Latest news with #Appointments
New Straits Times
15-07-2025
- Politics
- New Straits Times
Former Bar president calls to amend JAC Act to give 'meaningful interpretation'
KUALA LUMPUR: The government should amend the Constitution to give the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) Act 2009 greater legal weight in the appointment of judges, says former Malaysian Bar Council president Salim Bashir. He said while the JAC Act 2009 had set out the procedural framework for judicial selections and recommendations, it should be given a "meaningful interpretation". "JAC Act 2009 is a federal law enacted under legislative power by virtue of Article 132(1)(a) of the Federal Constitution. "Though it sets out a procedural framework for selections of judges and recommendations, it should be given a meaningful interpretation that its existence is to complement the constitutional discretion bestowed under Article 122B(1) to the prime minister for recommendations and His Majesty for the appointment of judges. "Otherwise, it will certainly render the law redundant, repugnant to its objective and stamp absurdity to the working of rule of law and independence of judiciary," he said. Yesterday, Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said said that the JAC Act was not a binding provision in the appointment of judges. She said that such appointments were ultimately governed by Article 122B of the Federal Constitution, which empowered the prime minister to advise the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and the Conference of Rulers. She added that the JAC's role was to screen, assess and recommend names of judicial candidates, but its recommendations were not final or binding. Salim said if the government believes that the JAC Act did not provide any binding effect on the appointment of judges, then it should move to amend the Constitution. "Her (Azalina) statement has given impetus for legislative changes, and the government should consider amending the Constitution to give effect to the JAC Act on the appointment of judges. I am sure legislative members will render their support." Meanwhile, criminal lawyer Datuk Geethan Ram Vincent agreed with Azalina's constitutional interpretation, but cautioned against overlooking the JAC's intended role. "Yes, this is correct. Under Article 122B of the Federal Constitution, the prime minister retains full authority to advise the Yang di-Pertuan Agong on judicial appointments. The JAC can recommend, but not decide. "Despite lacking binding authority, the JAC serves important functions. It provides professional vetting of candidates, ensures some degree of transparency in appointments and maintains records of the selection process. "Even though its recommendations are not binding, the JAC acts as an important institutional check against arbitrary or political appointments." Geethan said the JAC's primary task was to review potential judges based on their experience, skills and professional conduct. "They interview candidates and then suggest names to the prime minister. Although the JAC thoroughly documents the selection process, it has no authority to compel the prime minister to accept its recommendations or to require any explanation if they are disregarded. "In essence, the JAC handles the groundwork but holds no real influence over whether its suggestions are acted upon." He added that while Azalina's remarks were technically accurate, they failed to address the broader issue of judicial independence. "While Azalina's remarks are technically accurate regarding the constitutional framework, they overlook the original intent behind creating the JAC to reduce political influence in judicial appointments. "Her statement reflects the current legal reality but fails to address whether this system adequately protects."
Barnama
13-07-2025
- Politics
- Barnama
JAC Act Not Binding In Judge Appointments
KOTA TINGGI, July 13 (Bernama) -- The Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) Act 2009 does not carry binding authority in the appointment of judges, said Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said. She said the Act's main role is to screen, evaluate and recommend candidates to the Prime Minister, while appointments to the Federal Court, Court of Appeal, and High Court must still follow Article 122B of the Federal Constitution. 'The JAC Act is not a final step in the appointment process. It only recommends names, and these recommendations are not binding. 'For JAC's role to be legally binding, the Constitution would need to be amended,' she told reporters after officiating the 22nd Pengerang UMNO Division Delegates Meeting today. Azalina also cited a previous explanation by former Minister in the Prime Minister's Department, Datuk Seri Mohamed Nazri Abdul Aziz, who clarified in Parliament that the JAC Act is an administrative provision and does not have binding legal effect. On the planned march by the Malaysian Bar tomorrow, Azalina said it is within their democratic right, as long as it is carried out professionally and within the boundaries of the law. 'If they want to march, that is their right. As lawyers, I believe most of them are professionals who understand Article 122B and the JAC Act 2009,' she said. Meanwhile, Azalina said that the appointment of a new Chief Justice will only be decided after the 269th Conference of Rulers, scheduled to be held from July 15 to 17. Yesterday, Muslim Lawyers Association (PEMBELA) chairman Datuk Zainul Rijal Abu Bakar urged for the appointment process to be expedited, citing the recent and upcoming retirements of several senior judges.
