Latest news with #Bhakra-Nangal
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
06-05-2025
- Politics
- Business Standard
Punjab-Haryana water dispute explained: What's causing the water crisis?
Tensions between Punjab and Haryana over water sharing have once again flared up, with Punjab refusing to release an additional 4,500 cusecs of water to Haryana through the Bhakra-Nangal project. The issue led to major political parties rallying together in Punjab, opposing the move. At the heart of the standoff lies Punjab's growing water crisis. Here's a closer look at the current water sharing dispute and how it started. Punjab-Haryana water dispute The dispute began on April 23, when Haryana sought 8,500 cusecs of water, 4,500 cusecs more than its usual share, from the Bhakra-Nangal project, citing a severe drinking water shortage in its western districts. Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann rejected the request, and the matter was taken up by the Bhakra Beas Management Board (BBMB). BBMB approved Haryana's request, with member states Haryana, Rajasthan, and Delhi voting in favour. Himachal Pradesh abstained, and Punjab voted against. What is the Bhakra-Nangal project? The Bhakra-Nangal project is a river valley project which serves multiple purposes, such as irrigation, hydropower generation, flood control, and drinking water supply. The project is located at the Sutlej River, in the states of Himachal Pradesh and Punjab and comprises two main dams: Bhakra Dam and Nangal Dam. Who manages BBMB and how is water distributed? This is one of India's earliest post-independence infrastructure schemes, was originally managed solely by Punjab before the state was divided in 1966. After the reorganisation, the Bhakra Management Board — later renamed BBMB — was created to manage water distribution among Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan, Himachal Pradesh, and Delhi. Under the BBMB's current allocation: Punjab receives 5.512 million acre-feet (MAF) Haryana gets 2.987 MAF Rajasthan is allotted 3.318 MAF Punjab, however, claims that Haryana has already drawn 3.110 million acre-feet (MAF). This means Haryana has already exceeded its full-year share. Punjab has argued that any additional supply would come at the cost of its own pressing needs. Why is Punjab facing a water crisis? Despite being the origin of three major rivers, including the Sutlej, Ravi, and Beas, Punjab is in the grip of a severe water crisis. A report by The Indian Express breaks this down to both structural and administrative reasons: 1. Skewed water allocation: Punjab receives only 17.95 BCM of the 42.4 billion cubic metres (BCM) flowing through its rivers. The rest is shared with Haryana, Rajasthan, and even Pakistan. Despite this, Punjab is expected to support its heavy agricultural demands with limited canal water. 2. Excessive groundwater use: Punjab's annual water demand is 66.12 billion cubic metres (BCM), of which 62.58 BCM is used for agriculture. However, the total available supply is only 52.85 BCM. This leaves a deficit of 13.27 BCM — a gap largely filled by over-exploiting groundwater. Around 47 per cent of Punjab's water needs are met this way, putting immense pressure on aquifers. 3. Falling water levels: Dams like Bhakra, Pong, and Ranjit Sagar are reporting significantly lower water levels compared to last year. Experts attribute this to reduced snowfall in the Himalayas, which feeds these rivers. 4. Waste management: Despite annual floods, Punjab lacks an effective strategy to harness excess water. 5. Urban shortages and project delays: Cities like Ludhiana, Jalandhar, and Amritsar face acute water shortages, especially in summer. Projects such as bringing the Beas river water to Jalandhar have been delayed due to a lack of funding and bureaucratic hurdles. 6. Agricultural practices: Punjab's water-intensive cropping patterns — especially rice cultivation — have further aggravated groundwater depletion. Despite policy-level awareness, crop diversification has been slow. 7. Poor river management: Between April and June 2019, only 30-40 per cent of the water released from dams was used within Punjab; the rest flowed into Pakistan or other Indian states. The canalisation of rivers and flood management plans announced in 2019 remain largely unimplemented. So, what happens next? Punjab's refusal to share additional water with Haryana is not a state rivalry; it reflects a deeper problem. With groundwater levels plummeting, surface water under pressure, and urban centres increasingly parched, Punjab is experiencing a deeper water crisis. The situation calls for urgent intervention to help mitigate the situation, especially with drier summer months beginning in Infia. The matter of water sharing will likely reach the Supreme Court, where further information and future actions may be determined.
Time of India
06-05-2025
- Politics
- Time of India
Water sharing row: What is Dam Safety Act & why Punjab wants to repeal it
With Punjab's dispute over Haryana's demand for additional water snowballing into a political storm, there is a growing demand in the border state for repealing the Dam Safety Act. Parties in Punjab say the law gives Centre the control over dams located within the state's territory. Details What does it provide? The Dam Safety Act, 2021, aims to provide for the surveillance, inspection, operation, and maintenance of specified dams across the country to prevent dam failure-related disasters and establish an institutional mechanism to ensure their safe functioning. It received the President's assent on Dec 13, 2021. What are specified dams? Specified dams in the country are defined as dams with a height of more than 15 metres, or between 10 and 15 metres with certain design and structural conditions, such as reservoir capacity or flood discharge capacity. This includes dams on both inter-state and intra-state rivers. What is Punjab's stance? Punjab chief minister Bhagwant Mann indicated on Monday that the state govt was already working on a draft to replace it with its own legislation. The resolution moved by the AAP govt in the Punjab assembly on Monday sought the repeal of the Dam Safety Act. Punjab minister for water resources Barinder Kumar Goyal alleged that the Centre was trying to use the law to exercise control over dams in states. 'That is their planning. Dams belong to the state, and they have no business to interfere,' he said. Congress objecting to parts of trifurcation law too The Congress has also objected to sections 78, 79, and 80 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966, which laid out the grounds for the trifurcation of Punjab, on similar grounds. After the session, Congress MLA Pargat Singh said the AAP govt is silent on the law. 'These were overlooked even during the Punjab Termination Agreement Act, 2004. Both the laws should be annulled. There should be an expert committee to follow up on the issue,' he said. What do the parts state? Sections 78, 79, and 80 specifically deal with the rights and liabilities related to the Bhakra-Nangal and Beas projects, which are crucial water and power resources in the region. 'The main objection is that these sections, particularly 79, give Centre the control over the management and distribution of Punjab's river waters. Opposition parties argue that the arrangement undermines Punjab's riparian rights and its control over its own water resources. A related concern is that the Bhakra Beas Management Board (BBMB), under central control, may not adequately protect Punjab's interests in sharing water,' Pargat Singh said.
