Latest news with #Farritor


WIRED
04-06-2025
- Business
- WIRED
‘Big Balls' Is Officially a Full-Time Government Employee
Jun 4, 2025 11:08 AM The first wave of DOGE staffers was supposed to be gone after 130 days. Instead, core members of the team have signed on for the long haul. Photo-Illustration: Wired Staff;Although Elon Musk has said that he is largely exiting his role at the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), at least three of his early operatives and key lieutenants throughout his government takeover have recently become full-time government employees. Edward Coristine, Luke Farritor, and Ethan Shaotran's employment designations at the General Services Administration (GSA) have been officially converted to full-time from the restricted special government employee (SGE) classification that limited their time in government to a period of 130 days, according to documentation viewed by WIRED. Coristine, who has gone by 'Big Balls' online and previously worked for a telecommunications firm known for hiring former black hat hackers, was converted to full-time on May 31, along with Farritor. Shaotran became full-time on April 10. WIRED first reported in early February that Coristine, Farritor, and Shaotran were brought on by Musk's DOGE. They then gained unprecedented access to government systems. Before joining DOGE, they had connections to Musk-owned companies: Farritor interned at SpaceX, Coristine worked at Neuralink for three months, and Shaotran participated in an xAI hackathon last October. Since January, all three have obtained access to dozens of federal agencies in addition to GSA, including the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Education, the Department of Homeland Security, the Social Security Administration, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and many others. They have also been tied to major changes to the federal government apparatus: Farritor was closely linked to the dismantling of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and Coristine has reportedly been one of the leaders of the initiative related to President Donald Trump's 'gold card' visas that are sold for $5 million. It's not immediately clear if the new designations affect their abilities to maintain access to other agencies outside of GSA. Coristine, Farritor, and Shaotran, according to documentation viewed by WIRED, each maintain their 'senior advisor' titles. Coristine and Farritor are drawing some of the largest salaries possible for government employees through the 'General Schedule' employee rankings. They have a salary grade of GS-15, one of the highest grades, and Shaotran is one step below at GS-14. When they were special government employees, Coristine, Farritor, and Shaotran did not appear to be drawing salaries at all through GSA, WIRED reported in March. Kyle Schutt, another early DOGE operative, has also appeared to change employment classification at least twice, but currently seems to be listed as a special government employee in documentation seen by WIRED. The White House and GSA did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Despite Musk's apparent departure from the Trump administration last week, DOGE has shown no signs of pausing its work in government agencies. Last week, WIRED reported that there has been a renewed urgency for DOGE-style work at agencies including the Office of Personnel Management, US Department of Agriculture, the Department of Labor, and the Department of the Interior. Federal workers told WIRED they were asked to quickly review and potentially slash contracts, especially those pertaining to IT and human resources. Farritor and Coristine, along with other members of Musk's early DOGE team like Sam Corcos and Gavin Kliger, have met with a number of departments in recent days, while new DOGE affiliates have been detailed to different agencies. DOGE, WIRED reported, also appears to be actively recruiting.
Yahoo
29-04-2025
- Science
- Yahoo
DOGE Goons Access Classified Network Holding Nuclear Secrets
Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has infiltrated two confidential computer networks used to transmit nuclear weapons secrets and other sensitive information, NPR reported. Engineering wunderkind Luke Farritor, 23, and Miami-based venture capitalist Adam Ramada—both of whom work for DOGE—have had accounts on the National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) Enterprise Secure Network (ESN) for at least two weeks, the public radio network reported Monday. ESN is 'responsible for transmitting restricted data about America's nuclear weapons designs and the special nuclear materials used.' The NNSA uses the network to transmit technical information from nuclear laboratories to production facilities that store, maintain, and upgrade the country's nuclear arsenal. Such communication must be sent and received in secure rooms, however, which are not accessible to most users who have accounts on the network. They also reportedly have had access to the Secret Internet Protocol Router Network for at least two weeks, which the Department of Defense uses to communicate with the Department of Energy about nuclear weapons. NPR reported it is 'unclear just how much access to classified data the two DOGE staffers have.' A source described the accounts as a 'toehold' that 'could lead to something bigger.' Neither Farritor nor Ramada appears to have experience with nuclear weapons or the handling of classified information. The Department of Energy (DOE), which oversees the NNSA, told NPR in a statement that its reporting was 'false' and that the two Musk minions are no longer working for the administration. 'No DOGE personnel have accessed these NNSA systems,' a DOE spokesperson wrote in an email. 'The two DOGE individuals in question worked within the agency for several days and departed DOE in February.' It is unclear what classified information, if any, Farritor and Ramada have accessed. Farritor attended the University of Nebraska but dropped out after he rose to fame for using AI to partially decipher a portion of the Vesuvius scrolls that had stumped scientists for centuries. He then took a job working for Nat Friedman, a Silicon Valley entrepreneur who had previously worked as the CEO of GitHub and Xamarin. The engineer now spends his days helping Musk's team slash government contracts, leases, and jobs in the name of government efficiency. Despite Musk's claims, DOGE has yet to show proof that it has uncovered 'widespread fraud and abuse.' DOGE has nevertheless succeeded in making life difficult for scientists at the NNSA. It fired hundreds of workers at the nuclear agency in February; a federal judge later rescinded many of the dismissals. Ultimately, 50 people lost their jobs. Even with the reversal, however, DOGE's damage has already been done. The Bulwark reported in February that morale was 'through the floor' at NNSA, whose scientists have warned that DOGE's hostility may lead to a 'brain drain' at the agency. 'The skill set is so narrowly specific that there might be five guys in the entire U.S. who can do it,' an employee told The Bulwark. 'And you might have just fired one, two or three are retired, and the other is based somewhere else in the U.S. and doesn't want to move. So you're hosed.'


