Latest news with #ExecutiveOrders
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
Unfrozen: White House releases remaining $5B for K-12 programs
This story was originally published on K-12 Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily K-12 Dive newsletter. The Trump administration will release the remaining fiscal year 2025 K-12 grant funds that it had frozen — nearly $5 billion — to states and districts, the Office of Management and Budget confirmed Friday. The funding for student academic supports, English learners, immigrant students and teacher training was supposed to be available July 1, but was not released pending a "programmatic review" by OMB, the White House's budget arm. That review was to ensure the grants align with Trump administration policies and priorities, OMB told K-12 Dive earlier this month. The office had said initial findings showed "many of these grant programs have been grossly misused to subsidize a radical leftwing agenda.' On Friday, a senior administration official told K-12 Dive in an email, "Guardrails are in place to ensure these funds will not be used in violation of Executive Orders or administration policy." Earlier this week, OMB began releasing $1.3 billion it had withheld for after-school and summer programming under the 21st Century Community Learning Centers grant, according to the Afterschool Alliance. The remaining funds to be released are: $2.2 billion for Title II-A for professional development. $1.4 billion for Title IV-A for student support and academic enrichment. $890 million for Title III-A for English-learner services. $375 million for Title I-C for migrant education. Education officials, Republican and Democratic lawmakers, education organizations, parents and nonprofits had all urged OMB to release the funds that were approved by Congress in an appropriations bill that President Donald Trump signed in March. They said the weekslong delay in accessing the money was already causing "budgetary chaos" for schools, which began cancelling contracts, laying off staff and eliminating programs when the funds didn't arrive as scheduled. The disruption also spurred two lawsuits. A survey by AASA, the School Superintendents Association, found that nearly 30% of districts said they needed access to the withheld funds by Aug. 1 to avoid cutting programs and services for students. By Aug. 15, survey respondents said they would have to notify parents and educators about the loss of programs and services. The survey was conducted earlier this month and drew responses from 628 superintendents in 43 states. On Friday, David Schuler, AASA's executive director, said in a statement that he was pleased the "critical" funds would now be available to schools. Sen Patty Murray, D-Wash., vice chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, said in a statement Friday, "There is no good reason for the chaos and stress this president has inflicted on students, teachers, and parents across America for the last month, and it shouldn't take widespread blowback for this administration to do its job and simply get the funding out the door that Congress has delivered to help students." Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, addressed the news during a keynote speech Friday at the Together Educating America's Children conference in Washington, D.C., according to a press release. "Today, they backed down: our lobbying, our lawsuits, and our advocacy for why these funds matter to kids, it worked." Weingarten said. Becky Pringle, president of the National Education Association, said in a Friday statement, "These reckless funding delays have undermined planning, staffing, and support services at a time when schools should be focused on preparing students for success.' Recommended Reading Lawsuit adds pressure on Trump administration to release K-12 funds Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
5 days ago
- Business
- Forbes
How President Trump's 'AI Action Plan' May Impact Corporate Boards
getty The July 23 release of President Trump's comprehensive 'Winning the AI Race: America's AI Action Plan' presents technology opportunities and challenges for corporate leadership. On the one hand, the Plan commits the Administration to the admirable goal of expediting American efforts to establish global leadership in artificial intelligence and its critical infrastructure. On the other hand, its plan to achieve this goal by limiting what it regards as burdensome government regulation may prompt corporate leaders to compensate by adding new, more comprehensive internal risk-related guardrails. The Plan encompasses over 90 Federal policy actions across three policy pillars – 'Accelerating Innovation', 'Building American AI Infrastructure', and 'Leading in International Diplomacy and Security' – that will be rolled out by the Trump Administration over time. The pillars focus on exporting American AI; promoting the rapid buildout of data centers; removing 'onerous' Federal regulations that hinder AI development and deployment and updating Federal procurement guidelines to ensure that artificial intelligence models procured by the Federal government prioritize truthfulness and ideological neutrality. The New York Times described the Action Plan as 'opening the door for companies to develop the technology unfettered from oversight and safeguards', while assuring that A.I. be free of 'partisan bias.' The perception of the Plan is that in order for America to achieve global pre-eminence in AI, its development must not be hindered by a broad regulatory scheme. This represents a change in approach by the United States and reflects a departure from the approach of other governments (e.g., the European Commission) to