Latest news with #BelindaFeek
RNZ News
29-04-2025
- Business
- RNZ News
The forensic accountant and the ‘red flags' he found in alleged theft probe
By Belinda Feek, Open Justice reporter of Hamilton District Court Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly A businessman was allegedly paying himself fees for professional services that he was not qualified to receive, and without the knowledge of the company directors. That man is now before the courts fighting three charges of theft by a person in a special relationship and obtaining by deception between 2015 and 2018. Forensic accountant Dennis Parsons on Tuesday told a jury in the Hamilton District Court that he discovered a number of "red flags" when he went through the company's books, which the 73-year-old defendant was in charge of. In total, the Hamilton man, whose name and identifying details are suppressed, is alleged to have unlawfully obtained $111,079.80 and spent some of that money on personal items, including weedkiller and Hush Puppies shoes. The name of the company he was formerly associated with also has interim name suppression. On day two of the trial, Parsons continued giving evidence, detailing the report he compiled for the company's board of directors in 2018. He initially did one report, covering a 13-month period, but given what he discovered he was asked by the board to extend the ambit of his investigation to another year. Parsons was initially contacted by one of the company directors to investigate because of "alleged misappropriation" by the defendant. He was able to put the allegations into three categories: money that had vanished by way of cash cheque, the defendant's personal loan, and the personal expenditure. Asked by Crown solicitor Tom Sutcliffe if he recognised any red flags, Parsons said he wouldn't expect to see brokerage being charged by the company. "Because under the Credit Contract and Consumer Finance Act, the creditor [company] ... can charge reasonable fees, documentation fees, search fees, and can charge brokerage ... but only charge these fees that it has paid out to a third party. "Because there was no broker, they couldn't charge a fee for paying itself." He said most of the transactions were from customers who either walked in or were refinancing existing loans. "So there's no broker involved in these transactions. "So it's my understanding they were not entitled to charge these at any rate. "That was the first red flag." The second was when he discovered the cheques were made out to cash. "Quite simply, you need to be able to account for who you pay the money to. "If it goes into a cash currency we don't know where it's gone after it has been cashed at the bank. "So if [defendant] cashed it, he had $600 in his hand and we don't know what happened to that." The only way it could be traced is if the cash was being put back into the company bank account, but that didn't happen, he said. "There was no record of what happened to the cash," Parsons said. During his investigation, Parsons said he spoke with the broker used by the defendant. Parsons said the broker told him he didn't receive his share of some of the broker fees. Parsons also discovered broker forms that had the broker's name on them but not his signature. When asked by Sutcliffe what his concerns were about the cash cheques, Parsons said the cheques could have just been made out in the name of the broker. Sutcliffe then asked him to justify the defendant's alleged deposits. "$600 is banked as cash by [defendant] into his account. Then he's used broker fees to reduce his debt." All up, the defendant is alleged to have reduced his personal loan by $18,600 by the various cash deposits, he said. "You would expect to see reasons for each of these credits," Parsons said. His investigation also uncovered purchases of weedkiller and sprayer worth $182.56, a $140 smoke alarm, a $849 vacuum cleaner, Hush Puppies and shoe care kit, Wet and Forget Tiger Paw Shower Witch cleaner worth $229, and a Sunbeam "big fill" toastie machine, charged to either the company's office or general expenses. He also got his personal car cleaned at Trim Effects Waikato, worth $172.50, noting that it had been "damaged by rubbish". The man says he has done nothing wrong. "My defence is quite simple. I have committed no crime," he told the jury on Monday. "I'm simply carrying the can for a poorly governed company." The man said a "disconnect" had developed between himself and the board of directors. The trial is expected to last about two weeks. - This story was first published on New Zealand Herald .