WIRED
24-02-2025
- Business
- WIRED
DOGE Is Inside the National Institutes of Health's Finance System
Feb 24, 2025 1:36 PM At least three people linked to Elon Musk's DOGE task force have access to NIH systems that control budgets, procurement, and more, according to records and internal documents viewed by WIRED. Four representatives of Elon Musk's so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) task force have been installed at the National Institutes of Health, according to multiple sources. WIRED reporting shows not only which DOGE members are at the NIH, but the sensitive financial system at least some of them have access to. Government records reviewed by WIRED show that the four people associated with DOGE have email addresses linking them to the NIH, the federal agency for health research in the US. Internal documents reviewed by WIRED show that three of these employees are employed in the department that controls the NIH's central electronic business system, which includes finance, budget, procurement, a property-management system, and a grant-tracking system. The DOGE operatives listed in government records are Luke Farritor, Rachel Riley, Jeremy Lewin, and Clark Minor. Farritor is a former SpaceX intern and current Thiel fellow who also has a working email address linking him to the General Services Administration (GSA). Minor, a former engineer at Palantir, is, as has been reported, the chief information officer of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Lewin is an agency lead at DOGE, according to ProPublica; he has a GSA email and has been named in an affidavit related to a lawsuit as having been involved in the gutting of the US Agency for International Development. Riley works closely with Brad Smith, a former health care entrepreneur and DOGE leader prior to President Donald Trump's inauguration, according to the New York Times. Internal documents list Farritor, Riley, and Minor as working under the umbrella of the NIH Business System Department (NBS). NBS is the central electronic business system of the NIH, according to the agency's website. The NBS sits within the NIH's Office of Management, under the Office of the Director, and administers the core running of the NIH, including procurement, property management, data consolidation, and financial reporting. One NIH employee, who remained anonymous as they were not authorized to speak on behalf of the agency, referred to NBS as 'NIH's wallet.' Got a tip? Are you a current NIH employee, or otherwise have insight into how DOGE is operating within the government? We'd like to hear from you. Using a nonwork phone or computer, contact the reporter on Signal: mattreynolds.45 None of the DOGE-linked NIH employees responded to WIRED's requests to comment. The NIH did not respond to WIRED's request for comment. The NIH is the largest federal funder of biomedical research and a key sub-agency within HHS—the government agency now headed by RFK Jr. Earlier in February the NIH dramatically slashed the funding it gives to universities, leaning heavily on a report by the Heritage Foundation that railed against the 'massive growth in DEI staff at US universities.' The NIH, which has a budget of $48 billion, has also frozen funding for applications for $1.5 billion in medical research, according to NPR. DOGE workers, according to WIRED reporting, have effectively taken over key government agencies, including the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and the GSA. On Saturday, employees throughout the federal government were left in confusion after receiving an email from the OPM demanding that they reply with 'approx 5 bullets of what you accomplished last week.' The Trump administration's executive orders and policies have also wreaked havoc on domestic and international research. Cuts to USAID are helping to fuel human trafficking at scammer compounds and have made it harder for food aid to be delivered. Meanwhile cuts at the US Department of Agriculture have derailed vital climate and crop projects intended to benefit farmers.


