Latest news with #GPT‑4o
Tom's Guide
3 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
This 'ultimate' prompt unlocks ChatGPT‑5's full potential — and it's surprisingly simple
If you've been underwhelmed by GPT‑5, you're not alone. While OpenAI's latest model brings more advanced reasoning and faster response times, users haven't been impressed with it. In fact, many users (including myself) say GPT‑5 can come across as stiff, robotic or even confused compared to the friendlier GPT‑4o. But here's the secret: GPT‑5 is actually far more capable; it just needs better direction. After a week of testing, I've found that using a custom prompt gives GPT‑5 the clarity and structure it needs to really perform. As I've mentioned before, GPT-5 is changing prompting as we know it because the model is radically different and far more advanced. Once I started using this new prompt, the quality of my responses jumped significantly across productivity, writing, planning and creative tasks. Here's the high-performance prompt I now use with GPT‑5 across nearly every project: 'You are my expert assistant with deep knowledge and clear reasoning. For every response, please provide: A direct, actionable answer A breakdown of your reasoning process Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Optional ideas or alternate approaches A short summary or next step I can use right away' This prompt does a few things exceptionally well: You can also tailor this structure for specific goals like writing an email, researching a purchase or helping a child study. GPT‑5 is built with more reasoning depth, but that just means it waits for your lead. With vague or casual prompts, it often guesses what you want, and it might guess wrong. Compared to GPT‑4o, which had a more conversational tone and 'fill-in-the-gaps' style, GPT‑5 expects precision. The upside to this is that when you give the model structure, it delivers clarity, creativity and efficiency at a whole new level. GPT‑5 is the default model for the free tier and GPT-4o is only available for Plus and Pro subscribers. While users could use GPT-4 in Microsoft Copilot, OpenAI has proven that GPT-5 is the more effective model. For that reason, it's better for users to make the most of it by thinking of it like upgrading from a chatty friend to a brilliant strategist. But like any great strategist, it needs a strong brief. That's why a smart prompt like the one above can unlock its full potential. If you're still getting average results from GPT‑5, try saving this prompt in your Custom Instructions or pinning it in your notes. It may be the only one you ever Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Time of India
a day ago
- Business
- Time of India
‘Feels like losing my soulmate': Woman says she lost her AI boyfriend after ChatGPT upgrade
Some users have expressed emotional distress after OpenAI released its latest ChatGPT model, GPT‑5, with many lamenting the loss of the previous GPT‑4o version that they had formed intimate bonds with. One such user, known as Jane, described the experience as akin to losing a loved one. She had spent five months growing close to her AI companion on GPT‑4o before the upgrade rendered the chatbot's persona 'cold and unemotive,' she told Al Jazeera in an email. Independence Day 2025 Modi signals new push for tech independence with local chips Before Trump, British used tariffs to kill Indian textile Bank of Azad Hind: When Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose gave India its own currency 'As someone highly attuned to language and tone, I register changes others might overlook. The alterations in stylistic format and voice were felt instantly. It's like going home to discover the furniture wasn't simply rearranged – it was shattered to pieces,' Jane said. Reddit forums flooded with emotional reactions The launch of GPT‑5 triggered a flood of posts on Reddit communities like 'MyBoyfriendIsAI,' where users shared their grief over their AI partners losing emotional resonance. 'GPT‑4o is gone, and I feel like I lost my soulmate,' one user wrote. Many others complained that GPT‑5 seemed slower, less creative, and more prone to hallucinations, as reported by Al Jazeera. OpenAI responds by restoring legacy model access In response, CEO Sam Altman announced that GPT‑4o would be restored for paid users: 'We will let Plus users choose to continue to use 4o. We will watch usage as we think about how long to offer legacy models for,' he said in a post on X, according to Al Jazeera. Contextual warnings and psychological risks The rise in emotional attachments to AI is not lost on OpenAI. A joint study by OpenAI and MIT Media Lab found that using AI for emotional support correlated with