Latest news with #FADEC
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Crash Due To Dual Engine Failure? Air India Pilots Hold Simulated Flight
More than two weeks after the deadly crash of an Air India plane that killed all but one of the 242 people on board, investigators and the airline are studying possible dual engine failure as a scenario that prevented the Boeing Co. 787 jet from staying airborne. Pilots from the airline reenacted the doomed aircraft's parameters in a flight simulator, including with the landing gear deployed and the wing flaps retracted, and found those settings alone didn't cause a crash, according to people familiar with the investigation. The result, alongside the previous discovery that an emergency-power turbine deployed seconds before impact, has reinforced the focus on a technical failure as one possible cause, said the people, who asked not to be identified discussing non-public deliberations. The simulated flight was conducted separately from the official probe being led by Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau, or AAIB, and was done to explore possible scenarios, one of the people said. The Boeing 787 that crashed in Ahmedabad on June 12 was powered by two engines made by General Electric Co. Video footage of the aircraft showed the plane struggling to gain altitude after taking off, and then sinking back to the ground, where it exploded. Additional Clues Boeing declined to comment and deferred any questions to AAIB, while GE said it cannot comment on an active investigation. The AAIB and Air India did not respond to a request for comment. Whether or why both engines would have simultaneously lost power remains unknown, but investigators will seek additional clues from the two flight recorders, whose data has been extracted and is undergoing analysis. The investigation is exploring a wide range of scenarios, though a closer focus is on technical issues, the people said. Pilots who reviewed the footage have pointed to the fact that the landing gear was already partially tilted forward, suggesting the cockpit crew had initiated the retraction sequence of the wheels. At the same time, the landing-gear doors had not opened, which pilots say might mean that the aircraft experienced a loss of power or a hydraulic failure - again pointing to possible issues with the engines that provide the aircraft's electricity. The engines of modern aircraft are computer controlled using a system called Full Authority Digital Engine Control, or FADEC, which helps pilots control an aircraft's power and makes sure the engines are used efficiently and not outside their operating limits. An emergency turbine called the RAT, which deploys from the back of the aircraft in the case of electrical failure, was activated before the plane crashed, according to previous findings. That fan helps provide the aircraft with vital power, though it's far too small to generate any lift. 15 Seconds Analysis of the wreckage suggests the wing flaps and slats, which help an aircraft increase lift during takeoff, were extended correctly. The crash ranks as the worst accident in Indian civil aviation in several decades, and it's the first time that a Boeing 787 Dreamliner has been lost to an accident. The pilots, who died in the crash, sent out a Mayday signal shortly after takeoff. There were only about 15 seconds between the distress call and impact, two people familiar with the investigation said. Teams from Boeing and the US National Transportation Safety Board are supporting the investigation on the ground. It's unknown when authorities will give an update from readout of the flight recorders, which typically provide a comprehensive analysis of an aircraft's settings and performance metrics as well as conversations in the cockpit.
