Latest news with #Debiak


News18
2 days ago
- News18
AI vs Human: After 600 Minutes, Machine Bows To Human Brain In World Coding Championship
Last Updated: Przemyslaw Debiak's sharp coding skills and strategy outpaced the AI's predictable logic, as he swiftly solved complex problems and claimed victory at the coding championship In a remarkable development, an AI programmer has created history by defeating an advanced AI model in the World Coding Championship, sparking renewed faith in human ingenuity. This unprecedented victory highlights that human skills and intelligence still surpass that of artificial intelligence in the realm of technology. The World Coding Championship is a prestigious event where programmers from across the globe showcase their coding prowess by tackling complex problems in a limited timeframe. This year, the competition featured a unique twist: a human contestant pitted against a highly advanced AI model. The challenge was not just a test of technical abilities but also a measure of whether human intellect could outperform machine learning. Humanity has prevailed (for now!)I'm completely exhausted. I figured, I had 10h of sleep in the last 3 days and I'm barely alive. I'll post more about the contest when I get some rest. — Psyho (@FakePsyho) July 16, 2025 The triumph of the human mind was exemplified by programmer Przemyslaw Debiak, who emerged as the champion of the coding contest. Debiak's exceptional programming skills and strategic thinking were on full display as he tackled intricate problems swiftly, outmatching the AI's predictable methods. Experts attribute his success to his creativity and intuitive intelligence, which provided an unexpected edge over the AI's data-driven approach. The Competition Lasted 10 Hours The competition, spanning an intense 10 hours, saw the AI model, crafted with cutting-edge techniques specifically for coding challenges, fall short against Debiak's quick decision-making and innovative thinking. Despite moments of self-doubt, Debiak persevered and ultimately triumphed over the AI. Who Is Przemyslaw Debiak? Przemyslaw Debiak, the man who defeated artificial intelligence, is a seasoned programmer and a former employee of OpenAI. With a history of participation in numerous coding competitions, Debiak's victory underscores the potential of collaborative efforts between humans and machines to tackle even more complex problems in the field of technology. He shared updates on the competition via the social media platform X, expressing his exhaustion but also his elation at outsmarting the AI. view comments First Published: July 21, 2025, 18:34 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


Time of India
3 days ago
- Time of India
Brain over bots: "Humanity prevails" as human programmer defeats AI in 10-hour programming war
A Polish programmer has beaten an OpenAI model in a gruelling 10-hour coding competition, sparking fresh debate about where artificial intelligence fits in skilled work. Przemysaw Debiak, who goes by Psyho online pseudonym, came out on top against OpenAI 's custom-built model during the AtCoder World Tour Finals 2025 in Tokyo. The result has got people talking about what this means for programming's future. AtCoder runs one of the world's most respected competitive programming platforms, attracting elite coders from across the globe. This year's competition had an unusual twist - for the first time, an AI model called "OpenAIAHC" went head-to-head with 12 of the world's best human programmers. Debiak, who used to work for OpenAI, ended up winning the whole thing. A brutally intense competition format The competition format was brutal. Everyone had to tackle one massive optimisation problem in the Heuristic Contest category; one of the hardest areas in competitive programming. The problem was classified as NP-hard, meaning contestants needed clever, sometimes imperfect approaches to find the best solution they could within 10 hours. This wasn't just about coding ability. Competitors had to keep their concentration sharp and think strategically whilst battling exhaustion over the marathon session. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Nvidia's AI Strategy Is Clear - But Is Wall Street Paying Attention? Seeking Alpha Read More Undo The organisers made sure it was fair by giving everyone identical hardware - no computational advantages for the AI. Contestants could use any programming language AtCoder supports, but there was a catch: five-minute cooldown periods between submissions. This meant everyone had to think carefully before making their next move. Despite OpenAI's model having incredible processing power, Debiak's determination and problem-solving skills won out. His final score hit 1,812,272,558,909 points, beating the AI's 1,654,675,725,406 by a slim 9.5% margin. The AI still performed brilliantly though, outscoring the other 10 human competitors. Ex-OpenAI employee's win was symbolic of something far more important This wasn't really about points or algorithms, it was symbolic. Many people saw this competition as representing something much bigger: the ongoing struggle between human creativity and AI's growing capabilities. As artificial intelligence keeps advancing in medicine, engineering, and countless other fields, this contest became a pivotal moment in discussions about automation and whether humans still have a place in specialist work. The win meant something special for Debiak. Having worked at OpenAI previously, he knew exactly how powerful AI could become in transforming entire industries. Yet his victory showed that human determination, creativity, and mental toughness still count for something, even against advanced AI systems. Debiak posted on social media afterwards: "I'm completely exhausted. … I'm barely alive. Humanity has prevailed (for now!)." The close result highlighted how AI can crunch through vast amounts of data quickly, but still can't quite match the subtle problem-solving abilities humans bring, especially under intense pressure. Sam Altman's acknowledgement and what to expect next OpenAI handled their narrow defeat well. They congratulated Debiak on social media, writing: "Congrats to the champion for holding us off this time." Sam Altman, OpenAI's CEO, also praised Debiak with a simple "Good job psyho" post. Although AI came second, OpenAI saw this as progress in competitive programming AI. But it raises uncomfortable questions about future contests like AtCoder. If AI can already match some of the world's best human programmers, how long before machines completely take over these events? It's a worrying thought for anyone who sees these contests as celebrations of human technical achievement. For now, though, humans have held their ground. As AI keeps evolving, the balance between human and machine intelligence gets more delicate. Whilst AI programming abilities are expanding rapidly, this contest proved there are still areas where human creativity and resilience can just about edge out even the most sophisticated AI models. Whether this continues as AI becomes smarter and more autonomous is anyone's guess, but right now, human ingenuity has had its day. Debiak's victory wasn't just about beating a machine - it was about proving that humanity can still adapt and endure, even as technology races ahead at breakneck speed. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!


