Latest news with #ContemptofCourtAct
Glasgow Times
13-05-2025
- Glasgow Times
Dumbarton man appears in court charged with alleged rape
Jamie McGillivary appeared at Dumbarton Sheriff Court on May 9 over a series of allegations against the 35-year-old. He is charged with indecent assault and rape, of stalking, and of assault to severe injury. Mr McGillivary, from Dumbarton, is further charged with an assault to injury and danger of life. Another charge relates to sexual coercion and communicating indecently. A further allegation is abuse of a partner or ex, and he is charged with attempting to pervert the course of justice. READ NEXT: 'Do you know who we are?': Pair knifed four strangers in less than two hours READ NEXT: Chef mugged and battered in NCP car park as robbers demand money There are also eight more charges under the Sexual Offences (Scotland) Act 2009. Mr McGillivary appeared in private at the court where he made no plea or declaration and was committed for further examination. He was remanded in custody. The case is now live and restrictions apply under the Contempt of Court Act.
NDTV
01-05-2025
- Politics
- NDTV
High Court Issues Notices To Delhi, Cops Over Bomb Threats In Schools
New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Thursday issued notices to government's chief secretary and police in the capital after a plea alleged failure on their part in formulating a comprehensive mechanism to combat emergent situations such as bomb threats in schools. Justice Anish Dayal called it a serious issue, saying it required the urgent attention of authorities especially when repeated hoax calls had become very common and troubled children, their parents and schools. The plea before Justice Dayal claimed authorities were in contempt of the court's November 14 2024 order which directed them to develop a comprehensive action plan with a detailed standard operating procedure (SOP) to address such concerns. The directions required the government agencies and police to develop the mechanism within eight weeks of the issuance. On Thursday, the court sought an update on the matter and posted the hearing on May 19, when government and police officials were asked to remain present. In his plea, petitioner advocate Arpit Bhargava alleged inaction and negligent approach of Delhi government and Delhi Police in addressing the recurring bomb threat emails received by schools in the capital. He claimed the eight-week period got over on January 14, 2025, but there was no intimation on either the formulation or implementation of any detailed action plan or SoP in line with the court order. Advocate Beenashaw N Soni, representing Bhargava, underlined an "apparent" disregard of the court orders by authorities and ineptness in acting in larger public interest. She said the court's directions were aimed at ensuring safety and security of school children and educational institutions in the event of bomb threats or similar emergencies. "Continued failure of the contemnors/respondents to implement the directions of this court has left the school ecosystem across Delhi vulnerable to the recurring menace of bomb threats," the petitioner argued. The contempt plea went on, "These threats, regardless of their actual veracity, create an environment of fear and panic among children, teachers, and parents. The lack of a standardised response protocol and preventive measures directly endangers the safety and mental health of lakhs of school going children in the capital." Seeking coercive steps in line with Contempt of Court Act, the plea sought the court to impose punitive cost of litigation in favour of the petitioner and against authorities. The SOP, the high court in November 2024 said, should clearly outline the roles and responsibilities of all stakeholders, including law enforcement agencies, school management and municipal authorities ensuring seamless coordination and implementation. Hoax threats, particularly those perpetrated through sophisticated methods such as the dark web and VPNs, were not unique to Delhi or even India and they were a global problem which continued to challenge the law enforcement agencies worldwide, it added. Delhi Police previously revealed the presence of five bomb disposal squads and 18 bomb detection teams for over 4,600 schools in the capital. The petitioner initially approached the court in 2023 in the wake of a hoax bomb threat to the Delhi Public School, Mathura Road.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
01-05-2025
- Politics
- Business Standard
Delhi HC issues notice to govt, police over plea on school bomb threats SOP
Justice Anish Dayal called it a serious issue, saying it required the urgent attention of authorities especially when repeated hoax calls had become very common Press Trust of India New Delhi The Delhi High Court on Thursday issued notices to government's chief secretary and police in the capital after a plea alleged failure on their part in formulating a comprehensive mechanism to combat emergent situations such as bomb threats in schools. Justice Anish Dayal called it a serious issue, saying it required the urgent attention of authorities especially when repeated hoax calls had become very common and troubled children, their parents and schools. The plea before Justice Dayal claimed authorities were in contempt of the court's November 14 2024 order which directed them to develop a comprehensive action plan with a detailed standard operating procedure (SOP) to address such concerns. The directions required the government agencies and police to develop the mechanism within eight weeks of the issuance. On Thursday, the court sought an update on the matter and posted the hearing on May 19, when government and police officials were asked to remain present. In his plea, petitioner advocate Arpit Bhargava alleged inaction and negligent approach of Delhi government and Delhi Police in addressing the recurring bomb threat emails received by schools in the capital. He claimed the eight-week period got over on January 14, 2025, but there was no intimation on either the formulation or implementation of any detailed action plan or SoP in line with the court order. Advocate Beenashaw N Soni, representing Bhargava, underlined an "apparent" disregard of the court orders by authorities and ineptness in acting in larger public interest. She said the court's directions were aimed at ensuring safety and security of school children and educational institutions in the event of bomb threats or similar emergencies. "Continued failure of the contemnors/respondents to implement the directions of this court has left the school ecosystem across Delhi vulnerable to the recurring menace of bomb threats," the petitioner argued. The contempt plea went on, "These threats, regardless of their actual veracity, create an environment of fear and panic among children, teachers, and parents. The lack of a standardised response protocol and preventive measures directly endangers the safety and mental health of lakhs of school going children in the capital." Seeking coercive steps in line with Contempt of Court Act, the plea sought the court to impose punitive cost of litigation in favour of the petitioner and against authorities. The SOP, the high court in November 2024 said, should clearly outline the roles and responsibilities of all stakeholders, including law enforcement agencies, school management and municipal authorities ensuring seamless coordination and implementation. Hoax threats, particularly those perpetrated through sophisticated methods such as the dark web and VPNs, were not unique to Delhi or even India and they were a global problem which continued to challenge the law enforcement agencies worldwide, it added. Delhi Police previously revealed the presence of five bomb disposal squads and 18 bomb detection teams for over 4,600 schools in the capital. The petitioner initially moved court in 2023 in the wake of a hoax bomb threat to the Delhi Public School, Mathura Road.
