Latest news with #EdwardHopper
Yahoo
20-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
House GOP channels ‘Nighthawks' as they try to pass Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
House Republicans are channeling Edward Hopper this week as they try to pass President Trump's big, "beautiful bill." Hopper is known for "Nighthawks," one of the most iconic paintings in American history. The 1942 painting depicts four people in a diner in the middle of the night. A deserted streetscape commands the foreground. Two men – heads festooned with fedoras – sit separately at the counter, nursing coffee. One of the men has a cigarette tucked between his index and middle fingers. He's positioned next to a woman with scarlet hair and a red dress. She appears to holding a bite of a doughnut or sandwich, studying it as though it were a rare artifact. She seems to debate whether she should eat it. A young counterman – attired in white with a crisp envelope hat – leans downward in search of glassware or dishes hidden underneath. It's the dead of night. Everyone is distant and detached. Even the couple – even though they sit side-by-side – don't look at each other. In Nighthawks, everyone appears as though they're just trying to make it through the night to dawn. It's kind of what House Republicans are going through this week. 'Dead Of Night': Dems Accuse Gop Of Cowardice Over Late-night Votes On Trump's 'Big, Beautiful' Budget Bill Read On The Fox News App The House Budget Committee convened at 10:26 p.m. ET Sunday night to advance the tax cut and spending reduction package after a hiccup stalled the measure Friday afternoon. At 10:39 p.m. ET, the committee approved the bill 17-16 – with four House Republicans voting "present." The next stop is the House Rules Committee, the final parliamentary way station before depositing a piece of legislation on the floor. At 12:31 a.m. ET Monday, the Rules Committee announced it would prep the bill for the floor – with a meeting at 1 a.m. Wednesday morning. That session could last all day Wednesday. Literally. The Energy and Commerce panel met for 26 consecutive hours last week to prepare its section of the budget reconciliation measure. The Ways and Means Committee huddled all night long. The group of House Republicans pushing to state and local tax for high-tax states (known as SALT) scheduled a meeting with House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., for 9 p.m. ET Monday. And it's entirely possible that the House could be debating or even voting on the measure late Thursday, the wee hours of Friday morning or even Friday night. This is how Capitol Hill rolls when there's a big piece of legislation on the clock. The hours are late. The meetings are long. Lawmakers convene different sessions whenever they need to – just to get the measure across the finish line. Hitchhiker's Guide To Where The 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Stands, And What Happens Sunday In The Budget Committee The only difference between the halls of Congress now and "Nighthawks" is that the coffee fueled the figures in the painting until dawn. It was 1942. But this is 2025. Edward Hopper would know nothing of Celsius or Red Bull. There's an actual parliamentary reason as to why the Budget Committee met so late on Sunday night after its stumble on Friday afternoon. And there's a method to the Rules Committee's 1 a.m. madness on Wednesday. Let's rewind. The Budget Committee tried to blend the various provisions from nearly a dozen House committees into one unified legislative product midday Friday. That effort came up short. A total of five Budget Committee Republicans voted nay. They groused about spending cuts, green energy tax credits and the timeframe of work requirements for those on Medicaid. Four of the five GOP noes were truly opposed. Rep. Lloyd Smucker, R-Penn., voted nay so he could order a re-vote. Rules allow a member on the winning side of an issue (in this case, the nays), to ask for another vote later. Smucker supported the plan. But he then switched his vote to nay to be on the winning side. That teed up a possible re-vote. Republicans Ready Late-night Session On Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' After Gop Mutiny "Calling a vote moves the process forward. I think it's a catalyst," said Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington, R-Tex., after the failed vote Friday. The Budget Committee then announced it would convene at 10 p.m. ET Sunday. This is where things get interesting: The key here was for the Budget Committee to finish its work before midnight Friday. Once it got rolling, the process would only consume 15 or 20 minutes. The Budget Committee approved the plan 17-16 with four Republicans voting "present." "We're excited about what we did," said Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., who was one of the GOPers who voted nay Friday. But Norman