logo
#

Latest news with #FoxFooty

‘Picked off' or ‘not that bad'? The hit dividing football - and why it will decide the game's future
‘Picked off' or ‘not that bad'? The hit dividing football - and why it will decide the game's future

Sydney Morning Herald

time2 days ago

  • Sport
  • Sydney Morning Herald

‘Picked off' or ‘not that bad'? The hit dividing football - and why it will decide the game's future

King said on Fox Footy that he believed May 'picked off' Evans in an incident from a 'bygone era', and his hit warranted a six-week suspension. May later suffered a concussion of his own when Tom De Koning accidentally kneed him in the head during a last-quarter marking contest, so he will miss Sunday's match against St Kilda anyway. Comparable recent cases In May, the tribunal cleared Fremantle captain Alex Pearce after the Dockers successfully argued against Christian's careless classification for his collision with Port Adelaide's Darcy Byrne-Jones. Pearce's case differed from May's in that it was an aerial collision in a marking contest, but there were similarities in how Pearce arrived second to the ball and took his eyes off it at the last second to brace for contact. Pearce's legal team did not challenge the classifications of severe impact and high contact. They argued Pearce's actions were reasonable, with the veteran defender stressing he was making a genuine attempt to complete a chest mark at the point of collision. However, the case involving North Melbourne's Jackson Archer in March could also be relevant. Archer's three-game ban for his role in a collision that concussed Western Bulldog Luke Cleary was upheld at the tribunal, after the match review officer graded the Roo's actions as careless, severe impact and high contact. North's defence focused on Cleary's decision to go to ground to collect the ball, rather than stay on his feet. Tribunal chairman Jeff Gleeson acknowledged that rules encouraged players to keep their feet, but said that did not always happen and 'players need to be aware', saying Archer had 'slowed too little and too late'. What others are saying Former Hawk Isaac Smith's take on May's actions contrasts greatly with King. Speaking on Nine's Sunday Footy Show, Smith argued that May should not be suspended and that Evans' injuries were an unfortunate consequence of playing a contact sport. 'The only thing I can see the MRO picking up is that he didn't stay low, and he came up a couple of steps before he got to the contest – and that's what caused the impact,' Smith said. 'It's a line-ball one, and it's going to be fascinating to see where it ends up. I feel for Steven May here because I feel like he was contesting the ball and obviously, Evans is a smaller player to what he is. 'I think you can see him getting no weeks, or you can see him getting four weeks. The more I look at it, I think no weeks ... you look at the Alex Pearce one, [and] May has not done anything to initiate that contact.' Triple M's breakfast crew, including ex-St Kilda champion Nick Riewoldt, grilled Gawn on the May case on Monday. Gawn was adamant that May did not bump Evans, but that he was 'never going to take a backward step'. 'Whatever happens, will be the precedent. I understand you've got to look after the head, but it's going to be an interesting tribunal case. I might actually watch it,' Gawn said. 'I came in to defend [May] a little bit when it first happened, and the Carlton boys weren't really remonstrating, and then we all had a look at the ground and the guy's tooth was missing, so it was, 'OK, maybe I can't defend 'Maysy' '. 'Then we watched the replay, and we were like, 'Actually, it's not that bad', and the Carlton boys still didn't remonstrate, really, so it's a tough one.' Riewoldt, who did not believe May's actions were 'malicious', added that the Blues' eventual reaction was 'almost like out of obligation'. 'If he does get rubbed out, then essentially what we're saying is ... players have to be able to calculate from 20 metres away; the speed the other player is going, the speed you're going to be going, and the fact you're going to arrive a microsecond late,' Riewoldt said. Carlton forward Harry McKay said Nova that it was a 'nasty incident' but that no player would intentionally hit an opponent in the head. Former greats James Hird and Jimmy Bartel had sympathy for May but expect him to receive a suspension. Loading 'This is a really difficult one,' Hird said. 'If he had have stayed a little bit lower and kept his eye totally on the ball, he would be OK. But at the last split-second, he comes up, and his eyes go off the ball, which is why I think it will be three weeks. 'I don't think he has gone out on purpose to hurt anybody. Five years ago, it wouldn't have got weeks. But the rules have changed and unfortunately, for him, his shoulder gets him in the head.'

