Latest news with #Bill932
Yahoo
09-04-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Two bills to preserve conservation funding in marijuana tax revenue advance
Tim Blakeley, manager of Sunset Junction medical marijuana dispensary, shows marijuana plant buds on May 11, 2010 in Los Angeles, California. The dispensary is one 25 plaintiffs in a lawsuit against the city of Los Angeles fighting to stay open after city prosecutors began notifying 439 medical marijuana dispensaries that they must shut down by June 7. (Photo by Kevork Djansezian | Getty Images) Lawmakers in each chamber of the Montana Legislature have advanced bills that shift marijuana tax revenue, but preserve conservation funding. A previous bill that would have stopped the flow of marijuana revenue to a group of Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks programs, drawing opposition from many conservation groups, was tabled in a Senate committee on April 1. The two new bills each passed their respective house of origin with significantly more bipartisan support — Senate Bill 537 passed on Saturday 45-0, while House Bill 932 passed the same day 71-27. SB 537, introduced by Sen. Daniel Zolnikov, R-Billings, keeps the existing amount of funding for conservation initiatives in place but expands how the funds can be used. The bill also increases distributions to the Healing and Ending Addiction through Recovery and Treatment (HEART) account, and adds funding for the Department of Justice, including substantial investments in law enforcement. 'I would call this the Cops and Conservation Act,' Zolnikov said on the Senate floor on April 4. 'Because one thing we hear about from my side of the aisle is we need more law enforcement, there's more problems coming on, how do we help those guys. And I'll tell you what was awesome about this bill, working with the other side of the aisle, they were very supportive of this side of the aisle's priorities. Working with this side of the aisle, they seemed to be very comfortable clarifying the buckets on this side of the aisle's priorities and helping on the conservation side. And in the end, we're trying to fill gaps.' Zolnikov's bill emerged as a compromise piece of legislation following the pushback to Senate Bill 307, brought by Senate Majority Leader Tom McGillvray, R-Billings, which would have shifted marijuana revenue from conservation to law enforcement. McGillvray said his bill gave lawmakers a choice, whether they thought people, who may be harmed by the effects of marijuana, or trails and wildlife were more important issues to fund. By contrast, Zolnikov sought to eliminate the choice and instead give all stakeholders a little bit of what they wanted by allocating the roughly $33 million of tax revenue that currently goes into the state's general fund. Under the new structure, the current 4% revenue allocated each for state parks, trails and recreation and nongame wildlife remains as is. The 20% of funds currently earmarked for FWP's Habitat Montana fund instead goes to a new Habitat Legacy Account, which Zolnikov said broadens the use of the funds. According to the bill, 75% of funds in the account must be used solely to fund wildlife habitat projects, while the rest may be used for various conservation-related projects including noxious weed programs, grants for conservation districts, big game and wildlife highway crossings, and land and water acquisitions or easement purchases. 'It's all types of buckets in there that the conservation folks worked on and supported,' Zolnikov said. 'If you were in the hearing, it was the most fun group of people you could ever see all supporting it.' The HEART fund, which currently receives a set $6 million of marijuana revenue, would be boosted to a 20% allocation, which will allow the account to grow with tax revenue. The other additions, which target needs identified by McGillvray such as boosting law enforcement include: 2.5% for DOJ canine training, 1.5% for DOJ sexual assault exams and kits, 0.25% for the Board of Crime Control to fund crisis intervention training; 14% to the behavioral health system for future generations funds; 6.5% for drug and alcohol use prevention and 31% for DOJ law enforcement grants. Those grants would include distributing $50,000 to each police department, sheriff's office and tribal police department, plus proportional distributions based on department size. 'It's a pretty thorough bill. I'd say, working on it, I had to learn about a lot of problems that I think there's some gaps that we're not filling, and this really helped fills them in the future,' Zolnikov said. McGillvray told reporters on Tuesday that he felt many of the things in Zolnikov's bill, such as letting the HEART fund grow with tax revenue, were smart, but he still had some concerns about using the funds for conservation. 