19 hours ago
'Making America militarized again': Use of military in U.S. erodes democracy, veteran advocates say
Spouses experiencing health emergencies alone, because their loved ones are serving on the streets of Los Angeles. Troops fatigued by a mission they weren't prepared for. Children of active-duty troops left without their parents, who were deployed on U.S. soil.
Such incidents are happening because of the Trump administration's decision to send troops to Los Angeles, said Brandi Jones, organizing director for the Secure Families Initiative, a nonprofit that advocates for military spouses, children and veterans.
"We've heard from families who have a concern that what their loved ones have sacrificed and served in protection of the Constitution, and all the rights it guarantees, are really under siege right now in a way they could never have expected," Jones said Thursday during a virtual news conference.
On the eve of Independence Day, veterans, legal scholars and advocates for active-duty troops warned that sending troops to quell protests in California's largest city threatens democratic norms. Under a 147-year-old law, federal troops are barred from being used for civilian law enforcement.
Dan Maurer, a retired lieutenant colonel who is now a law professor at Ohio Northern University, described this state of affairs during the news conference as "exactly the situation we fought for independence from," adding that President Trump is "making America militarized again."
Though 150 National Guard troops were released from protest duty on Tuesday, according to a news release from U.S Northern Command, around 3,950 remain in Los Angeles alongside 700 Marines, who are protecting federal property from protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement actions.
Read more: As Marines arrive in L.A., military experts raise concerns: 'This could spiral out of control'
Trump has defended the deployment of troops in Los Angeles, saying on his social media platform that the city "would be burning to the ground right now" if they were not sent. He has suggested doing the same in other U.S. cities, calling the L.A. deployment "the first, perhaps of many," during an Oval Office news conference.
Troops in L.A. were federalized under Title 10 of the United States code, and their purview is narrow. They do not have the authority to arrest, only to detain individuals before handing them over to police, and they are only obligated to protect federal property and personnel, according to the U.S Northern Command.
Though Marines detained a U.S. Army veteran in early June, the most active involvement they and the National Guard have had in ICE's activity is providing security during arrests, according to reports from Reuters and the CBS show "Face the Nation."
"The administration has unnecessarily and provocatively deployed the military in a way that reflects the very fears that our founding fathers had," Maurer said. "Using the military as a police force in all but name."
"The closer they [the military] act to providing security around a perimeter ... the closer they act to detaining individuals, the closer they act to questioning individuals that are suspected of being illegal immigrants, the closer the military is pushed to that Posse Comitatus line," Maurer said, referring to the law that prohibits use of troops in a law enforcement capacity on American soil. "That is a very dangerous place to be."
Other speakers argued that the use of troops in Los Angeles jeopardizes service members, placing them in a environment they were never trained for, and pitting them against American citizens.
Read more: National Guard arrives in Los Angeles as fallout from immigration raids continues
"Our Marines are our nation's shock troops, and it's entirely inappropriate that they're deployed in the streets of Los Angeles," said Joe Plenzler, a Marine combat veteran who served as platoon commander, weapons platoon commander and company executive officer for the 2nd Batallion 7th Marines, which is now deployed in downtown L.A.
Plenzler recalled that more than half of the men he served with in 2nd Batallion came from Spanish-speaking families, and some were in this country as legal permanent residents with green cards and had yet to enjoy all the benefits of citizenship.
"Think about what might be going through their heads right now, as they're being ordered to help ICE arrest and deport hardworking people who look a lot like people they would see at their own family reunions," Plenzler said.
Plenzler also contrasted the training Marines receive with those of civilian law enforcement.
"We are not cops," Plenzler said. "Marines aren't trained in de-escalatory tactics required in community policing. We don't deploy troops in civilian settings, typically because it increases the risk of excessive force, wrongful deaths and erosion of public trust."
During the 1992 L.A. riots, Marines responded with the LAPD to a domestic dispute. One officer asked the Marines to cover him, and they, mistakenly believing he was asking them to open fire, fired 200 rounds into the home.
"Our troops are under-prepared, overstretched and overwhelmed," said Christopher Purdy, founder of the nonprofit veteran advocacy group The Chamberlain Network and a veteran of the Army National Guard.
Read more: Veterans' advocates warn of low morale amid L.A. deployment: 'This is not what we signed up for'
"Guard units doing these missions are often doing them with minimal preparation," Purdy said, stating that many units are given a single civil unrest training block a year.
"When I deployed to Iraq, we spent weeks of intense training on cultural competency, local laws and customs, how we should operate in a blend of civil and combat operations," Purdy said. "If we wouldn't accept that kind of shortcut for a combat deployment, why are we accepting it now when troops are being put out on the front line in American streets?"
Each speaker reflected on the importance of holding the federal government accountable, not only for its treatment of active-duty troops, but also for how these men and women are being used on American soil.
"I reflect this Fourth of July on both the promise and the responsibility of freedom. Military family readiness is force readiness," Jones said. "At Secure Families Initiative, we're hearing from active-duty families: You can't keep the force if families are stretched thin — or if troops are used against civilians."
Added Maurer: "The rule of law means absolutely nothing if those that we democratically entrust to enforce it faithfully ignore it at will. And I think that's where we are."
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