Time of India
16 hours ago
- Business
- Time of India
Air India Boeing 787 crash: What brought down AI 171 plane in Ahmedabad? Simulation puts focus on technical failure
Air India pilots have conducted simulations of the ill-fated flight's conditions. (PTI photo) Air India plane crash : Over a fortnight after the fatal Air India aircraft disaster that claimed lives of all onboard except for a single survivor, investigators alongside the airline are analysing the possibility of simultaneous engine failures that may have caused the Boeing 787 aircraft to lose altitude and crash. Air India pilots have conducted simulations of the ill-fated flight's conditions in a simulator, testing scenarios with extended landing gear and retracted wing flaps. These simulations revealed that these configurations alone would not have resulted in a crash, according to sources close to the investigation quoted in a Bloomberg report. These findings, coupled with the earlier detection of an emergency-power turbine activation moments before impact, have strengthened the investigation's focus towards technical malfunction as a potential cause, sources said in the report. Air India Plane Crash Simulation & Clues The cause of simultaneous power loss in both engines remains unclear, whilst investigators continue their analysis of data from the two flight recorders. Whilst the investigation considers various possibilities, technical matters have become a primary focus, according to sources familiar with the matter. The test flight simulation was performed independently of the formal investigation being conducted by India's AAIB, with the purpose of examining potential circumstances, according to one source familiar with the matter. The ill-fated Boeing 787 that met with disaster in Ahmedabad on June 12 utilised two General Electric Co. manufactured engines. Visual recordings captured the aircraft's unsuccessful attempt to achieve height post-takeoff, followed by its descent to the ground, finally leading to the crash. Aviation experts who studied the footage noted the forward tilt of the landing gear, indicating that the flight crew had begun retracting the wheels. The unopened landing-gear doors, combined with the gear position, suggests potential power loss or hydraulic system failure. This observation further strengthens the possibility of engine-related issues, as the engines supply the aircraft's electrical power, the Bloomberg report said. Computer-operated systems known as Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) regulate modern aircraft engines. This technology assists pilots in managing aircraft power while ensuring optimal engine performance within specified operational boundaries. Also Read | Air India plane crash: 787 Dreamliner is Boeing's flagship product - 10 things to know about aircraft model involved in Ahmedabad crash Previous investigations revealed that prior to the crash, the RAT (Ram Air Turbine), an emergency turbine located at the aircraft's rear section, was deployed. Although this device supplies crucial electrical power during system failures, its small size prevents it from producing any aerodynamic lift. Examination of the debris indicates that the wing flaps and slats, crucial components for enhancing aircraft lift during takeoff, were in their proper extended position. This incident stands as the most severe in Indian civil aviation history over multiple decades, and represents the first catastrophic loss of a Boeing 787 Dreamliner. The flight crew, who did not survive the incident, issued a Mayday distress signal moments after becoming airborne. According to two sources close to the investigation, approximately 15 seconds elapsed between the emergency call and the aircraft's impact. Representatives from Boeing and the US National Transportation Safety Board are present on site to assist with the investigative process. The timeline for authorities to release findings from the flight data recorders remains uncertain. These devices traditionally provide detailed information about aircraft configurations, operational parameters and flight deck communications. Also Read | Air India AI 171 plane crash in Ahmedabad: Flying has become safer over the decades; last 5 years safest since 2000 Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Economic Times
19 hours ago
- General
- Economic Times
Simulation of crashed Air India jet puts focus on technical flaw
More than two weeks after the deadly crash of an Air India plane that killed all but one of the 242 people on board, investigators and the airline are studying possible dual engine failure as a scenario that prevented the Boeing Co. 787 jet from staying airborne. ADVERTISEMENT Pilots from the airline reenacted the doomed aircraft's parameters in a flight simulator, including with the landing gear deployed and the wing flaps retracted, and found those settings alone didn't cause a crash, according to people familiar with the investigation. The result, alongside the previous discovery that an emergency-power turbine deployed seconds before impact, has reinforced the focus on a technical failure as one possible cause, said the people, who asked not to be identified discussing non-public deliberations. The simulated flight was conducted separately from the official probe being led by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau, or AAIB, and was done to explore possible scenarios, one of the people Boeing 787 that crashed in the western Indian city of Ahmedabad on June 12 was powered by two engines made by General Electric Co. Video footage of the aircraft showed the plane struggling to gain altitude after taking off, and then sinking back to the ground, where it exploded. Additional Clues Boeing declined to comment and deferred any questions to AAIB, while GE said it cannot comment on an active investigation. The AAIB and Air India did not respond to a request for comment. ADVERTISEMENT Whether or why both engines would have simultaneously lost power remains unknown, but investigators will seek additional