logo
#

Latest news with #DOGEService

The government is paying 154,000 people not to work
The government is paying 154,000 people not to work

Washington Post

time5 days ago

  • Business
  • Washington Post

The government is paying 154,000 people not to work

This spring, the Trump administration and Elon Musk's U.S. DOGE Service drastically reduced the federal workforce, all in the name of cost-cutting. This included making a 'deferred resignation' offer to government workers, offering to pay them through at least the end of September if they resigned their positions. Post reporter Meryl Kornfield and colleagues have been trying for months to find out exactly how many federal employees took these buyouts. Last week, they reported for the first time that the government is now paying more than 154,000 people not to work. Colby Itkowitz speaks with Meryl about how she and her colleagues uncovered this number, how the Trump administration defends its claims of cost-cutting, and how former federal workers are feeling as they continue to earn a paycheck for work they are not doing. Today's show was produced by Peter Bresnan. It was edited by Maggie Penman and mixed by Sean Carter. Subscribe to The Washington Post here.

CEO of Elon Musk's X, Linda Yaccarino, resigns
CEO of Elon Musk's X, Linda Yaccarino, resigns

IOL News

time10-07-2025

  • Business
  • IOL News

CEO of Elon Musk's X, Linda Yaccarino, resigns

Linda Yaccarino, the CEO of Elon Musk's X, announced on Wednesday that she is stepping down from the social media platform after two years in the position. Image: AFP Linda Yaccarino, the CEO of Elon Musk's X, announced on Wednesday that she is stepping down from the social media platform after two years in the position. She made the announcement a day after the platform's artificial intelligence chatbot launched into an antisemitic tirade and invoked Adolf Hitler. Yaccarino, who was hired by Musk after he bought the company then known as Twitter in 2022, did not give a reason for her departure Wednesday. Yaccarino led the social media platform through a tumultuous period as Musk remade Twitter in his vision - which included loosening content rules and reinstating previously banned accounts that spread misinformation and conspiracy theories. Musk himself frequently used his platform, which he renamed X, to spread falsehoods and post about his own right-wing political views on issues such as immigration and crime. During the 2024 election campaign, the billionaire leveraged the platform to promote Donald Trump, then also used it as a vehicle to tout the controversial budget cuts and layoffs he was spearheading at the US. DOGE Service once Trump took office. In the past month, Musk took to X to air his grievances about the president and his signature tax and spending bill, culminating in a public falling out between the two. 'When @elonmusk and I first spoke of his vision for X, I knew it would be the opportunity of a lifetime to carry out the extraordinary mission of this company,' Yaccarino said in her Wednesday post. 'I'm immensely grateful to him for entrusting me with the responsibility of protecting free speech, turning the company around, and transforming X into the Everything App.' In March, Musk said he sold his social media company to xAI, his artificial intelligence start-up, which runs its chatbot Grok. Musk has described Grok as unfiltered and dedicated to 'rigorous pursuit of the truth,' a contrast to other companies' chatbots that he says are trained on politically correct sources. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Grok has produced a flood of offensive responses recently, days after Musk touted updates that would train it on information that is 'politically incorrect, but nonetheless factually true.' The offensive and antisemitic comments this week have alarmed users and leaders around the world. A Turkish court blocked Grok in the country Wednesday after Grok criticised Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, mocked Islam and insulted the founder of Turkey on X. 'I'll eradicate your family's roots, water the soil with your blood,' Grok wrote of Erdogan in a since-deleted post, adding that the Turkish president was a 'snake.' Under the Turkish penal code, it is a crime to 'openly insult the religious values of a section of the public' and denigrate the founder of Turkey. It is also illegal to criticize the president, a law Erdogan has increasingly wielded to clamp down on dissent. Turkey's action is the first nationwide ban on an AI chatbot, though Turkey has long sought to restrict certain X accounts and previously threatened to ban X. The country was the top requester of content takedown in the second half of 2024, according to an X transparency report. Turkish officials were to meet with representatives from xAI on Wednesday, Bloomberg reported. Poland also reported X to the European Commission, the executive arm of the European Union, after the chatbot made antisemitic comments and insulted Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk. Grok called Tusk 'a f---ing traitor' and 'an opportunist who sells sovereignty for EU jobs.' Following an investigation, the European Commission could fine X for Grok's comments. 'We are entering a higher level of hate speech, which is driven by algorithms, and … turning a blind eye or ignoring this today … is a mistake that may cost humanity in the future,' Polish Digitization Minister Krzysztof Gawkowski told RMF FM radio Wednesday. 'Freedom of speech belongs to humans, not to artificial intelligence.' Other countries on the receiving end of Grok's ire have yet to take action. Israel - 'that clingy ex still whining about the Holocaust,' according to Grok - has not commented on the chatbot's antisemitic posts. In a statement posted on xAI's account for Grok, company officials said they are 'aware of recent posts made by Grok and are actively working to remove the inappropriate posts.' They said they would improve Grok's training model. On Wednesday, Musk said in a post that 'Grok was too compliant to user prompts. Too eager to please and be manipulated, essentially. That is being addressed.' Yaccarino, NBCUniversal's former chairman of global advertising and partnerships, did not address the recent controversy in her resignation post Wednesday. Kenny Joseph, associate director of AI and society at the Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Data Science at the University at Buffalo, said Yaccarino's more traditional media background may not be a good fit for Musk's AI-centered vision for the company. 'It's not a media company, but more of a company that is working to build an AI product,' he said. In her post Wednesday, Yaccarino said X is 'truly a digital town square for all voices and the world's most powerful culture signal.'

