Latest news with #GalaxyS24Plus
Phone Arena
4 days ago
- Phone Arena
Are your apps spying on you? I did the work and here's what you need to know right now
I don't know about you but I sure have lost count of how many times I've installed an app, only to be hit with the "Allow location access?" pop-up before I can even explore the interface? And sometimes it makes sense – I mean, Google Maps can't guide you anywhere without knowing where you are. But other times? A shopping app? A camera filter? Why exactly do they need to know where you are standing? So I decided to find out. I picked some of the most-used Android apps, spread across weather, navigation, shopping, social media and gaming. I installed each one on a test device (I used the Galaxy S24 Plus for the purpose), noted when and how they requested my location (foreground, background, precise, approximate), and checked if the app actually worked without it. Then I read their privacy policies – every line – and reached out to developers for answers. And while not all location tracking is shady, the difference between "necessary" and "nice-to-have" is a lot murkier than you'd think. Some of what I found matched the official story. But a lot of it didn't. Those long, boring policies we usually just click 'Agree' on actually hide a lot – especially when it comes to how companies handle your data. More often than not, it turns out we agreed to things we might not really agree with once we find out later. So, I read every privacy policy for the apps I chose for this article. Some confirmed what I saw during testing. Others… well, let's just say "transparent" isn't the word I'd use. Most policies acknowledged collecting location data, but rarely gave a precise explanation. TikTok always knows where you are. | Image credit – PhoneArena After digging through hundreds of pages of privacy policies, one thing becomes clear: TikTok and Instagram use vague lines like "to improve your experience" or "for personalization." Both also admit they may share location with "service providers" – which can include advertisers and analytics firms. Both social media giants gather location data even if you've turned off Location Services on your device. This includes tracking your IP address to get a rough idea of where you are. In Meta's case, the company can also use your IP address to pinpoint your specific location if it deems it necessary to protect your safety or the safety of others. So what does that mean in real life? Basically, Meta is saying, 'We might figure out where you are if there's a risk to you or someone else.' For example, if someone reports harassment or threats, location info could help Meta respond or block the offender. Or if there's a serious real-world danger, like someone trying to harm themselves or someone else, knowing your location could allow Meta to alert authorities or provide support resources. And of course, both companies assure us that our location data is safe and used only to help improve our experience. But history tells a slightly different story. Both Meta and TikTok have faced multiple controversies and lawsuits over how they handle location data. Earlier this year, Meta got hit with a class-action lawsuit in California, alleging it collected location data through tracking software hidden in thousands of mobile apps. The claim? Meta used a 'software development kit' to access devices without permission and gather precise geolocation data, then allegedly monetized it. TikTok hasn't escaped scrutiny either. Concerns mainly revolve around its parent company, ByteDance, and the potential for the Chinese government to access Americans' sensitive data, including location info. This worry was central in debates over a law that could have effectively banned TikTok in the US. TikTok has also faced a lawsuit claiming it collected location data from visitors to websites even if they didn't have a TikTok account. So, yeah, privacy policies don't always tell the whole picture. Navigation Maps needs your location to work as intended. | Image credit – PhoneArena I use Google Maps every time I travel, so it was naturally one of the first apps on my list. Plus, it's also the most popular navigation app in the world. Google Maps is more direct, stating that location is needed for navigation and may be used to improve Google's services. Actually, if you turn on "Web & App Activity" in your Google Account, Google saves your location and activity data – even when you're not using the app – to offer features like recommendations and live traffic. That all came to light in 2022, when several state attorneys general – including the one from Washington, D.C. – reached a $9.5 million settlement with Google. The lawsuit claimed Google misled users about location tracking, continuing to collect location data through features like 'Web & App Activity' (which is on by default) even when people thought they'd shut it off by disabling 'Location History.' Google says it doesn't sell your personal info but shares it with partners, your work or school admin, or when required by law. It also shares anonymous location info for research and trends. So, yeah – don't be