Latest news with #GHGSat
Yahoo
01-07-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Former Tory Minister George Freeman Suspended As Trade Envoy Over 'Cash For Questions' Claims
Former Conservative minister George Freeman was 'asked to step back' as a trade envoy for the government last night. It followed claims that he was paid by a company to ask government departments certain questions. He was listed as the trade envoy for Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Brunei but Downing Street confirmed he had been 'suspended' on Monday evening. Freeman, who has been the MP for Mid Norfolk since 2010 and served in both Rishi Sunak and Boris Johnson's governments, referred himself to the parliamentary watchdog over the concerns. He has been a paid adviser for a greenhouse gas emissions monitoring service, GHGSat, since April 2024. According to The Sunday Times, which published alleged leak emails from Freeman asking the company director what to ask, he then submitted questions to ministers about the sector the firm operates in. A No.10 spokesperson said: 'Parliamentary standards are a matter for the House and the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner. 'And you can see the individual has referred himself to that process. 'While that investigation takes place, it is right he has been asked to step back from the role, and he has been suspended in representing the UK as a trade envoy until that process has been concluded.' Freeman released a statement over the weekend announcing he had referred himself to the watchdog although he did not believe he had done 'anything wrong.' He said he 'regularly asks experts for clarification on technical points and terminology' as a long-standing advocate of new technologies. Freeman claimed he also 'deeply respects' the parliamentary system, and tries to 'assiduously follow the code of conduct for MPs and the need to act always in the public interest'. 'Throughout my 15 years in parliament (and government) I have always understood the need to be transparent in the work I have done for and with commercial clients and charities and am always willing to answer any criticism,' he said. He added: 'I am very concerned at the unauthorised and targeted access to my emails and diary which I have raised with the police and parliamentary authorities.' Trump Leaves Starmer Scrabbling On The Ground As He Unveils US-UK Trade Deal US Stance On Trade Unlikely To Change Even If A Democrat Replaced Trump, Minister Warns Trade Unionist Delivers Scathing Takedown Of Labour: 'Desperate Disappointment Is An Understatement'
Telegraph
30-06-2025
- Business
- Telegraph
Tory ‘cash for questions' MP suspended from government role
A Conservative MP accused of taking 'cash for questions' in Parliament has been suspended from a government job while he is under investigation. Downing Street said on Monday that George Freeman had been 'asked to step back' from his role as a trade envoy to Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore and Brunei. Mr Freeman reported himself to the parliamentary standards watchdog after it was alleged at the weekend that he asked questions of Labour ministers on behalf of a company that has paid him. The Sunday Times published leaked emails that allegedly showed Mr Freeman asking the director of GHGSat, an environmental monitoring company, 'what to ask about'. He also allegedly asked the firm to help him 'get the wording right' and said he would convert the queries into 'parliamentary language'. The former Tory science minister was paid £5,000 a month by GHGSat between April 2024 and March this year. Previous government employees are usually banned from lobbying the Government for a specified period after leaving office, while MPs are not allowed to take payments from companies to table questions in the Commons. At the time he took the advisory role, Mr Freeman was told by the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (Acoba) not to lobby the Government on behalf of GHGSat. Self-referral to standards watchdog The MP referred himself to the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner after the allegations were made public, and said he did not believe he had done anything 'inappropriate'. A No 10 spokesman said: 'Parliamentary standards are a matter for the House and the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner. 'And you can see the individual has referred himself to that process. 'While that investigation takes place, it is right he has been asked to step back from the role, and he has been suspended in representing the UK as a trade envoy until that process has been concluded.' Trade envoys are the lowest rank of government office for MPs, and are unpaid. Their role is to travel to the countries in their brief to drum up investment in the UK. Mr Freeman was appointed to the role in February this year. He could face sanctions including a suspension from the Commons if the standards commissioner finds he has broken the rules.
