Latest news with #BaillieGifford
The Herald Scotland
6 hours ago
- Entertainment
- The Herald Scotland
Val McDermid hits out on Baillie Gifford 'virtue signalling'
Speaking ahead of the return of the Edinburgh International Book Festival, which parted company with Baillie Gifford after a 20-year partnership in the wake of protests from climate activists, McDermid said the company had been 'unfairly pilloried.' Read more: The Fife-born writer warned of the risk of festivals and the arts having to be over-reliant on public funding and the support of private philanthropists in future. McDermid was speaking two years after climate activist Greta Thunberg pulled the plug on a sold-out appearance at the Edinburgh book festival in the wake of reports of Baillie Gifford's links to the fossil fuels industry, saying she did not want to be associated with 'greenwashing.' Crime writer Val McDermid has spoken out over criticisms of Baillie Gifford's sponsorship of festivals. (Image: The University of Edinburgh) At the time, Baillie Gifford insisted it was not a 'significant fuel investor.' It claimed only two per cent of its clients' money was invested in companies with links to the fossil fuels industry, compared to five per cent it said was invested in companies developing 'clean energy solutions.' The Edinburgh International Book Festival is now staged at the Edinburgh Futures Institute. However, the campaign group Fossil Free Books stepped up action against book festivals backed by Baillie Gifford in the spring of last year. Hundreds of writers backed an open letter warning the festivals to expect escalation, including the expansion of boycotts, increased author withdrawal of labour, and increased disruption.' Organisers of Edinburgh's event announced the end of its Baillie Gifford partnership two weeks later, blaming the 'withdrawal of several authors and threats of disruption.' Organisers of the annual book festivals in Wigtown and the Borders also announced the end of their involvement with Baillie Gifford. The Edinburgh book festival, which is by far Scotland's oldest and biggest celebration of literature, which has seen its government funding more than doubled in the space of 12 months, to a record £820,000. A further £160,000 increase planned for the next financial year is expected to see the festival's government funding rise by more than £1.5m by 2027-2028 compared to the last three years of Baillie Gifford's involvement with the event, which it supported through its schools and children's programme. The government has agreed to provide £300,000 in funding for the next three years to plug the gap created by the loss of Baillie Gifford's support. McDermid is one of 641 writers due to appear across almost 700 events in the forthcoming two-week programme of events, which will run from August 9-24. She told The Herald: 'Last year was difficult for this book festival. This year hasn't been easy, but I think we can all see a light at the end of the tunnel now. 'The festival has come back with a really strong programme, with a lot of interesting themes and writers. I think people will really show up. 'It's been a tough experience for the festival to pull it back from losing its principal funder. 'I know how hard the festival director Jenny Niven has worked with her team to recover the financial position, but it's still been difficult. 'There's no question that the festival has got less to play with than it had before.' McDermid was among a group of leading Scottish authors who backed an open letter which described the targeting of book festivals as 'deeply retrograde' and 'ill thought-out' over their sponsors. Others included Alexander McCall Smith, Andrew O'Hagan, Chris Brookmyre, Denise Mina, Doug Johnston, David Greig and Liz Lochhead. Many of the writers who backed the Fossil Free Books campaign have accepted invitations to appear at this year's Edinburgh book festival, including Ali Smith, Hannah Lavery, Jess Brough, Raymond Antrobus, Chitra Ramaswamy, Andrés N Ordorica, Harry Josephine Giles and Katie Goh. McDermid, who is due to make four appearances at the festival this August, said: 'The Edinburgh book festival was pushed into a corner last year by a group of people who, I think in many cases, saw it as an opportunity to put their name in public lights. 'The level of hypocrisy among some of the people involved was quite staggering. 'A lot of people just jumped on a bandwagon without thinking about it. 'There was a lot of virtue signalling, rather than sincerely held opinions from people who had actually researched the topic and knew what they were talking about. 'No-one is saying that Baillie Gifford is white than white. But there is no such thing as a clean sponsor. 'If you dig deep, everybody who sponsors an arts event has got something in the cupboard that you would be uncomfortable with.' 'What do you do? Are we not going to have book festivals anymore? Are we not going to have the arts unless they are sponsored by rich individuals. How clean are they?' McDermid suggested there was a risk of a return to the Renaissance era, 14th to the 17th century, when 'rich patrons' were relied on to fund the arts. She added: 'The arts shouldn't be dictated to by one individual or even one political party. 'I don't think the arts should be entirely funded by state funding. That would be wholly dangerous and potentially pernicious. 'There needs to be a mix of funding sources, including ticket sales, individual philanthropists and corporate sponsors too. 'We have to be careful where we take money from, but I think Baillie Gifford was unfairly pilloried in the circumstances.' A separate campaign group, Art Workers For Palestine Scotland, has targeted a number of other arts organisations backed by Baillie Gifford in recent months, including the [[Edinburgh]] International Festival and Fringe Society, over the company's links with defence firm Babcock International. [[The Herald]] told last year how Baillie Gifford had more than £60 million worth of shares in the owner of Rosyth Dockyard in Fife, which has previously worked with state-owned Israeli arms manufacturers.
