15-07-2025
Trump's Russia Math, Simplified
MOSCOW, RUSSIA - JULY 3 (RUSSIA OUT) Russian President Vladimir Putin speaks during the New Ideas ... More For New Times Forum at the Russia National Center, July 3, 2025, in Moscow, Russia. Putin visited a forum, hosted by Kremlin-backed Agency for Strategic Initiatives, prior to his announced telephone call with U.S. President Donald Trump. (Photo)
Before the math, there is one word – Energy. The Russian economy is about oil prices. Russia exported about 2.8 billion barrels of oil in 2024, and it earned $192 billion doing that. The core idea here is elegantly simple: weaponize America's energy production capacity to collapse Russia's economy and force a quick end to the war. Let's break down the math behind Trump's thinking and see whether it actually adds up. Separately, see the potential for growth in Google Stock To $350?
The Basic Economics
Russia's vulnerability is real. Russia's energy exports, which include oil and gas, generated approximately $240 billion in 2024. When compared to Russia's GDP of $2.2 trillion for the same year, these exports accounted for over 10% of their total economic output. And oil is responsible for 80% of the country's total energy exports.
So one way for Trump to hit Russia where it hurts is to flood the global energy market with subsidized U.S. oil. Let's say Trump offers a $20 per barrel subsidy on U.S. oil. That's a 30% subsidy on the current WTI crude price of $67 - making U.S. oil irresistibly cheap at just $47 a barrel.
Now, the U.S. has the production capability. At peak capacity, American frackers can pump out 14 million barrels daily. The problem is they typically shut down when prices drop too low to be profitable. This subsidy would keep them pumping regardless of market conditions.
The Financial Logic
Here's where it gets interesting from a fiscal perspective.
The hypothetical $20 per barrel subsidy on a production capacity of 14 million barrels a day works out to subsidy cost of $280 million a day for the U.S. And if the U.S. is willing to keep this subsidy going for 6 months, the total bill will come to just over $50 billion.
Looks steep? Not really, when you consider the broader economic picture. The U.S. carries $36.6 trillion in debt at an average 3.3% interest rate. Every 1% drop in rates saves $366 billion annually in interest payments.
If cheap energy helps drive down inflation and gives the Fed room to cut rates significantly, the subsidy could theoretically pay for itself multiple times over. Plus, lower energy costs would ripple through the entire economy - from data centers to shipping - creating deflationary pressure that could offset any tariff-driven price increases.
The Strategic Risks
The plan isn't without major vulnerabilities. Putin might escalate rather than capitulate when cornered economically. Russia has historically responded to existential threats with increased aggression, not surrender.
China represents the biggest wild card. As a major buyer of Russian energy, they could potentially prop up Russia's economy even when cheaper U.S. alternatives are available. However, if prices drop dramatically enough, China might prioritize its own economic interests over supporting Russia.
The Reality Check
This strategy essentially treats subsidies as a lesser evil compared to the costs of prolonged conflict and economic instability. It's a high-stakes bet that economic pressure can achieve what military aid hasn't - a quick resolution to the war.
The math works on paper, but geopolitics rarely follows economic theory. Russia's ability to endure economic hardship is historically impressive, and the assumption that cheap energy will automatically lead to Fed rate cuts involves several economic variables that don't always behave predictably.
Still, when weighed against the alternatives - continued military spending, prolonged instability, and ongoing economic uncertainty - a $50 billion energy subsidy starts looking like a calculated risk rather than reckless spending. Whether it would actually work depends on variables no spreadsheet can fully capture.
Markets, including cryptocurrencies, are trending higher. Related – Will The Rally In XRP Price Continue? This positive sentiment is largely driven by hopes that the Federal Reserve will resume cutting interest rates sooner than expected. However, investing always carries inherent risks. Now, we apply a risk assessment framework while building the 30-stock Trefis High Quality (HQ) Portfolio, which has a strong record of comfortably outperforming the S&P 500 over the past four years. Why is that? As a collective group, HQ Portfolio stocks have delivered superior returns with reduced risk compared to the benchmark index; less of a roller-coaster experience, as shown in HQ Portfolio performance metrics.