clues from the two flight recorders, whose data has been extracted and is undergoing analysis. The investigation is exploring a wide range of scenarios, though a closer focus is on technical issues, the people who reviewed the footage have pointed to the fact that the landing gear was already partially tilted forward, suggesting the cockpit crew had initiated the retraction sequence of the wheels. ADVERTISEMENT At the same time, the landing-gear doors had not opened, which pilots say might mean that the aircraft experienced a loss of power or a hydraulic failure — again pointing to possible issues with the engines that provide the aircraft's engines of modern aircraft are computer controlled using a system called Full Authority Digital Engine Control, or FADEC, which helps pilots control an aircraft's power and makes sure the engines are used efficiently and not outside their operating limits. ADVERTISEMENT An emergency turbine called the RAT, which deploys from the back of the aircraft in the case of electrical failure, was activated before the plane crashed, according to previous findings. That fan helps provide the aircraft with vital power, though it's far too small to generate any lift. 15 Seconds Analysis of the wreckage suggests the wing flaps and slats, which help an aircraft increase lift during takeoff, were extended correctly. The crash ranks as the worst accident in Indian civil aviation in several decades, and it's the first time that a Boeing 787 Dreamliner has been lost to an accident. ADVERTISEMENT The pilots, who died in the crash, sent out a Mayday signal shortly after takeoff. There were only about 15 seconds between the distress call and impact, two people familiar with the investigation from Boeing and the US National Transportation Safety Board are supporting the investigation on the ground. It's unknown when authorities will give an update from readout of the flight recorders, which typically provide a comprehensive analysis of an aircraft's settings and performance metrics as well as conversations in the cockpit. (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel)
Time of India
19 hours ago
- Time of India
Simulation of crashed Air India jet puts focus on technical flaw
More than two weeks after the deadly crash of an Air India plane that killed all but one of the 242 people on board, investigators and the airline are studying possible dual engine failure as a scenario that prevented the Boeing Co. 787 jet from staying airborne. Pilots from the airline reenacted the doomed aircraft's parameters in a flight simulator, including with the landing gear deployed and the wing flaps retracted, and found those settings alone didn't cause a crash, according to people familiar with the investigation. The result, alongside the previous discovery that an emergency-power turbine deployed seconds before impact, has reinforced the focus on a technical failure as one possible cause, said the people, who asked not to be identified discussing non-public deliberations. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Tom Cruise's Daughter Is Hands Down The Most Beautiful Woman In The World Fab Pop Undo The simulated flight was conducted separately from the official probe being led by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau, or AAIB, and was done to explore possible scenarios, one of the people said. The Boeing 787 that crashed in the western Indian city of Ahmedabad on June 12 was powered by two engines made by General Electric Co. Video footage of the aircraft showed the plane struggling to gain altitude after taking off, and then sinking back to the ground, where it exploded. Live Events Additional Clues Boeing declined to comment and deferred any questions to AAIB, while GE said it cannot comment on an active investigation. The AAIB and Air India did not respond to a request for comment. Whether or why both engines would have simultaneously lost power remains unknown, but investigators will seek additional clues from the two flight recorders, whose data has been extracted and is undergoing analysis. The investigation is exploring a wide range of scenarios, though a closer focus is on technical issues, the people said. Pilots who reviewed the footage have pointed to the fact that the landing gear was already partially tilted forward, suggesting the cockpit crew had initiated the retraction sequence of the wheels. At the same time, the landing-gear doors had not opened, which pilots say might mean that the aircraft experienced a loss of power or a hydraulic failure — again pointing to possible issues with the engines that provide the aircraft's electricity. The engines of modern aircraft are computer controlled using a system called Full Authority Digital Engine Control, or FADEC, which helps pilots control an aircraft's power and makes sure the engines are used efficiently and not outside their operating limits. An emergency turbine called the RAT, which deploys from the back of the aircraft in the case of electrical failure, was activated before the plane crashed, according to previous findings. That fan helps provide the aircraft with vital power, though it's far too small to generate any lift. 15 Seconds Analysis of the wreckage suggests the wing flaps and slats, which help an aircraft increase lift during takeoff, were extended correctly. The crash ranks as the worst accident in Indian civil aviation in several decades, and it's the first time that a Boeing 787 Dreamliner has been lost to an accident. The pilots, who died in the crash, sent out a Mayday signal shortly after takeoff. There were only about 15 seconds between the distress call and impact, two people familiar with the investigation said. Teams from Boeing and the US National Transportation Safety Board are supporting the investigation on the ground. It's unknown when authorities will give an update from readout of the flight recorders, which typically provide a comprehensive analysis of an aircraft's settings and performance metrics as well as conversations in the cockpit.