Otago Daily Times
21-04-2025
- Otago Daily Times
Colombian refugee jailed for repeatedly sexually assaulting teen
By Belinda Feek WARNING: This story contains details of sexual assault. After a teenager reported she had been repeatedly sexually assaulted by a group of men, one of them urged her to tell police that they were all innocent. 'Do everything possible I can't go to jail, actually do [victim] otherwise I'm going to get in serious trouble this isn't a joke man' [sic], Elias Tenorio-Quinones texted the then 15-year-old. But the teenager stayed strong, and last week in the Hamilton District Court the now 23-year-old Colombian refugee was jailed for two years and eight months. However, as he has been in custody for the past 21 months, he will soon be eligible for parole. Tenorio-Quinones is now the last of three offenders to be sentenced for the sexual assaults that occurred around Hamilton, including Hamilton Lake and Callum Brae Park, in 2022. Last year, CJ Sampiano, 20, was sentenced on three charges of sexual connection with a young person to 10 months' home detention and ordered to pay $5000 in emotional harm reparation. And their 20-year-old co-offender, who can't be named for legal reasons, was sentenced to six months' community detention, 12 months' supervision, and ordered to pay $1500 in emotional harm reparation on four of the same charges. Tenorio-Quinones got the most severe sentence as he admitted 10 charges; nine of sexual connection with a young person and one of attempting to pervert the course of justice. The court heard that between September 30, 2022, and October 17, 2022, Tenorio-Quinones met up with the victim numerous times and gave her cannabis before engaging in sex or sexual behaviour. At times, the victim tried to push Tenorio-Quinones off her, said 'no', or felt pressured, and, on two occasions, he filmed her having sex with his 20-year-old co-offender. After being arrested and bailed, Tenorio-Quinones tried to convince the victim to go to the police to report her friends for spreading 'bad information' about him and his co-offenders, and to also say he never forced her to have sex. 'A rollercoaster of emotions' In her statement, the victim's mother told Judge Philip Crayton that her daughter was vulnerable when she met the men. Soon after, her daughter changed. She became 'very emotional' and prone to 'blow up in extreme rages' and got involved in 'very risky behaviours'. '[She] has been on a rollercoaster of emotions, and her journey will be a long one,' the mother said. 'The sexual assaults have derailed [her] progress in life ... but she is improving.' Tenorio-Quinones took advantage of the victim and had also shown no remorse for his actions, she said. Tenorio-Quinones' counsel, Joon Yi, said his client was genuinely remorseful and a letter he had penned showed insight into what he had done. He denied there was any victim-blaming, saying he was 'simply explaining the background as to how he got to know the victim'. Crown solicitor Lexie Glasier appreciated Tenorio-Quinones had no previous convictions, but said he was still too young to qualify for any previous good character discount. 'He's not even had the opportunity to form a character that is good. 'These matters indicate he is not someone of good character.' She said he had also made comments in his pre-sentence report that appeared to blame his co-offenders, that he was influenced by them, and 'intoxicated mainly by marijuana'. His remorse letter also had elements of victim-blaming and minimisation of his actions, she submitted. 'You need to own your actions' Judge Crayton told Tenorio-Quinones he had impacted the victim's life 'in many different ways'. 'It's likely that will be lifelong, and it has been life-changing. 'You need to not only recognise it, you need to own it. 'She bears no responsibility for your actions and the actions of your friends. 'They are yours.' Judge Crayton declined to issue any previous good character discount. He had been sent 'a whole raft' of character references, many from family, who described Tenorio-Quinones as 'quiet, polite, and respectful'. 'And I'm sure you are. 'I'm sure that that element of your character is what gained the trust of your victim. 'It really couldn't be said that you are a person of positive character.' The judge accepted the letter of remorse demonstrated some insight, and allowed 3% discount. He gave a further 5% for background factors and applied credit for his guilty pleas and youth. From a starting point of four years and six months, Judge Crayton jailed Tenorio-Quinones for two years and eight months. SEXUAL HARM Where to get help: If it's an emergency and you feel that you or someone else is at risk, call 111. If you've ever experienced sexual assault or abuse and need to talk to someone, contact Safe to Talk confidentially, any time 24/7:• Call 0800 044 334• Text 4334 • Email support@ • For more info or to web chat visit Alternatively contact your local police station - click here for a list. If you have been sexually assaulted, remember it's not your fault.
