Latest news with #EuroNCAP
The Advertiser
6 days ago
- Automotive
- The Advertiser
Australian drivers are turning off 'annoying' safety systems, study shows
Australian drivers are ditching safety systems they find "annoying", "distracting" and "too sensitive" – despite knowing they bring real-world benefits – according to a new report from insurance company, AAMI. The company's latest annual Crash Index, which surveyed more than 480,000 AAMI insurance claimants over the past 12 months, revealed almost one in five drivers nationwide admitted to turning off some of their vehicle's advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS). That's despite 59 per cent of them agreeing that ADAS functions improved road safety and reduced the number – and severity – of crashes. "In-car safety features aren't just gadgets, they're designed to help protect us and make our roads safer," said AAMI motor prevention manager Mary Kennedy in a statement. "We should be embracing these features, not turning them off." CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. Of those who said they switched off safety systems, the function most often deactivated was lane departure warning/lane keeping, with 45 per cent admitting it was the first ADAS to be deactivated. Adaptive/radar cruise control was the next most turned-off safety aid, with 17 per cent of drivers who had turned off a feature admitting to avoiding its use. The most common reason for turning off the systems was that they were "annoying" or "distracting", with 69 per cent of drivers surveyed saying this led them to deactivating them. In 2023, Euro NCAP said it would work with automakers to minimise ADAS "noise pollution" and the "more annoying features of these technologies". "As much as it is a challenge to insist that manufacturers fit the latest safety technologies, the real challenge lies in convincing consumers of their necessity," Euro NCAP secretary general Michiel van Ratingen said in a statement. "There is a worrying trend of media and social channels encouraging drivers 'to turn them off'." Earlier this year, Chinese brand Leapmotor recalibrated some ADAS functions in the first model it released in Australia, the C10 mid-size electrified SUV, following media and customer criticism that its systems were too sensitive. The C10 has a five-star ANCAP rating and comes with lane-keep assist, emergency lane-keep assist and adaptive cruise control as standard. "Certainly, the feedback from very, very early on about the sensitivity of the ADAS has been one of the things that we continually work on," Leapmotor Australia boss Andy Hoang told Car Expert. Likewise, software in the Mitsubishi Triton dual-cab ute was updated in 2024 to reduce the sensitivity of its driver monitoring system. The AAMI research mirrors similar research conducted overseas, including a 2025 report by British consumer website Which? that showed more than half of drivers surveyed in the UK switched off safety systems. "We're looking at what is the safest, most insurable vehicle, rather than which one gives the least number of false interventions and the best driving comfort," Yousif Al-Ani, principal engineer for Thatcham Research, which assesses risk for insurance companies, told Which?. "Often, we have issues because those are two conflicting goals. In other words, a car that has ADAS set up to intervene sooner is inherently more insurable, but also more annoying to drive." In the UK, lane-keeping systems were the second most turned-off feature behind speed assist, which combines speed sign recognition and adaptive cruise control to adjust vehicle speed to the posted limit – when it works. Alarmingly, 34 per cent of UK drivers and 16 per cent of Australian drivers admitted to turning off automatic emergency braking (AEB). Proven to reduce incidents and injuries, AEB has been mandatory for all new cars sold in Australia since March 2025. A study conducted in the US by the Partnership for Analytics Research in Traffic Safety (PARTS) showed AEB contributed to a 46 per cent reduction in the number of rear-end crashes. It also showed that AEB systems with pedestrian detection reduced collisions with vulnerable road users by nine per cent. An earlier study showed that when AEB is paired with forward collision warning, the likelihood of motorists suffering injury in a collision fell by 53 per cent. MORE: How autonomous is my car? Levels of self-driving explained MORE: These are the safest cars tested by ANCAP in 2024 MORE: Yes, this safety tech has really reduced car crashes Content originally sourced from: Australian drivers are ditching safety systems they find "annoying", "distracting" and "too sensitive" – despite knowing they bring real-world benefits – according to a new report from insurance company, AAMI. The company's latest annual Crash Index, which surveyed more than 480,000 AAMI insurance claimants over the past 12 months, revealed almost one in five drivers nationwide admitted to turning off some of their vehicle's advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS). That's despite 59 per cent of them agreeing that ADAS functions improved road safety and reduced the number – and severity – of crashes. "In-car safety features aren't just gadgets, they're designed to help protect us and make our roads safer," said AAMI motor prevention manager Mary Kennedy in a statement. "We should be embracing these features, not turning them off." CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. Of those who said they switched off safety systems, the function most often deactivated was lane departure warning/lane keeping, with 45 per cent admitting it was the first ADAS to be deactivated. Adaptive/radar cruise control was the next most turned-off safety aid, with 17 per cent of drivers who had turned off a feature admitting to avoiding its use. The most common reason for turning off the systems was that they were "annoying" or "distracting", with 69 per cent of drivers surveyed saying this led them to deactivating them. In 2023, Euro NCAP said it would work with automakers to minimise ADAS "noise pollution" and the "more annoying features of these technologies". "As much as it is a challenge to insist that manufacturers fit the latest safety technologies, the real challenge lies in convincing consumers of their necessity," Euro NCAP secretary general Michiel van Ratingen said in a statement. "There is a worrying trend of media and social channels encouraging drivers 'to turn them off'." Earlier this year, Chinese brand Leapmotor recalibrated some ADAS functions in the first model it released in Australia, the C10 mid-size electrified SUV, following media and customer criticism that its systems were too sensitive. The C10 has a five-star ANCAP rating and comes with lane-keep assist, emergency lane-keep assist and adaptive cruise control as standard. "Certainly, the feedback from very, very early on about the sensitivity of the ADAS has been one of the things that we continually work on," Leapmotor Australia boss Andy Hoang told Car Expert. Likewise, software in the Mitsubishi Triton dual-cab ute was updated in 2024 to reduce the sensitivity of its driver monitoring system. The AAMI research mirrors similar research conducted overseas, including a 2025 report by British consumer website Which? that showed more than half of drivers surveyed in the UK switched off safety systems. "We're looking at what is the safest, most insurable vehicle, rather than which one gives the least number of false interventions and the best driving comfort," Yousif Al-Ani, principal engineer for Thatcham Research, which assesses risk for insurance companies, told Which?. "Often, we have issues because those are two conflicting goals. In other words, a car that has ADAS set up to intervene sooner is inherently more insurable, but also more annoying to drive." In the UK, lane-keeping systems were the second most turned-off feature behind speed assist, which combines speed sign recognition and adaptive cruise control to adjust vehicle speed to the posted limit – when it works. Alarmingly, 34 per cent of UK drivers and 16 per cent of Australian drivers admitted to turning off automatic emergency braking (AEB). Proven to reduce incidents and injuries, AEB has been mandatory for all new cars sold in Australia since March 2025. A study conducted in the US by the Partnership for Analytics Research in Traffic Safety (PARTS) showed AEB contributed to a 46 per cent reduction in the number of rear-end crashes. It also showed that AEB systems with pedestrian detection reduced collisions with vulnerable road users by nine per cent. An earlier study showed that when AEB is paired with forward collision warning, the likelihood of motorists suffering injury in a collision fell by 53 per cent. MORE: How autonomous is my car? Levels of self-driving explained MORE: These are the safest cars tested by ANCAP in 2024 MORE: Yes, this safety tech has really reduced car crashes Content originally sourced from: Australian drivers are ditching safety systems they find "annoying", "distracting" and "too sensitive" – despite knowing they bring real-world benefits – according to a new report from insurance company, AAMI. The company's latest annual Crash Index, which surveyed more than 480,000 AAMI insurance claimants over the