Latest news with #Evidence
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
SC man murder in Tirunelveli: activists demand law to prevent ‘honour' killing
Twenty-seven-year-old Kavin Selvaganesh, a Scheduled Caste (SC) man who was brutally murdered on Sunday (July 27, 2025) in a suspected case of 'honour' killing, was a brilliant student, his teachers told The Hindu. Kavin had been in a relationship with a woman since their school days, and recently, he expressed interest in marrying her. On Sunday, however, he was allegedly assaulted and killed by the woman's brother, Surjith, 23, at KTC Nagar in Tirunelveli, according to the police. The police have registered a case of murder and invoked sections under the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe Prevention of Atrocities Act, among others, against the accused. Speaking to The Hindu over the phone, Kavin's mother Tamilselvi, a teacher at a panchayat union school in Thoothukudi, said that her husband was a farm worker, and besides Kavin, they have a 25-year-old son named Praveen. After completing their engineering courses, both of them were placed in top tech firms in Chennai. 'A brilliant student' Teachers who taught Kavin at school describe him as a 'brilliant boy' who would often help other students with their lessons, especially in mathematics and science. 'We were shocked to hear about the way he died,' the teachers said. A. Kathir of Evidence, an NGO from Madurai, said the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) should take efforts to establish an exclusive law to prevent 'honour' killing. In Tamil Nadu, he said, 65 'honour' killings had been reported since 2017, while the government maintained that between 2015 and 2021, there were only three such crimes. 'We have documented each case,' he said. On average, one to two deaths, including suicides, were being reported every day in Tamil Nadu, where youngsters died due to threats from families over disagreements regarding their choice of partner. 'An exclusive Act would discourage violators from committing such crimes,' he added. In the case of Kavin, the parents of the accused were working as Sub-Inspectors in the Police department. Hence, the case should be transferred to the CBI, he demanded, and urged that the government give protection to the victim's family.
Scoop
18-07-2025
- Business
- Scoop
Pay Talk Protection: National Backs Labour's Transparency Bill
Members' bills from opposition MPs are more often than not doomed to fail, but there have been exceptions to the rule this term. Tracey McLellan's Evidence (Giving Evidence of Family Violence) Amendment Bill received unanimous support at its second reading, with all six parties in Parliament voting in favour. Deborah Russell's Companies (Address Information) Amendment Bill is being supported by National and ACT, but not by New Zealand First. Others, like Camilla Belich's Crimes (Theft by Employer) Amendment Bill, have passed thanks to the support of one of the smaller coalition parties (in this case, New Zealand First). But only one opposition bill has had the support of National, and only National this term, and it is another from Belich. On Wednesday night, her Employment Relations (Employee Remuneration Disclosure) Amendment Bill passed its second reading, thanks to National voting alongside the three opposition parties. The bill would ensure that pay secrecy clauses, which prevent employees from discussing their salaries with colleagues, would no longer be enforceable, meaning employers could not take legal action if an employee talked about pay. There will be cases where pay differences were justifiable (such as different skill sets or qualifications), but the bill's intention is to shed light on situations where they were unjustifiable. Australia, the UK, the EU, and some US states have either banned pay secrecy clauses or made them unenforceable. Belich said people already talk about their pay with colleagues, but stopping businesses from taking action against them for it would keep New Zealand up with the times. "It takes away the right for them to take action and discipline their employees when they talk about their pay. We know this happens already at the moment. So there's definitely a common sense, pragmatic element to this bill," she told RNZ. "It's making sure that usual human behaviour and workplace discussions are not something that people are disciplined for." Six National MPs took calls on the bill at its second reading. Every one of them referenced the gender pay gap and were hopeful the bill would be a mechanism to reduce it. Banks