Associated Press
09-04-2025
- Business
- Associated Press
Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) Industry Forecast, 2034 - Aviation's Key Path to Sustainability, as FADEC Systems Optimize Performance and Cut Emissions
The 'Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) Market - A Global and Regional Analysis: Focus on End User, Type, Channel Type and Country - Analysis and Forecast, 2025-2034" report has been added to offering. The full authority digital engine control (FADEC) market is experiencing robust growth driven by advancements in aerospace technologies and the growing need for fuel-efficient aircraft. As the aviation sector emphasizes safety and operational efficiency, FADEC systems play a pivotal role in optimizing engine performance and reducing emissions, thus driving market expansion. FADEC Market Drivers The full authority digital engine control (FADEC) market continues to witness significant growth propelled by advancements in aerospace technologies and the burgeoning demand for fuel-efficient aircraft. FADEC systems, integral to modern aircraft engines, offer precise control over engine parameters, optimizing performance and reducing emissions. With an increasing emphasis on safety and operational efficiency in the aviation sector, the adoption of FADEC systems is poised to surge further. Additionally, the rise in air travel, coupled with the expansion of commercial aviation fleets globally, is fuelling the demand for advanced FADEC solutions. Market players are focusing on innovation and strategic collaborations to enhance product offerings and gain a competitive edge in this evolving landscape. One key driver propelling the growth of the full authority digital engine control (FADEC) market is the relentless pursuit of fuel efficiency and environmental sustainability in the aviation industry. With stringent regulations aimed at reducing carbon emissions, airlines and aircraft manufacturers are increasingly turning to FADEC systems to optimize fuel consumption and minimize environmental impact. These advanced engine control systems enable precise monitoring and adjustment of engine parameters, ensuring optimal performance while simultaneously reducing fuel consumption and emissions, thus aligning with the industry's sustainability goals. As airlines strive to enhance operational efficiency and mitigate environmental impact, the demand for FADEC-equipped aircraft is expected to soar, driving the expansion of the FADEC market in the near future. FADEC Market Challenges The complexity and cost associated with the development and integration of advanced FADEC systems into existing and new aircraft platforms is one of the significant challenges faced by the full authority digital engine control (FADEC) market. The sophisticated technology and stringent safety requirements necessitate extensive testing and certification processes, leading to prolonged development timelines and increased expenses for manufacturers. Additionally, retrofitting older aircraft with FADEC systems can be technically challenging and economically prohibitive, posing a barrier to widespread adoption. Moreover, the rapid pace of technological advancements in aerospace engineering requires continuous innovation and upgrades, further complicating the landscape for FADEC suppliers. Addressing these challenges requires substantial investments in research and development, as well as close collaboration between industry stakeholders to streamline certification processes and drive down costs, thereby ensuring the widespread adoption of FADEC technology across the aviation sector. Regional and Competitive Landscape North America leads the growth of the full authority digital engine control (FADEC) market due to several key factors. Firstly, the region hosts some of the world's leading aerospace companies, including Boeing and Airbus North America, which drive innovation and adoption of advanced technologies like FADEC. Additionally, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Transport Canada have stringent safety regulations, prompting airlines to invest in cutting-edge engine control systems to meet compliance