past 12 months, revealed almost one in five drivers nationwide admitted to turning off some of their vehicle's advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS). That's despite 59 per cent of them agreeing that ADAS functions improved road safety and reduced the number – and severity – of crashes. "In-car safety features aren't just gadgets, they're designed to help protect us and make our roads safer," said AAMI motor prevention manager Mary Kennedy in a statement. "We should be embracing these features, not turning them off." CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. Of those who said they switched off safety systems, the function most often deactivated was lane departure warning/lane keeping, with 45 per cent admitting it was the first ADAS to be deactivated. Adaptive/radar cruise control was the next most turned-off safety aid, with 17 per cent of drivers who had turned off a feature admitting to avoiding its use. The most common reason for turning off the systems was that they were "annoying" or "distracting", with 69 per cent of drivers surveyed saying this led them to deactivating them. In 2023, Euro NCAP said it would work with automakers to minimise ADAS "noise pollution" and the "more annoying features of these technologies". "As much as it is a challenge to insist that manufacturers fit the latest safety technologies, the real challenge lies in convincing consumers of their necessity," Euro NCAP secretary general Michiel van Ratingen said in a statement. "There is a worrying trend of media and social channels encouraging drivers 'to turn them off'." Earlier this year, Chinese brand Leapmotor recalibrated some ADAS functions in the first model it released in Australia, the C10 mid-size electrified SUV, following media and customer criticism that its systems were too sensitive. The C10 has a five-star ANCAP rating and comes with lane-keep assist, emergency lane-keep assist and adaptive cruise control as standard. "Certainly, the feedback from very, very early on about the sensitivity of the ADAS has been one of the things that we continually work on," Leapmotor Australia boss Andy Hoang told Car Expert. Likewise, software in the Mitsubishi Triton dual-cab ute was updated in 2024 to reduce the sensitivity of its driver monitoring system. The AAMI research mirrors similar research conducted overseas, including a 2025 report by British consumer website Which? that showed more than half of drivers surveyed in the UK switched off safety systems. "We're looking at what is the safest, most insurable vehicle, rather than which one gives the least number of false interventions and the best driving comfort," Yousif Al-Ani, principal engineer for Thatcham Research, which assesses risk for insurance companies, told Which?. "Often, we have issues because those are two conflicting goals. In other words, a car that has ADAS set up to intervene sooner is inherently more insurable, but also more annoying to drive." In the UK, lane-keeping systems were the second most turned-off feature behind speed assist, which combines speed sign recognition and adaptive cruise control to adjust vehicle speed to the posted limit – when it works. Alarmingly, 34 per cent of UK drivers and 16 per cent of Australian drivers admitted to turning off automatic emergency braking (AEB). Proven to reduce incidents and injuries, AEB has been mandatory for all new cars sold in Australia since March 2025. A study conducted in the US by the Partnership for Analytics Research in Traffic Safety (PARTS) showed AEB contributed to a 46 per cent reduction in the number of rear-end crashes. It also showed that AEB systems with pedestrian detection reduced collisions with vulnerable road users by nine per cent. An earlier study showed that when AEB is paired with forward collision warning, the likelihood of motorists suffering injury in a collision fell by 53 per cent. MORE: How autonomous is my car? Levels of self-driving explained MORE: These are the safest cars tested by ANCAP in 2024 MORE: Yes, this safety tech has really reduced car crashes Content originally sourced from: Australian drivers are ditching safety systems they find "annoying", "distracting" and "too sensitive" – despite knowing they bring real-world benefits – according to a new report from insurance company, AAMI. The company's latest annual Crash Index, which surveyed more than 480,000 AAMI insurance claimants over the past 12 months, revealed almost one in five drivers nationwide admitted to turning off some of their vehicle's advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS). That's despite 59 per cent of them agreeing that ADAS functions