'The nexus between marijuana revenue and marijuana harms is just smart tax policy. And unfortunately, it all got started on the wrong foot, and it was a tough sell to get it back on the right foot,' he said. McGillvray added that removing revenue from the state's general fund for law enforcement is a 'big bite that could have a struggle' with the governor's office. On the House side, Rep. Ken Walsh, R-Twin Bridges, brought HB 932, which targets just the current 30% of conservation funding allocated to Habitat Montana. It functions in roughly the same way as SB 537, moving those funds to a new Habitat Legacy Account. Under HB 932, that account would funnel 75% into a separate Land and Wildlife Stewardship account that would be used solely for habitat conservation projects, while the remaining funds would be split between wildlife crossings, and the Wildlife Habitat Improvement Program (WHIP) account. WHIP funds can currently only be used for noxious weed treatment, but Walsh's bill would greatly expand their use. 'What this bill will do is expand that bucket for private land owners, and conservation groups and fish, wildlife and parks to work together,' Walsh said He listed off some possible applications — irrigation infrastructure, forest management, prescribed fire, fish passage, soil enhancement, and wetland protection. 'Maybe even wildlife crossings, so we don't hit as many elk and deer on the road,' he said. The bill drew some opposition for continuing to fund conservation-related programs. 'This bill is going to lock up marijuana revenue in wildlife management kinds of things. And I know that's important to this body. But we have been listening all session about what's going on in our correctional system — we don't have enough space, don't have enough space,' Rep. Fiona Nave, R-Columbus, said. 'That's drug driven. We need the marijuana funding … to be available for drug treatment and law enforcement.' But lawmakers overwhelmingly backed the bill under its expanded scope. 'This allocated available dollars to important Montana industries, agriculture and the outdoor economy. It's a good bill for these businesses,' said Rep. Ed Buttrey, R-Great Falls. HB 932 is awaiting a hearing before the Senate Fish and Game Committee while SB 537 will be heard in the House Taxation Committee later this month.
Yahoo
27-02-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Maryland lawmakers want governors to face stronger ethics laws
BALTIMORE — Lawmakers are seeking to require that Maryland governors place their personal financial holdings into a blind trust months after conflicts of interest were raised during Maryland's U.S. Senate race between former Gov. Larry Hogan and now-Sen. Angela Alsobrooks. Senate Bill 723 and House Bill 932 would require the governor to either place their financial interests into a certified blind trust approved by the State Ethics Commission or divest from any interest the SEC determines may pose a conflict of interest with the governor's public duties. A blind trust is an arrangement often used by politicians to give control of their private financial interests to an independent manager to avoid conflicts of interest. 'While we do have financial disclosure requirements here in Maryland that we all comply with, I would suggest that when it comes to the highest office in the state — the governor, who has unique power — that we need an even stronger framework so as to mitigate against conflicts of interest, reinforce accountability and transparency and protect the ethical integrity of that uniquely powerful office,' said Sen. Brian Feldman, a Montgomery County Democrat sponsoring the Senate bill. While Feldman did not name any particular governor at Wednesday's bill hearing in the Senate Education, Energy and the Environment Committee, he referenced an October 2024 article from Time magazine that raised ethical concerns about former Gov. Larry Hogan, a Republican. The report, which was published before the only televised debate between Hogan and now-U.S. Sen. Angela Alsobrooks, claimed the former governor had approved millions of dollars in affordable housing awards for six developers who were clients of his real estate brokerage firm. Maryland Democrats, including Gov. Wes Moore, called for stronger state ethics laws the day after the story came out. At the time, Moore said there were 'a lot of answers that the old governor needs to provide' and said the state should look into the contracts Hogan approved while he was in office. Hogan, meanwhile, called the story 'completely false' and 'some old false conspiracy theory.' Moore finalized the creation of a blind trust several months after taking office. As of April 2023, his blind trust included more than $2.5 million in investments. Nearly half of Moore's holdings posed potential conflicts of interest, including more than $1.2 million in shares of a cannabis company that does business in Maryland. Under the bill's provisions, the trustee of a governor's blind trust would generally be prohibited from