Washington Post
24-02-2025
- Business
- Washington Post
The blinding contempt of the DOGE bros
More often than not, when conquering armies storm across borders or into rebel strongholds, they set about finding ways to humiliate the people they find there. They are capricious and cruel. They want their enemies to understand their own insignificance. In Elon Musk's siege on Washington, the first village taken was the U.S. Agency for International Development, which dispensed roughly $32 billion in foreign aid last year (or less than half a percent of the federal budget). And for four weeks now, his Department of Government Efficiency — DOGE — has made a chilling example of the people who served there. I recently had a series of conversations with a senior USAID staff member who witnessed the agency's takeover from the inside. (I'd love to have asked U.S. DOGE Service about these events, but despite Musk's grand claim of historic transparency, his department has no contact with the media beyond self-serving social media posts.) A DOGE official first arrived at USAID's offices on Jan. 27, a week after Donald Trump's inauguration. Late that night, a group of senior employees were hastily summoned to a teleconference with the two men who were to become their DOGE-era overlords: Luke Farritor and Gavin Kliger. Farritor, 23, is a former SpaceX intern and University of Nebraska dropout who became famous in the tech world for having been part of a team that decoded an ancient Roman scroll. Kliger, 25, is a deep-state conspiracist on social media who, according to Wired, attended Berkeley and worked for an AI start-up. (He's also the guy Musk has now installed at the Treasury Department.) Farritor and Kliger appeared to USAID staff as remote figures on a computer screen, bringing to mind the 'Wizard of Oz.' They wore T shirts and polos and seemed to be Zooming from their offices in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, next to the White House. They were unfailingly civil but not much for listening. The first thing they did, in a series of calls and emails, was to gather information about how the agency's bills were paid and where the data was stored. They demanded and were given access to the payment system, but only on what you might think of as a 'read only' basis; according to the official I talked to on condition of anonymity to avoid retribution, they could not, initially, alter any transactions. Trump had decreed a freeze on all USAID spending five days earlier, and the two DOGE bros, as the staff would come to call them, wanted to make sure that order was being followed. The cordial atmosphere darkened three days later, on Jan. 30, when White House officials learned that some USAID grantees overseas had somehow gotten paid through the Health and Human Services Department after Trump issued his order. The White House team believed USAID had been secretly funneling money through fellow bureaucrats in the labyrinth of deep-state agencies. This is what Marco Rubio, the secretary of state and nominal head of USAID, was talking about when he told reporters traveling with him in Panama that the agency's staff had been 'insubordinate' and needed to be brought to heel. In fact, the explanation here, like the explanations for most things in government, was pretty mundane. It turns out that most of the government's humanitarian grants — as opposed to contractor payments — are administered through HHS. (Ironically, this is an efficiency measure, because it creates a central storehouse for multiple agencies' grants.) USAID staff wasn't going behind anyone's back to disburse the grant money; it's just that no one had told HHS to shut off the spigot. You can imagine, though, that DOGE didn't have much use for the boring government realities here. Musk's team needed a pretext for gutting the agency, and they decided they had one. The White House immediately decapitated the agency, putting 65 senior staff members on administrative leave. In internal conversations with senior staff, Farritor and Kliger demanded that all senior managers be stripped of their power to authorize payments — and that they alone become the authorizers. The most public clash at USAID revolved around DOGE officials who showed up at USAID headquarters at the Ronald Reagan Building and demanded access to its sensitive compartmented information facility, or SCIF, where confidential records are stored; three officials who refused to let them in were either fired or resigned. Out of view, though, the agency's most essential humanitarian programs overseas became the object of a weeks-long standoff between the State Department and DOGE. Rubio had decreed that certain critical programs — such as aid to Ukraine and Syria and costs related to the PEPFAR program to combat HIV in Africa — would continue to be funded. Several times, USAID managers prepared packages of these payments and got the agency's interim leaders to sign off on them with support from the White House. But each time, using their new gatekeeping powers and clearly acting on orders from Musk or one of his lieutenants, Farritor and Kliger would veto the payments — a process that required them to manually check boxes in the payment system one at a time, the same tedious way you probably pay your bills online. Meanwhile, AIDS clinics shuttered and staff found themselves stranded in unstable countries like Congo. A pregnant woman in an undisclosed country has sued the Trump administration because she was denied a Medevac helicopter. In another case, I was told, an employee in southern Africa who needed chemotherapy was also denied a chopper because no one would authorize the money. One night, as staff tried yet again to assemble a list of necessary payments, the agency's computer network went down for two hours. When it came back on, members of the IT team whispered to