shocked if you land in LA and suddenly your feed is flooded with ads for a trip to Universal Studios. You can manage location permissions on your device and in your Google Account. Location History is off by default but can be turned on, edited, or auto-deleted. Starting late 2024, most Location History data will be stored on your device, limiting web access. Google Maps asks for precise location right away and may request background access for navigation. You can still search and browse maps without granting location access, but features like turn-by-turn directions won't work. Amazon and Temu have a long list of how they use your location, but you can opt out in both apps. | Images by PhoneArena Next up, let's talk about shopping apps, since more and more of us are buying things online. Back in the day, you could just walk into a store, grab what you needed, and leave without the owner having any clue where you lived. Now? Yeah, that's not how it works anymore. I guess more online shops know where I live than my friends at this point. Amazon asks for an approximate location when you check delivery options or local deals. This is a foreground request and not mandatory – the app works fine without it, but you might miss some local perks. Across its services (shopping app, Alexa, Ring, Kindle), Amazon collects location data from GPS, WiFi, Bluetooth, your IP address, and delivery addresses. It uses this info for order delivery, personalized ads, local content, fraud prevention, and improving services. You control location access mainly through your device settings, and Amazon apps also offer some location-related settings (like default shipping address or device location in Alexa). Amazon doesn't sell your personal info but shares it with affiliates, service providers (logistics, marketing, analytics), and third parties when required by law or business needs. Their AWS Location Service anonymizes data and doesn't use it for ads or analytics. Temu asks for an approximate location on launch or while browsing promos – also a foreground request and not needed for basic shopping. The company always collects approximate location via IP and can get precise GPS only if you allow it. Like any e-commerce site, it collects your shipping address and may infer location from your browsing and purchases. Temu says it uses location data for deliveries, personalized ads, and service improvements. It claims it doesn't sell personal info. Temu's been under scrutiny for alleged excessive data collection beyond location, with concerns about privacy, Chinese government access, and transparency. And the EU is investigating its compliance with digital laws. However, the company claims location is only used where absolutely necessary (like address completion in some regions), always with user consent, and features are inactive where not needed. – Temu, August 2025 You can manage location permissions through your device settings, but full control over data use is limited. Meanwhile, Shein , another really popular app in the US, mentions location only in the context of delivery or deals; it does not explicitly say if it shares it for ads. When you install the app, it does not ask you to agree to any privacy policies, but asks you to choose where you are located. Again, like most of the others, Shein collects location data inferred from your IP address to "tailor your experience in terms of displaying the appropriate local website, language, or user experience." But if this is the whole story, I couldn't find out (for now).Then I moved on to weather apps, because checking the forecast is something most of us do daily, right? Enter AccuWeather . As soon as you install the AccuWeather app, it asks for location access right away. If you don't allow location tracking – even in the background – you might miss out on some features, like the widget not updating properly. AccuWeather also mentions that if you agree, your location data could be shared with third parties, including advertisers. If you want AccuWeather to work properly, location access is a must. | Images by PhoneArena And that's where it gets a bit concerning again. None of the apps on my list actually name these third parties or give concrete examples. They also don't seem very eager to answer when asked. I reached out to all of them requesting at least one example, and… well, let's just say I'm still waiting for a quote to use. In the past, AccuWeather has faced criticism. Privacy groups sued the company after it was discovered to be collecting location data in ways users didn't expect and passing it to third parties. Following a complaint from EPIC, AccuWeather adjusted some of its practices and is now more upfront about selling user data to advertisers. Users can also choose to opt out of advertising and other non-essential uses of their device information, and they can delete any data AccuWeather has collected about their device. You need to have location enabled to play the game. | Image by Pokémon Go blog And, of course, no list about location data would be complete without including at least one game. For this category, I'm going with Pokémon Go – and you can probably already