implement regulatory standards for AI. Simultaneously with the rollout of the Action Plan, President Trump signed three related Executive Orders: one prohibiting the federal government from purchasing AI tools it perceives as ideologically slanted; another accelerating certain AI infrastructure projects and a third relating to the exporting of American-developed AI products. Corporate boards are likely to follow two parallel paths in responding to the AI Action Plan. One path could involve thorough conversations between the board and management concerning the impact of the Plan on the company's AI strategy. These conversations will likely focus on establishing internal mechanisms to monitor the roll-out of the Plan, and on identifying opportunities under the Plan to enhance the company's approach to AI acquisition and deployment. The other, more challenging path could also involve board/management conversations, but on the opposite end of the spectrum ‒ whether the limited commitment to federal AI regulation could create increased liability and reputational exposure for the company. Any such conversation would be grounded in an honest self-evaluation of the current degree of board proficiency in artificial intelligence related matters. Is the board prepared to accelerate and monitor the company's use of AI? In such an exercise, the National Association of Corporate Directors' 2024 Blue Ribbon Commission Report, 'Technology Leadership in the Boardroom' might be an effective measuring stick. The more direct conversations about liability and risk would evaluate the need to enhance the board's AI oversight mechanisms and whether to add specific review standards in order to assure reliability, safety and trust. In addition, the board may consider whether additional oversight may be necessary in order to responsibly manage issues historically associated with 'irresponsible use' of AI (e.g. societal harms such as fraud, discrimination, bias, and disinformation; anti-competitive behavior, and the displacement and disempowerment of workers). The board will also likely consult with its advisors on whether to expand compliance programming to address possible government enforcement policies regarding the objectivity of AI systems in general, and their possible treatment of such controversial topics as diversity, equity and inclusion, climate change and misinformation. The board's pursuit of this parallel path will most certainly require an investment of time, review, evaluation, internal discussion and external consultation beyond that which it may already be contributing to AI. The ultimate governance question arising from the AI Action plan is whether boards will find it necessary to compensate for the absence of comprehensive AI regulation with increased internal oversight ‒ and whether it can do so without creating an expensive internal bureaucracy.
Cision Canada
7 days ago
- Automotive
- Cision Canada
Graphite One Joins Lucid and Domestic Battery Materials Developers Pledging Strategic Collaboration to Promote Domestic Critical Minerals in the U.S. Automotive Supply Chain
Companies Form "Minerals For National Automotive Competitiveness ("MINAC") Uniting Select Group of Miners and Processors" Initiative Aligns with G1's 100% U.S.-Based Advanced Graphite Materials Supply Chain Strategy and White House Executive Orders on Critical Minerals VANCOUVER, BC, July 23, 2025 /CNW/ - Graphite One Inc. (TSXV: GPH) (OTCQX: GPHOF) (" Graphite One", the " Company", or "G1"), is pleased to announce that the Company has entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (" MoU") with Lucid Group, Inc (" Lucid"), maker of the world's most advanced electric vehicles. This agreement has been signed as part of the formation of MINAC -- Minerals for National Automotive Competitiveness -- a collaborative aimed at fostering economic growth while reducing U.S. over-reliance on foreign supplies of critical minerals within the automotive supply chain. MINAC formally launched today during a Capitol Hill event featuring a roundtable discussion and remarks by Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs, Alaska Senator Dan Sullivan, Alaska Representative Nick Begich and Arizona Representative Andy Biggs in Washington, D.C. "Graphite One is pleased to be partnered with Lucid via supply chain offtake agreements for both synthetic and natural graphite," said Anthony Huston, CEO of Graphite One. "With MINAC representing domestic developers of the essential rechargeable battery materials and Lucid as an end-user, this agreement marks a significant step towards creating the fully U.S.-based supply chain that is an indispensable element of U.S. energy dominance." The formation of the MINAC U.S. battery materials collaborative follows G1 and Lucid's natural graphite supply agreement, announced in Anchorage, Alaska at Governor Mike Dunleavy's Alaska Sustainable Energy Conference in June here, and Graphite One's listing of Graphite Creek as Alaska's first mining project on the FAST-41 Federal Permitting Dashboard here and fifth mining project overall at the time of listing. Graphite One's Supply Chain Strategy With the United States currently 100 percent import dependent for synthetic and natural graphite, Graphite One is developing a complete U.S.