The Herald Scotland
6 days ago
- Entertainment
- The Herald Scotland
'Stop giving Edinburgh Book Festival pelters - or face losing it'
'The book festival has been getting pelters over the last year or two and it's on all sides,' he told The Herald. 'It's getting pelters because people think it's either too woke or not woke enough, or that it's taking money from a big business or the public sector. 'And actually, I think we need to take a step back and remember what the book festival is for; the book festival is supposed to be a festival of, fundamentally, ideas.' Last year the festival ended a 20-year partnership with its main sponsor, Baillie Gifford, after pressure from campaigners and authors to cut ties with the investment firm over alleged links to Israel and fossil fuels. Organisers warned the future of the festival was 'in jeopardy' as a result of the move they said came in response to the 'constant threat of disruption from activists' and 'intolerable' pressure on their staff. Mr Murray said: 'Authors started pulling out and the book festival realised they were losing more money from that than they would gain from Baillie Gifford. We live in an era where things have been tough for festivals with Brexit and Covid and inflation and all of these things putting costs up.' He said it was 'lamentable and a shame they lost Baillie Gifford money,' adding: 'I say that as someone who is passionately pro-Palestine and passionate about the fight against climate change. 'I think actually the way we will persuade people of those issues is by authors coming to the book festival and talking about them.' The 2023 festival saw a mass walkout during a talk and climate activist Greta Thunberg pull out, both in protest at the Baillie Gifford connection. Meanwhile a venue attempted to cancel an 'in conversation' event with ex-SNP MP Joanna Cherry over her gender critical views, which ended up going ahead after a legal warning. Read more More recently the book festival has faced attacks for lacking gender critical authors on the line-up and platforming Nicola Sturgeon, who is due to appear this year to discuss her new memoir. Palestinian-American poet Fady Joudah withdrew from the event last week in anger at the inclusion of two [[Israel]]i writers in the programme, accusing organisers of being 'insensitive' for inviting 'genocide apologists during [[Israel]]'s relentless extermination of the Palestinian people". Mr Murray said: 'We need to pull ourselves together, recognise how fantastic the book festival is and actually talk about the ideas it's platforming - not the administration of the festival. 'In a city like Edinburgh with its amazing enlightenment heritage we are a city that wants to debate ideas and tackle the big controversial issues of our time head-on, and we've got in the book festival this phenomenal, truly world-class literature festival where we talk about ideas. 'The book festival is not shying away from the big controversial, divisive, difficult issues. I understand people have really strong views on those controversial topics. I do personally as well. But what I think we have to value is that we almost uniquely in the world have this forum where they're debated and we have that public forum to discuss them. 'We don't know how lucky we are in a sense to have that. Because it has not shied away from the big difficult issues, yes it's attracting a lot of criticism - it is becoming a bit of a political football.' The Labour MP, elected for the first time last year, warned that continued attacks on the book festival pose two risks. 'One is that we don't get the book festival anymore,' he said. 'That it just isn't able to withstand the onslaught of attacks it gets from the left, from the right - from everybody. That would be a terrible shame because the contribution of the book festival is phenomenal to our city.' More from our Edinburgh correspondent He added: 'There's a second risk which is we become bland and sanitised and avoid controversial topics for fear of upsetting some people. 'When you consider the challenges we're facing in the world - whether it's climate change, the trans issue, the future of Scotland - we cannot afford to not talk about those and content ourselves with something bland, something safe, and something comfortable. 'We need to be discussing those and the book festival is the way we do that.'
