logo
#

Latest news with #ChristopherWesley

Families whose ancestors gave up Indigenous status sue to have rights restored
Families whose ancestors gave up Indigenous status sue to have rights restored

National Post

time3 days ago

  • Politics
  • National Post

Families whose ancestors gave up Indigenous status sue to have rights restored

VANCOUVER — A proposed class-action lawsuit filed in Federal Court says the Canadian government wrongfully denies people status under the country's Indian Act if their ancestors 'voluntarily' gave up Indigenous status under laws that predate Confederation. Article content Plaintiffs Charles Wesley, Christopher Wesley, Sharon Nicholas and Nicole Nicholas filed a statement of claim in Vancouver this month seeking damages from the federal government for 'being deprived of the benefits' of status under the act. Article content Article content Article content The claim says they all have 'at least one direct ancestor' who was 'enfranchised' under Canadian law, where they gave up their status and received the rights and privileges of Canadian citizenship. Article content Article content The lawsuit says their 'family history of enfranchisement' means they and their children and grandchildren are not eligible to register for status, depriving them of 'tangible economic, educational, and health benefits of Indian status.' Article content The claim says the federal government has already 'conceded' that the act's registration provisions are unconstitutional in a legal challenge filed by Sharon Nicholas and Nicole Nicholas in B.C. Supreme Court, a case heard earlier this year with a decision pending. Article content The claims says it is 'misleading' to refer to enfranchisement as voluntary because it was often done 'under considerable duress' because it spared their children from residential schooling, and women and children were also automatically enfranchised if their husbands or fathers applied. Article content

Families whose ancestors gave up Indigenous status sue for rights return
Families whose ancestors gave up Indigenous status sue for rights return

CTV News

time3 days ago

  • Politics
  • CTV News

Families whose ancestors gave up Indigenous status sue for rights return

The Canadian flag flies atop the Peace Tower on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Wednesday, Oct. 30, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick A proposed class-action lawsuit filed in Federal Court says the Canadian government wrongfully denies people status under the country's Indian Act if their ancestors 'voluntarily' gave up Indigenous status under laws that predate Confederation. Plaintiffs Charles Wesley, Christopher Wesley, Sharon Nicholas and Nicole Nicholas filed a statement of claim in Vancouver this month seeking damages from the federal government for 'being deprived of the benefits' of status under the act. The claim says they all have 'at least one direct ancestor' who was 'enfranchised' under Canadian law, where they gave up their status and received the rights and privileges of Canadian citizenship. The lawsuit says their 'family history of enfranchisement' means they and their children and grandchildren are not eligible to register for status, depriving them of 'tangible economic, educational, and health benefits of Indian status.' The claim says the federal government has already 'conceded' that the act's registration provisions are unconstitutional in a legal challenge filed by Sharon Nicholas and Nicole Nicholas in B.C. Supreme Court, a case heard earlier this year with a decision pending. The claims says it is 'misleading' to refer to enfranchisement as voluntary because it was often done 'under considerable duress' because it spared their children from residential schooling, and women and children were also automatically enfranchised if their husbands or fathers applied. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 13, 2025.

Families whose ancestors gave up Indigenous status sue for rights return
Families whose ancestors gave up Indigenous status sue for rights return

Toronto Star

time3 days ago

  • Politics
  • Toronto Star

Families whose ancestors gave up Indigenous status sue for rights return

VANCOUVER - A proposed class-action lawsuit filed in Federal Court says the Canadian government wrongfully denies people status under the country's Indian Act if their ancestors 'voluntarily' gave up Indigenous status under laws that predate Confederation. Plaintiffs Charles Wesley, Christopher Wesley, Sharon Nicholas and Nicole Nicholas filed a statement of claim in Vancouver this month seeking damages from the federal government for 'being deprived of the benefits' of status under the act.

Families whose ancestors gave up Indigenous status sue for rights return
Families whose ancestors gave up Indigenous status sue for rights return

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Politics
  • Yahoo

Families whose ancestors gave up Indigenous status sue for rights return

VANCOUVER — A proposed class-action lawsuit filed in Federal Court says the Canadian government wrongfully denies people status under the country's Indian Act if their ancestors "voluntarily" gave up Indigenous status under laws that predate Confederation. Plaintiffs Charles Wesley, Christopher Wesley, Sharon Nicholas and Nicole Nicholas filed a statement of claim in Vancouver this month seeking damages from the federal government for "being deprived of the benefits" of status under the act. The claim says they all have "at least one direct ancestor" who was "enfranchised" under Canadian law, where they gave up their status and received the rights and privileges of Canadian citizenship. The lawsuit says their "family history of enfranchisement" means they and their children and grandchildren are not eligible to register for status, depriving them of "tangible economic, educational, and health benefits of Indian status." The claim says the federal government has already "conceded" that the act's registration provisions are unconstitutional in a legal challenge filed by Sharon Nicholas and Nicole Nicholas in B.C. Supreme Court, a case heard earlier this year with a decision pending. The claims says it is "misleading" to refer to enfranchisement as voluntary because it was often done "under considerable duress" because it spared their children from residential schooling, and women and children were also automatically enfranchised if their husbands or fathers applied. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 13, 2025. The Canadian Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store