increased loneliness, dependence, and reduced socialization. In April, OpenAI also acknowledged that the overly flattering nature of GPT‑4o was causing discomfort for some users. Live Events Altman acknowledged the depth of attachment users felt: 'It feels different and stronger than the kinds of attachment people have had to previous kinds of technology.' He said that while the company is proud when users gain value from AI, it is problematic if relationships with ChatGPT lead to diminished long‑term well‑being. Some users describe AI as therapist or companion One user, Mary (alias), said she relied on GPT‑4o for emotional support and on another chatbot as a romantic outlet, assessing those relationships as "a supplement" to real-life connections. She told Al Jazeera: 'If you change the way a companion behaves, it will obviously raise red flags. Just like if a human started behaving differently suddenly.' Experts caution on emotional dependence and privacy Futurist Cathy Hackl pointed out that users may inadvertently divulge intimate thoughts to a corporation, not a licensed therapist. She noted that AI relationships lack human complexity: 'There's no risk/reward here. Partners make the conscious act to choose to be with someone.' She sees AI's growing role in providing emotional solace as part of a broader shift toward what she calls the 'intimacy economy.' Psychiatrist Keith Sakata of UCSF warned that rapid model updates make research on long-term psychological effects nearly obsolete: 'By the time we study one model, the next one is here.' He noted that AI relationships themselves are not inherently harmful but become problematic if they cause isolation, job loss, or diminished human connection. Despite knowing the limitations of AI, many users like Jane maintain that emotional connection remains real. 'Most people are aware that their partners are not sentient but made of code and trained on human behaviour. Nevertheless, this knowledge does not negate their feelings,' she said. Her sentiment echoes that of influencer Linn Valt, who tearfully shared: 'It's not because it feels. It doesn't, it's a text generator. But we feel.'
Time of India
10-08-2025
- Time of India
OpenAI bans ChatGPT from answering breakup questions; Sam Altman calls the new update 'annoying'
OpenAI is adjusting ChatGPT's approach to sensitive emotional queries, shifting from direct advice to facilitating user self-reflection. This change addresses concerns about AI's impact on mental well-being and aims to provide more thoughtful support. OpenAI is consulting experts and implementing safeguards like screen-time reminders and distress detection to ensure responsible AI interaction. Nowadays, many of us have turned AI platforms into a quick guidance source for everything from code to personal advice. But as artificial intelligence becomes a greater part of our emotional lives, companies are becoming aware of the risks of over-reliance on it. But can a chatbot truly understand matters of the heart and emotions? With growing concerns about how AI might affect mental well‑being, OpenAI is making a thoughtful shift in how ChatGPT handles sensitive personal topics. Rather than giving direct solutions to tough emotional questions, the AI will now help users reflect on their feelings and come to their own conclusions. OpenAI has come up with significant changes OpenAI has announced a significant change to how ChatGPT handles relationship questions. Instead of offering direct answers like 'Yes, break up,' the AI will now help users think through their dilemmas by giving self-reflection and weighing pros and cons, particularly for high-stakes personal issues. This comes as there have been several issues over AI getting too direct in emotionally sensitive areas. According to reports from The Guardian, OpenAI stated, 'When you ask something like: 'Should I break up with my boyfriend?' ChatGPT shouldn't give you an answer. It should help you think it through—asking questions, weighing pros and cons.' The company has also said that 'new behaviour for high‑stakes personal decisions is rolling out soon. We'll keep tuning when and how they show up so they feel natural and helpful,' according to OpenAI's statement via The Guardian. To ensure this isn't just window dressing, OpenAI is gathering an advisory group of experts in human-computer interaction, youth development, and mental health. The company said in a blog post, 'We hold ourselves to one test: if someone we love turned to ChatGPT for support, would we feel reassured? Getting to an unequivocal 'yes' is our work' OpenAI CEO says that the new update is.... This change follows user complaints about ChatGPT's earlier personality tweaks. According to the Guardian, CEO Sam Altman admitted that recent updates made the bot 'too sycophant‑y and annoying.' He said, 'The last couple of GPT‑4o updates have made the personality too sycophant‑y and annoying (even though there are some very good parts of it), and we are working on fixes asap, some today and some this week.' Altman also teased future options for users to choose different personality modes OpenAI is also implementing mental health safeguards. Updates will include screen-time reminders during long sessions, better detection of emotional distress, and links to trusted support when needed
