21 hours ago
Judge voids Virginia Beach district-based election system, but not results
VIRGINIA BEACH — A Circuit Court judge ruled Monday that the district-based election system Virginia Beach imposed to comply with federal voting rights law is void. According to the ruling, that's because the General Assembly did not vote to pass corresponding legislation that would have officially changed the city's charter.
Attorneys said Monday's summary judgement, means that the '10-1' system used in the past two local election cycles is not permitted unless and until the state legislature passes legislation that amends the city charter to that effect. However, the ruling applies only to future elections — the results of the previous two elections that used the 10-1 system are upheld. The next City Council elections are in the fall of 2026.
Circuit Judge Randall D. Smith issued the ruling from the bench.
Former council member Linwood Branch and other residents initially brought the suit last summer, saying the city had illegally removed the three at-large seats.
'We're very pleased with today's ruling,' said Brandan Goodwin, the attorney representing Branch and the other plaintiffs. 'We think the judge got it absolutely right when he found that City Council did not have the authority to abolish those at-large seats.'
The City Council adopted an ordinance in 2023 instituting the '10-1' election system in conjunction with the city's 10-year redistricting measure, which meant that Virginia Beach residents across 10 districts vote for a City Council member only in the district they live in, plus the mayor. But the city's charter provides for a 7-3-1 system, where residents vote for a council member in one of seven districts where they reside, plus three at-large members and the mayor. The General Assembly passed legislation in 2021 that requires, in localities with district-based election residency requirements, for members to be elected by voters who live in the district and not by voters from the locality at large. But subsequent attempts to change the city's charter have failed.
The city's position is that there are not redistricting maps to be drawn that result in seven districts and comply with the state and federal Voting Rights Act, and Virginia Beach will continue to defend the 10-1 system until voters say otherwise.
'The current reality is that all the council members are determined duly elected, so this only has impact on the future,' said Chris Boynton, Virginia Beach's deputy city attorney. '(The ruling) is a disappointment certainly, but it doesn't change the immediate reality, which is everybody's looking to the referendum to see where this goes next.'
In the meantime, Virginia Beach voters will have the opportunity to weigh in on how their elections should be conducted in November. A referendum on the ballot will pose the question: 'Should the method of city council elections set forth in the Virginia Beach City Charter be changed from a modified 7-3-1 system to a 10-1 system?'
If the answer is yes, the Virginia Beach City Council can ask the state legislature — again — to pass legislation that would modify the charter to reflect the change. Because Virginia is a Dillon Rule state, the city cannot by itself amend the charter. Gov. Glenn Youngkin has historically vetoed similar legislation, citing the ongoing litigation.
The voting system shake up came after a federal judge ruled in 2021 that the city's at-large voting system violated the federal 1965 Voting Rights Act because it 'denies Hispanics, African Americans and Asians equal access to the electoral and political process.' With the referendum on the horizon, that judge has indicated he could reopen the case.
Kate Seltzer, (757)713-7881