-based, advanced graphite supply chain solution anchored by the Graphite Creek deposit, recognized by the US Geological Survey as the largest graphite deposit in the U.S. "and among the largest in the world." The Graphite One Project plan includes building an advanced graphite material and battery anode material manufacturing plant located in Warren, Ohio. The plan also includes a recycling facility to reclaim graphite and the other battery materials, to be co-located at the Ohio site, the third link in Graphite One's circular economy strategy. About MINAC MINAC is a partnership among U.S. mineral and automotive producers to develop the domestic supply chains that will support national security and enable American energy leadership. The collaboration promotes the use of the United States' vast mineral resources to create jobs, fuel prosperity, and significantly reduce reliance on foreign nations within the automotive supply chain; potentially unlocking billions in investment in mining, minerals processing, and derivative products manufacturing. About Graphite One Inc. GRAPHITE ONE INC. continues to develop its Graphite One Project (the " Project"), with the goal of becoming an American producer of high grade anode materials that is integrated with a domestic graphite resource. The Project is proposed as a vertically integrated enterprise to mine, process and manufacture high grade anode materials primarily for the lithium‐ion electric vehicle battery market. On Behalf of the Board of Directors "Anthony Huston" (signed) For more information on Graphite One Inc., please visit the Company's website, On X @Graphite One Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. All statements in this release, other than statements of historical facts, including those related to entering MINAC, the anticipated benefits of MINAC in fostering economic growth, future production, establishment of a processing plant and a graphite manufacturing plant, completion of project financing, establishment of a battery materials recycling facility, and events or developments that the Company intends, expects, plans, or proposes are forward-looking statements. Generally, forward‐looking information can be identified by the use of forward‐looking terminology such as "proposes", "expects", "is expected", "scheduled", "estimates", "projects", "plans", "is planning", "intends", "assumes", "believes", "indicates", "to be" or variations of such words and phrases that state that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will be taken", "occur" or "be achieved". The Company cautions that there is no certainty that the Company will enter into a definitive agreement with Lucid and even if the Company does enter into such arrangement, that the anticipated outcomes will result. Although the Company believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include market prices, exploitation and exploration successes, continuity of mineralization, uncertainties related to the ability to obtain necessary permits, licenses and title and delays due to third party opposition, changes in government policies regarding mining and natural resource exploration and exploitation, and continued availability of capital and financing, and general economic, market or business conditions. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on this forward-looking information, which is given as of the date it is expressed in this press release, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking information, except as required by applicable securities laws. For more information on the Company, investors should review the Company's continuous disclosure filings that are available at
CNBC
21-07-2025
- Business
- CNBC
Orange juice importer says Brazil tariffs will raise prices for American consumers
Orange juice prices could rise by 20% to 25%, according to Johanna Foods, a small U.S. business suing the White House over tariffs threatened against Brazil. President Donald Trump said in a July 9 letter to President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva that he would apply a 50% tariff to all imports from Brazil starting Aug. 1. Trump said the high tariff rate was necessary because of "the way Brazil has treated former President Bolsonaro." Prosecutors in Brazil have alleged that Bolsonaro was part of a scheme that included a plan to assassinate the country's current president, who defeated him in the last election, and Supreme Federal Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes. Bolsonaro has denied any wrongdoing. Trump also said Brazil was censoring U.S.-based social media platforms and was running "unsustainable Trade Deficits" with the United States. However, the United States has a goods trade surplus with Brazil — more than $7 billion last year, according to data from the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. Johanna Foods, which says it supplies nearly 75% of all private label "not from concentrate" orange juice to customers in the U.S., says those arguments do not constitute an economic emergency and therefore the president does not have the power to levy this tariff. "The Brazil Letter does not refer to any legal or statutory authority under which the Brazil Tariff can be imposed by the President," the company's attorney Marc Kaplin writes in a filing. "The Brazil Letter does not constitute a proper executive action, is not an Executive Order, does not reference or incorporate any Executive Orders or modify or amend any existing Executive Order," the attorney continued. The company said some of its customers include Walmart, Aldi, Wegman's, Safeway and Albertsons. Johanna Foods CEO Robert Facchina said the duty would result in an estimated $68 million hit, exceeding any single year of profits since the company was created in 1995. "The Brazil Tariff will result in a significant, and perhaps prohibitive, price increase in a staple American breakfast food," the lawsuit reads. "The not from concentrate orange juice ingredients imported from Brazil are not reasonably available from any supplier in the United States in sufficient quantity or quality to meet the Plaintiffs' production needs." Orange juice prices have