciliation with his family but his 'ego' is in the way. Psychotherapist Emma Reed Turrell said: 'Reconciliation is absolutely possible with moments of accountability and responsibility on both sides. She said in a message for Harry: 'Stick a pin in your ego for a moment and focus not on being right, but being in a relationship. There needs to be forgiveness on both sides.' It came after The Mail on Sunday revealed that Prince Harry is planning to outflank the boardroom rival who accused him of bullying by launching a new African children's charity. Last week, a Charity Commission probe found 'no evidence' to support Sentebale chairman Dr Sophie Chandauka's allegations of bullying, harassment, misogyny and misogynoir – discrimination against black women. But historian Tessa Dunlop said that Sentebale scandal had been very damaging to Harry. 'I'm sure they (Sussexes) are not always easy to work with. She [Dr Sophie Chandauka] weaponised Prince Harry's own words used against him, suggesting Harry has been a malevolent influence on the direction of the charity' She added: 'We're also still talking and writing about Harry, I think there is one thing worse than writing and talking about him, and that's us going silent. Maybe he can find a new mission.' The Duke of Sussex last week walked away from Sentebale following a damning report into an explosive race row. But sources say he is determined to continue the work of the charity, which he co-founded with Prince Seeiso of Lesotho in 2006 in honour of their mothers. 'The Duke is anxious that the fight against poverty and Aids in Lesotho and Botswana carries on,' said an insider. 'He and Prince Seeiso are keen to work together on a new venture. They are talking about setting up a new charity or clubbing together to support other existing charities doing similar work in the region.' The MoS has learned that Harry has now upped the ante by issuing a formal complaint about Dr Chandauka's conduct, accusing her of 'recycling' unfounded claims. A letter to the commission from his office notes that since the investigation, Dr Chandauka had revisited 'serious, highly-charged and damaging allegations'. It said the claims 'directly impact' his other charity work, adding: 'Ms Chandauka continues to publicly recycle these claims, this time beneath the guise of clarification, all while leveraging the charity's public platform to do so. 'This conduct appears to directly contravene your warning about the risks of airing internal disputes in the media and seems to constitute an ongoing misuse of charitable resources for the pursuit of personal vindication.' Despite rejecting the bullying claims, the Charity Commission found problems in Sentebale's governance and rebuked 'all parties' for allowing the dispute to play out in public. However it said Dr Chandauka and the board could remain in place – a decision that left the Duke devastated and complaining of a 'hostile takeover'. This newspaper can now reveal startling new details of the background to Dr Chandauka's 2023 appointment. In an email to fellow board members, she requested $3,000 (£2,200) a day for her time, claiming this represented 'a very significant compromise/pay cut' as she typically charged £2,500 for 60-minute speaking engagements. A source said it raised eyebrows among trustees and was in 'stark contrast to the selfless, pro bono spirit in which most serve'. In the event, the Zimbabwean-born lawyer eventually agreed to work pro bono. Other emails show she was originally turned down for the role of chairman, but launched 'an all-out pressure campaign' for a formal explanation for her rejection. She eventually got the job, with Harry at the time hailing her appointment. The first hint of trouble came in April 2024, when the Duchess of Sussex ushered the charity boss to the centre of a stage at a polo match. Dr Chandauka said that because a clip of the awkward interaction went viral, Harry invited her to make a public statement in support of his wife. She refused, saying the charity 'cannot be an extension of the Sussexes'. But it was a disagreement over fundraising and a £400,000 bill for consultancy work that caused the relationship to sour further. In March, Harry and Prince Seeiso, plus some trustees, resigned. A statement said the relationship with Dr Chandauka was 'broken', 'beyond repair' and 'untenable'. On Saturday, it was reported the Lesotho children's centre run by Sentebale has been 'effectively mothballed' amid a funding crisis – until recently, some 700 children with HIV attended its camps. In a statement after the commission's report, Sentebale said: 'The Charity Commission is explicitly clear... that it is not the Commission's responsibility to adjudicate or mediate internal disputes. 'The Commission has not investigated any individual allegations and therefore has not made any findings in relation to individuals, including Prince Harry.' The former trustees also issued a statement rebuking the commission for choosing to 'ignore key concerns' over the 'leadership and oversight' of Sentebale's chairman.
Times
20-06-2025
- General
- Times
The Queen did carry cash for a flutter
Despite having her likeness plastered all over the stuff, the late Queen appeared to display a certain aversion to cash. During her reign it was widely assumed that Her Majesty invariably travelled light, relying on equerries and sundry flunkies to stump up the odd bob should she be confronted with a sudden urge, or obligation, to purchase an item, like a Women's Institute jar of homemade lemon curd or a tartan pin cushion from a Highland Games charity stall. The only exception to this pleasingly penniless existence was recorded in a ground-breaking documentary on the royal family in 1969, during which the monarch was witnessed buying an ice lolly for a five-year-old Prince Edward in a village shop near Balmoral. However, it now turns out that the Queen was anything but averse to splashing the cash. Speaking on The Times podcast The Royals, Ailsa Anderson, the Queen's press secretary, has revealed that her employer would now and then indulge in a flutter at the races, dispatching an equerry to the course bookmaker armed with a wad of her mint's finest. The result on one occasion was a £16 win, which provoked an outburst of royal delight out of all proportion to the sum involved. In a sense, we are all queens now. Cash is becoming a niche form of exchange, increasingly supplanted by cards and smartphones. A NatWest survey last year suggested that only 8 per cent of British adults use cash exclusively. Nevertheless, the end of the folding stuff (moolah, wonga, lolly, bread and dough) is far from assured. Cash use ticks up in periods of uncertainty, especially among people who don't have much of it. Studies suggest that the brain registers more pain when parting with hard currency than when tapping a card. And, as Her Majesty understood, there is certain pleasure in handling the pound sterling, especially when one's face is staring right back at one.
Times
20-06-2025
- General
- Times
Late Queen carried cash for bets at the races, ex-aide reveals
For years it was thought that the late Queen did not handle cash, save for a neatly folded banknote in her handbag for the collection at church on Sunday. A former aide of Elizabeth II has now revealed that there was one other occasion when the late monarch carried a stash of the folding stuff: at the races. Ailsa Anderson, the late Queen's press secretary, has revealed that while Her Majesty did not place a bet herself, she was known to hand cash to an equerry who would carry out the task for her. Until now, it was assumed Queen Elizabeth II never carried cash except for a neatly folded note for church Speaking on The Times podcast The Royals, Anderson said: 'It would be done through the equerry.' When asked if she handed over cash she said: 'Yes, absolutely. She didn't place [the bet] herself but the race cards were there.'
