Latest news with #Cevallos
Business Insider
25-05-2025
- Business
- Business Insider
Frustrated job seekers are giving up on their dream roles: 'I'll take almost anything'
Sarah Cevallos misses her old job. The 41-year-old spent much of her career building her own health tech practice in California, helping cancer patients navigate the complexities of their diagnoses. For a while, the role was rewarding — she felt her work was helping people. After she left in 2021, she bounced between opportunities at other health startups. She was laid off from her most recent employer in summer 2024, but was confident her résumé would quickly secure her a C-Suite role elsewhere. For eight months, rejection after rejection wore down her morale. "Being unemployed is not easy," Cevallos said. When she landed her current job — also in health tech, but with a heavier focus on finance instead of patient care — she felt a mix of relief and disappointment. "I am currently at an organization where I am using a fraction of my skills, and I supplement my income with other consulting work," she told Business Insider. She added that she "had to make a decision": wait for the perfect role, or start earning a paycheck. Taking a so-so job because you need the money isn't new, but the 2025 job search is especially characterized by a dwindling number of postings, the threat of artificial intelligence, and a high likelihood of being ghosted. The steady rise since early 2023 in the number of job seekers who count as long-term unemployed is a stark contrast to the quick job-hopping of the pandemic economic recovery. Flip-flopping policy from the White House and tanking economic sentiment mean white-collar industries are wary of hiring. Traditional paths to work at nonprofits, science labs, and government agencies have been hit by sweeping federal funding and staffing cuts. Employees are staying put, even if they aren't happy in their roles. In recent months, BI has heard from over 750 Americans across generations who are on the job hunt. Many don't have the luxury of choosing whether their passion or the money matters most at work. They're taking whatever they can find. "It's got to be very, very difficult to make the choice of paying the bills or finding purpose at work," Kyle M.K., a talent strategy advisor at the job-search platform Indeed told BI. "Unfortunately, in a lot of cases, that is a decision that many people have to make." Of course, there are still some bright spots in the overall economic outlook. The US added a higher-than-expected number of jobs in April, and inflation cooled. Some economists are also rolling back their predictions of a 2025 recession. For now, Cevallos is grateful she earns enough money to afford expenses and save for her daughter's college education. Someday, she hopes to pivot back to helping oncology patients — the "industry that I dedicated my life to." From dream job to 'I'll accept almost anything' While many Americans do have a dream job in mind, some are finding that the work they feel most excited about isn't what pays the bills. A February report by the HR platform Nectar found that less than 40% of Americans are excited about their roles and responsibilities at work, and Gallup reported that employee engagement dropped to its lowest level in a decade last year. "Unfortunately, sometimes people start a job and they realize it's not right for them, and they're either stuck or they're back in the job market," M.K. said. "Either way, not a great position for anyone to be in. It's not good for the job seeker. It's not good for the employer." M.K. added that finding purpose in the work you do is "a very important part about being a human." Still, he said the economic climate has changed, and it's more common now for employees to focus on their foundational needs — like paying rent and affording groceries — over their psychological needs. This differs from a few years ago during " The Great Resignation," when Americans were quitting more often and prioritizing emotional fulfillment in their jobs, he said. Herb Osborne, 71, can relate. Unable to afford retirement, he works full-time for a Bay Area business that makes olive oil and charcuterie accessories and combs through financial documents as a hotel auditor on weekends. His hours often stretch across seven days a week, leaving Osborne exhausted. "I have not had a four- or five-day span of vacation in 10 years, and that tears at you," he said. In an ideal world, Osborne wishes he were spending his 70s traveling and spending time with friends. He doesn't mind his current job, but he said the lack of PTO and work-life balance can feel crushing. He misses the joy he felt interacting with customers and leading staff in his early career — he held a string of managerial roles at Sharper Image, Little Caesars, and a jewelry store, and speaks of each one fondly. "Financially, for me, it is really almost imperative that I work," he said, adding that he needs to bring home over $5,000 a month on top of his roughly $2,000 in Social Security to cover expenses. "I do work every day in order just to survive. And it's scary now at the age I'm at, because Social Security doesn't cover anything." Abbey Owens, 21, is in a different life phase but facing a similar dilemma. The New York resident graduated this month with her bachelor's degree and, in a perfect scenario, she'd land a role in social media marketing. She's fascinated by marketing strategies, and after four years of studying and internships, she's "really good at it," she said. Since this past fall, she has applied to nearly 100 marketing and communications jobs, with no luck yet. Because she wants to be financially independent postgrad, Owens said she's now open to taking any job she's "even somewhat" qualified for and would accept "any amount as long as it paid the bills." "What I look for in a job has gotten so much broader in this process," she said. "It was very specific originally, and it's just really grown into: 'I'll accept almost anything.'" Her backup plan is to be a bartender. However, M.K. said working a job you aren't happy doing has emotional consequences, even if it's necessary to earn a paycheck. He advised job seekers to prioritize jobs that best fit their skills and areas of interest, even if the job title or company itself is different from their initial goal. And, while people are hanging onto stability right now, M.K. said it doesn't necessarily mean they don't care about finding purpose at work. Some are likely biding their time until it feels safer to make a change. "In a world of uncertainty, there is less movement between jobs and people are sticking around," he said. "But they haven't stopped searching for well-being." Do you have a story to share? If so, contact this reporter at allisonkelly@ or via Signal at alliekelly.10;.