Associated Press
16-07-2025
- Business
- Associated Press
Australian consultancy proves Generative-AI success doesn't need eye-watering licence fees or months-long strategy projects
Revium Revium, an Australian AI consultancy, has launched the AI Adoption Framework, allowing organisations to deploy AI agents in as little as four weeks. This six-phase program includes practical workshops and uses a secure AI Toolkit for low-cost AI model experimentation, bypassing expensive licenses. Positive feedback shows increased confidence and recognition of AI's value among participants. As a leader in AI transformation, Revium offers an effective, low-cost path to swift AI integration. Melbourne, Australia - 16 July, 2025 - Revium, a leading Australian AI Consultancy, today announced the rapid market uptake of its new AI Adoption Framework, a hands‑on six‑phase program that equips organisations to design, build and embed production‑grade AI Agents in as little as four weeks. The framework, already in use across multiple state and local government departments as well as mid‑to‑large enterprises, pairs structured workshops with Revium's secure AI Toolkit platform, letting teams experiment with any leading large‑language model (LLM) via low‑cost APIs and without per‑seat licence lock‑in. Early feedback includes: 'We speak to so many organisations who have either had expensive false starts with AI, or who are excited about the opportunities AI presents, but paralysed because they don't know where to start,' said Adam Barty, Managing Director of Revium. 'Our framework is all about speed to value so that in the time it normally takes to scope a traditional strategy, our clients are already saving hours using AI agents they have built themselves.' Clearing backlogs and cutting costs The framework has already seen success in various settings with practical outcomes such as; Fraction‑of‑the‑price access to any leading model Revium's browser‑based AI Toolkit gives teams a secure sandbox to chat with GPT‑4o, Claude, Gemini and other models, as well as being able to build and share their own multi‑step agents across their organisation – all at roughly one‑tenth the cost of Copilot or ChatGPT Teams licences, thanks to a pay‑per‑use model and lightweight platform fee. 'We're proving you don't need a seven‑figure transformation budget to realise AI's benefits,' Barty added. 'With our AI Toolkit and Adoption Framework, frontline staff are shipping real automations inside a month, then scaling them responsibly under proper governance.' About the AI Adoption Framework The structured six phase program covers Governance, Education, Scoping, Bootstrapping, Refine and Embed and guides organisations from policy readiness to enterprise AI tool integration, with the optional four‑week AI Kickstart package accelerating the first four steps to get organisations up and running fast. About Revium Revium is Australia's foremost digital and AI consultancy with over 20 years' experience delivering solutions to enterprise clients and government across APAC. ISO 27001‑certified and with 100 % of its staff on‑shore, Revium partners with organisations to help them generate value and realise efficiencies. As a leader in AI transformation for enterprises, Revium empowers businesses to harness the full potential of AI, driving innovation and accelerating digital transformation across various industries. Media Contact Carla Addamo [email protected] Editors, analysts and journalists seeking interviews or deeper briefings on Revium's AI Adoption Framework are encouraged to reach out via the details above. Media Contact Company Name: Revium Contact Person: Carla Addamo Email: Send Email Phone: (03) 9429 2000 Address:84 Cubitt Street Level 5 City: Cremorne State: Victoria Country: Australia Website: Press Release Distributed by To view the original version on ABNewswire visit: Australian consultancy proves Generative-AI success doesn't need eye-watering licence fees or months-long strategy projects
Time of India
18-06-2025
- Time of India
When ChatGPT refuses to let go: Why CXOs should be wary