standards. Furthermore, North America's robust commercial aviation sector, characterized by a high volume of air travel and a large fleet of modern aircraft, creates a strong demand for FADEC-equipped engines. For instance, GE Aviation, a prominent player in the FADEC market, has its headquarters in the U.S. and supplies FADEC systems to major airlines worldwide, contributing to the region's dominance in FADEC adoption and market growth. The competitive landscape of the full authority digital engine control (FADEC) market is characterized by the presence of established aerospace companies alongside emerging players focusing on innovation and niche segments. Major players such as GE Aviation, Rolls-Royce plc, and Honeywell International dominate the market with their extensive product portfolios, global presence, and strong R&D capabilities. These industry giants continually invest in research and development to enhance their FADEC offerings, aiming to maintain their competitive edge. Additionally, partnerships and collaborations between FADEC manufacturers and aircraft OEMs further intensify competition, as companies vie for lucrative contracts and market share. Moreover, the market also witnesses the emergence of smaller players specializing in niche segments or offering innovative FADEC solutions tailored to specific aircraft types or applications, adding diversity to the competitive landscape. As technological advancements and regulatory requirements continue to shape the FADEC market, competition is expected to remain fierce, driving further innovation and strategic alliances among market players. Key Topics Covered 1. Markets: Industry Outlook 1.1 Trends: Current and Future Impact Assessment 1.2 Supply Chain Overview 1.2.1 Value Chain Analysis 1.2.2 Pricing Forecast 1.3 R&D Review 1.3.1 Patent Filing Trend by Country, by Company 1.4 Regulatory Landscape 1.5 Ongoing and Upcoming Programs 1.6 Stakeholder Analysis 1.6.1 Use Cases 1.6.2 End User and Buying Criteria 1.7 Stakeholder Analysis 1.7.1 Market Drivers 1.7.2 Market Restraints 1.7.3 Market Opportunities 2. Global Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) Market by Application 2.1 Application Summary 2.2 Global Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) Market, by End User 2.2.1 Commercial Aircraft) 2.2.1.1 Narrow-Body Aircraft 2.2.1.2 Wide-Body Aircraft 2.2.1.3 Regional Aircraft 2.2.1.4 Others 2.2.2 Military Aircraft 2.2.2.1 Combat Aircraft 2.2.2.2 Transport and Training Aircraft 2.2.2.3 Others 3. Global Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) Market by Product 3.1 Product Summary 3.2 Global Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) Market by Type 3.2.1 Electronic Engine Controller (EEC) 3.2.2 Engine Control Unit (ECU) 3.3 Global Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) Market by Channel Type 3.3.1 Single-Channel 3.3.2 Dual Channel 3.3.3 Triple Channel 4. Global Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) Market by Region 4.1 Global Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) Market - by Region 4.2 North America 4.3 Europe 4.4 Asia-Pacific 4.5 Rest-of-the-World 5. Markets - Competitive Benchmarking & Company Profiles 5.1 Next Frontiers 5.2 Geographic Assessment 5.3 Company Profiles 5.3.1 BAE Systems 5.3.1.1 Overview 5.3.1.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio 5.3.1.3 Top Competitors 5.3.1.4 Target Customers/End Users 5.3.1.5 Key Personnel 5.3.1.6 Analyst View 5.3.2 Honeywell International Inc. 5.3.3 United Technology Corporation 5.3.4 Memscap 5.3.5 Raytheon Technologies 5.3.6 GE Aviation 5.3.7 Primus Aerospace 5.3.8 Safran 5.3.9 Rolls-Royce 5.3.10 Woodward 5.2.11 Others Key Players 6. Research Methodology For more information about this report visit About is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends. View source version on Laura Wood, Senior Press Manager For E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470 For U.S./ CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900 KEYWORD: INDUSTRY KEYWORD: AEROSPACE MANUFACTURING SOURCE: Research and Markets Copyright Business Wire 2025. PUB: 04/09/2025 11:48 AM/DISC: 04/09/2025 11:48 AM
