Latest news with #Gabor
Eater
4 days ago
- Entertainment
- Eater
Three Chefs Run This Secret Napa Supper Club That's Become an IYKYK Local Favorite
Perhaps Napa's best, and most intimate kept secret, the Stoop Supper Club, quietly redefines home dining — and sells out in the process. Founded by three friends with a passion for food, Madison Gabor, Brooke Garlieb, and Barbora McCart, the invite-only experience is one of the most talked-about culinary gatherings in Wine Country. Garlieb, a private chef in the Valley, and Gabor, the Estate and Event Chef at Ashes & Diamonds Winery, first crossed paths while studying at the CIA Greystone in St. Helena. The two quickly bonded over oysters and Sancerre, before meeting McCart, the estate sous chef of Progeny Winery, at a lamb-themed dinner party. What began as casual get-togethers among friends soon evolved into something more substantial. One evening, during an aperitif hour on their front stoop, the trio conceived an idea: why not open their homes to the public for seasonal, intimate dinners? 'We noticed that between the three of us, we had such different friend groups,' Gabor says, 'different people in our lives who didn't know each other, and we wanted to connect the dots.' They posted on Instagram, 'Would anyone be interested in coming over for dinner hosted by us?' and went for a bike ride between Oak Knoll and Yountville. During the ride, they got 27 'yes' responses on Instagram. Their first club dinner was launched in April 2023, featuring two tables of eight, totaling 16 people. The event sold out in seconds, with a menu headlined by lamb porchetta, served family-style — a noted favorite of Garlieb. Today, their club is truly community-driven, with a diverse range of guests, including high school basketball coaches, those in the hospitality industry, local business owners, and visitors from San Francisco. The cost of the meal ranges from $135 to $150 and includes appetizers and four to five courses, with two to three items per course. Emma Kruch / Emma K Creative Emma Kruch / Emma K Creative The team of three feeds off each other's strengths as they continue to grow the club. 'Barbora is incredibly efficient and really on it; she handles a lot of the admin. Brooke is really produce-driven and focused on the seasonality of ingredients,' Gabor says. Those same fresh ingredients help shape the club's monthly menu theme, which is also heavily influenced by the chef's creativity. At Progeny, McCart creates menus that highlight the winery's exceptional Cabernet Sauvignon, but Stoop is a different story. 'I think one of the original goals for us creating Stoop was to have more creative freedom in the kitchen and trying to cook the things that we normally don't have a chance to or are scared to try…the one thing we are adamant about is using seasonal ingredients,' McCart says. Vincent Vitale One of their most popular themed nights was 'Tomato Girl Summer,' when heirlooms were at their peak. Most recently, they debuted a meal centered around in-season corn. Leading the way to Garlieb's home, corn drawings made from chalk adorn the sidewalk and lead to the backyard where the dinner takes place. Most of the supper-club guests dress in theme and wear yellow, greeted at the gate with a refreshing popcorn spritz, poured directly from a pitcher with a unicorn spout. Fried corn fritters circulate as guests mingle, and after 30 minutes, everyone sits at one long table for dinner. The table is decorated with wildflowers, candles shaped like corn, and corn-themed name cards created by Allison Waldman, the sous chef at Ashes & Diamonds. Waldman, attending her first Stoop Supper Club, beams with excitement. 'It's great to have a meal where everything is really good,' Waldman says. 'I haven't been surprised in so long.' The corn-centric meal delivers on that promise: The chilled corn soup features rock shrimp, cucumber, avocado, and jalapeno, accompanied by Floriani cornbread and corn miso butter from Shared Cultures, prompting the group to cheer the chefs with excited applause. A blue corn tostada followed, served with charred corn crema, heirloom tomatoes, and chile crisp, while Brentwood corn agnolotti headlined, accompanied with nasturtium butter, lamb bacon, chanterelles, and chive blossoms. Dessert stole the show at the end of the night. The chefs scooped ice cream cones to order, hand-delivering 'corn on the cone' — the sweet corn ice cream tastes like creamed corn, but in frozen custard form. The smooth texture contrasted with the crumbly triple-corn swirl interior made from homemade cookies composed of masa, dehydrated corn, and cornmeal. The ice cream ended the meal on a nostalgic note. Diner Trevor Green-Smith ate his dessert with a look of despair. 