logo
#

Latest news with #FirstInstanceCourt

Court Overturns Jail For Lebanese Pimp, 3 Women Accused Of Prostitution
Court Overturns Jail For Lebanese Pimp, 3 Women Accused Of Prostitution

Arab Times

time04-05-2025

  • Arab Times

Court Overturns Jail For Lebanese Pimp, 3 Women Accused Of Prostitution

KUWAIT CITY, May 4: The Court of Cassation upheld the decision of the Court of Appeals, which overturned the ruling of the First Instance Court to sentence a Lebanese and three women to three years in prison with hard labor for involvement in prostitution, reports Al-Seyassah daily. Initially, the court decided not to prosecute the defendants for facilitating encounters of certain women with men seeking illicit pleasure. According to the Public Prosecution, the Lebanese established and operated a prostitution den by organizing the entry of men into an apartment, where they selected women, made their payment and were provided condoms. The prosecution stated that the Lebanese profited from the other three defendants by enticing them into prostitution and collecting their 'earnings' with their consent, as proven by investigations. The other three defendants were charged with aiding the Lebanese in managing the prostitution den. Their 'tasks' included arranging the entry for men whenever the Lebanese is absent, allowing the men to choose women, receiving payment and providing condoms. The men also engaged in sexual intercourse with the women, all above 21 years old and married. The prosecution stated that two of the defendants are married women who willingly had sexual relations with men other than their husbands. Attorney Enaam Haider, who represented the Lebanese in court, argued that the appealed ruling violated the law and contained flaws in its application and interpretation. She explained this argument is based on the premise that the prosecution's authorization was invalid due to frivolous investigations, which concealed essential facts. 'Consequently, any evidence derived from this authorization was also invalid,' she asserted. Haider contended that the authorization was issued to apprehend individuals accused of committing a non-existent crime. She pointed out that the appealed ruling was described as violating the law; flawed in its application, interpretation and reasoning; and arbitrary in its conclusions due to the lack of incriminating evidence. In conclusion, Haider stressed that the appealed ruling was flawed in its reasoning and contradicted the evidence stated in the documents; taking into consideration the absence of conclusive evidence establishing the alleged crimes and the impossibility of legally construing the incident as criminal, hence, the accusation is baseless

Kuwaiti acquitted in duds check case
Kuwaiti acquitted in duds check case

Arab Times

time24-02-2025

  • Arab Times

Kuwaiti acquitted in duds check case

KUWAIT CITY, Feb 23: The Misdemeanor Section in the Court of Appeals overturned the ruling of a lower court that sentenced a citizen, in absentia, to two years in prison for issuing a dud check of KD 500,000 leading to his acquittal. Lawyer for the accused, Attorney Ali Al- Wawan, argued that the check was issued as part of a commercial agreement between the two parties, through which the complainant would import goods from an Asian country and the defendant would provide payment. When he cashed the check, the complainant discovered that the funds in the bank account of the citizen were insufficient; so he immediately filed a lawsuit against the citizen for breach of trust and issuance of dud check. Since the First Instance Court decided to convict the citizen in absentia , Al-Wawan pleaded before the Appeals Court and explained that the check drawn from the bank was in the name of his client; but there was an agreement between the two parties not to withdraw from the bank until the goods were delivered. He said this agreement was made in front of witnesses, but the complainant quickly went to the bank to cash the check and found that the balance was not enough for the amount mentioned in the check. Al-Wawan continued that his client did not receive the goods and there are no documents confirming receipt of the goods. He added his client admitted that the amount available in the bank was KD350,000 and this was confirmed through the bank statement, meaning he had no intention of committing fraud or deception, and that he asked the complainant for a period of time until the goods arrived in the country, after which he will deposit the remaining amount -- KD150,000.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store