Yahoo
31-03-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Jumpmind Hires Lauren Cevallos to Lead Product Strategy and Customer Success
Former industry analyst will help guide the company's product and solution roadmap to align to customer needs and requirements COLUMBUS, Ohio, March 31, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jumpmind, Inc., a leading provider of innovative retail technology solutions, today announced it has appointed Lauren Cevallos to lead product strategy and customer success initiatives. A former commerce technology analyst at Forrester, Cevallos will lead Jumpmind's efforts to align product strategy and innovation with customer requirements, strengthen customer relationships and anticipate market trends. At Forrester, Cevallos researched POS software, associate empowerment and consumer expectations for the in-store experience. She also guided Fortune 500 companies on their technology buying decisions and retail initiatives. "As Jumpmind's growth accelerates, Lauren will play a key role ensuring our long-term technology and product vision and innovation are centered around customer needs," said Jumpmind CEO and President Joe Corbin. "We're excited to have her join the team at this pivotal moment in the transformation of the retail store." Cevallos joins Jumpmind at a time when demand for its mobile POS technology is growing rapidly. Jumpmind, used by retailers such as American Eagle Outfitters, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Petco and The Vitamin Shoppe, recently expanded its global footprint with new operations in EMEA and the Middle East, following the successful launch of Landmark Retail, one of the largest retail conglomerates in the region. The technology provider also launched the Jumpmind Cloud in January, offering retailers a near-effortless way to take Jumpmind's advanced POS and unified promotion solutions operational in a matter of days. "Jumpmind has a fantastic product, and I believe strongly in the company's vision to transform the store," said Cevallos. "The care and integrity the Jumpmind team brings to working with clients is a key differentiator in the sector. I'm excited to join the team, and I look forward to amplifying the transformational work Jumpmind is doing with major retailers." For more information about Jumpmind, visit About Jumpmind Jumpmind is a leading provider of innovative retail technology solutions. Our cloud-native, mobile POS platform empowers retailers to streamline operations, enhance customer experiences, and achieve sustainable growth. With a future-proof architecture and a focus on delivering exceptional value to our clients, Jumpmind is committed to shaping the future of retail technology. Jumpmind powers inspired in-store experiences for a growing list of leading retailers, including American Eagle Outfitters, Build-A-Bear Workshop, DTLR, Petco, Reitmans Canada Ltd., Shoe Palace, The Paper Store, Landmark Group, and The Vitamin Shoppe. Learn more about Jumpmind at View source version on Contacts Media Contact: Erin LutzLutz Public Relations and Marketing (for Jumpmind)949.293.1055erin@ Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
11-02-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
MSNBC legal analyst pushes back on 'Morning Joe' co-hosts sounding alarm on 'constitutional crisis'
MSNBC legal analyst Danny Cevallos pushed back on the notion that President Donald Trump was creating a "constitutional crisis" during an appearance on "Morning Joe" on Tuesday. "I think we need to be careful with the term 'constitutional crisis' because, as I define it, that would be a situation where the Constitution doesn't have an answer and there is a pressing conflict," Cevallos said. "The flurry of executive orders, the chaos, that I think doesn't get us to crisis yet. It is irritating for the courts, it is challenging. It could lead to a serious problem if, as you said, they become too congested with dealing with these orders." MSNBC host Mika Brzezinski referenced The New York Times, who published a report with several legal scholars arguing that Trump was creating a "constitutional crisis." "The crisis occurs and we've already talked about it at the moment when there is a court order and the president or the administration refuses to follow it, because historically, we don't really have a clear answer for what to do in that situation," he added. 