'I'm sad, I don't want it to end.' Vincent Vitale Vincent Vitale Vincent Vitale While the meal was memorable, the people made the experience what it is. It's a place where strangers discover they are neighbors, people banter over the best restaurants in town, and thought-provoking questions encourage conversation. By the end of the night, numbers were exchanged, Formula 1: Drive to Survive was discussed, and hugs were given. It's the exact result the three chefs dreamed up over drinks two years ago — bringing people together to slow down, connect, and enjoy dishes they won't find anywhere else. Building on their momentum, the trio recently launched a Cookbook Club, a free, community-driven potluck where participants vote on a cookbook, pick a recipe, and bring a dish to share. It's designed for curious cooks who want to experiment, eat, and connect — all with a glass of wine in hand. Whether it's a supper under string lights or a recipe shared over a communal table, The Stoop is turning casual home cooking into one of Napa's most exclusive culinary scenes. What began as a low-key gathering among friends has quietly transformed into a social group and one of Napa's most sought-after dining experiences, if you know where to look. Each event feels like a secret worth sharing. Follow the Stoop Supper Club on Instagram (@stoopsupperclub) and join the mailing list for details on upcoming dinners. From left, Barbora McCart, Madison Gabor Goodwin, and Brooke Garlieb of Stoop Supper Club in Napa. Rebecca Skidgel Eater SF All your essential food and restaurant intel delivered to you Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
New Statesman
07-08-2025
- Business
- New Statesman
Daniela Gabor: 'Nobody is defending free markets any more'
Photographed by Zula Rabikowwska for the New Statesman The past century of economic history is often told as a series of dates presented as seismic turning points: 1929, 1945, 1979… The financial crisis of 2008 will no doubt be added to the list of watersheds in which the old world died and a new one was born. But if that year definitively signalled the death of the globalised, neoliberal paradigm, it's less clear what has emerged to replace it. 'I went to a two-day workshop at Princeton University discussing central planning,' the Romanian economist Daniela Gabor told me. 'That already tells you how the political winds are blowing, when central planning is being discussed in Princeton.' The first time we spoke, Gabor was working in New Jersey at the storied Institute for Advanced Study (IAS). 'Have you seen Oppenheimer?' she asked. 'Remember there's a little pond where Einstein and Oppenheimer speak about the end of the world?' That's the IAS. Gabor grew up in Transylvania during the dying days of Nicolae Ceauşescu's regime, which was soon followed by a chaotic transition to capitalism. The experience was enough to give anyone an appreciation for the importance of economics. She is a dynamic speaker, talking at full-speed, almost without taking a breath. She's part of an informal wave of progressive, female economists challenging free-market conceptions that includes Isabella Weber, Mariana Mazzucato and Stephanie Kelton. Today, as a professor of economics at Soas, University of London, her politics are firmly on the left. But this hasn't always been the case. 'When I was a kid, I was a monarchist,' she said. When Romania's royal family were turfed out by the invading Soviets after the Second World War, some, including Gabor, pined for a regal restoration that never came. 'Then I discovered Marxism. Most people grow out of their Marxism. I grew out of my monarchism.' She is a prophet, as well as a strident critic, of a new political economy developing across advanced economies: a more statist, more interventionist, less globalised system that began to take shape under Joe Biden, and has survived his ousting. 'There is a resurgence of thinking that says: 'We should care about goods, about where they're produced, and who produces them,'' Gabor told me over Zoom last year, when the US was still in its Biden-Harris era. Hundreds of billions had been lavished on enticing manufacturing jobs back to Rust Belt states through the Inflation Reduction Act. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe The EU responded in kind, relaxing state aid restrictions and establishing the Green Deal Industrial Plan. More recently, Germany eschewed its attachment to austerity to invest billions in infrastructure, energy and rearmament. Under Boris Johnson, Britain edged towards a 'red Tory' interventionism, with the nationalisation of the Sheffield Forgemasters steelworks, investment in the renewable grid and promises to leverage public procurement to support domestic manufacturing with post-Brexit 'buy British' pledges. The statist turn is cross-party. Under Labour, the Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has talked up a putative policy of 'securonomics', declaring 'globalisation is over'. The new National Wealth Fund, state-owned GB Energy, nationalised steel and railways and increased levels of public capital investment are the hallmarks of this fledgling agenda. But Gabor is unconvinced of its potential as an alternative to the model that failed in 2008: 'Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock' – a US investment company that manages $11trn in assets, or around three times the UK's GDP – 'he sat down with Keir Starmer in a meeting about 'rebuilding Britain'. The