still wasn't excited enough to vote yes on Sunday night. He voted present. "There's so much more that we have to do to rein in government and rein in the costs and the deficits," said Norman on FOX Business Monday. But regardless, the measure was out of the Budget Committee before the witching hour on Sunday. And then came the Rules Committee announcement – just after midnight on Monday – about a session at 1 a.m. Wednesday to ready the "big, beautiful bill" for the House floor. There are several reasons House Rules Committee Republicans decided to huddle at 1 a.m. et Wednesday. Let's begin with the parliamentary one. House Republicans Face Down Dem Attacks, Protests To Pull All-nighter On Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' The Budget Committee wrapped up just before midnight Sunday. The rules allow Democrats two full days to file their paperwork and viewpoints after that meeting. So, they had all day Monday and all day Tuesday. The Rules Committee needs an "hour" to announce its formally meeting. So, the "official" announcement of the Rules Committee meeting on Wednesday will go out just after 12:01:01 a.m. ET Wednesday. That triggers a 1 a.m. ET meeting on Wednesday. Here are the other, more practical reasons. Republicans need all the time they can get. There is talk of trying to vote on the floor late in the day on Wednesday. We'll see about that. But the early Rules Committee meeting time makes that a possibility. Second of all, it's possible the Rules Committee meeting could consume the entire calendar day of Wednesday. Streams of lawmakers from both sides will file into the Rules Committee to propose various amendments. This is a protracted process. But by the same token, meeting at 1 a.m. ET could diminish attendance. After all, who wants to show up at 1 a.m. ET for a meeting and maybe discuss your amendment at 6:30 a.m. ET? You get the idea. And once the bill gets out of the Rules Committee, expect late night meetings among Republicans as they try to close the deal. It's possible the House could vote at virtually any time of day Wednesday, Thursday or Friday to pass the bill. That could be late in the evening. Or even overnight. They will vote when the bill is ready, regardless of the time on the clock. Such is the lot drawn this week by House Republicans for the "big, beautiful bill." Maybe they'll have the votes. Maybe they won't. Maybe they'll pass more spending cuts. Maybe there'll be a deal on SALT for state and local taxes. Maybe not. Maybe the vote comes at 3 in the afternoon. But more likely, sometime late at night. Just like in Nighthawks, everyone on Capitol Hill is just trying to make it through the night and to the article source: House GOP channels 'Nighthawks' as they try to pass Trump's 'big, beautiful bill'
Fox News
20-05-2025
- Business
- Fox News
House GOP channels ‘Nighthawks' as they try to pass Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
House Republicans are channeling Edward Hopper this week as they try to pass President Trump's big, "beautiful bill." Hopper is known for "Nighthawks," one of the most iconic paintings in American history. The 1942 painting depicts four people in a diner in the middle of the night. A deserted streetscape commands the foreground. Two men – heads festooned with fedoras – sit separately at the counter, nursing coffee. One of the men has a cigarette tucked between his index and middle fingers. He's positioned next to a woman with scarlet hair and a red dress. She appears to holding a bite of a doughnut or sandwich, studying it as though it were a rare artifact. She seems to debate whether she should eat it. A young counterman – attired in white with a crisp envelope hat – leans downward in search of glassware or dishes hidden underneath. It's the dead of night. Everyone is distant and detached. Even the couple – even though they sit side-by-side – don't look at each other. In Nighthawks, everyone appears as though they're just trying to make it through the night to dawn. It's kind of what House Republicans are going through this week. The House Budget Committee convened at 10:26 p.m. ET Sunday night to advance the tax cut and spending reduction package after a hiccup stalled the measure Friday afternoon. At 10:39 p.m. ET, the committee approved the bill 17-16 – with four House Republicans voting "present." The next stop is the House Rules Committee, the final parliamentary way station before depositing a piece of legislation on the floor. At 12:31 a.m. ET Monday, the Rules Committee announced it would prep the bill for the floor – with a meeting at 1 a.m. Wednesday morning. That session could last all day Wednesday. Literally. The Energy and Commerce panel met for 26 consecutive hours last week to prepare its section of the budget reconciliation measure. The Ways and Means Committee huddled all night long. The group of House Republicans pushing to state and local tax