The Herald Scotland
22-07-2025
- Business
- The Herald Scotland
Edinburgh Festival faces new demands to drop Baillie Gifford
The Herald told last year how Baillie Gifford had more than £60 million worth of shares in the owner of Rosyth Dockyard in Fife, which has previously worked with state-owned Israeli arms manufacturers. Read more: The group, which has called on Scottish arts organisations to sign up to a cultural boycott of Israel, has suggested that the EIF is being 'funded by genocide' just days before the first performances are due to get underway. Baillie Gifford was dropped by the Edinburgh International Book Festival weeks before last year's event was due to be held following a prolonged campaign over the company's links with the fossil fuel industry. The Edinburgh International Festival was instigated in the aftermath of the Second World targeting of the EIF has emerged weeks after the festival backed an open letter from arts organisations across the UK warning of the impact of 'relentless negativity' over corporate sponsorship. Francesca Hegyi, chief executive of the EIF, has suggested there has been a 'wholescale collapse of arts sponsorship' since Baillie Gifford was targeted over its links with fossil fuel companies. Baillie Gifford is currently the biggest corporate backer of the EIF, which recently secured record Scottish Government of £11.75m for the next three years, compared to annual funding of more than £2.3m in recent years. In a statement launching the new campaign, the pro-Palestine group highlighted the EIF's support for Ukraine and Ukrainian companies following the invasion by Russia three years ago. At the time, the festival severed its links with the Russian conductor Valery Gergiev, who was made an honorary president of the event in 2011. The EIF also joined forces with the Scottish Government to stage a free concert by a newly-formed "Ukrainian Freedom Orchestra." [[Art]] Workers For [[Palestine]] has stepped up pressure on arts organisations in recent months, including the Glasgow Film Theatre and the Fruitmarket Gallery in [[Edinburgh]]. The Centre for Contemporary Arts in Glasgow has been closed since a large-scale protest was staged on June 24. Its board and management have faced calls to resign over the handling of an "intended occupation" of part of the building, which saw the police called to break up the protest. The pro-Palestine group said: 'After nearly two years of meetings, emails, and statements our ask to the Edinburgh International Festival has changed. 'We are no longer asking the EIF to merely speak to Baillie Gifford. We are demanding they cut ties. Why? Because EIF refuses to act in good faith. "Their own letter to us shows this clearly: 'We do not intend to adopt public political positions on international conflicts.' 'But the EIF has previously taken political positions. They promoted Ukrainian work with hashtags, programming decisions and marketing campaigns. So why is Palestine the exception? 'They're not neutral — they're complicit. Baillie Gifford is one of the EIF's biggest funders. They invest in Babcock International, a UK arms company supplying Israel. 'In plain terms: Palestinian death is making Baillie Gifford rich. And the EIF chooses to accept that money. This is blood money. This is the profits of the Palestinian genocide being used for 'art.' 'Our updated demand: EIF must cut ties with Baillie Gifford. No more conversations. No more delay. "This is about the right to live — not institutional comfort. This is about Palestinian liberation." Baillie Gifford is one of the main supporters of the Fringe Society and the National Galleries of Scotland, which is working in partnership with the Edinburgh International Film Festival next month. Earlier this month the campaign group issued a statement warning Scottish arts organisations: "Transparency, accountability and ethical leadership are non-negotiable." The latest statement targeting the EIF states: "Art is never neutral. Art can either resist — or it can enable. "This is our collective call. This is our line in the sand. We will continue to support artists taking action. We will no longer spend unpaid energy convincing the EIF of the obvious. That art funded by genocide is artwashing.' A spokesperson for the Edinburgh International Festival said: "We share public concern about the ongoing violence in the Palestinian territories, and other areas enduring conflict. "The right to speak out, to demand change, and to protest these issues is fundamental to democracy. "The Edinburgh International Festival gives voice to artists for important ideas, questions and stories to be freely presented and debated with nuance and empathy. "Our 2025 programme tackles this and other important global issues head-on, from a range of perspectives. "Our responsibility is to ensure the future of the festival, so that we can continue to offer public benefit and offer audiences transformational experiences. "To do this we must secure funding from a balanced mix of public and private sources. "Support from long-standing donors such as Baillie Gifford enables us to sustain our artistic ambition, remain accessible to the widest possible audience, and contribute meaningfully to Scotland's cultural life. "Following a rigorous review, our board of trustees agreed to maintain the support from Baillie Gifford, which continues to endorse all that the festival does, from the August festival programme to our year-round work with Edinburgh's communities."
