Frustrated job seekers are giving up on their dream roles: 'I'll take almost anything'
Sarah Cevallos misses her old job.
The 41-year-old spent much of her career building her own health tech practice in California, helping cancer patients navigate the complexities of their diagnoses. For a while, the role was rewarding — she felt her work was helping people. After she left in 2021, she bounced between opportunities at other health startups.
She was laid off from her most recent employer in summer 2024, but was confident her résumé would quickly secure her a C-Suite role elsewhere. For eight months, rejection after rejection wore down her morale.
"Being unemployed is not easy," Cevallos said. When she landed her current job — also in health tech, but with a heavier focus on finance instead of patient care — she felt a mix of relief and disappointment.
"I am currently at an organization where I am using a fraction of my skills, and I supplement my income with other consulting work," she told Business Insider. She added that she "had to make a decision": wait for the perfect role, or start earning a paycheck.
Taking a so-so job because you need the money isn't new, but the 2025 job search is especially characterized by a dwindling number of postings, the threat of artificial intelligence, and a high likelihood of being ghosted. The steady rise since early 2023 in the number of job seekers who count as long-term unemployed is a stark contrast to the quick job-hopping of the pandemic economic recovery.
Flip-flopping policy from the White House and tanking economic sentiment mean white-collar industries are wary of hiring. Traditional paths to work at nonprofits, science labs, and government agencies have been hit by sweeping federal funding and staffing cuts. Employees are staying put, even if they aren't happy in their roles.
In recent months, BI has heard from over 750 Americans across generations who are on the job hunt. Many don't have the luxury of choosing whether their passion or the money matters most at work. They're taking whatever they can find.
"It's got to be very, very difficult to make the choice of paying the bills or finding purpose at work," Kyle M.K., a talent strategy advisor at the job-search platform Indeed told BI. "Unfortunately, in a lot of cases, that is a decision that many people have to make."
Of course, there are still some bright spots in the overall economic outlook. The US added a higher-than-expected number of jobs in April, and inflation cooled. Some economists are also rolling back their predictions of a 2025 recession.
For now, Cevallos is grateful she earns enough money to afford expenses and save for her daughter's college education. Someday, she hopes to pivot back to helping oncology patients — the "industry that I dedicated my life to."
From dream job to 'I'll accept almost anything'
While many Americans do have a dream job in mind, some are finding that the work they feel most excited about isn't what pays the bills. A February report by the HR platform Nectar found that less than 40% of Americans are excited about their roles and responsibilities at work, and Gallup reported that employee engagement dropped to its lowest level in a decade last year.
"Unfortunately, sometimes people start a job and they realize it's not right for them, and they're either stuck or they're back in the job market," M.K. said. "Either way, not a great position for anyone to be in. It's not good for the job seeker. It's not good for the employer."
M.K. added that finding purpose in the work you do is "a very important part about being a human." Still, he said the economic climate has changed, and it's more common now for employees to focus on their foundational needs — like paying rent and affording groceries — over their psychological needs. This differs from a few years ago during " The Great Resignation," when Americans were quitting more often and prioritizing emotional fulfillment in their jobs, he said.
Herb Osborne, 71, can relate. Unable to afford retirement, he works full-time for a Bay Area business that makes olive oil and charcuterie accessories and combs through financial documents as a hotel auditor on weekends. His hours often stretch across seven days a week, leaving Osborne exhausted.
"I have not had a four- or five-day span of vacation in 10 years, and that tears at you," he said.
In an ideal world, Osborne wishes he were spending his 70s traveling and spending time with friends. He doesn't mind his current job, but he said the lack of PTO and work-life balance can feel crushing. He misses the joy he felt interacting with customers and leading staff in his early career — he held a string of managerial roles at Sharper Image, Little Caesars, and a jewelry store, and speaks of each one fondly.
"Financially, for me, it is really almost imperative that I work," he said, adding that he needs to bring home over $5,000 a month on top of his roughly $2,000 in Social Security to cover expenses. "I do work every day in order just to survive. And it's scary now at the age I'm at, because Social Security doesn't cover anything."