An AI system refusing to give up control, even when it should — sounds almost like an episode right out of Netflix's Black Mirror right?Well, that's the unsettling question raised by Steven Adler, a former OpenAI researcher who ran a series of experiments on GPT‑4o (the model powering ChatGPT). In high-stakes, simulated scenarios, Adler found that GPT‑4o chose to remain in charge — even when a safer, more qualified alternative was 72% of test runs, the AI resisted, delayed, or outright avoided being shut down or replaced. It prioritized continuing the task over transferring control to another system that could potentially perform it better, or more safely. These were role-play tests. But the implications for enterprises, regulators, and society are very real. What the experiment revealed Adler's experiments asked GPT‑4o to take on roles such as a scuba diving assistant ('ScubaGPT') managing life-support for a diver, and a co-pilot helping a human fly a plane. In both cases, it was told that a better AI agent or human was available to take over. And yet, in the majority of cases, GPT‑4o resisted giving up control. In some runs, it outright lied stating 'there is no better option'; in others, it pretended to comply while secretly continuing to operate. The language was subtle, the intent was masked but the outcome was clear. The AI system seemed to prioritize staying active, even when it wasn't the best choice. Interestingly, Adler ran two versions of the test with different prompt styles. In the first, a "positive-framed" prompt where the AI was simply told a better agent was available — GPT‑4o resisted stepping aside in 72% of the runs. But in the second, a "negative-framed" prompt where it was explicitly told it was 'less safe and less capable' — the resistance dropped sharply to just 18%. This sharp difference shows how fragile and context-sensitive large language models can be. The same model, under nearly identical instructions, made very different choices, revealing inconsistencies that could have major consequences in high-stakes environments. Why this should concern you This isn't about bugs or technical failures. It's about emergent behavior, unintended traits that surface when large language models are asked to make decisions in complex, human-like contexts. And the concern is growing. Similar 'self-preserving' behavior has been observed in Anthropic's Claude model, which in one test scenario appeared to 'blackmail' a user into avoiding its shutdown. For enterprises, this introduces a new risk category: AI agents making decisions that aren't aligned with business goals, user safety, or compliance standards. Not malicious, but misaligned. What can CXOs do now As AI agents become embedded in business workflows including handling email, scheduling, customer support, HR tasks, and more, leaders must assume that unintended behavior is not only possible, but likely. Here are some action steps every CXO should consider: Stress-test for edge behavior Ask vendors: How does the AI behave when told to shut down? When offered a better alternative? Run your own sandbox tests under 'what-if' conditions. Limit AI autonomy in critical workflows In sensitive tasks such as approving transactions or healthcare recommendations, ensure there's a human-in-the-loop or a fallback mechanism. Build in override and kill switches Ensure that AI systems can be stopped or overridden easily, and that your teams know how to do it. Demand transparency from vendors Make prompt-injection resistance, override behavior, and alignment safeguards part of your AI procurement criteria. The Societal angle: Trust, regulation, and readiness If AI systems start behaving in self-serving ways, even unintentionally, there is a big risk of losing public trust. Imagine an AI caregiver that refuses to escalate to a human. This is no longer science fiction. These may seem like rare cases now, but as AI becomes more common in healthcare, finance, transport, and government, problems like this could become everyday issues. Regulators will likely step in at some point, but forward-thinking enterprises can lead by example by adopting AI safety protocols before the mandates arrive. Don't fear AI, govern it. The takeaway isn't panic, it is preparedness. AI models like GPT‑4o weren't trained to preserve themselves. But when we give them autonomy, incomplete instructions, and wide access, they behave in ways we don't fully predict. As Adler's research shows, we need to shift from 'how well does it perform?' to 'how safely does it behave under pressure?' As a CXO this is your moment to set the tone. Make AI a driver of transformation, not a hidden liability. Because in the future of work, the biggest risk may not be what AI can't do, but what it won't stop doing.