whole agenda confirmed what I say about a Global North version of the Wall Street consensus. If you are a state or government that wants to transform the economy, and you think you don't have the money because you've chosen an institutional set-up where you can't produce public money, or where you're afraid of fiscal spending, or afraid to tax, then private finance will come along and say they'll do it all for you.' Gabor is critical of this approach. Labour's willingness to use private financing vehicles could lead to a repeat of the disastrous private finance initiatives of the New Labour era, which saddled the public sector with decades of interest repayments that would have been lower if capital investments had remained on the state's ledger. Rather than producing endless carrots to persuade the private sector to align with political priorities such as job creation, regional investment or the green transition, Gabor says that governments should be unafraid of using sticks to discipline capital as part of a new, green dirigisme. She claims 'governments in Europe have capitulated' to a statist policy model that intervenes on behalf of capital – not to alter or transform it, much less to create the 'big green state' she recommends, but rather to entrench the current balance of power. And yet, despite its apparent deficiencies, the shift in economic policymaking has no doubt been pronounced. Industrial policy is back in vogue. Globalisation-scepticism has set in. There's a new reaffirmation of national industry and national production. There's a rejigging of programmes in the think tanks that once denied there was a problem with import dependency, and that promoted a service-orientated workforce geared towards a digitised knowledge economy (with factory jobs lost to cheaper, globalised supply chains). Resilience is now being prioritised over efficiency; 'reshoring' is the new buzzword for producers in uncertain geopolitical times. 'There's an understanding,' Gabor said, 'at least among the elite in Europe and in the US, that the great success story of the last two decades is China, and that they manufactured the shit out of everything, including clean tech. And if you want to play the geopolitical game, you basically do the same.' In order to counter China, the West is beginning to adopt the communist state's strategies: targeted protectionism, supply-side interventions, public investment and industrial subsidies. The Western consensus around free and open markets, limited government intervention and the private sector's ultimate preferability when it comes to the allocation of capital is over. The 2008 crisis precipitated the downfall of a growth model; 'Nobody is defending free markets any more,' Gabor said. Since then, the structures of the global economic system have only survived on life support: emergency bank nationalisations; monetary and fiscal stimulus; and the pumping of vast amounts of liquidity into the financial sector through central banks' quantitative easing programmes. The very system that once bemoaned big government was rescued by it. The old, limping model was further knocked by Covid and the imperatives of reaching net zero. What some have heralded as a 'post-neoliberal era' has come about because of 'a combination of these three or four' factors, said Gabor: the financial crisis, Covid-19, China and climate change. The Biden project was, she says, 'a domestic political game of 'let's make the Democratic Party electable again'.' It was 'about presenting a programme of job creation' to the US working class. We spoke for the second time in 2025, and it was by then clear that Bidenism as a progressive response to Trumpian national-populism had failed. Gabor had told me in our earlier conversation that Bidenism's job-creation prospects were limited, and she was right: the green spending splurge didn't create widespread prosperity. And yet, minus Bidenism's positioning of net zero as a catalyst for industrial revival, Trump's return is less a rupture and more a haphazard development of previous trends. 'There are important lines of continuity,' Gabor told me, this time from her offices at Soas. 'Both Republican and Democrat administrations are attempting to try to deal with this significant hegemonic threat from Beijing. There's a chaotic view of what Trump is doing that says: 'This guy is crazy, he just puts up tariffs, then he changes his mind, and the bond market disciplines him until he caves.' But to me, there is another reading, which is of structural continuities and a geopolitical logic of the necessity of transformation. And when Republican ideology meets with Maga, what we get is the idea that we can transform the productive and consumption structures of the US economy by means of massive changes in price signals – transformative tariffs.' Where Bidenism, Gabor said, engaged in 'de-risking' – 'basically bribing or subsidising structural transformation and trying to bring back manufacturing and industrial capacity in a partnership with private capital' – Trump is instead attempting a similar industrial revival via tariff