Hindustan Times
01-05-2025
- Politics
- Hindustan Times
SOP over bomb threats in schools: Delhi HC issues notice to govt, police on plea seeking contempt
New Delhi, The Delhi High Court on Thursday issued notices to government's chief secretary and police in the capital after a plea alleged failure on their part in formulating a comprehensive mechanism to combat emergent situations such as bomb threats in schools. Justice Anish Dayal called it a serious issue, saying it required the urgent attention of authorities especially when repeated hoax calls had become very common and troubled children, their parents and schools. The plea before Justice Dayal claimed authorities were in contempt of the court's November 14 2024 order which directed them to develop a comprehensive action plan with a detailed standard operating procedure to address such concerns. The directions required the government agencies and police to develop the mechanism within eight weeks of the issuance. On Thursday, the court sought an update on the matter and posted the hearing on May 19, when government and police officials were asked to remain present. In his plea, petitioner advocate Arpit Bhargava alleged inaction and negligent approach of Delhi government and Delhi Police in addressing the recurring bomb threat emails received by schools in the capital. He claimed the eight-week period got over on January 14, 2025, but there was no intimation on either the formulation or implementation of any detailed action plan or SoP in line with the court order. Advocate Beenashaw N Soni, representing Bhargava, underlined an "apparent" disregard of the court orders by authorities and ineptness in acting in larger public interest. She said the court's directions were aimed at ensuring safety and security of school children and educational institutions in the event of bomb threats or similar emergencies. "Continued failure of the contemnors/respondents to implement the directions of this court has left the school ecosystem across Delhi vulnerable to the recurring menace of bomb threats," the petitioner argued. The contempt plea went on, "These threats, regardless of their actual veracity, create an environment of fear and panic among children, teachers, and parents. The lack of a standardised response protocol and preventive measures directly endangers the safety and mental health of lakhs of school going children in the capital." Seeking coercive steps in line with Contempt of Court Act, the plea sought the court to impose punitive cost of litigation in favour of the petitioner and against authorities. The SOP, the high court in November 2024 said, should clearly outline the roles and responsibilities of all stakeholders, including law enforcement agencies, school management and municipal authorities ensuring seamless coordination and implementation. Hoax threats, particularly those perpetrated through sophisticated methods such as the dark web and VPNs, were not unique to Delhi or even India and they were a global problem which continued to challenge the law enforcement agencies worldwide, it added. Delhi Police previously revealed the presence of five bomb disposal squads and 18 bomb detection teams for over 4,600 schools in the capital. The petitioner initially moved court in 2023 in the wake of a hoax bomb threat to the Delhi Public School, Mathura Road.
Time of India
22-04-2025
- Politics
- Time of India
WB terms plea seeking president's rule 'bundle of reckless allegations'
Under Section 15 of the Contempt of Court Act , 1971, a contempt petition by a citizen, other than a party to a case where the court has passed an order and which has been disobeyed, can be filed in the SC only after obtaining prior consent in writing from either the attorney general or the solicitor general. Agnihotri's 2021 petition had alleged that immediately after the TMC govt was re-elected, Hindus were being targeted by Muslims to take revenge for their support for BJP. "Soon after the declaration of result on May 2, 2021, Trinamool Congress workers and supporters started creating chaos, unrest and setting houses and properties of Hindus on fire, looting and plundering their belongings for the reason that they had supported BJP in the assembly election." Advocate Jain requested Justice BR Gavai-led bench to permit him to file additional documents relating to the recent spate of violence resulting in Hindus fleeing their houses in Murshidabad. West Bengal govt in its response termed the petition a bundle of "reckless allegations" being used as a tool to create communal tension in the state by insulting certain religious groups and beliefs. It said the petitioner, despite being earlier indicted by Allahabad HC for lying, had again indulged in blatant falsehood to create fear psychosis by alleging that illegal Bangladeshi Muslim migrants and Rohingya Muslims in the state were committing acts of violence against Hindus.
