Maryland lawmakers want governors to face stronger ethics laws
BALTIMORE — Lawmakers are seeking to require that Maryland governors place their personal financial holdings into a blind trust months after conflicts of interest were raised during Maryland's U.S. Senate race between former Gov. Larry Hogan and now-Sen. Angela Alsobrooks.
Senate Bill 723 and House Bill 932 would require the governor to either place their financial interests into a certified blind trust approved by the State Ethics Commission or divest from any interest the SEC determines may pose a conflict of interest with the governor's public duties.
A blind trust is an arrangement often used by politicians to give control of their private financial interests to an independent manager to avoid conflicts of interest.
'While we do have financial disclosure requirements here in Maryland that we all comply with, I would suggest that when it comes to the highest office in the state — the governor, who has unique power — that we need an even stronger framework so as to mitigate against conflicts of interest, reinforce accountability and transparency and protect the ethical integrity of that uniquely powerful office,' said Sen. Brian Feldman, a Montgomery County Democrat sponsoring the Senate bill.
While Feldman did not name any particular governor at Wednesday's bill hearing in the Senate Education, Energy and the Environment Committee, he referenced an October 2024 article from Time magazine that raised ethical concerns about former Gov. Larry Hogan, a Republican.
The report, which was published before the only televised debate between Hogan and now-U.S. Sen. Angela Alsobrooks, claimed the former governor had approved millions of dollars in affordable housing awards for six developers who were clients of his real estate brokerage firm.
Maryland Democrats, including Gov. Wes Moore, called for stronger state ethics laws the day after the story came out. At the time, Moore said there were 'a lot of answers that the old governor needs to provide' and said the state should look into the contracts Hogan approved while he was in office.
Hogan, meanwhile, called the story 'completely false' and 'some old false conspiracy theory.'
Moore finalized the creation of a blind trust several months after taking office. As of April 2023, his blind trust included more than $2.5 million in investments. Nearly half of Moore's holdings posed potential conflicts of interest, including more than $1.2 million in shares of a cannabis company that does business in Maryland.
Under the bill's provisions, the trustee of a governor's blind trust would generally be prohibited from informing the governor about the management or income of the trust while the governor is in office. However, they can provide enough needed information to file tax returns. The State Ethics Commission would post a governor's approved certified blind trust and related documents on its website.
Additionally, the measure would require any business entity seeking a state grant, award or contract to report any financial interest held by the governor or restricted individuals — a governor's spouse, parents, grandparents, siblings, children, grandchildren and in-laws — to the state's ethics commission. A report from a business entity would also be posted to the commission's website.
Joanne Antoine, executive director of Common Cause Maryland, referenced similar concerns as Feldman, saying that over the last few years, the public has been questioning the actions of former governors.
'Conflicts of interest are cancerous to our democracy,' she said. 'When our elected officials put their interests first, what they're sending is a message to the public that the state doesn't think their needs are a priority.'
---------
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrat-controlled budget office wrongly analyzed Trump's big bill, missed record savings, White House says
The White House is challenging the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office's assessment that President Donald Trump's sweeping tax and spending package will raise the federal deficit by trillions of dollars throughout the next decade. The national debt, currently $36.2 trillion, tracks what the U.S. owes its creditors, while the national deficit measures how much the federal government's spending exceeds its revenues. So far, the federal government has spent more than $1 trillion more than it has collected this fiscal year, according to the Department of the Treasury. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) issued an analysis Wednesday predicting that the so-called "big, beautiful, bill" the House passed in May would increase the federal deficit by $2.4 trillion over the next 10 years. But according to the White House, the CBO's analysis is based on a faulty premise because it assumes that Republicans in Congress will fail to extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts. Rather, the White House's Office of Management and Budget (OMB) forecasts that the tax and spending measures would independently reduce deficits by $1.4 trillion. Senate Weighs Trump's 'Big, Beautiful, Bill' As Policy Group Backs Cbo, Projects $3 Trillion Debt Increase Read On The Fox News App Additionally, the White House argues that the measure, coupled with other initiatives like tariffs and other spending cuts, will lead to reducing the deficit by at least $6.6 trillion over 10 years. The "big, beautiful, bill" has faced criticism from figures including SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who labeled the measure an "abomination" and argued that the bill would increase the federal deficit. The measure now heads to the Senate, where lawmakers, including Sen. Rand Paul, R-K.Y., have voiced opposition to the legislation. Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Faces Resistance From Republican Senators Over Debt Fears Meanwhile, OMB Director Russell Vought told lawmakers on the House Appropriations Committee Wednesday that he believed the CBO's analysis was "fundamentally wrong." "It will lead to reduced deficits and debt of $1.4 trillion," Vought said. "It will reduce mandatory savings of $1.7 trillion. I don't think the way they construct their baseline, not only does it not give a fair shake to economic growth, but it fundamentally misreads the economic consequences of not extending the current tax relief." Failure to pass Trump's tax package would trigger a recession, according to Vought. "We'll have a recession," Vought told lawmakers. "The economic storm clouds will be very dark. I think we'll have a 60% tax increase on the American people." Meanwhile, the White House has accused the CBO of employing those who've contributed to Democratic campaigns, even though CBO Director Phillip Swagel served in former President George W. Bush's administration. Price Tag Estimate For House Gop Tax Package Rises To $3.94T "I don't think many people know this: There hasn't been a single staffer in the entire Congressional Budget Office that has contributed to a Republican since the year 2000," Leavitt told reporters Tuesday. "But guess what, there have been many staffers within the Congressional Budget Office who have contributed to Democratic candidates and politicians every single cycle since. So unfortunately, this is an institution in our country that has become partisan and political." The CBO director is appointed according to the recommendations of the House and Senate Budget Committees. Then-Sen. Mike Enzi, R-Wyoming, first recommended Swagel in 2019, and then Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, recommended Swagel again in 2023. The CBO did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital on OMB's analysis or claims from the White House about the office being full of staffers who've backed Democrats. Fox News' Deirdre Heavey contributed to this report. Original article source: Democrat-controlled budget office wrongly analyzed Trump's big bill, missed record savings, White House says
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Idaho rethinks LGBTQ rights as laws, symbols, and support face pushback
Stories by Idaho Statesman journalists, with AI summarization This collection of stories examines recent efforts by Idaho lawmakers and officials to restrict LGBTQ rights in public spaces, marriage, sports, education, and community symbols. State legislators advanced a resolution to revoke same-sex marriage rights and praised decisions by Boise State's women's volleyball team to opt out of matches involving transgender athletes. Businesses like Micron and St. Luke's have pulled back public support for diversity, equity and inclusion programs, with St. Luke's employees voicing disappointment over the decision not to fly the Pride flag during Pride Month. Boise officials kept flying the Pride flag at City Hall despite a new law banning non-government flags, and city leaders debated how to navigate the law's lack of penalties. At the Nampa Public Library, a youth club flyer led to public disputes, while statewide book bans faced lawsuits over their impact on LGBTQ content and First Amendment rights. Read the stories below. Boise State has forfeited two volleyball games against San Jose State this season, including one that was scheduled for Thursday. | Published November 19, 2024 | Read Full Story by Shaun Goodwin 'Unfortunately ... there are Republican factions that have infiltrated Idaho who only support constitutional rights if they are in alignment with what they believe.' | Published November 23, 2024 | Read Full Story by Carolyn Komatsoulis 'This is yet another example of the extreme wing of the Republican Party ginning up divisive social issues in order to create problems where none exist,' said Idaho's Democratic leadership. | Published January 7, 2025 | Read Full Story by Ian Max Stevenson Idaho voters should have enough self-respect to punish this abuse of government power at the ballot box. | Opinion | Published February 5, 2025 | Read Full Story by Bryan Clark Boise 'will continue' to fly the Pride flag outside City Hall, a spokesperson said. She did not answer a question about whether the city knew that it was illegal. | Published April 11, 2025 | Read Full Story by Sarah Cutler Idaho companies like Micron and St. Luke's face growing political pressure on diversity-related initiatives. | Published June 2, 2025 | Read Full Story by Angela Palermo We don't approach this viewpoint from a political or personal value system. We approach it from the lens through which we healthcare workers view every patient encounter... | Opinion | Published June 2, 2025 | Read Full Story by Undersigned St. Luke's employees The Trump administration has been rolling back diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives. | Published May 31, 2025 | Read Full Story by Carolyn Komatsoulis Laws like this one can be problematic, a lawyer said. | Published June 5, 2025 | Read Full Story by Carolyn Komatsoulis The summary above was drafted with the help of AI tools and edited by journalists in our News division. All stories listed were reported, written and edited by McClatchy journalists.