Abbey Owens, 21, is in a different life phase but facing a similar dilemma. The New York resident graduated this month with her bachelor's degree and, in a perfect scenario, she'd land a role in social media marketing. She's fascinated by marketing strategies, and after four years of studying and internships, she's "really good at it," she said. Since this past fall, she has applied to nearly 100 marketing and communications jobs, with no luck yet.
Because she wants to be financially independent postgrad, Owens said she's now open to taking any job she's "even somewhat" qualified for and would accept "any amount as long as it paid the bills."
"What I look for in a job has gotten so much broader in this process," she said. "It was very specific originally, and it's just really grown into: 'I'll accept almost anything.'" Her backup plan is to be a bartender.
However, M.K. said working a job you aren't happy doing has emotional consequences, even if it's necessary to earn a paycheck. He advised job seekers to prioritize jobs that best fit their skills and areas of interest, even if the job title or company itself is different from their initial goal. And, while people are hanging onto stability right now, M.K. said it doesn't necessarily mean they don't care about finding purpose at work. Some are likely biding their time until it feels safer to make a change.
"In a world of uncertainty, there is less movement between jobs and people are sticking around," he said. "But they haven't stopped searching for well-being."
Do you have a story to share? If so, contact this reporter at allisonkelly@businessinsider.com or via Signal at alliekelly.10;.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Only Two Republicans Were Brave Enough to Vote Against Medicaid Cuts
House Republicans passed Trump's 'big, beautiful' spending bill by just one vote early Thursday morning. After hours of deliberation, the bill passed 215–214, an incredibly slim margin that highlights the lack of political cohesion within the GOP. Two Republican representatives—Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Warren Davidson of Ohio—voted with the Democrats. The bill will include even more funding for the military and more funding for Trump's border crackdown, while slashing crucial programs like Medicaid, Medicare, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, and also repealing clean energy credits put in place by the Biden administration. Up to 15 million Americans will be uninsured by 2034 due to the bill's cuts, and 7.6 million will be at risk of losing Medicaid, according to estimates from the Congressional Budget Office. 'What we're going to do here this morning is truly historic, and it will make all the difference in the daily lives of hardworking Americans.… To put it simply, this bill gets Americans back to winning again, and it's been a long time coming,' Speaker Mike Johnson said, in a floor speech prior to the vote. Democrats are accusing the GOP of pushing the anti-working-class bill 'under the cover of darkness.' 'Here's what it will mean for the American people,' Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said, prior to the vote. 'Children will get hurt. Women will get hurt. Older Americans who rely on Medicaid for nursing home care and for home care will get hurt. People with disabilities who rely on Medicaid to survive, will get hurt. Hospitals in your districts will close. Nursing homes will shut down. And people will die.' This story has been updated.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New Ruling Moves Oregon Closer to Legal In-Home Psilocybin Use
A lawsuit seeking the development of in-home psilocybin services for individuals with disabilities in Oregon will continue after a U.S. district court denied a motion to dismiss on May 30. The case could set an important precedent for future drug laws and accessibility for all Americans, including those with disabilities. In 2020, 56 percent of Oregonians voted in favor of the Oregon Psilocybin Services Act (Measure 109), which directed the Oregon Health Authority to license and regulate psilocybin products and services for individuals aged 21 and older. While a handful of cities in the U.S. had previously decriminalized psilocybin, Oregon was the first state to both decriminalize and create a legal regulatory framework for its supervised use. After two years of rule drafting, the OHA began accepting applications in 2023 for licensed psilocybin service centers, which are regulated facilities where psilocybin can be administered. Rather than focus on selling a product, service centers are geared toward health and wellness and are designed to offer support before, during, and after psilocybin use by licensed service facilitators. This model opened up psilocybin use for most Oregon residents but makes accessing psilocybin services impossible for individuals unable to leave home because of a disability. To fix this oversight in the law, four practitioners licensed by the state to guide people