improved road safety and reduced the number – and severity – of crashes. "In-car safety features aren't just gadgets, they're designed to help protect us and make our roads safer," said AAMI motor prevention manager Mary Kennedy in a statement. "We should be embracing these features, not turning them off." CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. Of those who said they switched off safety systems, the function most often deactivated was lane departure warning/lane keeping, with 45 per cent admitting it was the first ADAS to be deactivated. Adaptive/radar cruise control was the next most turned-off safety aid, with 17 per cent of drivers who had turned off a feature admitting to avoiding its use. The most common reason for turning off the systems was that they were "annoying" or "distracting", with 69 per cent of drivers surveyed saying this led them to deactivating them. In 2023, Euro NCAP said it would work with automakers to minimise ADAS "noise pollution" and the "more annoying features of these technologies". "As much as it is a challenge to insist that manufacturers fit the latest safety technologies, the real challenge lies in convincing consumers of their necessity," Euro NCAP secretary general Michiel van Ratingen said in a statement. "There is a worrying trend of media and social channels encouraging drivers 'to turn them off'." Earlier this year, Chinese brand Leapmotor recalibrated some ADAS functions in the first model it released in Australia, the C10 mid-size electrified SUV, following media and customer criticism that its systems were too sensitive. The C10 has a five-star ANCAP rating and comes with lane-keep assist, emergency lane-keep assist and adaptive cruise control as standard. "Certainly, the feedback from very, very early on about the sensitivity of the ADAS has been one of the things that we continually work on," Leapmotor Australia boss Andy Hoang told Car Expert. Likewise, software in the Mitsubishi Triton dual-cab ute was updated in 2024 to reduce the sensitivity of its driver monitoring system. The AAMI research mirrors similar research conducted overseas, including a 2025 report by British consumer website Which? that showed more than half of drivers surveyed in the UK switched off safety systems. "We're looking at what is the safest, most insurable vehicle, rather than which one gives the least number of false interventions and the best driving comfort," Yousif Al-Ani, principal engineer for Thatcham Research, which assesses risk for insurance companies, told Which?. "Often, we have issues because those are two conflicting goals. In other words, a car that has ADAS set up to intervene sooner is inherently more insurable, but also more annoying to drive." In the UK, lane-keeping systems were the second most turned-off feature behind speed assist, which combines speed sign recognition and adaptive cruise control to adjust vehicle speed to the posted limit – when it works. Alarmingly, 34 per cent of UK drivers and 16 per cent of Australian drivers admitted to turning off automatic emergency braking (AEB). Proven to reduce incidents and injuries, AEB has been mandatory for all new cars sold in Australia since March 2025. A study conducted in the US by the Partnership for Analytics Research in Traffic Safety (PARTS) showed AEB contributed to a 46 per cent reduction in the number of rear-end crashes. It also showed that AEB systems with pedestrian detection reduced collisions with vulnerable road users by nine per cent. An earlier study showed that when AEB is paired with forward collision warning, the likelihood of motorists suffering injury in a collision fell by 53 per cent. MORE: How autonomous is my car? Levels of self-driving explained MORE: These are the safest cars tested by ANCAP in 2024 MORE: Yes, this safety tech has really reduced car crashes Content originally sourced from:
Forbes
21-07-2025
- Automotive
- Forbes
Tesla Makes The Safest Car In Europe But Autopilot Has Issues