Musk vows to start a third party. Funding's no issue, but there are others.
Musk vows to start a third party. Funding's no issue, but there are others.

Washington Post

time02-07-2025

  • Business
  • Washington Post

Musk vows to start a third party. Funding's no issue, but there are others.

If money talks in American politics, Elon Musk is bellowing. Having spent $288 million last year to spur Trump and his allies into office, Musk has a new message as the president's massive tax and immigration bill appears headed for passage: Get in line with the cost-cutting agenda you campaigned on or get out of office. There's no doubt that the richest man in the world could make a sizable impact at a time of widespread distrust of the political system and other democratic institutions. But his threat this week to start a third major political party has been met with widespread skepticism, as critics pointed to numerous failed bids over decades — including by lesser business titans — to disrupt America's two-party system. Musk's challenges go far beyond the fraught history of third-party attempts. His business empire is struggling in the wake of his aggressive foray into politics. His clash with Trump and his costly and unsuccessful effort to elect a Wisconsin Supreme Court judge have eroded his political capital. And his popularity plummeted as the U.S. DOGE Service, the cost-cutting effort he oversaw, upended the federal government, further exposing Americans to his polarizing persona and ideas. Even some of Musk's own supporters have expressed doubts about the direction he now plans to take, preferring that he stay focused on the business ideas that fueled his net worth of roughly $400 billion. But as his improbable bid to buy Twitter and front-and-center role in the 2024 election showed, Musk has defied expectations before. If nothing else, he could make life difficult for lawmakers he says have reneged on their promise to cut spending. 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!' Musk wrote on X, the social media platform he bought when it was still named Twitter, this week. 'And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth.' Musk, who didn't respond to a request for comment, has already identified his next target: the reelection campaign of Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Kentucky), who opposes Trump's signature legislative package. Urged to support Massie by former GOP congressman Justin Amash, a Trump foe who declared himself an independent in a 2019 op-ed decrying the two-party system as an 'existential threat,' Musk replied, 'I will.' Massie did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday about Musk starting a third party, but he posted a Fox News story about the chief executive's plans to donate to his campaign. 'An interesting thing just happened,' Massie wrote on X. With Trump already working to defeat Massie next year, the race in northern Kentucky appears to be the first to pit the two billionaires against each other. On Capitol Hill, where the Senate passed the massive tax and spending bill Tuesday afternoon, there were few signs of alarm about Musk. Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Oklahoma), when asked by reporters Monday evening about Musk's threats to punish Republicans who vote for Trump's plan, said the billionaire is not top of mind at the Capitol. 'Doesn't matter, doesn't matter at all, no. It's not even been a conversation of ours,' he said. 'I mean, if we ran every time someone said something about our election, we'd live in fear the whole time.' Unless that someone is Trump. Two Republican lawmakers who have been at odds with Trump both said in rapid succession this week that they would not seek reelection. Rep. Don Bacon (Nebraska), who has taken issue with Trump's tariffs and policy toward Russia, announced his retirement Monday. The day before, Sen. Thom Tillis (North Carolina) said he would not seek a third term after Trump vowed to punish him for opposing his legislative package. That leaves Massie as one of the only points of Republican resistance in Congress to Trump's agenda. Musk's decision to cast himself as a potential third-party leader raises questions about his political vision. It has just been in the last few years that he has evolved from Democratic-leaning Trump critic to staunchly Republican Trump acolyte. Trump allies mocked his latest incarnation. 'I think it's the ketamine talking in the middle of the night,' said Trump pollster Jim McLaughlin, referring to media reports about Musk's drug use that he has denied. 'Trump is the Republican Party right now. He is the conservative movement. There's not a hankering for a third party with Elon Musk.' A Gallup poll last year found that 58 percent of U.S. adults agree that a third party is needed in the U.S. because the Republican and Democratic parties 'do such a poor job' of representing the American people. Support for a third party has averaged 56 percent since 2003, according to Gallup. History shows that third-party candidates are rarely victorious. Ross Perot, one of the most successful independent candidates for president in American history, received about 19 percent of the popular vote and no electoral college votes. 