logo
#

Latest news with #BlinneNiGhralaigh

Palestine Action ban challenged after arrests soar
Palestine Action ban challenged after arrests soar

The National

time21-07-2025

  • Politics
  • The National

Palestine Action ban challenged after arrests soar

Days after more than 100 protesters were arrested around the UK during regular demonstrations over the Gaza war, lawyers have blamed a government ban on Palestine Action for the wave of arrests. During a motion to reverse the proscription of the group, Blinne Ni Ghralaigh warned that the effect of proscription was already significant on the right to demonstrate against the conflict. 'Dozens and dozens of people have been arrested for protesting, seated and mostly silent protest,' she said. More than 100 people were arrested around the country during demonstrations this weekend protesting against the proscription, with protests held in London, Manchester, Edinburgh, Bristol and Truro on Saturday. Saturday's arrests brought the total number of people arrested since the ban came into force to more than 200, with more than 72 arrested around the UK last weekend and 29 the week before. On Saturday 55 people were held at a demonstration in London's Parliament Square under the Terrorism Act 2000 for displaying signs supporting Palestine Action, the Metropolitan Police said. The protesters held up placards reading: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' Another nine were detained at a separate London march, and a further eight were held in Truro in Cornwall. Other protests were held in north-western Manchester where 16 people were detained, in western Bristol where another 17 were arrested and in the Scottish capital Edinburgh, police said. The rallies were organised by campaign group Defend Our Juries, which had said they were intended to 'defy' the ban. The Home Office is defending Monday's legal challenge, arguing that Palestine Action could challenge the decision at the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission (POAC), a specialist tribunal, rather than at the High Court. Another Palestine Action lawyer Raza Husain told the court during opening arguments that the POAC was not 'convenient nor effective' in this case. 'It would be quite absurd to say that we should tolerate the consequences of the proscription … even if it is unlawful, and just go to POAC,' he told the judges. Ms Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes, which police said caused about £7 million of damage. The government contends the group the threshold of a terror organisation by carrying out an act of sabotage intended to change government policy. Since the Labour Party under Keir Starmer won power in the general election last year, ministers have tightened arms exports to Israel but not conceded to its critics in adopting a wholesale ban. Mr Husain argued however the proscription of Palestine Action was repugnant to the tradition of the common law and contrary to the European Convention on Human Rights. The barrister continued: 'The decision is so extreme as to render the UK an international outlier.' Mr Husain added: 'The decision to proscribe Palestine Action had the hallmarks of an authoritarian and blatant abuse of power.' 'The consequences are not just limited to arrest,' Mr Husain said, telling the court there was 'rampant uncertainty' in the aftermath of the ban.

Irish lawyer presents genocide risk case against Israel at ICJ
Irish lawyer presents genocide risk case against Israel at ICJ

Middle East Eye

time28-04-2025

  • Politics
  • Middle East Eye

Irish lawyer presents genocide risk case against Israel at ICJ

Some more key arguments from Blinne Ni Ghralaigh's ICJ presentation: Genocidal conduct allegations : UN Commission of Inquiry and human rights experts confirm Israel's actions meet genocide criteria Current proceedings focus specifically on Israel's legal obligations to provide humanitarian aid Palestinians face "real and imminent" genocide risk requiring urgent international action ICJ authority affirmed : Court maintains full jurisdiction to rule on Israel's international law obligations Must determine member states' duty to prevent potential genocide Israel's procedural objections lack legal merit Evidence suppression : Israel actively blocks UN investigative teams from accessing Gaza Systematic destruction and burial of potential war crime evidence Creates evidentiary obstacles for future accountability processes International obligations : All states bear responsibility to prevent violations of fundamental norms Prohibition of genocide requires concrete preventive actions Court must issue clear directives regarding humanitarian protections

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store