colleagues to be wary; during the outage, they believed, spyware had been installed on the network to monitor communication among employees. Finally, on the second Saturday in February, the two IT guys from DOGE shut everyone else out of the payment system entirely. They were now the only people who could even see the payments waiting to be approved. Hardly any of the essential funding promised by Rubio had been processed as of earlier last week. All this rigmarole over paying bills probably seems arcane compared with, say, mass firings or forced resignations at the Justice Department. But if you step back for a moment, what's happened at USAID over the past couple of weeks is unfathomable. A $50 billion agency — funded by taxpayers, empowered by Congress and employing something like 11,000 people around the world — is now tightly controlled by a handful of 20-something software engineers who have never worked a day in government. They disregard promises from the American secretary of state while agonized policy experts stand by helplessly. In the coming weeks, courts will have to decide if those engineers and their billionaire boss had the right to fire pretty much everybody who worked at USAID. If I were betting (admittedly, this would have to be one very un-fun gambling site), I would wager that a year from now the agency itself will have disappeared, with much of its programs and staff continuing on at State. All of which probably could have been achieved in a more orderly and humane way had the agency been allowed to wind down more gradually under Rubio's supervision. Maybe this unsettles Farritor and Kliger on some level — maybe they toss and turn on leather couches in the Eisenhower Building, troubled by a suspicion that Musk has them doing things they will one day regret. But I doubt it. Like young revolutionaries everywhere, Musk's former interns are probably swept up in the cause, reveling in the power to torture a bureaucracy they've been taught to loathe. Humiliating career public servants isn't some accidental by-product of the quest for efficiency. It seems to be the point of the exercise. The swift sacking of USAID shook official Washington and set the tone for how DOGE would attack the rest of the government, starting with the Education Department and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. For me, it raises a fundamental question about Musk's work, and I don't think I'm alone in asking it. Is it what Musk is trying to do that makes me recoil — or is it the way in which he's doing it? Is it even possible to separate the substance here from the style? After all, in the abstract, most critics of an ever-expanding federal bureaucracy — and I'm solidly among them — would be open to bold moves like folding USAID into the State Department or padlocking the Education Department. If anything, as I've written, I'd like to see Musk take on even more controversial fights, like modernizing the entitlement programs that are the drivers of unsustainable debt or overhauling the corrupt and outdated system by which the Pentagon gets its weapons. You don't have to work hard to convince me that we have too many agencies and too many low-impact programs. But does this really need to be done — can it be done effectively at all — by branding lifelong public servants as 'criminals' and making them suffer for sport? What's the perverse joy to be had in making some of the foremost experts in their fields prostrate themselves before a couple of grad-school-level coders who probably couldn't find Congo on a map? Here's a thought exercise: Let's imagine for the moment that Kamala Harris had won the presidency, and she had immediately gone out and recruited, say, Mark Cuban to reprise Al Gore's old mission of 'reinventing government.' Let's imagine that Cuban brought with him to Washington a cadre of young, idealistic MBAs, and in the first week they held meetings at some small agency and very respectfully asked for their personnel and payment records, so they could suggest some meaningful reforms. And let's say the agency told them to go to hell. Would all of us who believe in the value of government service be jumping up and down and screaming about breaches of protocol and congressional prerogative? Or would we be saying: Who are these bureaucrats to think they can deny the president access to anything? The problem isn't that Musk has been given a brief to reassess program and budgets; it's that he evinces no real intellectual interest in any of these things. Musk — who, according to biographer Walter Isaacson, calls other people 'stupid' the way most of us say 'please' or 'thank you' — seems to have chosen his hires not for any remotely relevant experience but rather to send a message about how little respect he has for public service generally. A couple of my interns can do this better than all of you. Posting on X, Musk said it was time for USAID to die and crowed about feeding it to a wood chipper. It's impossible to overstate the level of his contempt. You can ascribe that contempt to right-wing or libertarian political ideology, but I'm guessing it has at least as much to do with the tech industry generally. From the moment Silicon Valley exploded in the 1990s, and probably before that, its leading denizens have subscribed to a kind of techno-chauvinism — a belief that only engineers know how to solve the problems of humankind, and if you work for the government, then you can't be very smart, so you must be doing everything wrong. Rep. Ro Khanna, (D-California), whose district includes legendary tech meccas like Cupertino and Sunnyvale, expressed it to me this way: 'They have this view that they have more knowledge, more chutzpah, that they are the ones who are moving civilization forward and building new things, that they're entitled to rule or govern, and that they do a better job of