for high-tax states (known as SALT) scheduled a meeting with House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., for 9 p.m. ET Monday. And it's entirely possible that the House could be debating or even voting on the measure late Thursday, the wee hours of Friday morning or even Friday night. This is how Capitol Hill rolls when there's a big piece of legislation on the clock. The hours are late. The meetings are long. Lawmakers convene different sessions whenever they need to – just to get the measure across the finish line. The only difference between the halls of Congress now and "Nighthawks" is that the coffee fueled the figures in the painting until dawn. It was 1942. But this is 2025. Edward Hopper would know nothing of Celsius or Red Bull. There's an actual parliamentary reason as to why the Budget Committee met so late on Sunday night after its stumble on Friday afternoon. And there's a method to the Rules Committee's 1 a.m. madness on Wednesday. Let's rewind. The Budget Committee tried to blend the various provisions from nearly a dozen House committees into one unified legislative product midday Friday. That effort came up short. A total of five Budget Committee Republicans voted nay. They groused about spending cuts, green energy tax credits and the timeframe of work requirements for those on Medicaid. Four of the five GOP noes were truly opposed. Rep. Lloyd Smucker, R-Penn., voted nay so he could order a re-vote. Rules allow a member on the winning side of an issue (in this case, the nays), to ask for another vote later. Smucker supported the plan. But he then switched his vote to nay to be on the winning side. That teed up a possible re-vote. "Calling a vote moves the process forward. I think it's a catalyst," said Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington, R-Tex., after the failed vote Friday. The Budget Committee then announced it would convene at 10 p.m. ET Sunday. This is where things get interesting: The key here was for the Budget Committee to finish its work before midnight Friday. Once it got rolling, the process would only consume 15 or 20 minutes. The Budget Committee approved the plan 17-16 with four Republicans voting "present." "We're excited about what we did," said Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., who was one of the GOPers who voted nay Friday. But Norman still wasn't excited enough to vote yes on Sunday night. He voted present. "There's so much more that we have to do to rein in government and rein in the costs and the deficits," said Norman on FOX Business Monday. But regardless, the measure was out of the Budget Committee before the witching hour on Sunday. And then came the Rules Committee announcement – just after midnight on Monday – about a session at 1 a.m. Wednesday to ready the "big, beautiful bill" for the House floor. There are several reasons House Rules Committee Republicans decided to huddle at 1 a.m. et Wednesday. Let's begin with the parliamentary one. The Budget Committee wrapped up just before midnight Sunday. The rules allow Democrats two full days to file their paperwork and viewpoints after that meeting. So, they had all day Monday and all day Tuesday. The Rules Committee needs an "hour" to announce its formally meeting. So, the "official" announcement of the Rules Committee meeting on Wednesday will go out just after 12:01:01 a.m. ET Wednesday. That triggers a 1 a.m. ET meeting on Wednesday. Here are the other, more practical reasons. Republicans need all the time they can get. There is talk of trying to vote on the floor late in the day on Wednesday. We'll see about that. But the early Rules Committee meeting time makes that a possibility. Second of all, it's possible the Rules Committee meeting could consume the entire calendar day of Wednesday. Streams of lawmakers from both sides will file into the Rules Committee to propose various amendments. This is a protracted process. But by the same token, meeting at 1 a.m. ET could diminish attendance. After all, who wants to show up at 1 a.m. ET for a meeting and maybe discuss your amendment at 6:30 a.m. ET? You get the idea. And once the bill gets out of the Rules Committee, expect late night meetings among Republicans as they try to close the deal. It's possible the House could vote at virtually any time of day Wednesday, Thursday or Friday to pass the bill. That could be late in the evening. Or even overnight. They will vote when the bill is ready, regardless of the time on the clock. Such is the lot drawn this week by House Republicans for the "big, beautiful bill." Maybe they'll have the votes. Maybe they won't. Maybe they'll pass more spending cuts. Maybe there'll be a deal on SALT for state and local taxes. Maybe not. Maybe the vote comes at 3 in the afternoon. But more likely, sometime late at night. Just like in Nighthawks, everyone on Capitol Hill is just trying to make it through the night and to the dawn.