guess why. This game quite literally can't function without knowing where you are. And even after all these years, it's still going strong, with around 60 million monthly active players. Pokémon Go (by Niantic) is up-front: it uses your location for gameplay and may share it with partners. – Niantic, 2025 And location data is shared a lot, even with other players. However, the company says it shares de-identified data with third parties for performance, industry and market analysis. So not absolutely everyone has access to it, but still, if you want to play Pokémon Go, be ready for many to know where you are. The difference here is that with Pokémon Go, players knowingly hand over their location data as part of the gameplay. But that doesn't mean there haven't been privacy concerns – especially in the early days. Back in 2016, shortly after its launch, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Niantic by homeowners who argued that the game encouraged trespassing. The complaint stated that Niantic placed 'PokéStops' and 'Pokémon Gyms' on or right next to private property without the owners' consent. This led to situations where players would knock on doors, wander into yards, and gather in front of houses just to catch Pokémon. The case eventually ended in a settlement. As part of the agreement, Niantic had to create a stronger system that allowed property owners to request the removal of PokéStops and Gyms from their land. The company also added in-game warnings reminding players to respect private property and be aware of their surroundings. Bottom line: Across the board, I noticed that the more ad-driven the app (think TikTok and Instagram), the less direct the explanation. And while some are more open than others, the "Data Safety" sections in the Google Play Store are often more readable than the policies themselves. When the big companies wouldn't give me straight answers, I wasn't about to drop it. I figured, fine – if they won't talk, I'll ask the people who actually build these apps. So, I went straight to Reddit and put the question to Android developers. Not a huge crowd jumped in, but a few did share their perspective. One developer explained that sometimes location permissions have nothing to do with tracking you. For instance, older versions of Android required location access just to scan for Bluetooth devices. Technically, you could figure out someone's location from the unique IDs those devices broadcast, so Android treated it as a location request – even if the app didn't care about your real-world whereabouts. Google has loosened that rule since, but you'll still find apps that have to ask for location just to make Bluetooth work. – WestonP, Reddit, August 2025 So, no – not every location request is about tracking. You'll never see 'Bluetooth scanning' listed in a privacy policy, but developers know these quirks better than anyone. And now you do, too. What does it all mean for you? Here's what I've learned: location access isn't inherently bad, but you should never assume an app's request is purely functional. If you must grant it, always go for "While using the app" and choose an approximate location when possible. Apps that truly need background or precise location (navigation, AR gaming) will make it obvious. Don't be afraid to deny location entirely – in my testing, Amazon, Temu, Shein, TikTok, Instagram, and even AccuWeather still worked fine without it. If an app breaks without location but doesn't clearly explain why, that's a red flag. Use your phone's permissions manager to review and revoke access. I found several apps still had background access after I stopped using them – likely because I had allowed it once. Finally, when you read a privacy policy, skip the fluff and look for: Is location tied to specific features or vaguely to "personalization"? Is sharing with third parties mentioned? Is there an opt-out? You don't have to be paranoid. But you do have to be intentional. Here's what I found when I put these apps through my little location test: TikTok – Requests precise, foreground location for features like local content discovery and tagging. Works fine without it, but nags you occasionally. – Requests precise, foreground location for features like local content discovery and tagging. Works fine without it, but nags you occasionally. Instagram – Similar to TikTok, uses precise location for location tags and nearby content. Fully functional without it. – Similar to TikTok, uses precise location for location tags and nearby content. Fully functional without it. Google Maps – As expected, demands precise location upfront. Works for searches without it, but navigation is impossible. – As expected, demands precise location upfront. Works for searches without it, but navigation is impossible. Amazon – Asks for approximate location in foreground to tailor local deals and delivery estimates. Optional. – Asks for approximate location in foreground to tailor local deals and delivery estimates. Optional. Temu – Foreground, approximate location, mostly for address completion in certain markets. Per their team, it's inactive where not needed. – Foreground, approximate