Peninsula MP Vanessa Weenink, who gave National's first contribution to the bill, told RNZ the party supported the bill because it had a "proud history" of driving down the gender pay gap. "We know that pay transparency is a key factor for driving down the gender pay gap. International studies have shown that when that legislation has been brought in, that it's measurable in the amount of reduction in the pay gap. So we really want to see that continue to fall down." Belich said it was great to see continued support for the bill. "I was heartened by the comments made in the house, where the National Party members said they would support this right through. I hope that's what they do," she said. "I think given the current context, where we've had significant changes to our pay equity regime, where women have had the ability to take pay equity claims severely curtailed, these types of bills, which make small changes to make a more transparent workforce, are increasingly important." Weenink said the "optics" around pay equity had nothing to do with National's support for the bill, as the party had also supported the bill at its first reading, well before the pay equity changes were announced. "It's just our ongoing commitment to doing what we can to make the workplace fair and improve productivity. How I see it is that if you can see you're being paid less than someone else who's working right beside you, doing the same job, then that's going to massively reduce your motivation, isn't it?" She did not see it as National handing Labour a win, but rather an opportunity to put party politics aside and improve things for New Zealanders. The bill passed its first reading in November. Sometimes, a bill is given cautious support at its first reading, in order to send it to Select Committee to see if the kinks are ironed out. The Education and Workforce Committee received 225 submissions on the bill, the majority in support. Belich said a number of changes were made to the bill through the Select Committee process, including making it clear there would be no requirement to make a disclosure. "It's still something that can be a private matter. It's only if you wish to that you shouldn't be disciplined for the desire to actually discuss that. So that was probably the major change through Select Committee." She said there were some definitional tidy-ups, including making it clear what the definitions of remuneration and detriment were, as well as ensuring the bill would not be retrospective. Some privileged or commercially sensitive information, for example, owner benefits for a business owner who also receives an employee salary, would also be excluded. Despite the changes, ACT and New Zealand First continued to oppose the bill. ACT said it would allow people to breach agreements they had signed up to, for which there should be consequences. "Once you've signed something, you are supposed to oblige to the conditions that you have signed for. If you do not agree to something in the agreement that you have signed, then there is an opportunity for you to go back and renegotiate the terms and conditions that you don't agree to," Parmjeet Parmar told the House. "But you don't just breach the agreement and say that there should be no consequences for that." New Zealand First's Mark Patterson said it "runs smack into the brick wall" of the party's belief in the "sanctity" of contract law. "While this bill doesn't prevent pay secrecy and that's still able to be incorporated within a contract, it does limit an employer's ability to enforce it, and that goes against what a contract should be," he said. Belich said she found the arguments against the bill "interesting," as it was specifically designed so businesses would not need to spend money to change their contracts. "If we'd said you cannot have a pay secrecy clause in your contract, or pay secrecy clauses are now illegal to have even in an employment document, there'd be thousands of employment agreements throughout the country that would need to be changed, that would cost money, that would take legal advice. It would be a burden on business." The bill still needs to go through the Committee of the Whole House stage for any further tidy-ups, and then a third reading, though Weenink did not foresee any major changes. "It took a long time to bash some of these things out, and I think we've got it to a really good place." Acknowledging National is a "broad church" and there had been strong discussions about the bill amongst the caucus, she did not expect any changes to the party's position at the third reading.