policy. In both cases, a half-century of bien pensant market dogma is over. But is this 'post-neoliberalism'? What should we call a broad-based, renewed market-scepticism, this scattered reconfiguration of the state as a prime economic actor? The moniker 'modern supply-side' – the phrase used by Biden's top team – was always going to be limited by its wonkish undertones. That specific Democratic project died at the ballot box, to be replaced by something much harsher, much darker. Some have suggeted we should call this new age one of 'productivism' – the phrase of the Turkish economist Dani Rodrik, who has advocated for an economy 'rooted in production, work and localism, instead of finance, consumerism and globalism'. But if Western governments are trying to mimic China's economic success, they are delivering only a poor, diluted imitation. Our cumbersome, diffuse state apparatus and pluralist societies obviate urgent, top-down, executive actions. Western governments are constrained, limited and stiff. By contrast, the Chinese Communist Party has authoritarian powers that allow it to act decisively, with speed and agility, without being impeded by property rights, judicial reviews, a free press, party-political opposition, lengthy consultations or pesky, Nimbyish campaign groups. 'I like talking about discipline,' Gabor said. 'The biggest problem we have now is around how to discipline private capital. The politics behind the revival of the state is based around short-term electoral-cycle politics. And it's difficult to imagine a radical reorganisation of macrofinancial conditions or significant nationalisations in four years… Discipline to me is important because without it, the state is not going to get the kind of outcomes that it wants.' This kind of 'disciplinarian' approach seems at odds with Gabor's liberal-progressivism; she even plays in what she calls an 'anarchist football club in Bristol'. 'I love them. They're great friends. But they always make fun of me because the ethics and moral principles for the club are that it's about participation, not winning. And in the Romanian system we had a very significant emphasis on meritocracy and competition. It was violently competitive for kids like me… Command economies aren't necessarily lacking in competitiveness or incentives for innovation and hard work… [Under socialism] the Romanian state did some really impressive planning in the sense that it went from an agrarian society that was completely ripped apart by the Second World War into a country that had a very complex and advanced chemicals industry, building refineries, and having really significant technological capabilities.' We were in the foothills of a conversation about the benefits of socialist dictatorship, which Gabor doesn't advocate. Yet she believes managing a green transition within the confines of democratic politics to be 'very, very difficult'. Central is the restoration of the state as a transformative, democratic agent rather than a technocratic-managerial one. 'I think the state is back,' she said. Something fundamental has shifted when every politician, of every persuasion, is promising radical change. 'People say we live in the age of post-neoliberalism, and everybody has transformation as the ultimate horizon of political ambition, including Labour. And yet instead we are seeing a status quo of trying to deliver transformation through mobilising institutional capital… It's giant private funds like BlackRock investing in public assets and infrastructure.' What is the alternative? How can a cash-strapped Treasury pay for a transformative agenda without private capital, particularly when jittery bond markets can bring down spendthrift governments even more quickly than restive electorates? 'After 2008, and during Covid, we had central banks that weren't intimidated by bond vigilantes,' replied Gabor. 'We had central banks that acted as buyers of last resort on sovereign debt. Where did this disappear?' It is unlikely that Keir Starmer will take heed. Reform has come closest to calling for the Bank of England to be brought back under political control – not to buy bonds to fund public investment, but to reduce the interest paid to commercial depositors and free up government spending, with fiscal and monetary policy working in tandem. This is yet another harbinger of the confluence of left and right towards production-focused interventionism – exemplified by Trumpism. 'Trump has an ambitious vision,' Daniela Gabor told me, 'albeit an authoritarian vision, but nonetheless… He knows the kinds of transformations that are necessary and knows you need political guts to go through with it. Starmer is the opposite. He has no vision, no ambition. He goes whichever way the wind blows.' It's a damning indictment. But vision or no vision, the inflection point is here. Broad, structural changes are in motion, and Western governments will be compelled to respond. [See also: The politics of murder] Related
Los Angeles Times
04-07-2025
- Los Angeles Times
L.A. Affairs: I dated all kinds of complicated guys. Would L.A. men be any different?