Yahoo
22-07-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
1 Unstoppable Stock to Buy Before It Soars More Than 1,100% Over the Next 10 Years, According to 1 World-Renowned Analyst
Key Points Nvidia has had a blistering run since the dawn of AI, but there could be much more to come. One legendary investor believes that the chipmaker could soar to heights over the coming decade. Asking if a $50 trillion market cap is far-fetched might be the wrong question. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › U.S. investors might not be familiar with the name James Anderson, but his pedigree and investing success are undeniable. The iconic investor was a star stock picker at Scottish investment management firm Baillie Gifford for more than four decades. He headed the premier Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust for more than 20 years, amassing gains of more than 1,700% during his tenure. Anderson established his reputation as a visionary by taking early stakes in trailblazing, explosive-growth companies including Netflix, Amazon, Tesla, and Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA), generating substantial gains for investors in the process. Given his history of spotting big winners early on, investors would do well to heed his advice. The age of artificial intelligence (AI) has only just begun, and if adoption continues at the current rate, Nvidia's market cap could catapult to as much as $50 trillion (not a typo) by 2035. While that might seem far-fetched at first glance, Anderson provides a compelling argument to support his assertion. Cornering the market Groundbreaking advances in the field of AI have had a profound impact on Nvidia's fortunes. Since the dawn of generative AI in late 2022, the company's market cap has soared tenfold from $416 billion to $4.16 trillion (as of this writing). Helping drive that increase was Nvidia's graphics processing units (GPUs) becoming the gold standard for processing AI. The chipmaker's financial results have helped fuel its meteoric rise. After generating two consecutive years of triple-digit year-over-year growth, the inevitable slowdown occurred, but the current results are enviable nonetheless. In its fiscal 2026 first quarter (ended April 27), Nvidia generated revenue that grew 69% year over year to a record $44.1 billion, while adjusted earnings per share of $0.81 marked a 31% jump. To give the results context, Nvidia's $44 billion in sales in the most recent quarter far exceeds the $27 billion in revenue the company produced for all of fiscal 2023. As impressive as these results are, there could be much more to come. AI could add as much as $15.7 trillion to the global economy by 2030, according to a report released by "Big Four" accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). The report goes on to suggest "AI is still at a very early stage." Capturing just a portion of that market opportunity would be a windfall for Nvidia, driving its sales and profits even higher. Anderson calculates that the market for data centers, where the vast majority of AI processing takes place, is growing at a rate of roughly 60% annually. If growth continues at that rate over the coming decade, and Nvidia can maintain its profit margins, that would translate to EPS of $1,350 and free cash flow of roughly $1,000 per share. Given those metrics, the stock would then be worth roughly $20,000 per share, which works out to a market cap of about $49 trillion. Competitive advantages Looking at Anderson's most profitable investments can be illuminating. Amazon stock has surged 227,600% since its IPO, while Netflix and Tesla have soared 105,000% and 20,020%, respectively. However, Anderson points out that this isn't an apples-to-apples comparison, since these big winners "didn't start from highly profitable and dominant positions but had to get there." Nvidia checks those boxes. The company is highly profitable, and despite rising competition, Nvidia is currently the undisputed industry leader in the data center GPU space, with a dominant 92% market share, according