Latest news with #Beijing-Moscow
NDTV
3 days ago
- Business
- NDTV
Trump's Tariffs On India An "Unforced Error": Ex-US NSA Bolton
New York: Tariffs imposed on India by US President Donald Trump for purchases of Russian oil may have pushed New Delhi further into the Beijing-Moscow axis and this lack of focus by Washington is an "unforced error", a former top White House official has said. National security adviser during the first Trump administration John Bolton made the comments a day before the "high-stakes" summit meeting between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Alaska on Friday. "When Trump slapped tariffs on India for buying Russian oil, but not China which also purchases Russia oil, it may have pushed India further into the Beijing-Moscow axis. This lack of focus by the Trump Admin is an unforced error," Bolton said in a post on X on Thursday. Trump has slapped additional 25 per cent tariffs on India for its purchases of Russian oil, bringing the total levies imposed on India to 50 per cent. Experts have pointed out that Washington has not imposed similar duties on China, which buys significantly more Russian energy than Delhi. In an interview to CNN, Bolton, who was present for the first summit between Trump and Putin in Helsinki in 2018, noted that the White House has imposed secondary tariffs on countries like India for buying oil and gas from Russia. "They have slapped the 25 per cent tariff on India, although it hasn't gone into effect yet. I can tell you the reaction in India to that, particularly with no tariff slapped on China, which bought an awful lot more oil and gas from Russia, is the Indians are incandescent about this," Bolton said. Bolton referred to the possible visit by Putin to India later this year and Prime Minister Narendra Modi's upcoming visit to China for the first time since 2018. "Obviously both Moscow and Beijing are going to try to bring India closer to them. I mean, this could have negative consequences (for the US), because it wasn't well thought through," Bolton said. Last week, when Modi had a telephone conversation with Putin, he invited the Russian leader to India later this year for the 23rd India-Russia Annual Summit. Modi is expected to travel to China later this month, after a gap of over seven years, to attend the Tianjin Summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation to be held from August 31 to September 1.
Time of India
3 days ago
- Business
- Time of India
Trump's tariffs on India may have pushed Delhi further into Beijing-Moscow axis: ex-US NSA John Bolton
New York: Tariffs imposed on India by US President Donald Trump for purchases of Russian oil may have pushed New Delhi further into the Beijing-Moscow axis and this lack of focus by Washington is an "unforced error", a former top White House official has said. Independence Day 2025 Modi signals new push for tech independence with local chips Before Trump, British used tariffs to kill Indian textile Bank of Azad Hind: When Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose gave India its own currency National security adviser during the first Trump administration John Bolton made the comments a day before the "high-stakes" summit meeting between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Alaska on Friday. "When Trump slapped tariffs on India for buying Russian oil, but not China which also purchases Russia oil, it may have pushed India further into the Beijing-Moscow axis. This lack of focus by the Trump Admin is an unforced error," Bolton said in a post on X on Thursday. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Dubai villas | search ads Get Deals Undo Trump has slapped additional 25 per cent tariffs on India for its purchases of Russian oil, bringing the total levies imposed on India to 50 per cent. Experts have pointed out that Washington has not imposed similar duties on China, which buys significantly more Russian energy than Delhi. Live Events In an interview to CNN, Bolton, who was present for the first summit between Trump and Putin in Helsinki in 2018, noted that the White House has imposed secondary tariffs on countries like India for buying oil and gas from Russia. "They have slapped the 25 per cent tariff on India, although it hasn't gone into effect yet. I can tell you the reaction in India to that, particularly with no tariff slapped on China, which bought an awful lot more oil and gas from Russia, is the Indians are incandescent about this," Bolton said. Bolton referred to the possible visit by Putin to India later this year and Prime Minister Narendra Modi's upcoming visit to China for the first time since 2018. "Obviously both Moscow and Beijing are going to try to bring India closer to them. I mean, this could have negative consequences (for the US), because it wasn't well thought through," Bolton said. Last week, when Modi had a telephone conversation with Putin, he invited the Russian leader to India later this year for the 23rd India-Russia Annual Summit . Modi is expected to travel to China later this month, after a gap of over seven years, to attend the Tianjin Summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation to be held from August 31 to September 1.