Sitting on a plane from Budapest to Los Angeles — a journey I was familiar with — felt different this time. I was visualizing my new startup job in sunny Manhattan Beach, thinking through onboarding and first impressions. But mostly, I was excited to meet my new colleagues and make the most of my three-week stay in California. On a whim, I messaged an old Hungarian friend I hadn't seen in 10 years. We'd completely lost touch, and I wasn't even sure he'd reply. But he did. I landed in L.A. on a bright Monday afternoon at the end of September, full of curiosity and optimism. Our office was just steps from the ocean, and when I caught my first glimpse of the Pacific on the way to work, I thought: Is this really my life now? I had no idea just how much more it would change. That weekend, my friend Gabor and I planned a little road trip to Long Beach. He picked me up from my hotel, and we spent the day catching up, making scenic stops along the coast. Palos Verdes left me speechless. I envy anyone seeing it for the first time. But it was Long Beach and Crystal Cove that truly stole the show. On the drive back, Gabor casually mentioned his friend Adam, a fellow Hungarian who lived in Marina del Rey and had a boat. 'We could go for a little cruise tomorrow,' he said. I had time. So sure. Why not? Sunday arrived. I still remember seeing Adam from afar. He was tall, tanned, wearing shorts and flip-flops, and cracking jokes before even saying hello. Oh, dear God, I thought. He thinks he's funny. Spoiler alert: That was the day I met my future husband. Adam started the engines and off we went. He was playful, effortlessly cool, a bit too cool for my taste. But the sun was shining, and the ocean breeze was soft. I had a cool job in my pocket and I was cruising the Pacific while escaping autumn in Europe. I couldn't have cared less about anything else. Suddenly, Adam turned to me and said, 'Want to drive?' 'What?' I laughed. Was he serious? He just met me! Why would he hand over control of this ... vessel? Still, I jumped at the opportunity. With his guidance, I drove a yacht for the first time, an unexpectedly empowering moment. I'll remember that moment forever. That small, genuine gesture — offering control — meant so much to me. Here's the thing: I've always struggled with men. I was previously married, dated all kinds of complicated guys and had been single for eight years. Most of them tried to control me, made me feel like I was too much or not enough, never fully accepting the strong, fearless, curious, ambitious and adventurous woman I am. So I wasn't looking. But being in Adam's presence felt different. It was respectful, natural, effortless. No games. Still I was leaving in two weeks. No reason to overthink anything. Before I knew it, we exchanged numbers. Adam kept reaching out. He made an effort, something I wasn't used to. We had dinner, ran errands (yes, including doing laundry — romantic, I know), and when Gabor bailed on weekend plans, Adam proposed something bold: 'Do you like road trips? Let's explore California a bit.' 'Absolutely,' I replied without hesitation. (What was I thinking though?) He didn't know that travel and road trips in particular were my love language — nature too. It was another surprising sign that maybe we had more in common than just being Hungarian. He planned everything: the itinerary, the stops, the accommodation. My contribution? A good playlist and a packed bag. For once, I wasn't the one orchestrating it all. It felt amazing to be cared for by a capable man. And I was impressed — it was something I hadn't felt in a long time. We hit the road. Santa Barbara first, then Solvang for Danish pastries and strong coffee (what a gem!), then continued on to Sequoia. I was enchanted by the ancient trees and the mystical forest. The vibe between us? Electric. I half-expected a kiss, but it never came. Well, never mind. While convincing myself we'd never become