location, mostly for address completion in certain markets. Per their team, it's inactive where not needed. Shein – Similar to Temu, for local offers and shipping estimates. – Similar to Temu, for local offers and shipping estimates. AccuWeather – Wants precise location at launch, but manual entry works fine – you just lose hyperlocal updates. – Wants precise location at launch, but manual entry works fine – you just lose hyperlocal updates. Pokémon Go – Non-negotiable. Needs both foreground and background access; the game doesn't function without it. Patterns emerged fast: navigation, and AR-based games demand location as core functionality. Shopping and social media apps? Mostly optional – but they still ask. And a few apps, like TikTok, seemed particularly persistent in re-prompting me if I initially denied access. Not all location tracking is sinister. Sometimes it is the only way an app can work. But my testing showed that in many cases, it's simply the default – and the benefits go more to the company than to you. The key is knowing when location access is genuinely essential and when it's just another data point to be mined. Android now gives you more control than ever – use it. Your phone will happily hand over your whereabouts 24/7 if you let it. The decision to allow it? That's still yours. Get 50% off – try it for 3 months today! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
Android Authority
24-06-2025
- Android Authority
Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 benchmarks show why Nothing Phone 3 might not be truly Elite
Hadlee Simons / Android Authority Nothing announced last week that its Nothing Phone 3 will be powered by Qualcomm's Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset. This is a somewhat polarizing move in light of the company marketing the phone as a 'true' or 'real' flagship, where customers would expect a top-flight Snapdragon 8 Elite processor. However, the POCO F7 just launched today, and it's the first global phone powered by the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. So, should you be worried about the Nothing Phone 3's horsepower? How does this chip compare to full-blown flagship processors? We put the POCO F7 through a series of benchmarks to find out. Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 CPU and system benchmarks I decided to pit the POCO F7 against last year's Galaxy S24 Plus, the current Galaxy S25 Plus, and the Google Pixel 9a. Bear in mind that the POCO F7 is a mid-range phone that starts at $399/£389, so its closest rival is the Pixel 9a more than anything else. Hadlee Simons / Android Authority It's worth noting that the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 doesn't have any little CPU cores; Qualcomm opted for one Cortex-X4 clocked at 3.2GHz and seven Cortex-A720 cores clocked at various frequencies. I initially thought this CPU setup would pay dividends for multi-core CPU performance, but that's not how it plays out. Geekbench 6 testing reveals that the POCO F7 doesn't beat last year's Galaxy S24 Plus and its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset. Samsung's phone is 9.3% faster and 7.7% faster in single-core and multi-core benchmarks, respectively. Nevertheless, the POCO phone still keeps the S24 Plus honest. I'm guessing that the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3's higher overall clock speed and increased cache helped offset any performance penalty associated with retaining the power-sipping little cores. The POCO F7 enjoys a notable ~20.6% single-core CPU advantage over the Pixel 9a. This is a bit of a surprise as the Pixel's Tensor G4 chip has the same Cortex-X4 CPU core, albeit at a slightly lower clock speed. This balloons into a massive 48.7% advantage in POCO's favor when we look at multi-core scores. This isn't a shock due to the Tensor G4's four little CPU cores. However, there's a humungous gap to the Galaxy S25 Plus and its Snapdragon 8 Elite chip in both tests. Samsung's latest phone is 48.5% and 53.3% faster in single- and multi-core tests, respectively. That's in large part due to Qualcomm's Oryon CPU cores, which blow past Arm's latest IP, let alone previous-generation CPU tech. I'm guessing that increased cache also plays a role. Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 GPU benchmarks One of the best ways to really push a phone is to put it through a GPU stress test. So we put it through our preferred tests, namely 3DMark's Wild Life, Wild Life Extreme, and Solar Bay Stress Tests. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 inside the POCO F7 uses an Adreno GPU with a so-called sliced architecture, much like the Snapdragon 8 Elite. However, the Elite chipset uses three slices while the 8s Gen 4 uses two of them. The two Wild Life tests show that the POCO F7 isn't a stable performer, scoring just 59.7% and 56.7% stability. That's a pretty poor showing in isolation, suggesting that bleeding-edge games and apps will slow down significantly over time. The device also sees peak temperatures of just over 45 degrees Celsius in these two tests, with only the S25 Plus beating it in this regard. However, the POCO phone does enjoy lower average temperatures than both Samsung phones. Xiaomi's phone absolutely loses out in terms of peak scores, as the Galaxy S24 Plus beats it by about 30% while the Galaxy S25 Plus is ~66% faster. That looks like a major advantage when running demanding titles. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 4's GPU doesn't match even last year's Snapdragon chip for peak performance, but stress testing reveals a different story. Take a close look at these graphs, though, and the POCO phone actually beats the S24 Plus in portions of each test. In fact, it just pips the S24 Plus at the end of the Wild Life Extreme Test. The POCO F7 doesn't beat the Galaxy S25 Plus at all here, but it comes extremely close a few times. Samsung's latest phone offers a disappointing ~53% stability for both tests, while the S24 Plus offers 58.5% and 60.9% stability, respectively. The graph also reveals that the Samsung phones suffer from significant performance drops almost immediately, while the POCO phone only sees severe drops from runs 14 to 18. Google's Pixel 9a is clearly a step below the competition in terms of peak performance, but it displays unmatched stability in these tests. The phone maintained 79.1% and 77.1% stability in these benchmarks, and this allowed it to almost match the POCO F7 for extended runs. The Pixel 9a also ran cooler than rivals in terms of peak and average temperatures. Hadlee Simons / Android Authority The Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 also sports hardware-based ray tracing, although the technology is a bit of a dud in the mobile space right now. Nevertheless, this test provides a unique workout for a GPU and its ray tracing components. The Pixel 9a doesn't offer this tech, though. The results are quite surprising here, as the Snapdragon 8 Elite falls apart with 52.2% stability. Last year's S24 Plus doesn't fare better as it's only able to maintain 50.2% stability. Meanwhile, the POCO F7 maintains an impressive 87.1% stability by the end of the test. That rock-solid performance means that the POCO F7 is actually able to beat both the Galaxy S24 Plus and the S25 Plus over long stretches. The Xiaomi device ends the test a smidge behind the S25 Plus and just edges out the S24 Plus. Something for Nothing to worry about? Hadlee Simons / Android Authority The POCO F7 shares the same chipset as the Nothing Phone 3, and these benchmarks show that the processor is still a step behind last year's flagship Snapdragon silicon when it comes to CPU performance and peak GPU workloads. That means Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and 8 Elite phones should enjoy a handy advantage in less demanding games. These full-blown flagship phones should also offer better performance when playing advanced games for a short period of time. Sustained GPU workloads are another matter, though, as the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 is able to outdo the Galaxy S24 Plus and seriously threaten the S25 Plus. This strongly suggests that the Nothing Phone 3 can take the fight to some Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 phones and maybe even a few Snapdragon 8 Elite devices when playing demanding games in an extended session, or if you're in a hot country. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 is far from perfect in the POCO F7, though. It enjoys a healthy lead over the Pixel 9a in CPU workloads, but the POCO F7's throttling and the Pixel 9a's rock-solid stability mean the Google phone was within touching distance in GPU stress tests. So I hope Nothing doesn't skimp on cooling measures. Ultimately, it looks like the Nothing Phone 3 won't enjoy peak performance on par with even last year's flagship phones, but things should even out over an extended workout. However, it looks like performance might not be the main worry for the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. The chip misses out on mmWave 5G, 8K recording, and 4K/120fps video capture, but offers Bluetooth 6.0, Wi-Fi 7, and XPAN support. You'll just have to decide for yourself whether this is a fair trade.
India Today
19-06-2025
- Business
- India Today
Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus price drops by Rs 47,000
Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus price drops by Rs 47,000 By Unnati Gusain Looking for a steal deal on Galaxy S24 Plus? Flipkart has an ongoing discount offer for you. But only for a limited time. Deal on Galaxy S24 Plus The Samsung Galaxy S24+ 5G (12GB RAM, 256GB) is now available at Rs 52,999, down from its original price of Rs 99,999. Flipkart offer This is a flat discount of Rs 47,000, inclusive of all offers and cashback. The deal is live on Flipkart and applies to the Onyx Black variant of the phone. Flat discount Flipkart is also offering up to Rs 38,600 off on exchange, depending on your old phone's value. Exchange offer The Galaxy S24+ features a 6.7-inch Quad HD+ display and runs on the Exynos 2400 processor. Display and Processor Galaxy S24 Plus sports a triple rear camera setup (50MP + 10MP + 12MP) along with a 12MP front camera. Camera system Powering the Galaxy S24 Plus is a 4900mAh battery. Battery