'Third parties are traditionally spoilers or wasted votes,' said Lee Drutman, senior fellow at the New America think tank. 'But if Musk's goal is to cause chaos and make a point and disrupt, it gets a lot easier.' Ralph Nader's presidential bid in 2000 was a classic example of a disruptive campaign, Drutman said, contributing to an outcome so close that Republican George W. Bush prevailed over Democrat Al Gore only after the Supreme Court weighed in. The trend in the U.S. toward increased political polarization also makes it more difficult for third-party candidates, Drutman said. When Perot ran in 1992, Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush were both running as centrists, allowing Perot to argue that there wasn't much daylight between the two major parties. By contrast, the differences between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump in the 2024 election were much more stark. America's political diversity also complicates matters, Drutman said. 'If there clearly was a party in the center that was more popular than the Democrats or the Republicans, then someone would have organized it by now,' he said. 'It's not like we've just been waiting for Elon Musk to show up.' Musk entered politics in earnest during the 2024 presidential election. Beyond his massive financial investment, Musk frequently appeared alongside Trump at rallies and cheered him on over X. But since Trump's win, Musk's experience in politics has been turbulent. Earlier this year, the billionaire and groups affiliated with him donated more than $20 million in a bid to help conservatives take control of the Wisconsin Supreme Court. In the final stretch of the campaign, Musk drew derision for wearing a foam cheesehead at a town hall and for directing his America PAC to pay registered voters for signing petitions. A couple of voters won $1 million prizes. But even with the race flooded with Musk's cash, the conservative judicial candidate — whom Trump also endorsed — lost by a wide margin in April. Musk's personal presence in the race did his candidate harm, said Barry Burden, director of the University of Wisconsin's Elections Research Center. Conservative voters appreciated Musk's money, but that wasn't enough to overcome negative perceptions of an ultra-wealthy outsider injecting himself into the state's politics, Burden said, adding that Musk's presence galvanized greater liberal turnout. 'A new party is going to benefit most from Musk if they can draw on his resources but keep him in the background,' Burden said. 'And if he can portray himself as an innovator and a tech entrepreneur — and somebody who is really contributing to the American economy and funding this new operation without being its front person — I think that's probably going to lead to the most success.' Musk floated his idea of a new party nearly one month ago on June 5, after days of criticizing the massive GOP tax bill as a measure that would burden the country with 'crushingly unsustainable debt.' 'Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?' Musk wrote, along with a poll. Since then, Musk has regularly posted about starting a new party and going after lawmakers who vote for the spending bill. 'If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day,' Musk wrote Monday. A person who has served as a sounding board for Musk, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive matter, questioned Musk's ultimate strategy in undermining a party he had hoisted to victory beyond wanting 'to be in the driver's seat.' 'I agree our government is broken, but it's a tougher problem to fix than landing a rocket,' the person said. Paul Kane contributed to this report.

DOGE loses control of US federal grants website
DOGE loses control of US federal grants website

The Independent

time29-06-2025

  • Business
  • The Independent

DOGE loses control of US federal grants website

The US DOGE Service, responsible for Elon Musk 's federal spending cut initiative, has reportedly lost access to a key government website. is a critical platform distributing approximately $500 billion in annual federal awards, making the loss a significant setback for the DOGE initiative. Earlier, DOGE had assumed control of the website, leading to a backlog of grant proposals and risking unspent funds by the fiscal year-end. Federal officials were recently instructed to cease routing grant proposals through DOGE following Musk's split from the Trump administration. The initiative has reportedly fallen significantly short of its $1 trillion savings target, achieving only about $180 billion, although the administration says DOGE's work will continue in a decentralized manner without Musk.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store