Latest news with #GurminderSingh
Hindustan Times
24-05-2025
- Politics
- Hindustan Times
Punjab, Haryana water-sharing row: Hearing deferred till May 26
The Punjab and Haryana high court on Friday deferred hearing in the plea from Punjab government, seeking recall of the May 6 order that allowed release of additional water to Haryana from Bhakra Dam. During the hearing on Friday, the Punjab government reiterated its allegations that 'material facts' about the controversy were not brought to the notice of the court by Centre and Haryana, which led to the May 6 order. Punjab's counsel, senior advocate Gurminder Singh concluded his arguments on Friday and hearing was deferred for Monday (May 26) when Centre and Haryana will present their side of arguments. On May 6, the high court directed Punjab government to not interfere with the functioning of the BBMB and abide by the Union home secretary's May 2 decision which asked BBMB to release additional 4,500 cusecs of water to Haryana. The HC order had come on a plea from BBMB, seeking withdrawal of Punjab cops from the dam site, alleging that they were interfering with the working of board. The Punjab government on May 14 moved high court seeking recall of the order arguing that the Union power secretary is the competent authority to deal with disputes around water-sharing under the BBMB Act, and not the Union home secretary. The controversy erupted on April 28 when the Haryana government's demand for additional water from the Bhakra dam was approved by the BBMB despite opposition from Punjab. The Punjab government refused to accept the decision and deployed police at Nangal dam, 13km downstream from Bhakra, to stop the additional water release. The Union home ministry stepped in on May 2 and directed that additional water be released to Haryana. However, the BBMB said that the order could not be complied with as Punjab Police prevented board officials from discharging their duties. The BBMB was established by the Union power ministry in 1966 under Section 79 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, which regulates water distribution from Bhakra, Nangal, Pong, and Ranjit Sagar dams between Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Delhi and Rajasthan.
Hindustan Times
23-05-2025
- Politics
- Hindustan Times
Water-sharing row: Punjab govt accuses Centre, Haryana of concealing facts
Chandigarh: The Punjab government on Thursday told the Punjab and Haryana high court that controversy surrounding release of additional water to Haryana was a case of 'institutional bullying' of Punjab, where Centre and other parties joined hands against one state. Appearing for the Punjab government, senior advocate Gurminder Singh claimed before the high court bench of chief justice Sheel Nagu and justice Sumeet Goel that 'material facts' were concealed by the Centre and Haryana during proceedings in the court, following which the high court on May 6 directed the BBMB to release additional water to Haryana. The submissions were made during the hearing of a plea filed by Punjab seeking recall of the May 6 order. According to Singh, the high court was never informed of a statutory reference made by the BBMB chairman to the Centre on April 29 regarding the dispute over release of additional water. It was made at Haryana's behest on April 29 following a difference of opinion in the board meeting of April 28, where Punjab had opposed the move. It was then for the Centre to decide the issue in accordance with the provisions of Rule 7 of the BBMB Rules, 1974, he said, adding that the BBMB chairman, despite making the reference to the Centre, presided over a meeting the next day on April 30 and 'chose to conceal and remain silent'. The high court was also kept in the dark about the meeting presided over by the Union home secretary on May 2, which became basis for the May 6 order, he said further claiming that 'nothing' about the meeting was circulated to the parties concerned and even the purpose of the meeting was 'misrepresented'. It was not about release of additional water but related to law and order, he said. The concealment of facts was not accidental but deliberate, Singh claimed adding that these things had a bearing on the court proceedings, which led to passing of the May 6 order. The BBMB had approached court 'in garb' of an aggrieved seeking redressal of grievances regarding security. But the real intent was to seek 'stamp of approval of an illegal act', he further submitted. The Centre and Haryana are to make their submissions on Friday. However, before the hearing could end on Thursday, additional solicitor general Satya Pal Jain responded by saying that there was no concealment and misrepresentation of facts by Centre. 'Punjab is making attempts to get rid of the high court orders (of May 6),' Jain added. On May 6, the high court directed Punjab government to not interfere with the functioning of the BBMB and abide by the Union home secretary's May 2 decision which asked the BBMB to release additional 4,500 cusecs of water to Haryana. The HC order had come on a plea from the BBMB seeking withdrawal of Punjab cops from Nangal dam alleging that they were interfering with the working of board. The Punjab government on May 14 moved high court seeking recall of the order arguing that the Union power secretary is the competent authority to deal with disputes around water sharing under the BBMB Act, and not the Union home secretary. The controversy erupted on April 28 when the Haryana government's demand for additional water from the Bhakra dam was approved by the BBMB despite opposition from Punjab. The Punjab government refused to accept the decision and deployed police at Nangal dam, 13km downstream from Bhakra, to stop the additional water release. The Union home ministry stepped in on May 2 and directed that additional water be released to Haryana. However, the BBMB said that the order could not be complied with as the Punjab Police prevented board officials from discharging their duties. The BBMB was established by the Union power ministry in 1966 under Section 79 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, which regulates water distribution from Bhakra, Nangal, Pong, and Ranjit Sagar dams between Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Delhi and Rajasthan.