Model 3 picks up top safety award in Europe. Photo: Wolfram Steinberg/dpa Photo: Wolfram ... More Steinberg/dpa (Photo by Wolfram Steinberg/picture alliance via Getty Images) Tesla sales might be plummeting across Europe, mainly due to CEO Elon Musk's misguided political aspirations, but on the safety front, the company's Model 3 just aced it. Tesla polls 359 out of 400 points to win safest car prize That's right folks, earlier this month, the Tesla Model 3 was named the safest new car on sale in 2025, according to the latest test results from the Euro NCAP. Out of the 20 newly tested vehicles, the Model 3 surged to the top of the list, polling an impressive 359 out of 400 possible points across all major safety categories. Just to reiterate, Euro NCAP has created its five-star safety rating system to help consumers, their families and businesses compare vehicles more easily and to help them identify the safest choice for their needs. Even though the Model 3 has been on the market longer than its competitors, the Tesla sedan continues to set a high bar for safety. Under Euro NCAP's stricter 2025 testing protocols, the Model 3 received 90% for adult occupant protection, 93% for child occupant protection, 89% for pedestrian protection, and 87% for its Safety Assist systems. The revised Tesla was complimented by Euro NCAP for its advanced driver assistance features such as the brand's automatic emergency braking (AEB) system, which performed admirably in a variety of test conditions. According to a WhatCar article, the car's child presence detection system and Intelligent Speed Assistance were also mentioned as notable features. Additional safety features praised by the NCAP organization include the Model 3's robust crash protection for both front and side collisions and pedestrian-friendly pop-up hood. While the Model 3 aced the safety tests, Euro NCAP testers raised concerns about driver expectations of the brand's Autopilot system. These concerns focused on the fact that some owners may overestimate the system's capabilities, which may lead to misuse or driver distraction behind the wheel. Even so, the Model 3 remained the highest-scoring vehicle tested under Euro NCAP's updated criteria this year. The fact that Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) Supervised, perhaps the company's most comprehensive safety suite, is not yet permitted on European roads makes the Euro NCAP's concerns all the more intriguing. Even though many European cities employ map layouts that are far more complex than many American street scenarios, Tesla says that with FSD Supervised, the Model 3 could move through inner-city streets with little human supervision. I'm not sure how Euro NCAP might test that, but you'll be the first to know here once they do.
Mid East Info
19-07-2025
- Automotive
- Mid East Info
JAECOO J7 SHS: The Self-Charging SUV That Delivers More Than Just Range
OMODA&JAECOO, one of the world's fastest-growing mobility innovators, is set to transform the hybrid vehicle market in the UAE with the highly anticipated arrival of the JAECOO J7 SHS (Super Hybrid System), known as J7 SHS, by the end of August. Designed to meet the evolving needs of the modern driver, the J7 SHS (Super Hybrid System) delivers a seamless blend of electrified performance, ultra-long range, intelligent safety, and premium design – without ever requiring charging. Charging Optional, Freedom Guaranteed What sets the J7 SHS (Super Hybrid System) apart is its revolutionary Super Hybrid System that offers an EV-like drive experience while eliminating the stress of range anxiety or charging dependence. Unlike typical electrified vehicles, the J7 Super Hybrid System allows drivers to travel over 1,200 kilometers (WLTP) on a single tank and full charge, redefining convenience for UAE residents who often commute between Emirates. With a pure electric range of 90 kilometers, it also ensures peaceful, emission-free driving for urban routes – making it perfect for both the city and the open road. This unique hybrid logic gives UAE drivers the best of both worlds: the quiet, smooth ride of an electric car and the confidence of fuel-powered backup, especially vital in areas where charging infrastructure is sparse. Built for the UAE – Comfort, Endurance, and Efficiency The J7 SHS (Super Hybrid System) is engineered for the region's extreme conditions, with the ability to function efficiently in temperatures ranging from -35°C to 60°C. It promises reliable performance and exceptional fuel economy, consuming just 3.1 litres per 100 kilometers in charge-sustaining mode – a class-leading statistic. Whether navigating the bustling roads of Dubai or cruising through desert highways, the J7 Super Hybrid System offers a composed, confident, and cost-effective driving experience. Safety Without Compromise Safety is central to the J7 SHS (Super Hybrid System). It holds a prestigious five-star rating from both Euro NCAP and ANCAP, affirming its world-class protection for adult and child passengers, pedestrians, and vulnerable road users. The advanced driver assistance suite includes features such as: Intelligent lane support system Central curtain airbags to mitigate side-impact injuries Automatic emergency braking with cyclist and pedestrian detection Instant 2-millisecond battery power cut-off to prevent thermal runaway