'Constitutional Crisis': The Impound Control Act Takes Center Stage After Russel Vought's Confirmation Democrats, including Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., also argued that Trump was creating a constitutional crisis. Read On The Fox News App Cevallos also said that Trump issued flurries of executive orders in his first term and he was doing the same in his second. "Issuing a bunch of executive orders, not only do we know that the courts can handle it, they already did this back in 2017. This is the same M.O. The Trump administration then would just fire out executive orders – it felt like they weren't even spell checking them," he said. "And then they would let the courts prune them like the proverbial bonsai tree, or they would just withdraw them and go back to the drawing board. It's probably not the most efficient way of doing it. It's chaotic. As you said, it's problematic." Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture "But 'constitutional crisis' for me is the moment the court issues an order and the administration resists. You could say that the last notable occurrence was when [former President Richard] Nixon initially refused to comply with a subpoena issued by the Supreme Court. Eventually he capitulated," Cevallos added. "But history is full of these near-crisis examples. The question is, what do we do going forward?" Several of the Trump administration's actions, such as the federal funding freeze and the barring of the Department of Government Efficiency's (DOGE) access to personal data, have been challenged by Democratic attorneys general and several states that took issue with the executive orders. Trump and Vice President JD Vance have pushed back on the restraining orders from the judges. The president's DOJ specifically said that the judge's decision to bar the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing personal data was "anti-constitutional."Original article source: MSNBC legal analyst pushes back on 'Morning Joe' co-hosts sounding alarm on 'constitutional crisis'
Fox News
11-02-2025
- Politics
- Fox News
MSNBC legal analyst pushes back on 'Morning Joe' co-hosts sounding alarm on 'constitutional crisis'
MSNBC legal analyst Danny Cevallos pushed back on the notion that President Donald Trump was creating a "constitutional crisis" during an appearance on "Morning Joe" on Tuesday. "I think we need to be careful with the term 'constitutional crisis' because, as I define it, that would be a situation where the Constitution doesn't have an answer and there is a pressing conflict," Cevallos said. "The flurry of executive orders, the chaos, that I think doesn't get us to crisis yet. It is irritating for the courts, it is challenging. It could lead to a serious problem if, as you said, they become too congested with dealing with these orders." MSNBC host Mika Brzezinski referenced The New York Times, who published a report with several legal scholars arguing that Trump was creating a "constitutional crisis." "The crisis occurs and we've already talked about it at the moment when there is a court order and the president or the administration refuses to follow it, because historically, we don't really have a clear answer for what to do in that situation," he added. Democrats, including Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., also argued that Trump was creating a constitutional crisis. Cevallos also said that Trump issued flurries of executive orders in his first term and he was doing the same in his second. "Issuing a bunch of executive orders, not only do we know that the courts can handle it, they already did this back in 2017. This is the same M.O. The Trump administration then would just fire out executive orders – it felt like they weren't even spell checking them," he said. "And then they would let the courts prune them like the proverbial bonsai tree, or they would just withdraw them and go back to the drawing board. It's probably not the most efficient way of doing it. It's chaotic. As you said, it's problematic." "But 'constitutional crisis' for me is the moment the court issues an order and the administration resists. You could say that the last notable occurrence was when [former President Richard] Nixon initially refused to comply with a subpoena issued by the Supreme Court. Eventually he capitulated," Cevallos added. "But history is full of these near-crisis examples. The question is, what do we do going forward?" Several of the Trump administration's actions, such as the federal funding freeze and the barring of the Department of Government Efficiency's (DOGE) access to personal data, have been challenged by Democratic attorneys general and several states that took issue with the executive orders. Trump and Vice President JD Vance have pushed back on the restraining orders from the judges. The president's DOJ specifically said that the judge's decision to bar the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing personal data was "anti-constitutional."