‘Picked off' or ‘not that bad'? The hit dividing football - and why it will decide the game's future
‘Picked off' or ‘not that bad'? The hit dividing football - and why it will decide the game's future

The Age

time2 days ago

  • Sport
  • The Age

‘Picked off' or ‘not that bad'? The hit dividing football - and why it will decide the game's future

King said on Fox Footy that he believed May 'picked off' Evans in an incident from a 'bygone era', and his hit warranted a six-week suspension. May later suffered a concussion of his own when Tom De Koning accidentally kneed him in the head during a last-quarter marking contest, so he will miss Sunday's match against St Kilda anyway. Comparable recent cases In May, the tribunal cleared Fremantle captain Alex Pearce after the Dockers successfully argued against Christian's careless classification for his collision with Port Adelaide's Darcy Byrne-Jones. Pearce's case differed from May's in that it was an aerial collision in a marking contest, but there were similarities in how Pearce arrived second to the ball and took his eyes off it at the last second to brace for contact. Pearce's legal team did not challenge the classifications of severe impact and high contact. They argued Pearce's actions were reasonable, with the veteran defender stressing he was making a genuine attempt to complete a chest mark at the point of collision. However, the case involving North Melbourne's Jackson Archer in March could also be relevant. Archer's three-game ban for his role in a collision that concussed Western Bulldog Luke Cleary was upheld at the tribunal, after the match review officer graded the Roo's actions as careless, severe impact and high contact. North's defence focused on Cleary's decision to go to ground to collect the ball, rather than stay on his feet. Tribunal chairman Jeff Gleeson acknowledged that rules encouraged players to keep their feet, but said that did not always happen and 'players need to be aware', saying Archer had 'slowed too little and too late'. What others are saying Former Hawk Isaac Smith's take on May's actions contrasts greatly with King. Speaking on Nine's Sunday Footy Show, Smith argued that May should not be suspended and that Evans' injuries were an unfortunate consequence of playing a contact sport. 'The only thing I can see the MRO picking up is that he didn't stay low, and he came up a couple of steps before he got to the contest – and that's what caused the impact,' Smith said. 'It's a line-ball one, and it's going to be fascinating to see where it ends up. I feel for Steven May here because I feel like he was contesting the ball and obviously, Evans is a smaller player to what he is. 'I think you can see him getting no weeks, or you can see him getting four weeks. The more I look at it, I think no weeks ... you look at the Alex Pearce one, [and] May has not done anything to initiate that contact.' Triple M's breakfast crew, including ex-St Kilda champion Nick Riewoldt, grilled Gawn on the May case on Monday. Gawn was adamant that May did not bump Evans, but that he was 'never going to take a backward step'. 'Whatever happens, will be the precedent. I understand you've got to look after the head, but it's going to be an interesting tribunal case. I might actually watch it,' Gawn said. 'I came in to defend [May] a little bit when it first happened, and the Carlton boys weren't really remonstrating, and then we all had a look at the ground and the guy's tooth was missing, so it was, 'OK, maybe I can't defend 'Maysy' '. 'Then we watched the replay, and we were like, 'Actually, it's not that bad', and the Carlton boys still didn't remonstrate, really, so it's a tough one.' Riewoldt, who did not believe May's actions were 'malicious', added that the Blues' eventual reaction was 'almost like out of obligation'. 'If he does get rubbed out, then essentially what we're saying is ... players have to be able to calculate from 20 metres away; the speed the other player is going, the speed you're going to be going, and the fact you're going to arrive a microsecond late,' Riewoldt said. Carlton forward Harry McKay said Nova that it was a 'nasty incident' but that no player would intentionally hit an opponent in the head. Former greats James Hird and Jimmy Bartel had sympathy for May but expect him to receive a suspension. Loading 'This is a really difficult one,' Hird said. 'If he had have stayed a little bit lower and kept his eye totally on the ball, he would be OK. But at the last split-second, he comes up, and his eyes go off the ball, which is why I think it will be three weeks. 'I don't think he has gone out on purpose to hurt anybody. Five years ago, it wouldn't have got weeks. But the rules have changed and unfortunately, for him, his shoulder gets him in the head.'

