16-07-2025
Teacher sacked on professional incompetence grounds loses unfair dismissal claim
A primary school teacher dismissed from her job on the grounds of professional incompetence has lost her claim for unfair dismissal.
This follows Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) Adjudicator Emile Daly finding that teacher Ruth Lydon was not unfairly dismissed by the Board of Management (BOM) of St. Ciaran's National School, Fuerty, Co Roscommon after a marathon WRC process.
Ms Daly made her ruling after 10 WRC hearing days held over a two-and-a-half-year period from October 17 2022 to May 12 of this year.
Ms Lydon worked as a Special Education Teacher (SET) and was dismissed from her role by the school BOM in September 2021.
St. Ciaran's National School is a 60-pupil, three-teacher school. Ms Lydon started teaching at the school in 2002 and in 2010 she became the main SET.
In her evidence, school principal Rosita Murphy told the WRC that in October 2017, Ms Lydon had stopped communicating with the other staff and children's parents.
Ms Murphy said that in a small school in a local community, the situation became untenable. Parents made complaints about discipline in Ms Lydon's class.
Ms Murphy said that in November 2017, there was ongoing evidence that Ms Lydon was unable to discipline or manage her classrooms.
Outlining disciplinary issues in the classroom in February 2018, Ms Murphy alleged that children were hiding in the toilet without Ms Lydon noticing and children were walking around the classroom during class.
Ms Murphy further alleged that in early March 2018, more complaints were received from parents, books were thrown in the classroom and belongings of children were rifled by other children, which caused upset.
Ms Murphy stated that misbehaviour was met with weak and inconsistent responses such as 'Don't do that again, good boy'.
Ms Murphy said that the issues went beyond discipline where Ms Lydon would concentrate on one child while the rest of the class were all talking and misbehaving.
Ms Murphy also alleged that children were raising their voices, on one occasion chanting 'fight, fight, fight,', which Ms Lydon failed to control and children were not doing their work during class.
Ms Murphy alleged that on one occasion, a child used inappropriate language, using the words 'f**king bitch' and Ms Lydon reprimanded the child in front of the whole class, saying 'you can't use words like 'you f**king bitch''.
Ms Murphy stated that Ms Lydon did not appear to think that there was anything wrong about her repeating these words in front of the children.
A child's project was destroyed by another child and when Ms Murphy allegedly addressed this with Ms Lydon, she said it was not up to her to Pritt-stick.
Ms Murphy alleged in March 2018, Ms Lydon took a day off 'to do timetables'.
Ms Murphy initiated a competency process for Ms Lydon in January 2023 as part of the Circular Process and in May 2018, commenced a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) around five areas - Classroom discipline; Standard of Teaching; Engagement with Pupils; Engagement with Parents and Staff and Planning of Classwork.
As part of the PIP, Ms Murphy found that 'Under Poor Engagement with Pupils', Ms Murphy said in response to a question from a child, Ms Lydon said she was 'allowed wear slippers because she was an adult and could wear what she wants'.
Ms Murphy found three of Ms Lydon's pupils sitting in the staff room, having asked her if they could go to the toilets. Ms Murphy found that there was no improvement during the PIP.
Peadar O'Muiri was appointed by the Department of Education Chief Inspector to attend the school to assess Ms Lydon's professional competence as part of an external review in the Circular Process.
Mr O'Muiri made three inspection visits and found that Ms Lydon was not performing at an acceptable level of professional competence in her role.
In her findings, Ms Daly stated that given Mr O'Muiri's findings, that Ms Lydon's work was weak in all areas of competency that he assessed, it is hard to see how the Board Of Management (BOM) had any option other than to respond in the most serious way – which was to proceed to disciplinary action.
A Department of Education circular 49/2018 provides a statutory mechanism for a school to suspend and/or dismiss a teacher.
Ms Daly stated that 'there is a widely-held misconception that a teacher cannot be dismissed from their teaching post. But this is not so, a teacher may be dismissed if there are appropriate grounds to do so and if Circular 49/2018 is followed'.
Ms Daly stated that given the length of time that the Circular Process took - three and a half years - she has little doubt that the impact that this process had on Ms Lydon, the school management, the children attending this small school and their parents "was difficult, attritional and damaging'.
Ms Daly said that she was satisfied that, over time, Ms Lydon did not improve to the level that was required to provide an appropriate education to the children in her care. The school principal said there was ongoing evidence that the teacher was unable to discipline or manage her classrooms (Image: Colin Keegan, Collins Agency, Dublin)
Ms Daly concluded that much time was spent on recording what Ms Lydon regarded to be unfair treatment and making bullying allegations against the School Principal, Ms Murphy, and insufficient time was spent actively listening to the critical feedback that she was receiving from Ms Murphy, her line manager, and reflecting on how she needed to improve the standard of her teaching.
Ms Daly stated that if there is anything the BOM could be criticised for, it is for allowing the process to go on as long as it did.
Ms Daly stated that she was satisfied that the School Principal, Ms Murphy, carried out her duties in accordance with the terms of Stage 1 of the Circular and until she correctly disengaged from the process having completed her Stage 2 report to the BOM.
Ms Daly stated that Department Inspector Mr O'Muiri observed in his report a failure by Ms Lydon to engage with the children, inadequate support plans, inadequate targets or measured progress, disorganisation, not getting through the teaching that was required, not engaging with pupils, reading from text books while children became disengaged.
Ms Daly stated that Mr O'Muiri's findings 'were stark' and Ms Lydon failed every competency that she was assessed on.
Ms Daly stated that she was satisfied that the decision by the BOM to dismiss Ms Lydon by letter dated 18 March 2021 was within a band of reasonable responses to the uncontested findings of the Inspector.
The BOM decision was upheld by a Disciplinary Appeals Panel (DAP) made up of an independent chair appointed by the Education Minister, a representative of a management body and a trade union representative.
Ms Daly said that she was satisfied that the Circular Process was adhered to by both the school and the Department of Education.
The WRC hearing heard that Ms Lydon has obtained other teaching work since her dismissal.
At hearing, Ms Lydon said that she thought the PIP was a complete nonsense and Ms Murphy's report on the PIP was also a nonsense.
Ms Lydon said that she considers the whole Circular process was prejudged by Ms Murphy and the BOM and that she didn't really stand a chance of remaining in her post from the point that it was started.
In the case, the BOM was represented by Cathy McGready BL instructed by Lorcan Maule of Mason Hayes and Curran, while Ms Lydon was represented by Niamh Ni Leathlobhair BL and Mark O'Connell BL, instructed by Dalippe Lalloo, Lalloo & Co Solicitors.
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here.
The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week
