Latest news with #Ferretly
Forbes
3 days ago
- Business
- Forbes
How To Build A Smarter Risk Framework In A Post-Background-Check Era
Darrin Lipscomb is the Founder & CEO of Ferretly, a risk intelligence platform helping organizations adapt to modern compliance challenges. Institutional risk frameworks are under growing strain, yet many leaders remain unaware of the shifts undermining their effectiveness. I see this erosion as especially evident (yet overlooked) when it comes to talent and hiring decisions. The average cost of a bad hire ranges from $15,000 to even more, yet traditional screening methods often miss the behavioral red flags that can help predict cultural misalignment and team disruption. Where Risk Actually Lives Today Across the United States, we are seeing legislative changes quietly dismantle the legal foundation that compliance systems were built on. Utah's S.B. 70, Maryland's recent conviction reporting restrictions, Washington's 2026 rollout of expanded limitations—these aren't isolated policy adjustments. These structural shifts increasingly render traditional background check frameworks obsolete. Meanwhile, the real vectors of organizational risk have migrated entirely. Reputation damage now travels at the speed of social media. Cultural misalignment can derail million-dollar partnerships in hours. Brand risk lives in real-time digital behavior, not in historical databases that are being legislated out of relevance. The result is a dangerous gap where legacy compliance infrastructure, designed for a static world, operates in a dynamic environment where the actual risk signals live elsewhere entirely. Consider the reality: Companies relying solely on conviction-based screening may miss critical risk indicators because the legal framework no longer permits access to them. Yet the behaviors that generate risk haven't disappeared. They've moved to platforms that legacy systems weren't built to monitor. It's like trying to drive on the freeway with a speedometer that only works under 25 mph. Signal Degradation Versus Signal Migration Criminal records, employment verification and education credentials check what someone did, not what they're doing now or how they operate in real time. In contrast, public digital behavior can offer more predictive insight into cultural fit, judgment and alignment than a clean background check from five years ago. Social media patterns reveal decision-making processes, communication styles and value systems that directly affect team dynamics. The shift isn't just cultural—it's operational. Leading companies are supplementing traditional background checks with reviews of candidates' public digital behavior to assess cultural alignment and risk in real time. Shopify, for example, states that both criminal history and public profile reviews may be part of their hiring process, depending on the role. Not because they're abandoning risk management, but because they recognize where actionable signals live in 2025. Infrastructure Versus Information I find that many organizations confuse data collection with system design. They add more checks, more verification steps and more bureaucracy without addressing the underlying infrastructure problem. Real compliance infrastructure isn't about gathering more information. It's about processing the right information, at the right time, in the right context. Modern risk requires real-time analysis of behavioral patterns. Therefore, effective risk infrastructure must be predictive, not just historical. It must analyze patterns over isolated events. And it must be built into decision-making workflows, not tacked on as a separate compliance bureaucracy. Predictive Compliance Architecture I believe organizations looking to modernize should anchor their risk infrastructure to three key principles. This involves analyzing ongoing behavioral patterns that predict future alignment or risk. Examples include hostile public commentary, engagement with extremist subcultures, linguistic markers of deception, harassment or trolling and rapid ideological shifts. Organizations can capture these signals through natural language processing for sentiment and toxicity analysis, visual symbol recognition for meme culture, coded language and timeline-based anomaly detection that identifies concerning pattern changes. This means that you recognize that risk suggests different things in different roles and cultures. Organizations must assess signals in the context of their organizational values, teams and mission. For example, a financial controller role likely prioritizes trust, ethics and data integrity, making gambling behavior, cryptocurrency speculation and financial fraud indicators particularly relevant. On the other hand, a sales executive role emphasizes influence and communication, making manipulative tactics, aggression and toxic humor as more concerning. The framework should start with role values: What values must this person embody publicly and privately? What behaviors most directly undermine those values? Effective integration makes risk signals part of your operational flow rather than an external process. Low-friction tactics include tagging behavioral summaries inside HR or applicant tracking systems (ATS) profiles, embedding risk indicators in hiring committee review templates and creating dashboard systems with digestible weekly alerts. Many organizations are piloting automated digital behavior screening solutions for key roles. The vendor landscape is growing, enabling smaller employers to access real-time behavioral insights during hiring. The Institutional Adaptation Challenge Government agencies are adapting. Since 2019, U.S. visa applicants have been increasingly expected to provide all social media identifiers. As of July 2025, consular officers may request applicants to make these accounts public for vetting purposes. Major research institutions such as the RAND Corporation have documented the federal government's exploration of open-source intelligence, including a systematic review of public digital behavior as an additional layer for vetting and personnel security frameworks. But private sector adaptation remains uneven. The competitive advantage will go to institutions