Clayton Oliver's car stolen during home invasion on eve of 200th game
Clayton Oliver's car stolen during home invasion on eve of 200th game

7NEWS

time4 days ago

  • Sport
  • 7NEWS

Clayton Oliver's car stolen during home invasion on eve of 200th game

Melbourne coach Simon Goodwin has revealed midfielder Clayton Oliver's car was stolen during the week. 7NEWS exclusively reported the champion's house was broken into, but there were no further details around what happened other than Oliver was OK and will take the field on Saturday night for his milestone 200th game. WATCH THE VIDEO ABOVE: Clayton Oliver has house broken into ahead of 200th game. Know the news with the 7NEWS app: Download today It's still unclear whether Oliver was home at the time, but Goodwin said his car was stolen during the home invasion. 'A couple of days ago he had his car stolen so he had a bit of a laugh about it yesterday, but he's all good,' Goodwin told Fox Footy on Saturday night. 'I think it's given him a great chance to reflect, he has many of his family and friends here to support him. It's just great to see him in such a great place.' It's the latest chapter — albeit not one that was his fault — in what has been a turbulent couple of years for the three-time All-Australian. Oliver had a desire to be traded to Geelong at the end of last year, but Melbourne held firm, holding him to his lucrative and long-term contract. The denied attempt at a move came after a string of off-field and personal issues which saw him take time away from the club. Since fighting back from those challenges, Oliver has returned to the fold but is still working to rediscover his best form. Trade speculation is expected to resurface at the end of year as the Demons splutter to another season without finals.

‘Wasting everybody's time': AFL Tribunal ‘farce' laid bare
‘Wasting everybody's time': AFL Tribunal ‘farce' laid bare

News.com.au

time6 days ago

  • Sport
  • News.com.au

‘Wasting everybody's time': AFL Tribunal ‘farce' laid bare

Criticism towards the AFL for their decision to send Carlton's Adam Cerra's charge for umpire contact to the tribunal amid their mid-season rule change has come thick and fast. The Blues star walked away from Tuesday night's hearing with a $5,500 fine, a mere $125 closer to the Blues' hoped figure of a five grand figure than the AFL's $6,125. The end sanction was $750 less than he could have received had the league got its way. FOX FOOTY, available on Kayo Sports, is the only place to watch every match of every round in the 2025 Toyota AFL Premiership Season LIVE in 4K, with no ad-breaks during play. New to Kayo? Get your first month for just $1. Limited-time offer. Speaking on Fox Footy's AFL 360, host and veteran broadcaster Gerard Whateley was pointed in his assessment of the league's handling of a process that required plenty of resources for so such a minuscule outcome. 'I've covered the Tribunal since I was a cub reporter. I've seen high farce, when cases were cooked up in the lifts and the chairman present!' Gerard Whateley began. 'I've seen players blatantly lie and pure themselves. I've heard bio-mechanists invent the most fanciful stories. I have seen character witness, submissions from Prime Ministers to lower penalties... 'Tonight, the AFL has reached new levels of high farce, as they quibbled over $1,250 with a panel of lawyers who will shortly bill for about $30,000.' The AFL's introduction of a Tribunal hearing for any player who is sanctioned for umpire contact four times in 12 months allows the league leeway to argue for a player's suspension. MATT ROWELL — 4 GEORGE HEWETT — 4 JACK MACRAE — 4 ZAK BUTTERS — 3 JORDAN DAWSON — 3 HARLEY REID — 3 WILLEM DREW — 3 HUNTER CLARK — 3 Four umpires have been concussed as a result of umpire contact in the last 12 months, which was undoubtedly a big part of the AFL's reason to crack down on the contact as Whateley explained. 'I don't dismiss the broader principal, which is important... (but) it has gone too far. The AFL is duty-bound to its umpires to address it — the only way to do that is to confront players,' continued Whateley. 'But to go into a Tribunal hearing with two lawyers, Jeff Gleeson — who's one of the country's most esteemed — the two members of the jury and the admin staff ... to quibble over $1,250 to set this principal, I don't think they have quite achieved what they wanted to achieve. 'If you wanted to make a stand, and a stand worth making, you had to leave the spectre of suspension on the table — at least for a while, but that was withdrawn immediately. 'This is just wasting everybody's time. If you want to ramp the fines up, just write it into the guidelines and ramp the fines up.' Cerra will line up for Carlton this Saturday night when the Blues go up against Melbourne.