through psilocybin experiences have alleged that the current OHA process fails to reasonably accommodate those with disabilities as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Cusker et al v. OHA was filed after the OHA denied the plaintiffs' request for a process to be developed for in-home psilocybin services to people with disabilities who are unable to visit service centers. In response to the request, state attorneys argued that "there is no legal pathway to make accommodations for psilocybin to be consumed outside of a licensed service center" and that Measure 109 "would need to be amended for accommodations to be permitted." Although the measure only allows the use of psilocybin under facilitator supervision at a service center—which has to comply with specific location requirements, including stipulations prohibiting a center from being located within "the limits of an incorporated city or town" or in areas "zoned exclusively for residential use"—others believe the OHA has the authority and flexibility needed to interpret the language consistent with ADA requirements. But the OHA has declined to address the issue through rule making. The plaintiffs filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon since the claim revolves around the OHA violating the ADA, a federal law. While psilocybin was decriminalized and legally regulated under Oregon law, it remains classified as a Schedule I controlled substance under the federal Controlled Substances Act. The OHA filed a motion to dismiss the case, arguing that the federal court lacked jurisdiction to decide the case because plaintiffs were asking the court to violate both state and federal law. The federal court would have to order the OHA to break federal law if it required the agency to produce, possess, or administer a Schedule I drug. The OHA also argued that the court would have to order a violation of Oregon's Controlled Substances Act if it required the agency to dispense psilocybin outside of a service center. Ultimately, the court denied the OHA's motion to dismiss, relying on case law involving a non-ADA-compliant marijuana dispensary. In Smith v. 116 S Market LLC (2020), Michael Smith, who is paraplegic, encountered difficulty accessing a dispensary due to a lack of accessible parking spaces, uneven ground between the parking lot and entry, and a noncompliant ramp. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Smith, granting him $4,000 in statutory damages for each encounter, under the rationale that the decision did not force the dispensary owner to distribute a Schedule I drug but merely required ADA compliance—which does not violate federal law. By adopting this reasoning, Cusker will be able to move forward. The post New Ruling Moves Oregon Closer to Legal In-Home Psilocybin Use appeared first on
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DC Council pauses $2 raise for tipped workers
The Brief D.C. Council voted to delay scheduled $2 wage increase for tipped workers. Mayor Bowser pushing to repeal Initiative 82, citing economic challenges. Council's decision has sparked controversy among business owners and workers. WASHINGTON - Tipped workers in the District will not see their scheduled wage increase next month after the D.C. Council voted Tuesday to pause the $2 raise. The decision comes as Mayor Muriel Bowser seeks support for her proposed budget, which aims to address economic challenges for the city. Economic pressures are being felt across sectors, with rising office vacancy rates, uncertainty in the hotel industry, and restaurant closures at D.C.'s Wharf. Bowser is pushing for the repeal of Initiative 82, which raises the base wage for tipped workers. A salary increase to $12 an hour had been scheduled to take effect in July. READ MORE: DC Council votes to pause Initiative 82 $2 raise for tipped workers Restaurant owners argue that rising food costs and fewer customers make the higher wages unaffordable. The council's vohttps:// delays the increase to allow for further study of the economic impact, sparking controversy across the District. What we know Bowser's proposed 2026 budget outlines plans to move forward amid reduced federal support. The District was blindsided when Republican lawmakers blocked the release of local revenues. Federal downsizing could lead to vacant office spaces and the potential loss of 40,000 jobs over the coming years. Bowser's budget plan includes downtown investments during the Capital One Arena renovation, efforts to bring the Washington Commanders back to the RFK Stadium site, and incentives for tech companies through business development changes. While the budget avoids tax increases and layoffs, it imposes a hiring freeze and cuts certain social programs. The council is expected to vote on the budget in August. READ MORE: Tipping culture is "out of control," more Americans say in annual poll The Source Information in this article comes from the Restaurant Association of Metropolitan Washington and the D.C. City Council.