Hindustan Times
15-05-2025
- Politics
- Hindustan Times
Water-sharing row: HC notice to Centre, Hry, BBMB on Punjab plea for recalling May 6 order
Chandigarh : The Punjab and Haryana high court on Wednesday sought response from the Union and Haryana governments as well as the Bhakra Beas Management Board (BBMB) on a plea from the Punjab government, seeking recall of a May 6 court order that directed the state to allow the release additional 4,500 cusecs of water from the Bhakra dam for meeting the emergent needs of Haryana. 'The court has issued notice for May 20,' senior advocate and former advocate general Gurminder Singh, who appeared for Punjab, said after the hearing. On May 6, the high court directed Punjab not to interfere with the functioning of BBMB — a central body that manages and regulates water in Bhakra, Pong and Ranjit Sagar dams — and to abide by the Union home secretary's May 2 decision asking the board to release additional 4,500 cusecs of water to Haryana. The Punjab's plea, filed on Monday, contended that the May 6 high court order was 'illegal as the court was misled into believing' that the meeting held under the chairmanship of the Union home secretary on May 2 was conducted under Rule 7 of the BBMB rules, 1974, which requires a reference made by the board's chairman on the water-sharing issue. 'The direction in question was passed on account of concealment of material facts by non-applicant parties in the writ petition who have failed to bring true and correct facts to the notice of the court,' the plea alleged. The Punjab government has contended that the Union power secretary is the competent authority to deal with disputes around water sharing under the BBMB Act, and not the Union home secretary. The formal minutes of the May 2 meeting were not recorded, and only a press note was produced which, the plea alleged, formed the basis of the 'misleading information' that led to the May 6 court order. The order had come on a BBMB plea seeking the withdrawal of additional police deployment at Nangal dam, which it said was 'illegal and unconstitutional', and alleged it was being prevented from complying with the Centre's directions. The controversy dates back to April 28 when Haryana demanded 8,500 cusecs of water from the Bhakra dam, which was approved by BBMB. However, Punjab refused to accept the decision and deployed police at the Nangal dam, 13km downstream from Bhakra, to stop the additional water release. The Union home ministry stepped in on May 2 and directed that additional water be released to Haryana. However, the BBMB said the order could not be complied with as Punjab police prevented board officials from discharging their duties. Punjab has maintained that Haryana has already overdrawn its water quota and was 'demanding irrigation water under the guise of drinking needs'. The additional water could not be released even after the high court intervention of May 6. On May 9, BBMB chairman Manoj Tripathi, in an affidavit, told the court that board officials were prevented by Punjab Police from releasing the water. This led to the court asking the Punjab DGP and chief secretary to submit names of these officials and reiterating that additional water be released to Haryana. In response to the affidavit filed by the chairman, the Punjab government has filed another application alleging that Tripathi 'knowingly/intentionally submitted a false affidavit before the court on May 9' and demanded contempt proceedings against him for submitting a false affidavit. This application is yet to be taken up by the court. The BBMB was established by the Union power ministry in 1966 under Section 79 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, which regulates water distribution from Bhakra, Nangal, Pong, and Ranjit Sagar dams among Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Delhi and Rajasthan.