AFL 2025: Garry Lyon says Harley Reid trip worthy of a suspension, how much was he fined, MRO, West Coast Eagles loss to Port Adelaide
AFL 2025: Garry Lyon says Harley Reid trip worthy of a suspension, how much was he fined, MRO, West Coast Eagles loss to Port Adelaide

Courier-Mail

time14-07-2025

  • Sport
  • Courier-Mail

AFL 2025: Garry Lyon says Harley Reid trip worthy of a suspension, how much was he fined, MRO, West Coast Eagles loss to Port Adelaide

Don't miss out on the headlines from AFL. Followed categories will be added to My News. Former Melbourne captain Garry Lyon says burgeoning West Coast star Harley Reid should have been suspended for his tripping act last Sunday. Reid was fined $10,000 — down to $6,250 with an early plea — by the Match Review Officer for intentionally tripping Port Adelaide veteran Travis Boak in the third quarter of the Eagles' 26-point loss at Adelaide Oval. FOX FOOTY, available on Kayo Sports, is the only place to watch every match of every round in the 2025 Toyota AFL Premiership Season LIVE in 4K, with no ad-breaks during play. New to Kayo? Get your first month for just $1. Limited-time offer. With the footy in his hands, Boak appeared to have a clean exit from congestion before Reid stuck his leg out in a blatant attempt at stopping his opponent in his tracks. You can watch the incident in the player above. Harley Reid has copped criticism for this tripping act against Port Adelaide's Travis Boak. The second-year prodigy has been fined six times this season but not yet suspended after a ban last year cost him his Rising Star eligibility. And while he's totalled at least $15,000 worth of sanctions this year alone, Lyon was resolute that Reid's act was worthy of a ban, and that more fines wouldn't deter him. 'I can't fathom what the purpose is for fining a man for an act that, had he done it on the first occasion, I would've suspended him for, let alone the sixth,' Lyon began on Fox Footy's AFL 360. 'That, Gerard, I'm sorry — and I've defended Harley across the journey — that is a suspension every day of the week. 'And if you condone this in the manner of just giving him a fine, money's not going to be a problem for Harley Reid. 'The past playing cohort that are in the media now will all agree on that — that's the leg-breaker. That's a kick, Gerard. Harley Reid was lucky not to be suspended. (Photo by Janelle St Pierre/AFL Photos via Getty Images) Garry Lyon (right) called on Harley Reid to clean up his game. (Photo by James Wiltshire/AFL Photos via Getty Images) 'I'm not being overdramatic. You know I've been a defender of Harley ... but that's not a fine, Gerard, let alone the sixth time he's been fined this year. 'That is a suspension for Harley Reid every single day, and if you don't suspend that, you leave the door open for lots of terrible incidents. That's failed the game, that. That's a failure.' Respected Fox Footy commentator Gerard Whateley added: 'If we are searching for the dangerous trip, that was every bit of it.' The 20-year-old has played in all 17 West Coast games this season, averaging 18.6 disposals per game but leading the league for clangers. Reid went head-to-head against Port Adelaide star Jason Horne-Francis on numerous occasions on Sunday — headlined by a spicy back-and-forth that included verbal barbs — and Lyon quizzed AFL 360 guest Andrew McQualter on the challenges associated with keeping his highly talented youngster in line. 'It's an ongoing battle,' McQualter told Fox Footy on Monday night. 'We're sort of having it a bit with a few of our other players as well. 'We want our players to be fiercely competitive, but we also want to stay incredibly disciplined and not give away free kicks. 'We have some challenges with the territory game as it is, so we don't want to give opposition any easy ones. 'We're going to keep trying to be fierce but not give away any free kicks.' On how the former No.1 draft pick has handled feedback about his missteps, McQualter added: 'He's certainly responsive to it (constructive feedback), he understands that he wants to win and compete, but he has to get his balance right. '(It's) part of his learning process he's going through, and I've got no doubt he'll continue to improve and get better at it.' Originally published as 'That is a suspension': AFL great calls out ugly Harley Reid act

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store