already been rising across the country. Over the last year, the average price of a 16 ounce container of orange juice rose 23 cents, or more than 5%, to $4.49, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Orange juice futures, the global benchmark that tracks the commodity, have also jumped recently. During the last month, they are up nearly 40%, with most of that increase coming on the heels of Trump's threat. Brazil's Supreme Court ruled last month that social media companies can be held accountable for the content posted on their platforms. Elon Musk's social media site, X, was also briefly banned last year in Brazil after Musk refused to comply with a court request to ban some accounts. Facchina says layoffs of union manufacturing employees, administrative staff and a reduced production capacity at the company's Flemington, New Jersey, and Spokane, Washington, facilities are near-certain should these tariffs go into effect. Johanna Foods employs almost 700 people across Washington state and New Jersey. Brazil was the 18th-largest source of U.S. goods imports last year, with more than $42 billion worth of imports entering the country, according to U.S. International Trade Commission data. In its legal filing, the company asks the Court of International Trade to declare that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not grant Trump the statutory authority to impose the tariffs against Brazil, and that the president has not identified a national emergency or "unusual and extraordinary threat" as required by the IEEPA law to impose the tariffs. In response to the lawsuit, a White House spokesperson said the administration is "legally and fairly using tariff powers that have been granted to the executive branch by the Constitution and Congress to level the playing field for American workers and safeguard our national security."
NBC News
21-07-2025
- Business
- NBC News
Orange juice importer says Brazil tariffs will raise prices for American consumers
Orange juice prices could rise by 20% to 25%, according to Johanna Foods, a small U.S. business suing the White House over tariffs threatened against Brazil. President Donald Trump said in a July 9 letter to President Luiz Inacio da Silva that he would apply a 50% tariff to all imports from Brazil starting on August 1. Trump said the high tariff rate was necessary because of "the way Brazil has treated former President Bolsonaro." Prosecutors in Brazil have alleged that Bolsonaro was part of a scheme that included a plan to assassinate the country's current president, who defeated him in the last election, and Supreme Federal Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes. Bolsonaro has denied all wrongdoing. Trump also said Brazil was censoring U.S.-based social media platforms and was running 'unsustainable Trade Deficits' with the United States. However, the United States has a goods trade surplus with Brazil — more than $7 billion last year, according to data from the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. Johanna Foods, which says it supplies nearly 75% of all private label 'not from concentrate' orange juice to customers in the U.S., says those arguments do not constitute an economic emergency and therefore the president does not have the power to levy this tariff. 'The Brazil Letter does not refer to any legal or statutory authority under which the Brazil Tariff can be imposed by the President,' the company's attorney Marc Kaplin writes in a filing. 'The Brazil Letter does not constitute a proper executive action, is not an Executive Order, does not reference or incorporate any Executive Orders or modify or amend any existing Executive Order.' The company says some of its customers include Walmart, Aldi, Wegman's, Safeway and Albertsons. Johanna Foods CEO Robert Facchina says the duty would result in an estimated $68 million hit, exceeding any single year of profits since the company was created in 1995. 'The Brazil Tariff will result in a significant, and perhaps prohibitive, price increase in a staple American breakfast food,' he writes. 'The not from concentrate orange juice ingredients imported from Brazil are not reasonably available from any supplier in the United States in sufficient quantity or quality to meet the Plaintiffs' production needs.' Brazil's Supreme Court ruled last month that social media companies can be held accountable for the content posted on their platforms. Elon Musk's social media site, X, was also briefly banned last year in Brazil after Musk refused to comply with a court request to ban some accounts. Facchina says layoffs of union manufacturing employees, administrative staff and a reduced production capacity at the company's Flemington, New Jersey, and Spokane, Washington, facilities are near certain should these tariffs go into effect. Johanna Foods employs almost 700 people across Washington state and New Jersey. Brazil was the 18th-largest source of U.S. goods imports last year, with more than $42 billion worth of imports entering the country, according to U.S. International Trade Commission data. In its legal filing, the company asks the Court of International Trade to declare that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not grant Trump the statutory authority to impose the tariffs against Brazil, and that the president has not identified a national emergency or 'unusual and extraordinary threat' as required by the IEEPA law to impose the tariffs. In response to the lawsuit, a White House spokesman said the administration is "legally and fairly using tariff powers that have been granted to the executive branch by the Constitution and Congress to level the playing field for American workers and safeguard our national security.'