Otago Daily Times
17-07-2025
- Business
- Otago Daily Times
Pay talk protection: National backs Labour's transparency bill
Labour MP Dr Deborah Russell. By Giles Dexter of RNZ Members' bills from opposition MPs are more often than not doomed to fail, but there have been exceptions to the rule this term. Tracey McLellan's Evidence (Giving Evidence of Family Violence) Amendment Bill received unanimous support at its second reading, with all six parties in Parliament voting in favour. Deborah Russell's Companies (Address Information) Amendment Bill is being supported by National and ACT, but not by New Zealand First. Others, like Camilla Belich's Crimes (Theft by Employer) Amendment Bill, have passed thanks to the support of one of the smaller coalition parties (in this case, New Zealand First). But only one opposition bill has had the support of National, and only National this term, and it is another from Belich. On Wednesday night, her Employment Relations (Employee Remuneration Disclosure) Amendment Bill passed its second reading, thanks to National voting alongside the three opposition parties. The bill would ensure that pay secrecy clauses, which prevent employees from discussing their salaries with colleagues, would no longer be enforceable, meaning employers could not take legal action if an employee talked about pay. There will be cases where pay differences were justifiable (such as different skill sets or qualifications), but the bill's intention is to shed light on situations where they were unjustifiable. Australia, the UK, the EU, and some US states have either banned pay secrecy clauses or made them unenforceable. Belich said people already talk about their pay with colleagues, but stopping businesses from taking action against them for it would keep New Zealand up with the times. "It takes away the right for them to take action and discipline their employees when they talk about their pay. We know this happens already at the moment. So there's definitely a common sense, pragmatic element to this bill," she said. "It's making sure that usual human behaviour and workplace discussions are not something that people are disciplined for." Six National MPs took calls on the bill at its second reading. Every one of them referenced the gender pay gap and were hopeful the bill would be a mechanism to reduce it. Banks Peninsula MP Vanessa Weenink, who gave National's first contribution to the bill, said the party supported the bill because it had a "proud history" of driving down the gender pay gap. "We know that pay transparency is a key factor for driving down the gender pay gap. International studies have shown that when that legislation has been brought in, that it's measurable in the amount of reduction in the pay gap. So we really want to see that continue to fall down." Belich said it was great to see continued support for the bill. "I was heartened by the comments made in the house, where the National Party members said they would support this right through. I hope that's what they do," she said. "I think given the current context, where we've had significant changes to our pay equity regime, where women have had the ability to take pay equity claims severely curtailed, these types of bills, which make small changes to make a more transparent workforce, are increasingly important." Weenink said the "optics" around pay equity had nothing to do with National's support for the bill, as the party had also supported the bill at its first reading, well before the pay equity changes were announced. "It's just our ongoing commitment to doing what we can to make the workplace fair and improve productivity. How I see it is that if you can see you're being paid less than someone else who's working right beside you, doing the same job, then that's going to massively reduce your motivation, isn't it?" She did not see it as National handing Labour a win, but rather an opportunity to put party politics aside and improve things for New Zealanders. The bill passed its first reading in November. Sometimes, a bill is given cautious support at its first reading, in order to send it to Select Committee to see if the kinks are ironed out. The Education and Workforce Committee received 225 submissions on the bill, the majority in support. Belich said a number of changes were made to the bill through the Select Committee process, including making it clear there would be no requirement to make a disclosure. "It's still something that can be a private matter. It's only if you wish to that you shouldn't be disciplined for the desire to actually discuss that. So that was probably the major change through Select Committee." She said there were some definitional tidy-ups, including making it clear what the definitions of remuneration and detriment were, as well as ensuring the bill would not be retrospective. Some privileged or commercially sensitive information, for example, owner benefits for a business owner who also receives an employee salary, would also be excluded. Despite the changes, ACT and New Zealand First continued to oppose the bill. ACT said it would allow people to breach agreements they had signed up to, for which there should be consequences. "Once you've signed something, you are supposed to oblige to the conditions that you have signed for. If you do not agree to something in the agreement that you have signed, then there is an opportunity for you to go back and renegotiate the terms and conditions that you don't agree to," Parmjeet Parmar told the House. "But you don't just breach the agreement and say that there should be no consequences for that." New Zealand First's Mark Patterson said it "runs smack into the brick wall" of the party's belief in the "sanctity" of contract law. "While this bill doesn't prevent pay secrecy and that's still able to be incorporated within a contract, it does limit an employer's ability to enforce it, and that goes against what a contract should be," he said. Belich said she found the arguments against the bill "interesting," as it was specifically designed so businesses would not need to spend money to change their contracts. "If we'd said you cannot have a pay secrecy clause in your contract, or pay secrecy clauses are now illegal to have even in an employment document, there'd be thousands of employment agreements throughout the country that would need to be changed, that would cost money, that would take legal advice. It would be a burden on business." The bill still needs to go through the Committee of the Whole House stage for any further tidy-ups, and then a third reading, though Weenink did not foresee any major changes. "It took a long time to bash some of these things out, and I think we've got it to a really good place." Acknowledging National is a "broad church" and there had been strong discussions about the bill amongst the caucus, she did not expect any changes to the party's position at the third reading.