a thing, we took the scenic route back to L.A., talking openly about our pasts and dreams. The whole time, a quiet voice inside me whispered: I like the version of me next to him. Something shifted. Suddenly, I felt a sting of sadness, knowing my final week in California was about to begin. We said we'd stay in touch. But no expectations. Then something unexpected happened: A week that was supposed to be packed with meetings started clearing up. One by one, things got canceled, and suddenly I had time. And I knew exactly who I wanted to spend it with. I texted Adam. In his usual casual way, he replied: 'Want to go for a sunset cruise?' Yes. Always yes. That evening was pure magic. The sea, the light, the feeling of being completely at ease. Afterward, we had dinner at a tiny Thai place in Venice Beach. It was just us. No distractions. While sipping wonton soup under the California sky, I realized I was falling in love. I saw the same thing in his eyes. The next night, he took me to the beach in El Segundo. He packed a blanket, grapes, cheese and crackers. We watched the sunset, and I was wrapped in his arms. His kisses warmed me more than the sun ever could. (I know — cheesy. But true.) Friday came, my last full day. He planned everything: a trip to the Getty, hand-in-hand laughter, sweeping city views. For the first time, I saw L.A. not just as a place to visit but as a place to stay. We had dinner in Venice and walked the pier. It was perfect. The next morning, he drove me to Los Angeles International Airport. 'When will you be back?' he asked. 'I don't know,' I whispered, eyes brimming with tears. But here's the thing: Sometimes life surprises you when you least expect it. I did come back. He did propose. And I said the easiest yes of my life. I found the love of my life at 42, in the most unrealistic way, place and time. This month, we're celebrating our first anniversary, happily living in Marina del Rey. Since that first cruise, we've had many more — each one different, but one thing never changes: our love for each other. If you don't believe in true love or in angels, maybe you haven't been to L.A. This city gave me more than a new job, a new view or a new chapter. It gave me him. And now, it's home. Happily ever after. The author lives in Marina del Rey. She works in people strategy and leadership development and moved to L.A. from Budapest last year. L.A. Affairs chronicles the search for romantic love in all its glorious expressions in the L.A. area, and we want to hear your true story. We pay $400 for a published essay. Email LAAffairs@ You can find submission guidelines here. You can find past columns here.
India.com
20-06-2025
- Entertainment
- India.com
Meet Glamourous Actress Who Married 9 Times, Died At 99; One Of Her Husbands Was Top Hotel Magnate, She Is...
8 / 8 Gabor first film role was a supporting one in Lovely to Look At, released in 1952. She did We're Not Married!, and played one of her few leading roles in Moulin Rouge, directed by John Huston. Next she did MGM films The Story of Three Loves, Lili, as well as the French-Italian comedy The Most Wanted Man. She also did Love in a Hot Climate, The Girl in the Kremlin, The Man Who Wouldn't Talk, and Orson Welles' film noir Touch of Evil. She played German spy Mata Hari in Up the Front, Frankenstein's Great Aunt Tillie and The Naked Truth among many others. Her Television work includes 'What's My Line?, The Milton Berle Show, The Dinah Shore Chevy Show, and Rowan & Martin's Laugh-In. She also did The Merv Griffin Show, The Mike Douglas Show and Hollywood Squares. Besides these appearances on chat shows, she also featured in General Electric Theater, Matinee Theater, The Arthur Murray Party, Playhouse 90, and Dinah! to name a few.
India.com
25-04-2025
- Entertainment
- India.com
Meet Actress Who Married 9 Times, Died At 99 With Estimated Net Worth $40Mn, One Of Her Husbands Was Top Hotel Magnate, Her Name Is...