Spectator
30-06-2025
- Entertainment
- Spectator
The bluster and waffle of George Freeman
Retromania is well and truly upon us. Neil Young just headlined Glastonbury. Noel Edmonds is back on the telly. And a Tory MP has been turned over by a Sunday newspaper in a cash-for-questions scandal. Tonight we're gonna party like it's 1997. The humiliated party this time around is George Freeman, a former science minister in Rishi Sunak's government. He left frontline politics before frontline politics had the chance to leave him – and he was last heard from moaning in 2024 that he was unable to afford a £2,000-a-month mortgage on his £118,000 ministerial salary. After that, he found a side-hustle that better answered his needs – advising an environmental monitoring company called GHGSat, which paid him £5,000 a month for just eight hours of work between last April and March this year. When he took the job, he quite properly consulted Acoba, the regulator that presides over the ethics of private-sector appointments for former ministers and civil servants. GHGSat have said that they 'retained George Foreman MP for a brief period' and that their agreement with him 'did not include any lobbying activities'. Since Foreman remains a trade envoy and a member of the Science and Technology Committee, Acoba quite properly went out of its way to warn him that given 'this is a company that is interested in government policy and decisions relating to the civil space sector and emissions… there are risks associated with your influence and network of contacts gained whilst in ministerial office'. Acoba says Foreman specifically assured it that he had 'made it clear to the company that [he would] not lobby government on its behalf'. Anyway, now he's in the soup because the Sunday Times has established that while he was in this company's employment he appears to have tabled several written questions in relation to the areas of GHGSat's commercial interests, in consultation with – and in some cases adopting the exact language of – the company's senior executives. (It's merely the icing on the cake that he appears to have further contravened ethics rules by using his parliamentary offices to host meetings related to his outside commercial interests.) Foreman asked his staffer to tick 'any 'interest declaration' box if there is one', when he tabled the questions, which tells parliament that an MP has asked a question relating to one of their registered interests. The facts appear to be undisputed. He took money from this company. He was specifically warned against using his position in parliament to the company's advantage, and he gave undertakings not to. He then went on not only to table several parliamentary questions the answers to which may have been to the potential commercial advantage of this company, but leaked emails show he asked the company's managing director in writing for advice on 'what to ask about'. It's not just that all this is what the young folk like to call a bad look. It's the pious inanity of his response that really hoists the old eyebrows. No doubt under the advice of some spin-doctor telling him to 'get out in front of the story', he made great show of referring himself to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards. His statement to the Sunday Times when all this came to light was as follows: As a longstanding advocate of important new technologies, companies and industries, working cross-party through APPGs [All-Party Parliamentary Groups] and the select committee, I regularly ask experts for clarification on technical points and terminology, and deeply respect and try to assiduously follow the code of conduct for MPs and the need to act always in the public interest. Throughout my 15 years in parliament (and government) I have always understood the need to be transparent in the work I have done for and with commercial clients and charities and am always willing to answer any criticism. I don't believe I have done anything wrong but I am immediately referring myself to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards and will accept his judgment in due course. We can ignore most of that long feather-puffing opening sentence and all the long feather-puffing second one. And at the third, we can laugh aloud with great merriment: here is such a stickler for the rules, such a deep and assiduous respecter of the need for full transparency, that he voluntarily hands himself in to the Commissioner for Standards the moment that his emails are leaked to the Sunday Times. I imagine transposing the same situation to my own home The nub of all that bluster and waffle appears to be that his defence to the charge of asking questions on behalf of the company is that he was asking questions on his own behalf and simply consulting the company to help him get the technical language right. These things he was asking about were just things that he, personally, happened to be interested in – or at least thought would serve the public good – and it is the merest coincidence that they are also things that the company which paid him £60,000-odd could stand to profit from. Perhaps, indeed, this defence stands up. Even parliament is not without its Candide-like innocents. But it seems to me that if he really was all that determined not only to behave with exemplary probity, but to make sure that not a whiff of an ethical lapse should attend him, it might have occurred to him to mention the whole thing to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards beforehand. Just, y'know, to know where he stood on the whole thing. I imagine transposing the same situation to my own home. Let us say I discover (not at all an implausible situation) that the box of chocs I have deposited in the fridge for the teacher's end-of-term present – and which I specifically told the children not to help themselves to – has vanished. I imagine confronting my daughter. 'Did you eat the chocolates I told you not to eat?' 'Certainly not. I should say that as a long-term champion of secondary education and our hardworking teachers, I have from time to time found it appropriate to make sure that no educators are in danger of eating potentially poisoned chocolate.' 'There's chocolate wrappers on the floor of your room, and an empty chocolate box in your bin.' 'I have striven, throughout my career as a child and now young adult, at all times assiduously to obey parental instructions, and I have no recollection of knowingly doing anything to contravene them. Filial duty has always been my watchword, and my conscience is clear. But in keeping with my determination to uphold the very highest standards in domestic life, I'm voluntarily referring myself to the independent ombudsman and will accept his judgment in due course.' 'What are you talking about? There's literally a smudge of chocolate on your chin.' 'I don't think it would be appropriate to pre-empt the findings of the inquiry, do you?' 'I'm stopping your pocket money for a week.' 'Actually, I think you'll need to raise my pocket money to help pay for the independent investigation into the matter. I have always been a firm believer in going through the appropriate procedures.' Anyway, we'll await the judgment in due course and lay in some chocs to munch for when the time comes.