Yahoo
11-06-2025
- Health
- Yahoo
New exhibit examines coal dust pollution in Newport News
Environmental studies have yet to directly link Newport News residents' health problems with coal dust pollution the community has spent generations advocating against. An exhibition opening Thursday is presenting its own evidence. Local nonprofit EmPower All is collaborating with The Repair Lab, an environmental justice research lab out of the University of Virginia, to present 'Evidence: Coal Dust in Hampton Roads.' The exhibition will have an opening reception Thursday evening at the Downing-Gross Cultural Arts Center. The exhibit features data and archival evidence, including photos and newspaper articles dating back to the 1920s, detailing local coal dust pollution, along with a civic engagement workshop and representative air quality monitors. Adrian Wood, a multimedia producer with the Repair Lab, said the exhibition is the culmination of research to find residents' stories, including tenants unions fighting to install sprinkler systems in the 1980s — to tamp down coal dust in rail cars — and the first recorded local air quality studies in the 1950s. 'The exhibit is a collection of all the work that came before us,' Wood said. 'I have worked to gather these materials, but it really represents a lot of work that's very wide-ranging, mostly done by the residents of Southeast Newport News.' Coal dust has been a longstanding issue for Newport News, particularly the Southeast community. Kinder Morgan and Dominion Terminal Associates have some of the largest coal terminals in the country near the neighborhoods, terminals that have operated since the 1880s. Previous environmental studies focused around coal terminals in Norfolk have not linked coal dust pollution to community health issues. However, a 2005 study showed the Southeast community's asthma rates were more than double city and state averages. Additionally, Newport News ranked ninth in the state for the most asthma hospitalizations in 2023. Yugonda Sample-Jones, a resident of the Southeast community who is CEO of EmPower All, said continued academic research is proving what her community has known for decades. Coal dust continues to plague Newport News and Norfolk communities. Residents are skeptical change will come. Newport News not selected for $20 million grant to address coal dust, will explore other options 'Extremely distressing' Chesapeake Bay blue crab populations call for curtailing harvest, experts say 'We know what has been done to our health, who has died from this pollution and what things have been done in the past,' Sample-Jones said. The state Department of Environmental Quality is conducting an air quality monitoring study that will run through late 2026, but the city recently lost out on a $20 million federal grant to address local coal dust pollution. Despite the setbacks, Newport News spokesperson Kimberly Bracy said, the city remains committed to finding solutions to mitigate coal dust pollution. Lathaniel Kirts knew the dangers of coal dust pollution when he lived in Norfolk before seeing the same thing when he moved across the water in 2019. 'You normalize it,' said Kirts, who helped facilitate the exhibit with Repair Lab and will assist in Thursday's civic engagement workshop. 'But then you realize that that is environmental injustice right in plain sight.' It can be easy for outsiders to ignore the problem if their house isn't covered in dust or their loved one isn't hospitalized from air pollution, said Kirts, who lives next to the Southeast community. However, Southeast is a predominantly Black and low-income community, and Kirts said part of fighting environmental injustice means sharing the stories of those who have been ignored for years. 'So many times, racism is silent, oppression is quiet, but it's so deadly. And that's what coal dust is,' Kirts said. 'It's a silent and physical force that invades us, and then slowly oppresses and kills us. What we're trying to do is highlight those voices in this exhibit to show what's been happening.' Devlin Epding, 757-510-4037, When: Opening reception, 5:30-8 p.m. Thursday. Exhibit, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Mondays through Fridays; 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. Saturdays; closed Sundays. Through July 9. Where: Downing-Gross Cultural Arts Center, 2410 Wickham Ave., Newport News Tickets: Free Details: 757-247-8950