it than democracy.' No one embodies this idea more fully than Musk and his young adherents. They behave as though the federal government is just some legacy company they acquired for not very much (with Trump as their front man), and now they're going to shutter it. They marched into USAID as you would march into any newly owned subsidiary on the verge of bankruptcy. They see themselves, I'm sure, as selfless; they could be back west plotting new start-ups and reaping untold billions, but they've decided to save their country from mentally challenged bureaucrats instead. You have to wonder, though, if all that contempt is blinding Musk to the obvious ways in which government agencies aren't — and shouldn't be — analogous to bloated companies at all. For one thing, the goal of any company, when you get past all the Messianic blather about changing the world, is to make money for its investors — period. The more efficient you are, the more money everybody makes. The central goal of government, on the other hand, is to protect its citizens and enforce its laws — and to address the imbalances that a free market can't.. Efficiency is desirable and often lacking for no good reason — but it is not an end in itself. Why does it take multiple people and several days just to authorize a batch of payments at USAID? Because every agency has a system of checks and balances to make sure the taxpayers aren't being cheated. Government always trades off some efficiency to safeguard the integrity of the system. And when you buy a failing company, you own it outright, whereas, in government, Congress is a permanent and coequal board of directors that can't just be ignored. This is why DOGE's ransacking of departments has already drawn a raft of legal challenges, some of which will likely be sustained, though that could take months if not longer. Musk's unelected engineers are unilaterally unmaking decisions that only Congress has the constitutional power to undo. It would have been easy enough for Trump's White House to go to its sheep-like caucuses in Congress and ask them to eliminate a bunch of agencies in the next budget. But Trump and Musk wanted the immediate gratification of a blitzkrieg instead, which means they may well end up having to give back some of the territory they so triumphantly seized. You could argue, and I'm sure Musk would, that such a view is hopelessly naive — that a government that's been spreading its tentacles slowly for 100-plus years can only be hacked back viciously and all at once, without all the legal niceties that entrenched bureaucracies are adept at exploiting. But my instinct, having been around Washington a lot longer than anyone at DOGE, is that most of what's done here thoughtlessly and by fiat is generally undone by someone at some point. Terrorizing an agency really isn't the same thing as permanently reforming it. Although to Musk and his band of engineers, it might be a lot more fun.
Yahoo
07-02-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Trump energy secretary allowed 23-year-old DOGE rep to access IT systems over objections from general counsel
A representative from Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, was granted access to the Energy Department's IT system on Wednesday by Energy Secretary Chris Wright, two people with knowledge of the situation told CNN. Wright granted access to DOGE representative Luke Farritor — a 23-year-old former SpaceX intern — even over objections from members of the department's general counsel and chief information offices, the people told CNN. The DOE chief information office is the department's IT and cybersecurity office. Members of the general counsel and chief information offices 'said this is a bad idea' because Farritor hadn't had a standard background investigation needed to access the department's system, one of the people told CNN. 'He's not cleared to be in DOE, on our systems. None of those things have been done.' Farritor was granted access to basic IT including email and Microsoft 365, one of the people said. The chief information office only does a small amount of IT and cybersecurity work for the National Nuclear Security Administration, they said, including providing connectivity and running basic internet services for NNSA's headquarters. It does not run IT systems for the nuclear agency's labs controlling the nation's nuclear stockpile. There are also plans to install a different SpaceX network security engineer as DOE's new chief information officer, the people told CNN. An Energy Department spokesperson didn't immediately return a request for comment. In addition to DOGE presence in the building, Energy Department employees — including the National Nuclear Security Administration — have received the so-called buyout emails that employees in many other agencies have been receiving. The 'buyouts' generally allow employees to leave their jobs but be paid through the end of September. NNSA being included in the 'buyout' wave is significant because it manufactures and maintains the nation's nuclear stockpile and does other critical national security work. Energy Department employees working at the department under a year have received emails they've been deemed to be on probationary status and warned they could be fired immediately. These types of emails have gone out to over 1,000 employees at the Environmental Protection Agency as well. There are at least 1,000 DOE staff working in relatively new offices in the department created after Biden's infrastructure and climate laws passed a few years ago, including the Grid Deployment Office – which works on modernizing and securing the nation's electrical grid. CNN previously reported 60 Energy Department employees were placed on administrative leave earlier this week due to their work on issues deemed to be involved with diversity, equity and inclusion.