Sky News
29-06-2025
- Business
- Sky News
Ex-Tory minister George Freeman refers himself to standards watchdog over 'cash for questions' accusations
A former Tory minister has referred himself to the parliamentary watchdog following allegations he was paid by a company that helped him write questions to government. George Freeman, the MP for Norfolk, is reported by The Times to have submitted queries to Labour ministers about the sector the firm operates in. The newspaper published what it said were leaked emails that showed exchanges in which Mr Freeman had asked the company's director what to ask about as he prepared written parliamentary questions related to space data and emissions tracking. Written parliamentary questions can be tabled by any MP and are a common way of requesting more information from a minister in a certain department. Mr Freeman, who reportedly tabled the questions to the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology and the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, became a paid adviser with GHGSat, a monitoring service for greenhouse gas emissions, in April last year. The appointments watchdog Acoba advised him that in taking up the role, "there are risks associated with your influence and network of contacts gained whilst in ministerial office". "In particular, this is a company that is interested in government policy and decisions relating to the civil space sector and emissions," the watchdog said. "You noted you have made it clear to the company that you will not lobby government on its behalf, and this will not form part of your role." In a statement, Mr Freeman said he did not believe he had done "anything wrong" but that he was referring himself to the standards commissioner. "As a longstanding advocate of important new technologies, companies and industries, working cross-party through APPGs and the select committee, I regularly ask experts for clarification on technical points and terminology, and deeply respect and try to assiduously follow the code of conduct for MPs and the need to act always in the public interest," he said. "Throughout my 15 years in parliament (and government) I have always understood the need to be transparent in the work I have done for and with commercial clients and charities and am always willing to answer any criticism. "I don't believe I have done anything wrong but I am immediately referring myself to the parliamentary commissioner for standards and will accept his judgment in due course." He added: "I am very concerned at the unauthorised and targeted access to my emails and diary which I have raised with the police and parliamentary authorities." A Conservative Party spokesperson said: "George Freeman MP has referred himself to the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner. "It would be inappropriate for the Conservative Party to comment further whilst the commissioner's inquiries are ongoing." The Lib Dems and Labour called on Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch to suspend him, saying the incident bore a resemblance to the cash for questions scandal that engulfed John Major's leadership in the 1990s. A Labour spokesperson said: "Cash for questions was a hallmark of Tory sleaze in the 1990s, and three decades on the same issue has raised its head again. "George Freeman has referred himself for investigation so now Kemi Badenoch must suspend him from the Tory whip." Liberal Democrat Deputy Leader Daisy Cooper added: "This looks like the same old sleaze and scandal people have come to expect from the Conservative Party. "Kemi Badenoch should immediately suspend the whip from George Freeman while this is investigated. "Failure to act would confirm that even after being booted out of government, the Conservatives are still hopelessly out of touch."
ITV News
29-06-2025
- Business
- ITV News
George Freeman, MP for Mid Norfolk, refers himself to watchdog over 'cash for questions' allegations
The Conservative MP for Mid Norfolk has referred himself to the parliamentary watchdog after he was accused of taking money to ask questions of government on behalf of a private company. The Times reported that George Freeman broke multiple rules set out in the MP's code of conduct, including lobbying on behalf of a private company. The report alleged that he was paid by firm that helped him write questions which were submitted to Labour ministers. The newspaper published what it said were leaked emails that showed exchanges in which Mr Freeman had asked the company's director what to ask about as he prepared written parliamentary questions related to space data and emissions tracking. He reportedly tabled the questions, which are a way for MPs to ask for more information on the policies and activities of government departments, to the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology and the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero. He became a paid adviser with GHGSat, a monitoring service for greenhouse gas emissions, in April last year. The appointments watchdog Acoba advised him that in taking up the role, 'there are risks associated with your influence and network of contacts gained whilst in ministerial office'. 'In particular, this is a company that is interested in government policy and decisions relating to the civil space sector and emissions. 'You noted you have made it clear to the company that you will not lobby government on its behalf, and this will not form part of your role.' Mr Freeman told the Times: 'As a longstanding advocate of important new technologies, companies and industries, working cross-party through APPGs (All-Party Parliamentary Groups) and the select committee, I regularly ask experts for clarification on technical points and terminology, and deeply respect and try to assiduously follow the code of conduct for MPs and the need to act always in the public interest. 'Throughout my 15 years in parliament (and government), I have always understood the need to be transparent in the work I have done for and with commercial clients and charities and am always willing to answer any criticism. 'I don't believe I have done anything wrong but I am immediately referring myself to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards and will accept his judgment in due course.' Mr Freeman and GHGSat have been contacted for comment. A Conservative Party spokesperson said: 'George Freeman MP has referred himself to the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner. 'It would be inappropriate for the Conservative Party to comment further whilst the Commissioner's inquiries are ongoing.' The Lib Dems and Labour called for Tory leader Kemi Badenoch to suspend him. A Labour spokesperson said: 'Cash for questions was a hallmark of Tory sleaze in the 1990s, and three decades on the same issue has raised its head again. 'George Freeman has referred himself for investigation so now Kemi Badenoch must suspend him from the Tory whip.' Liberal Democrat Deputy Leader Daisy Cooper MP said: 'This looks like the same old sleaze and scandal people have come to expect from the Conservative Party. 'Kemi Badenoch should immediately suspend the whip from George Freeman while this is investigated. 'Failure to act would confirm that even after being booted out of government, the Conservatives are still hopelessly out of touch.' The MP for Mid Norfolk is currently on the science, innovation and technology committee and a trade envoy. He was responsible for the UK space agency in his previous role as a minister in the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology under Rishi Sunak.