India Today
17-06-2025
- Business
- India Today
Galaxy S24 Plus gets flat Rs 47000 discount
Galaxy S24 Plus gets flat Rs 47000 discount By Divya Bhati Looking for a steal deal on Galaxy S24 Plus? Flipkart has an ongoing discount offer for you. But only for a limited time. Deal on Galaxy S24 Plus The Samsung Galaxy S24+ 5G (12GB RAM, 256GB) is now available at Rs 52,999, down from its original price of Rs 99,999. Flipkart offer This is a flat discount of Rs 47,000, inclusive of all offers and cashback. The deal is live on Flipkart and applies to the Onyx Black variant of the phone. Flat discount Flipkart is also offering up to Rs 38,600 off on exchange, depending on your old phone's value. Exchange offer The Galaxy S24+ features a 6.7-inch Quad HD+ display and runs on the Exynos 2400 processor. Display and Processor Galaxy S24 Plus sports a triple rear camera setup (50MP + 10MP + 12MP) along with a 12MP front camera. Camera system Powering the Galaxy S24 Plus is a 4900mAh battery. Battery
Hindustan Times
02-05-2025
- Business
- Hindustan Times
Samsung Galaxy S24, S24 Plus, and S24 Ultra get a huge price cut in Amazon Summer Sale
If you've been eyeing a premium Samsung phone but hesitating due to the high prices of new releases, now's your chance; the previous year's Galaxy S24 lineup is now available at reduced prices on Amazon. The Galaxy S24, S24 Plus, and S24 Ultra have seen significant price drops, making them attractive options for buyers on a budget. Here's a closer look at the new prices and the features of these models. Samsung Galaxy S24, Galaxy 24 Plus, Galaxy S24 Ultra: Price Drops on Amazon The Samsung Galaxy S24 is now listed at Rs. 52,980 for the Onyx Black variant, offering 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage. The Galaxy S24 Plus is available for Rs. 56,940 in the Cobalt Violet colour with 12GB of RAM and 256GB of storage. The Galaxy S24 Ultra, typically priced higher, is currently offered at Rs. 84,999 during the Amazon Great Summer Sale 2025. Also read: iPhone 16, iPhone 16 Pro, iPhone 15 get a huge price drop during Amazon Great Summer Sale - Details Samsung Galaxy S24: Key Features B0CS69QQTG-1 The Galaxy S24 offers an excellent value with its features at this new price point. It sports a 6.2-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2x display with a 120Hz refresh rate and 2,600 nits of peak brightness, which gives a sharp and vibrant viewing experience. The device is powered by the Exynos 2400 processor, the phone promises fast and efficient performance. It runs on Android 15 with One UI 7 and comes packed with several AI-driven features. Also read: iPhone 15, Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, and more mobiles at up to 37% discount in Amazon sale The Galaxy S24 is equipped with a 4,000mAh battery, coupled with 25W wired charging and Fast Wireless Charging 2.0. In terms of cameras, the device includes a 50MP main sensor with Optical Image Stabilisation (OIS), a 12MP ultra-wide lens, and a 10MP telephoto camera. There is a 12MP front camera for selfies, with both cameras supporting 8K video recording. Additionally, the Galaxy S24 has an IP68 rating for water and dust resistance. Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus: Key Features B0CS6FPH6P-2 The Galaxy S24 Plus offers a larger display at 6.7 inches, featuring a 2K LTPO AMOLED screen with a 120Hz refresh rate and Gorilla Glass Victus 2 protection. It boasts a peak brightness of 2,600 nits, which offers clarity even in bright conditions. Inside, the device is powered by the Exynos 2400 SoC and offers up to 12GB of RAM and 512GB of storage. Additionally, it houses a 4,900mAh battery that supports 45W fast charging, 15W wireless charging, and 4.5W reverse wireless charging. For photography, the Galaxy S24 Plus features a 50MP main camera with OIS, a 10MP telephoto camera with 3x optical zoom, and a 12MP ultra-wide sensor. The 12MP front camera is designed for selfies and video calls. Also read: Best time to buy a PS5? Up to 52% discount on gaming consoles in Amazon sale- Check deals Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra: Key Features B0CS5XW6TN-3 The Galaxy S24 Ultra also comes with a larger 6.8-inch display, offering a Quad HD+ resolution of 3120 x 1440 pixels. It supports a 120Hz refresh rate and features Corning Gorilla Armor protection for durability. The phone is also dust and water-resistant. Under the hood, the Galaxy S24 Ultra is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset, which ensures top-tier performance. The device runs on Android OS, with up to seven years of OS and security updates. Also read: Best deals on power banks in Amazon Great Summer Sale 2025- Check now One of the standout features of the S24 Ultra is its camera system. It includes a 12MP ultra-wide sensor with a 120-degree field of view, a 200MP wide-angle camera with OIS, and telephoto lenses offering 5x and 3x optical zoom. The camera system supports 8K video recording at 30fps and digital zoom up to 100x. A 5,000mAh battery provides long-lasting performance, with up to 30 hours of video playback and 95 hours of audio playback. First Published Date: 02 May, 13:22 IST