to IoT Analytics. Beyond its industry-leading position, Nvidia has other advantages. It's "persistent exponential progress, the competitive advantages in hardware and software, and the culture and leadership are exactly what we look for," he noted. Plenty of things will have to go right To be clear, even if everything else went according to plan, there are plenty of other things that could trip up Nvidia on its journey to $50 trillion. The ongoing adoption of AI appears likely, but it may not materialize. A rival could invent a better solution for handling AI models. Nvidia could fail in its efforts to stay ahead of the competition. A black swan event could confound growth. Tariffs could backfire, driving up inflation and sparking a recession. Not to be a killjoy, but the world is full of uncertainty, and any of these developments -- or many more not listed -- could be a stumbling block for Nvidia on the path to $50 trillion. A better question Anderson was quick to point out that his theoretical benchmark "Isn't a prediction but a possibility if artificial intelligence works for customers and Nvidia's lead is intact." He goes on to suggest that the likelihood of Nvidia reaching those heights is slim, suggesting the potential for this outcome clocks in at between 10% and 15%. Yet it's worth taking a step back and focusing on the big picture. "It is the long duration of the development of [GPU] usage in AI -- and not just AI -- from excitement, through potential pauses, to transformation of industries that is most important to us," Anderson said. On the subject of valuation, Nvidia is currently selling for 29 times next year's expected earnings, which is frankly a bargain, given the magnitude of the opportunity. For me, the question isn't whether Nvidia could ultimately hit a market cap of $50 trillion over the coming decade. The more relevant question is whether the company will continue its long track record of innovation, while finding new ways to implement its technology, and capitalize on these secular tailwinds in the process. Given its track record, I would submit the answer is a resounding "yes." That's why Nvidia stock remains a buy. Should you buy stock in Nvidia right now? Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $652,133!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,056,790!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Danny Vena has positions in Amazon, Netflix, Nvidia, and Tesla. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Netflix, Nvidia, and Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 1 Unstoppable Stock to Buy Before It Soars More Than 1,100% Over the Next 10 Years, According to 1 World-Renowned Analyst was originally published by The Motley Fool Error al recuperar los datos Inicia sesión para acceder a tu cartera de valores Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos
Globe and Mail
22-07-2025
- Business
- Globe and Mail
1 Unstoppable Stock to Buy Before It Soars More Than 1,100% Over the Next 10 Years, According to 1 World-Renowned Analyst
Key Points Nvidia has had a blistering run since the dawn of AI, but there could be much more to come. One legendary investor believes that the chipmaker could soar to heights over the coming decade. Asking if a $50 trillion market cap is far-fetched might be the wrong question. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › U.S. investors might not be familiar with the name James Anderson, but his pedigree and investing success are undeniable. The iconic investor was a star stock picker at Scottish investment management firm Baillie Gifford for more than four decades. He headed the premier Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust for more than 20 years, amassing gains of more than 1,700% during his tenure. Anderson established his reputation as a visionary by taking early stakes in trailblazing, explosive-growth companies including Netflix, Amazon, Tesla, and Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA), generating substantial gains for investors in the process. Given his history of spotting big winners early on, investors would do well to heed his advice. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » The age of artificial intelligence (AI) has only just begun, and if adoption continues at the current rate, Nvidia's market cap could catapult to as much as $50 trillion (not a typo) by 2035. While that might seem far-fetched at first glance, Anderson provides a compelling argument to support his assertion. Cornering the market Groundbreaking advances in the field of AI have had a profound impact on Nvidia's fortunes. Since the dawn of generative AI in late 2022, the company's market cap has soared tenfold from $416 billion to $4.16 trillion (as of this writing). Helping drive that increase was Nvidia's graphics processing units (GPUs) becoming the gold standard for processing AI. The chipmaker's financial results have helped fuel its meteoric rise. After generating two consecutive years of triple-digit year-over-year growth, the inevitable slowdown occurred, but the current results are enviable nonetheless. In its fiscal 2026 first quarter (ended April 27), Nvidia generated revenue that grew 69% year over year to a record $44.1 billion, while adjusted earnings per share of $0.81 marked a 31% jump. To give the results context, Nvidia's $44 billion in sales in the most recent quarter far exceeds the $27 billion in revenue the company produced for all of fiscal 2023. As impressive as these results are, there could be much more to come. AI could add as much as $15.7 trillion to the global economy by 2030, according to a report released by "Big Four" accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). The report goes on to suggest "AI is still at a very early stage." Capturing just a portion of that market opportunity would be a windfall for Nvidia, driving its sales and profits even higher. Anderson calculates that the market for data centers, where the vast majority of AI processing takes place, is growing at a rate of roughly 60% annually. If growth continues at that rate over the coming decade, and Nvidia can maintain its profit margins, that would translate to EPS of $1,350 and free cash flow of roughly $1,000 per share. Given those metrics, the stock would then be worth roughly $20,000 per share, which works out to a market cap of about $49 trillion. Competitive advantages Looking at Anderson's most profitable investments can be illuminating. Amazon stock has surged 227,600% since its IPO, while Netflix and Tesla have soared 105,000% and 20,020%, respectively. However, Anderson points out that this isn't an apples-to-apples comparison, since these big winners "didn't start from highly profitable and dominant positions but had to get there." Nvidia checks those boxes. The company is highly profitable, and despite rising competition, Nvidia is currently the undisputed industry leader in the data center GPU space, with a dominant 92% market share, according to IoT Analytics. Beyond its industry-leading position, Nvidia has other advantages. It's "persistent exponential progress, the competitive advantages in hardware and software, and the culture and leadership are exactly what we look for," he noted. Plenty of things will have to go right To be clear, even if everything else went according to plan, there are plenty of other things that could trip up Nvidia on its journey to $50 trillion. The ongoing adoption of AI appears likely, but it may not materialize. A rival could invent a better solution for handling AI models. Nvidia could fail in its efforts to stay ahead of the competition. A black swan event could confound growth. Tariffs could backfire, driving up inflation and sparking a recession. Not to be a killjoy, but the world is full of uncertainty, and any of these developments -- or many more not listed -- could be a stumbling block for Nvidia on the path to $50 trillion. A better question Anderson was quick to point out that his theoretical benchmark "Isn't a prediction but a possibility if artificial intelligence works for customers and Nvidia's lead is intact." He goes on to suggest that the likelihood of Nvidia reaching those heights is slim, suggesting the potential for this outcome clocks in at between 10% and 15%. Yet it's worth taking a step back and focusing on the big picture. "It is the long duration of the development of [GPU] usage in AI -- and not just AI -- from excitement, through potential pauses, to transformation of industries that is most important to us," Anderson said. On the subject of valuation, Nvidia is currently selling for 29 times next year's expected earnings, which is frankly a bargain, given the magnitude of the opportunity. For me, the question isn't whether Nvidia could ultimately hit a market cap of $50 trillion over the coming decade. The more relevant question is whether the company will continue its long track record of innovation, while finding new ways to implement its technology, and capitalize on these secular tailwinds in the process. Given its track record, I would submit the answer is a resounding "yes." That's why Nvidia stock remains a buy. Should you invest $1,000 in Nvidia right now? Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $652,133!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,056,790!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Danny Vena has positions in Amazon, Netflix, Nvidia, and Tesla. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Netflix, Nvidia, and Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