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Congrats, Idaho! Portland is the only city worse than Boise for this, study says
Watching my teenage sons and their friends play an impromptu game of 'Kick the Condom' along a downtown Portland sidewalk this spring, I was reminded of a fact that few Idahoans can deny. Nothing terrifies Boise more than being compared to Rip City. Ever since NPR's 'Here & Now' wondered 'Is Boise the next Portland?' in 2017, we developed a phobia. OK, even before that. And not just about Portland's goofy hipsters, jaw-dropping homeless problem or, um, randomly scattered prophylactics. (The ones we booted were still sealed in wrappers, at least.) It's the scary housing situation — Idaho's elephant in the closet. Ours wears a construction hat and holds a jackhammer with his trunk. So when I came across a new article from LendingTree titled, 'Portland, Ore., Has Worst Housing Crisis Outlook — Here's Why,' I was mortified, yet unsurprised, to find Boise excoriated right next to its Oregon big brother on the list of really-not-good places. Portland is worst. Boise is second worst. LendingTree, an online lending marketplace, took a handful of metrics and boiled them down to what most Treasure Valley residents inherently know. We've got a big-city housing predicament with nary a glimmer of light at the end of the tunnel. Boise wages stink. Home prices are insane. And availability is flat-out cooked. 'The vacancy rates in Portland and Boise are less than half of those in many other big metros,' said Matt Schulz, chief consumer finance analyst for LendingTree. 'When that happens, prices rise, making things even more expensive. Unfortunately, this isn't likely to change in many of the most troubled metros because the data shows that insufficient building is being done.' However, Boise actually is an exception. 'That's not the case in Boise,' Schulz continued in a prepared statement, 'where new permits are among the highest in the nation, but it's the case in Portland, Bridgeport (Connecticut) and other metros with similar rankings. That doesn't bode well for the near future.' Portland's No. 1 spot on the Housing Crisis Wall of Shame mainly was due to the aforementioned scant available housing scenario and the wallet-melting prices. Portland has the fourth-lowest vacancy rate (4.76%) — and 13th-highest home value-to-income ratio (5.57). As the article explains, 'This means median home values are 5.57 times more than the median income; the higher the ratio, the higher the unaffordability. The median home value in Portland is $526,500, while the median household income is $94,573.' Boise's home-to-value income ratio is about the same — 5.25. What really jumps out is the city's increase in home value-to-income ratio — fourth-fastest in the nation. It skyrocketed 7.12% from 2022 to 2023. In other words, those low-paying jobs aren't keeping up with those high-priced houses. 'A widening gap,' LendingTree explains, 'speaks to growing unaffordability.' Boise also has the second-lowest vacancy rate (4.56%), according to LendingTree — even if Schulz thinks we should be encouraged by all the planned construction. Northwest and West metros essentially owned the top of the housing crisis list. After Portland and Boise, the next four worst cities were Bridgeport (the exception), Spokane, Salt Lake City and Denver. Want to know where to move? 'Southern metros account for all five with the best outlook,' LendingTree says. 'McAllen, Texas, leads, with the lowest home value-to-income ratio at just 2.37. The median home value is $124,000, while the median household income is $52,281.' Can you even buy a Garden City trailer for $124,000? Then again, who wants to live in Texas? (Apologies to my brother in Austin. I'd live there just for the breakfast tacos.) Before we end this diatribe by proclaiming in unison that 'Portland sucks!' I will admit this. My kids and their friends had a ball visiting Oregon. They checked out Portland State, Lewis & Clark College and other nearby universities. (I wanna go back to school and attend beautiful Oregon State!) They watched their parents down pints at McMenamins in downtown Portland. And they tolerated me loitering joyfully upstairs in the Rare Book Room at Powell's City of Books, the world's biggest independent bookstore. I definitely like a few things about Portland. But I love a lot about Boise. I just hope we all can afford to keep living here.