Yahoo
11-06-2025
- Health
- Yahoo
New exhibit examines coal dust pollution in Newport News
Environmental studies have yet to directly link Newport News residents' health problems with coal dust pollution the community has spent generations advocating against. An exhibition opening Thursday is presenting its own evidence. Local nonprofit EmPower All is collaborating with The Repair Lab, an environmental justice research lab out of the University of Virginia, to present 'Evidence: Coal Dust in Hampton Roads.' The exhibition will have an opening reception Thursday evening at the Downing-Gross Cultural Arts Center. The exhibit features data and archival evidence, including photos and newspaper articles dating back to the 1920s, detailing local coal dust pollution, along with a civic engagement workshop and representative air quality monitors. Adrian Wood, a multimedia producer with the Repair Lab, said the exhibition is the culmination of research to find residents' stories, including tenants unions fighting to install sprinkler systems in the 1980s — to tamp down coal dust in rail cars — and the first recorded local air quality studies in the 1950s. 'The exhibit is a collection of all the work that came before us,' Wood said. 'I have worked to gather these materials, but it really represents a lot of work that's very wide-ranging, mostly done by the residents of Southeast Newport News.' Coal dust has been a longstanding issue for Newport News, particularly the Southeast community. Kinder Morgan and Dominion Terminal Associates have some of the largest coal terminals in the country near the neighborhoods, terminals that have operated since the 1880s. Previous environmental studies focused around coal terminals in Norfolk have not linked coal dust pollution to community health issues. However, a 2005 study showed the Southeast community's asthma rates were more than double city and state averages. Additionally, Newport News ranked ninth in the state for the most asthma hospitalizations in 2023. Yugonda Sample-Jones, a resident of the Southeast community who is CEO of EmPower All, said continued academic research is proving what her community has known for decades. Coal dust continues to plague Newport News and Norfolk communities. Residents are skeptical change will come. Newport News not selected for $20 million grant to address coal dust, will explore other options 'Extremely distressing' Chesapeake Bay blue crab populations call for curtailing harvest, experts say 'We know what has been done to our health, who has died from this pollution and what things have been done in the past,' Sample-Jones said. The state Department of Environmental Quality is conducting an air quality monitoring study that will run through late 2026, but the city recently lost out on a $20 million federal grant to address local coal dust pollution. Despite the setbacks, Newport News spokesperson Kimberly Bracy said, the city remains committed to finding solutions to mitigate coal dust pollution. Lathaniel Kirts knew the dangers of coal dust pollution when he lived in Norfolk before seeing the same thing when he moved across the water in 2019. 'You normalize it,' said Kirts, who helped facilitate the exhibit with Repair Lab and will assist in Thursday's civic engagement workshop. 'But then you realize that that is environmental injustice right in plain sight.' It can be easy for outsiders to ignore the problem if their house isn't covered in dust or their loved one isn't hospitalized from air pollution, said Kirts, who lives next to the Southeast community. However, Southeast is a predominantly Black and low-income community, and Kirts said part of fighting environmental injustice means sharing the stories of those who have been ignored for years. 'So many times, racism is silent, oppression is quiet, but it's so deadly. And that's what coal dust is,' Kirts said. 'It's a silent and physical force that invades us, and then slowly oppresses and kills us. What we're trying to do is highlight those voices in this exhibit to show what's been happening.' Devlin Epding, 757-510-4037, When: Opening reception, 5:30-8 p.m. Thursday. Exhibit, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Mondays through Fridays; 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. Saturdays; closed Sundays. Through July 9. Where: Downing-Gross Cultural Arts Center, 2410 Wickham Ave., Newport News Tickets: Free Details: 757-247-8950
