23-05-2025
Christopher Schurr mistrial shows prompts questions about criminal justice system
After a deadlocked jury forced a mistrial in the recent second-degree murder trial of former Grand Rapids police officer Christopher Schurr, the prosecutor's decision to forgo a do-over of the trial leaves the family of the victim Patrick Lyoya to grieve without a verdict that might have brought them closure.
Lyoya, a Congolese immigrant was stopped by Schurr in 2022 because his vehicle had bad plates. Schurr gave chase when Lyoya exited the vehicle and attempted to flee on foot. The two engaged in a furious grappling match, and while Lyoya was face-down on the ground, Schurr claims that he shot Lyoya in the head because he feared for his life after Lyoya reached for the officer's taser.
While many are frustrated by the mistrial, and subsequent decision to not retry the case, some have expressed satisfaction and appreciation for the jury's presumably thorough, careful deliberations.
In a system established to administer criminal justice we can't ask for more, right? Wrong.
More opinion: Christopher Schurr's murder trial ended in a hung jury. It still has value.
There are many people of color and other people of good will who in the wake of this mistrial are speculating about whether there would have been a hung jury, or even whether the jury deliberations would have been careful and considered if the situation had been reversed. If an African immigrant had placed a pistol against the skull of a white police officer and pulled the trigger, would there have been a rush to conviction, or instead would a jury presume the defendant's innocence as the law requires and carefully consider all evidence and exculpatory defenses?
We can't know with certainty how these jurors — 10 of them white, three Hispanic and one biracial — or any other predominantly white jury would react, but scientific findings provide a basis for unsettling questions.
In a 2018 article published in the DePaul Journal for Social Justice, legal analyst Jonathan M. Warren explains:
'While issues of racial discrimination are a problem all their own, these issues are often compounded because of the lack of jury diversity. Many times, the jury pool looks much different than the defendant, as juries across America tend to be white and upper-middle class. Instead of being tried by a jury of one's peers, a defendant usually finds himself facing 'peers' with a higher economic class, lighter skin tone, different social background, and inability to truly empathize with the defendant's circumstances. This problem is pronounced with race, especially in regard to African-Americans. For example, one study found all-white juries convict black defendants 16% more often than white defendants. However, when at least one African-American was included in the jury pool, the racial conviction gap fell to nearly even.'
This phenomenon is not a mystery. For generations this country has been conditioned to believe Black people are criminal by nature. Prior to the Civil War, free Blacks living in northern cities competed with white workers for jobs and other economic opportunities, and to justify campaigns to colonize them in Africa, lies were fabricated about the inherent criminality of Black people. During Reconstruction, when southern sheriffs determined they could make a profit from renting prisoners to plantation owners who lost their slave labor, they arrested Black people en masse amidst swirling lies about Black people's supposed rampant criminal conduct. Finally, Blacks who were defiant or 'uppity' were often accused of rapes and murders that never occurred, and then summarily killed by mobs. NAACP records reflect that between 1882 and 1968 there were 4,743 lynchings, with Blacks comprising 72% of the victims.
In the modern era, police patrolling patterns are too often fueled by stereotypes of Black criminality and white innocence. Police often create self-fulfilling prophecies by looking for crime in Black communities – and finding it, while many crimes that occur with regularity in upscale white communities go undetected.
What should be of concern to all is the fact that the presumption of criminality is a malignant phenomenon that has metastasized into other communities of color. Consider that all that is needed to prove gang membership and the need for a life sentence in a hell-hole prison in El Salvador is Latino heritage and tattoos.
But racial dynamics are not the only factor to be considered. The fact that Schurr was a police officer complicates an already complicated situation. In his article, Warren explains:
'…[T]he current composition of juries tends to be more favorable to the prosecution and police. One manifestation of this bias is through increased credibility of police testimony. Such unearned officer credibility creates an atmosphere of reduced scrutiny, as jurors are more willing to take an officer at her word without the necessary analysis, reasoning, and ultimate weighing of credibility. Less police scrutiny leads to problems for the judicial system, especially because police officers, like anyone, are not perfect.'
The prosecutor has decided not to retry the Grand Rapids case, and the community must now move forward. In doing so perhaps all will be best served by remaining acutely aware that criminal proceedings that appear to be proper unavoidably occur against a historical and social backdrop that includes racial stereotypes and implicit biases that alternately favor and disfavor certain communities and law enforcement officers.
Notwithstanding their best efforts to be fair and to render a just result, in America, no jury is immune.
Mark P. Fancher is the staff attorney for the Racial Justice Project of the ACLU of Michigan.
Submit a letter to the editor at and we may publish it online and in print.
Like what you're reading? Please consider supporting local journalism and getting unlimited digital access with a Detroit Free Press subscription. We depend on readers like you.
This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Christopher Schurr mistrial in Lyoya shooting has history | Opinion
