Latest news with #Georgian-Abkhaz
JAMnews
3 days ago
- Politics
- JAMnews
‘Victims of the global reshaping of the world': opinion on the causes and outcomes of the 1992–93 Georgian-Abkhaz war
Goals and outcomes of the Georgian-Abkhaz war On 14 August, Abkhazia commemorated the victims of the Georgian-Abkhaz war, which began on that day in 1992. The war ended in 1993 with Georgia's defeat, but the conflict remains unresolved. The authors of the Telegram channel Abkhazia-Centre analyse what they see as the goals pursued by each side at the time and conclude that both became victims of the global reshaping of the world. Circumstances and objectives of the parties as of 14 August 1992 Georgian side: A coup had taken place, leaving the new authorities without legitimacy, and armed clashes were under way between supporters of ousted president Zviad Gamsakhurdia and forces backing the coup. Eduard Shevardnadze was looking for a way to shift public attention from internal confrontation to another issue. Outcome: The goal was only partly achieved. Shevardnadze managed to stay in power at the cost of civilian lives, chaos and upheaval. Abkhaz side: A set of actions aimed at seceding from Georgia. The inability to achieve legal separation from Georgia by democratic means, and an effort to alter the ethnic balance in their favour. Outcome: The goals were only partly achieved. Abkhazia is now fully dependent on Russia, economically backward and in a state of civilisational self-isolation. In the 32 years since, none of the pressing issues of that time – the status of the native language, demographics, the ability to independently decide matters of state, and so on – have been resolved. Russia: To create tools for exerting pressure on Georgia, the first state to declare its exit from the USSR, refuse to join the CIS and call for the withdrawal of Russian troops. To establish a buffer zone along Russia's southern border and maintain a managed conflict in which Moscow could present itself as mediator and peacekeeper, placing both sides in a position of dependence. To deploy armed forces with legal status and the consent of both warring sides. Outcome: The goals were achieved only partly and for a short time. Georgia was brought into the CIS, Russian military bases were legalised, and several pro-Russian leaders were installed. But within 12 years the bases were closed, and within 15 years Georgia withdrew from the CIS. The war in Abkhazia left Georgians viewing Russia exclusively in a negative light. The conflict also became a catalyst for major wars in the North Caucasus, shaking the very foundations of the Russian state. The blocking of transport links harmed Russia's economic interests, and the Russian-speaking population of Abkhazia dwindled to a minimum. United States: To distance the South Caucasus from Russia, create conflict zones along strategic transport routes (Abkhazia and South Ossetia), revert to the 19th-century route via Upper Lars, and ensure Russia is seen solely as an aggressor and occupier. Outcome: The goals were fully achieved. Conclusion The Abkhaz and Georgian sides became victims of the global reshaping of the world and the geopolitical shifts of the late 20th century. Toponyms, terminology, views and opinions expressed by the author are theirs alone and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of JAMnews or any employees thereof. JAMnews reserves the right to delete comments it considers to be offensive, inflammatory, threatening or otherwise unacceptable. News in Abkhazia
JAMnews
10-07-2025
- Politics
- JAMnews
Abkhazia bans property inheritance for Georgians who fought in the 1990s Georgian-Abkhaz war
Ban on Georgians claiming property in Abkhazia Abkhazia has passed a law stating that Georgian citizens who participated in the Georgian-Abkhaz war of 1992-93, as well as their family members, are not allowed to inherit property in Abkhazia. It is reported that this measure aims to close 'all loopholes for the republic's adversaries.' As a result of the Georgian-Abkhaz war of 1992-1993, more than 200,000 ethnic Georgians living in Abkhazia at the time were forced to leave. Their property was nationalized by the Abkhaz side and then redistributed to Abkhaz citizens who were left homeless or in need of housing due to the war. Despite this, new owners unofficially paid monetary compensation to some of the former owners for part of the property. Some Georgians also re-registered their housing under close relatives of different ethnicities. Although the Georgian-Abkhaz conflict remains unresolved, there have been several cases where Georgian citizens managed to defend their rights to lost property in Abkhaz courts. In addition, many lawsuits have been filed – and partially won – in Russian courts seeking the return of property by individuals who are currently Russian citizens. The new law, which expands the list of individuals with restricted inheritance rights, is aimed at countering this trend. According to the amendments introduced to the Civil Code, foreign citizens, stateless persons, and their family members cannot inherit property in Abkhazia if they: 'Fought and/or continue to fight against the independence and state sovereignty of the Republic of Abkhazia'; 'Planned, prepared, or initiated war against the Republic of Abkhazia'; 'Participated in Georgian armed formations during the occupation of Abkhazia by the State Council of Georgia between August 14, 1992, and September 30, 1993, or otherwise assisted the occupation regime of the Georgian State Council, including the Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia and its structures, or took part in military, combat, or police actions against the Republic of Abkhazia.' Toponyms and terminology used in the article, and views, opinions and strategies expressed in it do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of JAMnews or any employees thereof. JAMnews reserves the right to remove comments it considers to be offensive, inflammatory, threatening, or otherwise unacceptable. News in Abkhazia News in Georgia