Time of India
15-05-2025
- Politics
- Time of India
High court seeks reply from BBMB, Haryana, Centre on Punjab's plea to recall order on additional water release
Chandigarh: The Punjab and high court on Wednesday asked the (BBMB), Haryana, and the Centre to submit a response to a Punjab govt petition seeking a recall or modification of its May 6 order directing it to comply with the decision of the 's meeting on releasing additional water to Haryana from the Bhakra next hearing is on May 20, when the issue related to contempt against officials of the Punjab govt for non-compliance with the high court order is pending for the hearing, senior advocate Gurminder Singh, representing the Punjab govt, argued that the BBMB had effectively obtained a mandamus against the law through misrepresentation of facts. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Singh pointed out that constitutional provisions restrict the jurisdiction of courts in interstate water response, the BBMB's counsel questioned the Punjab govt's move to file a modification petition, suggesting that the correct course of action would have been for Punjab to file a writ of prohibition against the decisions made by the fresh plea claims that the May 6 high court order was passed after the BBMB concealed material facts in its original petition. The state argued that matters involving policy decision or issues affecting state rights should be referred to the central govt through the chairman of the board. However, despite the matter already being referred to the Centre for a decision under Rule 7 of BBMB Rules 1974, the board convened a meeting on April 30 and decided to release of 8,500 cusecs of water to Haryana, Punjab application further highlighted that while the BBMB petition referenced the indent made by Haryana, it concealed the fact that Haryana had sought to refer the matter to the central contended that a decision to release an additional 4,500 cusecs of water to Haryana was made in the May 2 meeting, but it was not brought to the notice of the high court that the Union home secretary was not the appropriate competent authority to adjudicate as per Rule 7 of BBMB Rules 1974."The applicant state is aggrieved by the direction passed as a result of completely erroneous, factually incorrect, and legally unsustainable submissions made by the BBMB, the state of Haryana, and the Union of India before the high court. The correct facts came to light when the Union of India produced before this court the letter dated May 9, along with the undated record of discussion of the meeting dated May 2. It is apparent that neither was the Union home secretary competent to decide the issue regarding the allocation of water under Rule 7 BBMB Rules of 1974, nor were the minutes ever circulated to the concerned states before May 9, which was the last date of hearing in the matter," the counsel for the Punjab submitted before the 121165711 413 |
Hindustan Times
14-05-2025
- Politics
- Hindustan Times
Water-sharing row: High court notice on Punjab plea for recalling May 6 order
The Punjab and Haryana high court on Wednesday sought response from the Centre, the Haryana government and the Bhakra Beas Management Board (BBMB) on a plea of the Punjab government, seeking recall of a May 6 order that directed the state to allow the release of additional 4,500 cusecs of water to neighbouring Haryana from the Bhakra dam. After the hearing on Wednesday, former advocate general and senior advocate Gurminder Singh, who appeared for Punjab, said, 'The court has issued notice for May 20.' The plea, filed on Monday, contended that the May 6 order is 'illegal as the court was misled into believing' that the meeting held under the chairmanship of the Union home secretary on May 2 was conducted under Rule 7 of the 1974 rules, which requires a reference made by the (BBMB) chairman on the water-sharing issue. 'The direction in question was passed on account of concealment of material facts by non-applicant parties in the writ petition who have failed to bring true and correct facts to the notice of the court,' it claimed. On May 6, the high court directed Punjab not to interfere with the functioning of BBMB and abide by the Union home secretary's May 2 decision which asked the board to release additional 4,500 cusecs of water to Haryana. The Punjab government has now contended that the Union power secretary is the competent authority to deal with disputes around water sharing under the BBMB Act, and not the Union home secretary. The formal minutes of the May 2 meeting were not recorded, and only a press note was produced which, it said, formed the basis of the 'misleading information' that led to the court order of May 6. The May 6 order had come on a BBMB plea seeking the withdrawal of additional police deployment at Nangal, which it said was 'illegal and unconstitutional', and argued that it was being prevented from complying with the Centre's directions. The controversy erupted on April 28 when the Haryana government's demand for additional water from the Bhakra dam was approved by the BBMB despite opposition from Punjab. The Punjab government refused to accept the decision and deployed police at Nangal dam, 13km downstream from Bhakra, to stop the additional water release. The Union home ministry stepped in on May 2 and directed that additional water be released to Haryana. However, the BBMB said that the order could not be complied with as Punjab Police prevented board officials from discharging their duties. Punjab has said that Haryana has already overdrawn its water quota and was 'demanding irrigation water under the guise of drinking needs'. The additional water could not be released even after the high court intervention of May 6. On May 9, BBMB chairman Manoj Tripathi, in an affidavit, told the high court that board officials were prevented by Punjab Police from releasing the water. This led to the high court asking the Punjab DGP and chief secretary to submit names of these officials and reiterating that additional water be released to Haryana. In response to the affidavit filed by the chairman, the Punjab government has filed another application alleging that Tripathi 'knowingly/intentionally submitted a false affidavit before the court on May 9' and demanded contempt proceedings against him for submitting a false affidavit. This application is yet to be taken up by the court. The BBMB was established by the Union power ministry in 1966 under Section 79 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, which regulates water distribution from Bhakra, Nangal, Pong, and Ranjit Sagar dams between Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Delhi and Rajasthan.