post-collision This comprehensive safety package reflects OMODA&JAECOO's commitment to engineering excellence and occupant well-being. Power Meets Performance Under the hood, the J7 SHS (Super Hybrid System) is equipped with a fifth-generation 1.5TGDI turbocharged engine paired with dual electric motors delivering a robust 328 HP and 515 Nm of torque. A Dedicated Hybrid Transmission (DHT) ensures a smooth, gearless transition and powerful acceleration. It's not just about getting from point A to B – it's about enjoying every moment in between. Smart Features and Sophisticated Design Aesthetically bold, the J7 SHS (Super Hybrid System) commands attention with its signature grille, sleek LED lighting, and sculpted lines. Inside, the cabin is a haven of luxury, wrapped in premium Nappa leather and illuminated by customizable ambient lighting and a panoramic sunroof. Tech-forward drivers will appreciate the 13.2-inch HD infotainment system with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, enhanced by a Sony premium audio setup. The 540-degree panoramic camera provides enhanced visibility and safety, while Vehicle-to-Load (V2L) functionality adds utility by powering external devices at 3.3 kW – ideal for outdoor adventures and emergencies. The Future of Hybrid Mobility Has Arrived With the J7 SHS (Super Hybrid System), OMODA&JAECOO delivers more than a vehicle—it delivers a vision of mobility that is smarter, cleaner, and more adaptable. As the UAE embraces a more sustainable future, the J7 SHS (Super Hybrid System) stands ready to meet the moment with intelligent hybrid technology, long-range reliability, and unmatched safety. For those seeking even more, the upcoming J8 SHS (Super Hybrid System) promises a bolder expression of SHS performance – with 596 HP, 915 Nm of torque, AWD, and acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in just 5.4 seconds. The J7 Super Hybrid System will be the first model from the SHS family to launch in the UAE, paving the way for the upcoming J8 SHS (Super Hybrid System) and C7 SHS (Super Hybrid System).
Miami Herald
15-07-2025
- Automotive
- Miami Herald
Suzuki Jimny Inches Closer to U.S. Approval. Or Is It?
The Suzuki Jimny is one of those vehicles that commands a global cult following not because of lavish features or massive power, but because of its charm, honesty, and go-anywhere capability. Now in its fourth generation, the boxy little off-roader remains in high demand years after its 2018 launch, with Suzuki continuing to report backorders for both the classic three-door and the newer five-door model. Despite this success, the US remains conspicuously absent from the Jimny's list of markets – a frustrating reality for American fans who have long pined for it. Why the absence? Safety regulations, primarily. While the Jimny meets homologation standards in many regions, the federal crashworthiness and ADAS standards in America are among the world's toughest, which makes the Jimny unfit for US safety regulations. Even with the Euro NCAP, the Jimny only got three stars, with shortcomings in pedestrian protection and safety assist systems. But that might soon change. According to a report from Japan's Creative Trend, Suzuki is planning a suite of safety upgrades to the Jimny 3-Door, potentially inching it closer to compliance and making it up to spec with the 5-Door model. These updates include "dual camera brake support," reverse brake support, adaptive cruise control, a backward false start prevention system, and an improved sign recognition function that can now recognize Stop signs. While Suzuki hasn't formally announced these improvements as part of a US strategy, they represent the most serious push yet to modernize the Jimny's active safety portfolio – an area where it has lagged behind its contemporaries. Curiously, the publication has labeled the upgrades as part of a fifth-generation revamp, which is a bit confusing for two reasons: a full model turnover will be too early since the current model was just introduced in 2018. Historically, the Jimny has a 10-year life cycle. Secondly, the updates were only for the safety features, with nothing changing in terms of exterior and interior design. Well, maybe, maybe not. Even with better sensors and smarter driver aids, the Jimny still faces fundamental challenges. US safety regulators also look at crash survivability, and small, lightweight vehicles tend to fare worse in offset and side-impact scenarios. The Jimny's ladder frame construction, though excellent off-road, isn't ideal for crumple zones or pedestrian protection. And then there's the matter of equipment like lane-keeping assist or blind