NDTV
3 days ago
- NDTV
Human Coder Beats AI In Epic 10-Hour Showdown: 'Humanity Prevails, For Now'
Machines might not be able to dominate humans despite the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) -- at least yet, after a Polish programmer defeated an OpenAI model in a head-to-head coding competition. Programmer Przemyslaw Debiak, better known as Psycho, emerged victorious after a 10-hour marathon coding stint at the AtCoder World Tour Finals 2025 Heuristic contest in Tokyo. The contest might have been the first time where an AI model competed directly against top human programmers in a major onsite world championship, according to a report in Arstechnia. Having already competed in several events prior to the big showdown against AI, Debiak, a former OpenAI employee, managed to coast to victory despite being 'completely exhausted'. "Humanity has prevailed (for now!) I'm completely exhausted. I figured, I had 10 hours of sleep in the last 3 days and I'm barely alive," wrote Debiak on X (formerly Twitter). "The results are official now and my lead over AI increased from 5.5 per cent to 9.5 per cent. Honestly, the hype feels kind of bizarre. Never expected so many people would be interested in programming contests. Guess this means I should drop in here more often," he added. The competition required the contestants to solve a single complex optimisation problem over 10 hours. The solution lies in using clever, often imperfect strategies to reach the best possible solutions within strict time constraints. While Debiak may have emerged as the winner, the AI model still managed to outperform the remaining elite human programmers, who had each qualified for the competition through year-long rankings. See the post here: Humanity has prevailed (for now!) I'm completely exhausted. I figured, I had 10h of sleep in the last 3 days and I'm barely alive. I'll post more about the contest when I get some rest. (To be clear, those are provisional results, but my lead should be big enough) — Psyho (@FakePsyho) July 16, 2025 Also Read | What Is Baby Grok? Musk's xAI Announces Kid-Friendly AI Chatbot After Companion Controversy "Last human to defeat AI?" Social media users congratulated Debiak on his victory and asked him to share the solution which helped him upstage the AI model. "Congrats! Looking forward to your analysis on the solutions if you get time," said one user, while another added: "This is much more interesting than basketball, tennis or even chess championships." A third commented: "You are likely one of the last humans to defeat an AI in a programming contest. This is a huge deal for humanity as a whole, even those who don't care about programming contests." With experts predicting that AI models will reach human-level consciousness, more popularly known as Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), in the next few years, Debiak's victory could perhaps be the last few instances where humans are able to beat the machines.


India Today
5 days ago
- Science
- India Today
OpenAI's AI crushes coding legends in 10-hour programming contest, but one human still beat the bot
Amid the ongoing debate on AI vs humans at work, a new instance has been added favouring humans. A Polish programmer, Przemysaw Debiak aka Psyho, triumphed over an advanced AI model from OpenAI in a head-to-head programming battle at the prestigious AtCoder World Tour Finals 2025 in Tokyo. Despite the relentless efficiency of artificial intelligence, it was human determination that came out on top, if only by a narrow contest, held by Japanese competitive programming platform AtCoder, is widely regarded as one of the toughest and most exclusive events in the field. Reserved for just 12 of the world's top-ranked programmers each year, the 2025 edition introduced a first-of-its-kind challenge: a direct face-off between human intelligence and a custom-built AI model from OpenAI, the company behind OpenAI sponsored the event and entered its model in a special 'Humans vs AI' exhibition match, it was their former employee, Debiak, who managed to edge out the machine. He had already competed in several events over the previous three days, pushed himself to the limit. 'I'm completely exhausted. ... I'm barely alive,' he posted on social media platform X (formerly Twitter) after the match. 'Humanity has prevailed (for now!).' His final score? An astonishing 1,812,272,558,909 points. OpenAI's model, listed under the name "OpenAIAHC," finished second with 1,654,675,725,406 points, just 9.5 per cent behind. The AI still managed to outperform the remaining ten elite human programmers, who had each qualified for the competition through year-long rankings. A test of enduranceThe competition's format was gruelling. Participants had 600 minutes, a full 10 hours, to tackle a single complex optimisation problem under the Heuristic Contest division. These problems fall under the NP-hard category, requiring contestants to use clever, often imperfect strategies to reach the best possible solutions within strict time competitors, human and AI alike, were provided with identical hardware to ensure fairness. Submissions were permitted in any programming language supported by AtCoder, with a five-minute cooldown period between each victory has become a modern-day metaphor for the resilience of human intellect in the face of rapid contest not only tested raw programming ability but also became a symbolic moment in the ongoing debate about AI's growing role in skilled CEO Sam Altman commentsadvertisementThe symbolic nature of the match wasn't lost on OpenAI. In a post on X, the company wrote: 'Our model took 2nd place at the AtCoder Heuristics World Finals! Congrats to the champion for holding us off this time.'OpenAI CEO Sam Altman also acknowledged Debiak's victory, posting a simple but telling message: 'Good job psyho.'For Debiak, it was a proud but exhausting win, made even more significant given his own history with OpenAI, where he previously worked. The result served as a reminder that, while AI continues to grow in capability, human ingenuity, under pressure, still holds its OpenAI called the second-place finish a milestone for AI in competitive programming raises broader questions about the future of such contests. If AI models can already rival world-class humans under fair conditions, how long will it be before they dominate completely?For now, the balance has been maintained. But as AI tools become faster, smarter, and more autonomous, contests like AtCoder may increasingly become battlegrounds not just for high scores—but for the soul of programming itself.- Ends