that modernize early, recognizing this shift as a strategic opportunity rather than a compliance burden. Beyond Compliance: Operational Intelligence The deeper opportunity is not just compliance but intelligence. When risk infrastructure is designed around real-time behavior and contextual fit, it elevates the entire organization. Consider a recent example: A technology company caught a candidate with clean criminal records who was actively engaging in harassment campaigns on social media. Traditional screening would have missed this entirely. The Strategic Imperative I recommend you start with your highest-risk roles: finance, customer-facing positions and leadership tracks. Pilot digital behavior screening for these positions while maintaining traditional checks as a baseline. Simply put, with the updated strategies in place, you hire better. You reduce team friction. You prevent reputational landmines before they explode. That's not just a screening upgrade, but a competitive advantage. Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Time Business News
06-08-2025
- Business
- Time Business News
The Reason Social Media Screen Resumes contributes to gaining the Confidence in the work place
Social media screening has been found to be the parameter of the online personas and real viability of individuals in the new hyperconnected world. Researchers found that in 2024, three out of every four employers do the research of job seekers through a search engine and seven out of every ten of them found information of a job seeker that led them to hire the candidate. The assumption that social media are vetted can be implemented to foster trust at the workplace because of the classical process. The bottom line, however, lies in the fact that 68 percent of employers report that they use social media screening to reach a conclusion, which cannot be discussed during the interviewing process, and that 55 respondents ask about the cultural fit (Sterling, 2024). This does not only introduce a risk delivery service opportunity, but also threatens trust development. The Social Scanning & Trust Online assurance of trust is a social platform vetting. The social websites as opposed to the regular historical background screening of histories portrays a current behavioral trend and communications processes which will define individual actions in the workplace. And that¿s exactly what the job is. Application of evaluation criterion to all the candidates the same way Gut feelings vs. Evidence based decision making Document to give a judgement on employment Information Document Resourcing Risks- Insurance against Mistakes bound to be expensive An Security/ Departments team An Security/ Departments group Trust is not merely a case of individual candidates, but it is the protection of the reputation of the entire organization. The effectiveness of the social media check as the means of securing vulnerable groups because it reveals all the risky elements prior to visiting an unstable setting is proven by the free study conducted by Ferretly. In the instances where it is quantified this occurs on an organizational loss: Ayaan Conflict is a research-oriented, analytical, and advisory platform to users based on a comparison of methodologies on conflict reducing techniques. Enhanced stimulus response relationship through which values within team are improved De-limitation of dangers to fame happens because of utter indiscipline among the workers They have proper morale and safety at the workplace Technology takes advantage of trust building process With the new screening technology, traditional problems of bias in screening are conquered. The complex automation will repeat it under general search conditions and in the same sources, thereby eliminating the human factor, which has the potential to become the source of creating bias decisions. The positive aspects of technology based screening are as follows: Impartial criteria of assessment Criterion standardising The right of spilling information in a privileged group Much sifting of material, public-property work Criminal background checks being actually run against candidates in a score driven matching process AI Analytics Just tell me it does not matter what The tens of thousands of sources can be automated each time scanned, unlike the unreliability of the manual-reviewed results because of the vagaries of the time constraints and the quality of the reviewer having reviewed the sources. The sentiments of the content are also questioned along with the intensity of the content leading to tangible flagging standards. Through the technology, the information that has been flagged has ensured that the information is effectively sticky with your candidate through different identifiers verification and all these have given confidence to the integrity of screening. There are methods of trust building. It is advisable that the organizations possess an elaborate social media policy whereby the following terms are elaborated on: The screening: (hopefully the ones versed on employment laws) There is the screening of individuals in the hiring process. and on what are these jobs vetted? Video recording of search MMP recording of searching Requirements of statutory recording of search Somewhere recording: Who read the outcome and interpolacies of it? The test should simply focus on behaviour that is relevant in any one particular job as it is most effective in building trust. It will not require full disclosure of the candidates and valuable data can still be obtained concerning the professional behaviour and cultural suitability. Based on the continuously increasing role of social media on professional identity, the screening process will have to evolve to maintain trust without compromising privacy. Businesses employing honest and clear digital verification will presently strive to achieve a more positive working environment and protection against reputation hazards in the long run. Social media screening does not have anything to do with judgment, but it is perceived as a means of building true trust on the grounds of open verification of compatibility between digital identity and work ethic. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