Hindustan Times
6 days ago
- Politics
- Hindustan Times
The far north has become NATO's soft underbelly, writes John Bolton
This guest essay is one of three we have published to mark the centenary of the Svalbard Treaty coming into force on August 14th 1925. The others are by Mikhail Komin and Kieran Mulvaney . ALTHOUGH LONG a factor in American strategic thinking, the Arctic now receives far more attention in Washington than in decades. Several forces are at play: increased use of Arctic maritime passages for military and commercial purposes; Russia's historical focus on its northern territories, now magnified by its aggression against Ukraine; and, most salient geopolitically, China's undisguised aim to be an Arctic power, using the developing Beijing-Moscow axis. America and its allies have yet to cope adequately with these challenges. In the second world war, Greenland was critical to North Atlantic convoy routes, hosting significant American deployments. The Pentagon clearly understood the Arctic's cold-war role, building the 'DEW [distant-early-warning] Line' across Alaska, Canada and Greenland to detect nuclear-equipped Soviet bombers or ballistic missiles heading to the continental United States. Responding to the Sputnik satellite, in 1958 President Dwight Eisenhower sent the USS Nautilus, the world's first nuclear-powered submarine, under the Arctic ice cap from the Bering Strait to the Atlantic, in the first submerged transit of the North Pole. Unfortunately, cold-war victory led to geostrategic complacency, not just in Washington, but across NATO and bilateral American alliances with the likes of Japan and South Korea. This complacency is disappearing as the race for Arctic hegemony picks up, but the West has much to do, and quickly, to counter the rising threats from China and Russia. The prize is potentially vast. Opportunities to exploit the fabled Northwest Passage across Canada, or its counterpart across Russia's northern coast, are enormous. Greater access to Far North natural-resource deposits, both at sea and ashore, are also generating a lot of attention. Updating the jocular insight of General Hastings Ismay, NATO's first secretary-general, is a good starting point for the West's Arctic grand strategy: 'Keep the Chinese out, the Americans in, and the Russians down.' The alliance's soft underbelly is now probably the Far North, not the Mediterranean. NATO has four front-line Arctic Ocean littoral states (Norway, Denmark, Canada and America) facing off with Russia, although the full mix of Arctic players and threats is far more extensive. President Donald Trump remains sceptical of NATO and, indeed, the very concept of collective-defence alliances. Nonetheless, America is a front-line Arctic power, as Alaska's congressional delegation relentlessly reminds Mr Trump, and the region's importance to his presidency's legacy should be obvious. Unfortunately, American military resources are currently wholly inadequate to the task, with insufficient Navy and Coast Guard vessels worldwide, let alone those required for Arctic (and Antarctic) operations, such as specialised icebreakers. NATO's admission of Finland in 2023 and Sweden in 2024 helped plug some of the gaps in the alliance's Arctic naval capabilities. William Seward, Abraham Lincoln's secretary of state, looks ever more prescient. Had he not led the United States to purchase Alaska from Russia in 1867, and Russia had remained a North American power, the cold war might never have ended. He also tried to purchase Greenland from Denmark in 1868. Had he succeeded, today's circumstances might have been easier. Mr Trump did not discover Greenland in 2019—when he first mooted buying it—but he has seriously complicated addressing how the huge island and its tiny population can once again be fully integrated into NATO defences. The 1951 US-Danish Defence of Greenland treaty is a workable basis for guarding against the thrusting Chinese and Russians, while allowing Greenland's political status to evolve. America had as many as 17 military facilities there during the cold war, and today's focus hopefully precludes China and Russia from acting covertly against NATO's security interests. Norway's Svalbard islands graphically embody the alliance's dilemmas. John Longyear, an American businessman, initially exploited their coal deposits in the early 20th century (more evidence of how ahistorical today's American isolationists are). However, allowable under the 1925 treaty confirming Norwegian sovereignty, Svalbard also features Russian mining operations about 30 miles from its major habitation, appropriately named Longyearbyen. A European intelligence official said recently that 'Svalbard has to be near the top of a list of where Russia might try something.' This is not fantasy. China poses an analogous threat to Taiwanese islands like Kinmen and Matsu, just off the mainland, which it could readily seize without invading Taiwan outright. These are inviting targets, testing allied resolve in the Far East and the Far North. Can Svalbard's treaty-based demilitarisation be preserved? As I discovered during my own visit there in April, the islands provide NATO's adversaries excellent locations for naval or air bases. Among NATO's Arctic Ocean members, Canada is the hole in the doughnut. Persistent Canadian underspending on defence during Justin Trudeau's several governments remains uncorrected. Helpfully, however, relations between America's and Canada's armed forces are otherwise quite good, including through long-term development of national missile defences for both countries. It is Canada's politicians who have failed. Moreover, disagreements between Canada and America over whether various aspects of the Northwest Passage are international waterways or Canadian territorial waters must also be resolved. One approach would be to agree that passage by NATO-member warships would be freely permitted in fulfilling their alliance obligations. These are merely preliminary considerations. Formidable issues remain, including the need for massive increase in NATO defence expenditures, not just for the Arctic but worldwide. Cold-war victory didn't 'end history' in the Arctic any more than anywhere else. And, critically, isolationism can play no part in strategising about a region so close and vital to American national-security interests. Time to pick up the pace. John Bolton was America's ambassador to the UN from 2005 to 2006 and its national security adviser from 2018 to 2019.
Economist
11-08-2025
- Business
- Economist
The far north has become NATO's soft underbelly, writes John Bolton
ALTHOUGH LONG a factor in American strategic thinking, the Arctic now receives far more attention in Washington than in decades. Several forces are at play: increased use of Arctic maritime passages for military and commercial purposes; Russia's historical focus on its northern territories, now magnified by its aggression against Ukraine; and, most salient geopolitically, China's undisguised aim to be an Arctic power, using the developing Beijing-Moscow axis. America and its allies have yet to cope adequately with these challenges.
