4 days ago
- Politics
- United News of India
SC continues hearing pleas against UP's Banke Bihari Temple Trust Ordinance, suggests interim oversight panel
New Delhi, Aug 5 (UNI) The Supreme Court today, continued hearing a batch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Uttar Pradesh Shri Bankey Bihari Ji Temple Trust Ordinance, 2025, which seeks to regulate the administration and development of the historic temple in Vrindavan.
A Bench comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi heard arguments from both sides and suggested the formation of an interim committee headed by a retired High Court judge to oversee the temple's administration until a final decision is rendered.
The petitioners, represented by Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, have opposed the Ordinance and also sought an injunction against the alleged diversion of temple funds for the proposed Banke Bihari Corridor Project. Sibal raised concerns over what he called "complete government control" over temple management, as indicated in a chart presented by the state.
'This chart shows complete government control,' Sibal submitted, urging the Court to allow petitioners to file counter-suggestions. Justice Kant assured, 'We'll address that.'
Accepting Sibal's request, the Court adjourned the matter to August 8 and asked both parties to propose names of a retired judge to head the interim oversight panel.
Appearing for the Uttar Pradesh government, Additional Solicitor General (ASG) KM Nataraj argued that the Ordinance had no connection with earlier writ petitions and was aimed purely at improving temple management in light of increasing footfall and fund mismanagement concerns.
'The state never intended, nor does it intend, to interfere in religious practices. The Ordinance is solely meant to improve administration and facilitate the daily visit of thousands of devotees,' ASG Nataraj submitted.
He clarified that the Ordinance was enacted in compliance with earlier directions from the Allahabad High Court and that temple funds would be used exclusively for the temple's welfare.
Justice Kant, upon reviewing the proposal submitted by the State, observed that it was broadly in line with what the Court had suggested during the earlier hearing on August 4.
The Supreme Court's involvement follows a series of legal and administrative developments regarding the redevelopment of the Shri Banke Bihari Temple precinct. The Uttar Pradesh government has proposed acquiring 5 acres of land surrounding the temple to build a corridor for crowd and public order management.
On August 4, the UP government had informed the Court that temple funds would only be used for temple redevelopment and not for any secular purposes. 'The funds are to be utilised solely for the temple. Nothing else has been done,' ASG Nataraj told the Court, defending the state's ordinance and redevelopment plans.
In a related order, a separate Supreme Court Bench of Justices Bela M. Trivedi and Satish Chandra Sharma recently permitted the state government to use fixed deposits held in the name of the deity for acquiring the required land. 'We permit the state of Uttar Pradesh to implement the scheme in its entirety... The Banke Bihari Ji Trust has fixed deposits in the name of the deity/temple. The state is permitted to utilise the amount for acquiring the land,' the Court had said.
In 2023, the Allahabad High Court had also approved the Uttar Pradesh government's proposal under Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution, which guarantee freedom of religion and religious management.
While the High Court backed the redevelopment project, it barred the use of Rs 262.50 crore lying in the deity's account for corridor construction and directed that government funds be used instead for secular infrastructure improvements.
The High Court emphasized that while the state could facilitate better management for devotees, it could not use temple funds for non-religious activities.
The court also directed removal of encroachments, the involvement of technical experts, and issued strict guidelines to ensure that the daily Darshan of devotees remains uninterrupted.
'In our opinion, even in private temples where devotees come in large numbers, human safety must be given utmost importance. The government is bound to ensure necessary arrangements,' the High Court had observed.
Several stakeholders, including local shopkeepers and residents, have also filed intervention applications opposing the corridor's expansion, particularly near the sacred 'Kunj Galis', citing concerns about heritage preservation and displacement.
The ongoing proceedings before the apex court are expected to play a pivotal role in determining the balance between religious freedom, temple autonomy, state regulation, and public interest.
The matter will next be heard on August 8, when the Court will examine the counter-suggestions and possibly finalize the name of a retired High Court judge to lead the interim committee.
UNI SNG AAB