spot monitoring – still absent in the Jimny, and hard to implement without bloating cost or complexity. Then there's the issue of size. Even with the new five-door variant stretching the Jimny to a more practical length, it remains tiny by American standards, smaller than many subcompacts – yes, even versus the outgoing Mitsubishi Mirage – with limited cargo space and cramped rear seats. It's also a niche product built in India (5-door) and Japan (3-door), so with Suzuki automobiles not having a presence stateside, importation will certainly bloat its pricing – if it passes the stringent US safety regulations at all. So yes, while safety upgrades are a welcome evolution, the Jimny still isn't quite ready for prime time in America. For now, the wait continues. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Auto Blog
12-07-2025
- Automotive
- Auto Blog
Tesla Model 3 Named Safest New Car in Europe for 2025
By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. The Tesla Model 3 has been crowned Europe's safest new car for 2025, according to the latest round of Euro NCAP crash tests. Under newly updated and stricter safety protocols, the Model 3 scored a remarkable 359 out of 400 possible points, leading all 20 newly tested vehicles and earning high marks across adult protection, child safety, pedestrian awareness, and active driver-assistance systems. But in typical Tesla fashion, the celebration comes with caveats. Source: Tesla Where The Model 3 Shines Despite being on the market longer than most of its rivals, the updated Model 3 continues to impress crash-test agencies. It scored 90% for adult occupant protection, 93% for child safety, 89% for pedestrian impact, and 87% in Safety Assist systems. Euro NCAP highlighted its upgraded autonomous emergency braking (AEB), as well as pedestrian detection and child presence alerts. Even Tesla's infamous pop-up hood design received praise for reducing injury risk during a collision with pedestrians — a clever bit of packaging that's often overlooked in the EV arms race. It's worth noting that these safety figures apply specifically to the new European-built variant, but U.S. versions share the same platform, safety tech, and most core hardware. Autopilot Still Raises Eyebrows Still, Euro NCAP issued a familiar warning about Autopilot misuse, reminding buyers that Tesla's driver-assist system still requires active supervision. That's particularly relevant in the U.S., where a long-running debate continues over Autopilot's branding, expectations, and real-world limitations. And while Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) Supervised system isn't yet approved in Europe, its potential rollout has raised further safety questions. Tesla's autonomous systems have come under increased scrutiny lately — and not just in testing. According to recent reports, Tesla's robotaxi prototypes are already being caught breaking traffic laws, prompting NHTSA inquiries before the service even fully launches. Safety, Stats, And Surprises The Model 3's five-star safety performance in Europe is part of why the car remains so dominant in the EV segment. But as our analysis showed earlier this year, Tesla is still responsible for more fatal accidents than any other carmaker— not necessarily because the cars are unsafe, but due to factors like high mileage use, driver behavior, and the complexities of partial autonomy. And yet, the Model 3 keeps selling. Even amid a Q2 sales drop, it remains one of Tesla's top performers, outpacing the newer but slightly more expensive Model Y in certain markets. If you're deciding between the two, our Model 3 vs. Model Y breakdown lays out the key differences — the Model 3 is sleeker and more efficient, while the Y offers more cargo and interior space. Or maybe you're cross-shopping rivals like the Polestar 2. If so, we've already run the head-to-head: Tesla Model 3 vs. Polestar 2 is a genuine toss-up depending on your priorities — though in terms of crash protection, Tesla now has the upper hand. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. One Of The Safest EVs — Just Don't Overthink It With Euro NCAP's award, Tesla can rightly claim that the Model 3 is among the safest cars you can buy in 2025. But safety isn't just about ratings on a page. It's about how drivers use the technology, how regulators manage its rollout, and how Tesla communicates what its systems can — and can't — do. Still, if you're simply looking for an EV with standout crash protection, cutting-edge driver assistance, and segment-leading safety scores, the Model 3 just made a convincing case for itself. Again. About the Author Max Taylor View Profile
