29-04-2025
NRI Talk: Ideal allocation for NRIs - 60% equity, 20% debt, and a global twist, says Prashant Tandon
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel
In a dynamic global investment landscape , finding the right asset allocation strategy is crucial for NRIs looking to optimize their portfolios. Prashant Tandon , Executive Director at Waterfield Advisors, offers a comprehensive view on how NRIs should approach their investments over the next 3-5 a balanced strategy that emphasizes 60% equity, 20% debt, and a global diversification angle, Tandon outlines the ideal framework for managing risk while capitalizing on growth insights, particularly in the context of global market turbulence and emerging opportunities in India, offer valuable guidance for NRIs seeking to secure long-term wealth. Edited Excerpts –A) President Donald Trump's recent implementation of sweeping tariffs has significantly impacted global equity markets, leading to substantial declines and heightened has been a blood bath in the Global Markets following Trump's announcement of universal tariffs, with the barometer S&P 500 declining ~20% from its all-time tariffs have intensified fears of a global recession, leading investors to seek safe-haven assets such as U.S. Treasuries and the Japanese yen. Analysts warn of continued market volatility and potential economic downturns if trade tensions persist.A) As we started the Calendar Year 2025, we continued to adopt a conservative stance and an underweight in US Equities, especially US Large it was our belief that we are entering an era where we were reaching the limits of US advised investors move into high quality fixed income assets such as short-dated US Treasuries. Additionally, gold can be looked for diversification and improving risk-adjusted returns.A) We suggest investors overweight geographies where valuations are more sanguine from a long-term is a glaring mismatch between US equity market capitalisation (67%) and its share in the global economy (~30%).The likely impact of Trump's policies could be a catalyst to trigger the long overdue reversion to includes China, Japan, Europe and UK as well as other Emerging Markets. Thus, investors should consider rebalancing from areas of overvaluation to regions of more balanced valuations and take a few chips off the table in US equities.A) Sectors where India has a competitive advantage as well as where tariffs are lower in comparison to other countries could be and Apparels, Chemicals, Electronics, Automobile and Auto components could be sectors that could see some traction and movement away from China.A) International markets provide the much-needed diversification when domestic markets face headwinds, especially an exodus of Foreign Institutional can access these markets via Feeder funds or via the LRS route by setting up overseas investing accounts.A) We have received numerous inquiries from investors in Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities. By embracing digital enablement, recognizing local dynamics, and aligning with the aspirations of these dynamic markets, companies have the opportunity to drive growth while playing a key role in the economic transformation of India's heartland.A) We recommend maintaining capital in the form of dry powder or highly liquid investments that can be strategically deployed when opportunities arise. Commodities also provide effective diversification, particularly gold, silver, and a broad mix of uncorrelated strategies like Arbitrage Funds and Absolute Return Funds can offer a buffer against trade-driven global market volatility, as their returns are not tied to traditional asset classes.A) This factor depends on the risk profile of the individual. For a balanced portfolio, we would suggest 60% Equity allocation, 20% fixed income allocation, 10% commodities, 5% international allocations and 5% in REITs and InvITs. Even investments in Private Markets can be considered.(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)