informing the governor about the management or income of the trust while the governor is in office. However, they can provide enough needed information to file tax returns. The State Ethics Commission would post a governor's approved certified blind trust and related documents on its website. Additionally, the measure would require any business entity seeking a state grant, award or contract to report any financial interest held by the governor or restricted individuals — a governor's spouse, parents, grandparents, siblings, children, grandchildren and in-laws — to the state's ethics commission. A report from a business entity would also be posted to the commission's website. Joanne Antoine, executive director of Common Cause Maryland, referenced similar concerns as Feldman, saying that over the last few years, the public has been questioning the actions of former governors. 'Conflicts of interest are cancerous to our democracy,' she said. 'When our elected officials put their interests first, what they're sending is a message to the public that the state doesn't think their needs are a priority.' ---------
Yahoo
27-02-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Maryland lawmakers want governors to face stronger ethics laws
BALTIMORE — Lawmakers are seeking to require that Maryland governors place their personal financial holdings into a blind trust months after conflicts of interest were raised during Maryland's U.S. Senate race between former Gov. Larry Hogan and now-Sen. Angela Alsobrooks. Senate Bill 723 and House Bill 932 would require the governor to either place their financial interests into a certified blind trust approved by the State Ethics Commission or divest from any interest the SEC determines may pose a conflict of interest with the governor's public duties. A blind trust is an arrangement often used by politicians to give control of their private financial interests to an independent manager to avoid conflicts of interest. 'While we do have financial disclosure requirements here in Maryland that we all comply with, I would suggest that when it comes to the highest office in the state — the governor, who has unique power — that we need an even stronger framework so as to mitigate against conflicts of interest, reinforce accountability and transparency and protect the ethical integrity of that uniquely powerful office,' said Sen. Brian Feldman, a Montgomery County Democrat sponsoring the Senate bill. While Feldman did not name any particular governor at Wednesday's bill hearing in the Senate Education, Energy and the Environment Committee, he referenced an October 2024 article from Time magazine that raised ethical concerns about former Gov. Larry Hogan, a Republican. The report, which was published before the only televised debate between Hogan and now-U.S. Sen. Angela Alsobrooks, claimed the former governor had approved millions of dollars in affordable housing awards for six developers who were clients of his real estate brokerage firm. Maryland Democrats, including Gov. Wes Moore, called for stronger state ethics laws the day after the story came out. At the time, Moore said there were 'a lot of answers that the old governor needs to provide' and said the state should look into the contracts Hogan approved while he was in office. Hogan, meanwhile, called the story 'completely false' and 'some old false conspiracy theory.' Moore finalized the creation of a blind trust several months after taking office. As of April 2023, his blind trust included more than $2.5 million in investments. Nearly half of Moore's holdings posed potential conflicts of interest, including more than $1.2 million in shares of a cannabis company that does business in Maryland. Under the bill's provisions, the trustee of a governor's blind trust would generally be prohibited from informing the governor about the management or income of the trust while the governor is in office. However, they can provide enough needed information to file tax returns. The State Ethics Commission would post a governor's approved certified blind trust and related documents on its website. Additionally, the measure would require any business entity seeking a state grant, award or contract to report any financial interest held by the governor or restricted individuals — a governor's spouse, parents, grandparents, siblings, children, grandchildren and in-laws — to the state's ethics commission. A report from a business entity would also be posted to the commission's website. Joanne Antoine, executive director of Common Cause Maryland, referenced similar concerns as Feldman, saying that over the last few years, the public has been questioning the actions of former governors. 'Conflicts of interest are cancerous to our democracy,' she said. 'When our elected officials put their interests first, what they're sending is a message to the public that the state doesn't think their needs are a priority.' ---------