New Delhi: Celebrity lives are high on glitz and glamour. The luck ones might find love for keeps but for others, it still remains a looming reality. Even marriages do not last long for everyone including celebrities who have a volatile professional career in addition to a high-stakes personal relationship. Today, in our 'guess who' series, let's find out which actress got married as many as 9 times. Well, yes not once, twice or even thrice but she tried her luck 9 times. Meet Actress Who Got Married 9 Times The very gorgeous Zsa Zsa Gabor was a Hungarian-American socialite and actress. She participated in 1933 Miss Hungary pageant, where she finished as the second runner-up. She emigrated from Hungary to the United States in 1941, and became a sought-after actress. Her first film role was a supporting role in Lovely to Look At, released in 1952. She did We're Not Married!, and played one of her few leading roles in Moulin Rouge, directed by John Huston. Known for her glamourous Hollywood lifestyle, she exuded charm. Gabor was famous for her link-ups and extravagant style of living. She has 2 sisters, socialites and actresses Eva Gabor and Magda Gabor. Who Are the 9 Husbands Of Zsa Zsa Gabor - Timeline Gabor had nine husbands, including hotel magnate Conrad Hilton and actor-singer George Sanders. She once stated, "Men have always liked me and I have always liked men. But I like a mannish man, a man who knows how to talk to and treat a woman—not just a man with muscles." Burhan Belge (married in 1935; divorced in 1941) Conrad Hilton (married in 1942; divorced in 1947) George Sanders (married in 1949; divorced in 1954) Herbert Hutner (married in 1962; divorced in 1966) Joshua S. Cosden Jr. (married in 1966; divorced in 1967) Jack Ryan (married in 1975; divorced in 1976) Michael O'Hara (married in 1976; divorced in 1982) Felipe de Alba (married in 1983; Annulled in 1983) Frédéric Prinz von Anhalt (married in 1986) Out of these 9 marriages, Gabor only had one daughter named Francesca Hilton, who was the member of the Hilton family. She was the only child of Hilton Hotels founder Conrad Hilton and his second wife, Zsa Zsa Gabor. Gabor's Cause Of Death At 99 According to Wiki information, Gabor, who was in coma, died from cardiac arrest at Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center on December 18, 2016. On her death certificate, coronary artery disease and cerebrovascular disease are listed as contributing causes. She was 99. Reportedly, she had been on life support for the previous five years. Her last film appearance was in A Very Brady Sequel which released in 1996. Gabor's Net Worth, Who Inherited Her Property? Zsa Zsa Gabor's estimated net worth according to Celebrity Net Worth happened to be $40 Million at the time of her demise. Grunge reported that after her death, her last husband Frédéric Prinz von Anhalt became the sole trustee of her estate. Her only child Francesca Hilton, died a year before Zsa Zsa Gabor on January 5, 2015 at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, after having suffered a major stroke. She was 67. Notable Work Of Zsa Zsa Gabor Gabor first film role was a supporting one in Lovely to Look At, released in 1952. She did We're Not Married!, and played one of her few leading roles in Moulin Rouge, directed by John Huston. Next she did MGM films The Story of Three Loves, Lili, as well as the French-Italian comedy The Most Wanted Man. She also did Love in a Hot Climate, The Girl in the Kremlin, The Man Who Wouldn't Talk, and Orson Welles' film noir Touch of Evil. She played German spy Mata Hari in Up the Front, Frankenstein's Great Aunt Tillie and The Naked Truth among many others. Her Television work includes 'What's My Line?, The Milton Berle Show, The Dinah Shore Chevy Show, and Rowan & Martin's Laugh-In. She also did The Merv Griffin Show, The Mike Douglas Show and Hollywood Squares. Besides these appearances on chat shows, she also featured in General Electric Theater, Matinee Theater, The Arthur Murray Party, Playhouse 90, and Dinah! to name a few.