Yahoo
19-05-2025
- Yahoo
Edward Hopper's watercolor of a Cape Elizabeth landmark sold for $1 million
May 19—Drive down Route 77 in Cape Elizabeth, and you'll spot a scene worth $1 million. In 1927, Edward Hopper made a small watercolor of the Spurwink Church. He painted en plein air, which means that he made the work somewhere near what is today the intersection of Spurwink Avenue and Bowery Beach Road. Last week, Sotheby's sold "Spurwink Church" for $1.016 million to an unidentified buyer. Pre-auction estimates had put the potential sale price at between $500,000 and $700,000. The auction house noted it was the first time in more than 30 years that the painting has been on the market. The prestigious auction house described this painting as "a quiet yet powerful testament to Edward Hopper's enduring sensitivity to place, light, and solitude." "As he did in his most celebrated works, Hopper saturates Spurwink Church in a warm, radiant light which imbues the scene with a palpable emotional depth," the description reads on the Sotheby's website. "Throughout his career, Hopper was especially drawn to the interactions of light with the landscapes and architecture in the various places surrounding him. Cape Elizabeth's bright summer sun offered no shortage of inspiration, with endless displays of sunlight and shadow against the bucolic scenery." The Spurwink Church dates back to 1802. The simple meeting house is the oldest public building in Cape Elizabeth and has been named to the National Registry of Historic Places. It was home to an active congregation until 1957, when its dwindling membership transferred ownership to the town. Today, the church is available for special events such as weddings, christenings and funerals. Hopper spent nine summers in Maine between 1914 and 1929. He painted the church's position at the top of a blustery hillside. The wind tosses the trees, and the rich blue of the Spurwink River can be seen in the distance. The watercolor is not large — just 14 inches by 20 inches. It was part of a private collection before last week's sale. "With its delicate balance of structure and atmosphere, 'Spurwink Church' encapsulates the contemplative stillness and emotional resonance that would come to define Hopper's oeuvre," the auction house said. "As both a record of Hopper's prolific time in Maine and a broader meditation on the passage of time and the poetics of light, 'Spurwink Church' exemplifies the depth and nuance of Hopper's celebrated artistic vision." Diana Boccardo is an independent consultant for Sotheby's and lives in Cumberland. She was not involved in the sale, but the lot caught her eye. Boccardo moved to Maine in recent years to be closer to her son and his family, and she immediately understood why the scene inspired Hopper. "I feel I can relate," she said. "I feel that Maine can be a muse for painting, for writing. I would also like to take a brush when I see it." Boccardo showed the scene to her neighbors and friends, who all eagerly followed the news of the sale. One was Maria Glaser, who has lived in Cape Elizabeth for 44 years. Glaser has friends who are buried in the cemetery that abuts the historic church and plans to be buried there herself. Glaser said she often drives by that intersection and admires the verdant landscape and the quiet loveliness of the area. She hopes the person who bought the painting lives in Maine — and, perhaps, would loan it to a museum here so admirers could see it in person. "I think it's exciting that our little town is in the hands of someone who truly, truly values it," she said. This story will be updated. Copy the Story Link
Axios
13-05-2025
- Entertainment
- Axios
Your fancy TV can look like a Seurat
Zoom out: The digital store offers more than 3,000 artworks from institutions like MOMA, The Met, and now, the Art Institute of Chicago. How it works: A subscription to the art store makes your TV look like a piece of art mounted on the wall rather than a blank black screen. Famous works from the AIC such as Georges Seurat's "A Sunday on La Grande Jatte — 1884" and Edward Hopper's "Nighthawks" will now be available to display. Follow the money: Samsung would not disclose to Axios the financial terms with AIC, but a spokesperson said: "All Art Store partners are fairly compensated for their works" and that revenues for partners can "exceed seven-figures per year." Samsung pays partners from subscription revenues based on how much their artworks are displayed by subscribers. By the numbers: A 55-inch Frame TV starts at about $1,500 and goes up to $2,500 for an 88-inch.
South China Morning Post
02-05-2025
- Entertainment
- South China Morning Post
Top 10: If you could own any piece of artwork in the world, what would it be, and why?
This week's question: What is one emoji you want to eliminate, and why? To take part, drop us a line via this form by 12pm on Wednesday, May 7. Zoey Leung Wat-tung, 15, CPC Yao Dao Secondary School: House by the Railroad by Edward Hopper depicts a solitary house with a railway in the background, symbolising change and isolation. The quiet atmosphere effectively reflects the loneliness and struggles of people in modern life. Breanne Kwok Tsz-ching, 12, Maryknoll Convent School: The Starry Night by Vincent van Gogh depicts a calm night filled with bright stars and a glowing moon. This serene scene contrasts sharply with my surroundings, which are characterised by a fast-paced district filled with tall public housing and heavy traffic. Zaman Sana Wai Wong-sum, 14, PLK Mrs Ma Kam Ming Cheung Fook Sien College: Edouard Manet's renowned artwork, The Execution of Emperor Maximilian, depicts the execution of Maximilian I of Mexico. It highlights the violence and political chaos of that era. Manet's work conveys the harsh realities of war, reflecting deep sadness and loss. Owen To Man-kwan, 15, Tsuen Wan Public Ho Chuen Yiu Memorial College: The Tralalero Tralala phenomenon on the internet has become a true masterpiece. The viral shark photo sparked a significant revolution in AI creativity, ushering in a new era in the digital world. Abstract images have brought joy and amusement to many. Tim Tse Kam-Tim, 14, TWGHs Li Ka Shing College: Weeping Woman by Pablo Picasso conveys profound sadness through its fragmented face and intense colours. This cubist portrait is not just a work of art; it serves as a powerful expression of sorrow, inspired by the Spanish Civil War. It demonstrates how pain can be transformed into something exceptionally beautiful.
