Latest news with #HeenaParveen
Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Politics
- Economic Times
Delhi HC grants interim stay on demolition notices on six properties in Batla House
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The Delhi High Court granted an interim stay on the demolition of six properties in the Batla House area of Okhla in South East Delhi. Residents of these properties have challenged the notices issued by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) in May claimed that out of these six properties, some are outside Khasra Number 279, whiddle others are within this Khasra. Residents of these properties said that their properties are covered within the PM Uday Scheme In an order passed on Monday, Justice Tejas Karia ordered to maintain the status quo till the next date of the High Court has issued notice to the DDA and sought a response within 4 weeks. Petitions are to be heard on July 10 before roster bench was dealing with petitions moved on behalf of Heena Parveen, Jinat Kausar, Rukhsana Begam, Nihal Fatima, Sufiyan Ahmed and Sajid Fakhar and Sonica Ghosh, Anurag Saksena and Gurmukh Dass Kohli appeared for Heena Parveen, Rukhsana Begum and Jinat was submitted that the DDA has issued a Generic notice. There is no clear demarcation of properties falling in Khasra Number 279. All properties are not illegal in this the other hand, standing counsel for DDA opposed the pleas. The petitions are on June 6, and the affidavits are on June was also submitted that demarcation had been submitted before the Supreme Court, and the order of June 4 was passed on the basis of this court said that since the Supreme Court's order of May 7 records that the occupants are entitled to adopt appropriate proceedings in accordance with law, the High Court passed an order in the case of Ishrat Jahan on June 4, 2025, directed the DDA to file an affidavit in relation to the action to be taken and demarcation report within three for Petitioners submitted that they have lived here for a long time. They purchased it from the was also submitted that there is an order to demolish illegal properties on 2 bigha and ten biswa. There are 34 Bighas od land in khasra number 279. Not all properties are illegal Nihal Fatima and others, the DDA submitted no title documents. Documents were executed during the pendency and passing of the for the Petitioner submitted that they have been living there since 1980-82. The notices are generic, nothing specific. The documents were in Urdu and Farsi; they were translated later on. People have been living there for 30 the high court granted protection to some residents of Batla House who approached the High Court against the notices issued by the DDA.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Politics
- Time of India
Delhi HC grants interim stay on demolition notices on six properties in Batla House
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The Delhi High Court granted an interim stay on the demolition of six properties in the Batla House area of Okhla in South East Delhi. Residents of these properties have challenged the notices issued by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) in May claimed that out of these six properties, some are outside Khasra Number 279, whiddle others are within this Khasra. Residents of these properties said that their properties are covered within the PM Uday Scheme In an order passed on Monday, Justice Tejas Karia ordered to maintain the status quo till the next date of the High Court has issued notice to the DDA and sought a response within 4 weeks. Petitions are to be heard on July 10 before roster bench was dealing with petitions moved on behalf of Heena Parveen, Jinat Kausar, Rukhsana Begam, Nihal Fatima, Sufiyan Ahmed and Sajid Fakhar and Sonica Ghosh, Anurag Saksena and Gurmukh Dass Kohli appeared for Heena Parveen, Rukhsana Begum and Jinat was submitted that the DDA has issued a Generic notice. There is no clear demarcation of properties falling in Khasra Number 279. All properties are not illegal in this the other hand, standing counsel for DDA opposed the pleas. The petitions are on June 6, and the affidavits are on June was also submitted that demarcation had been submitted before the Supreme Court, and the order of June 4 was passed on the basis of this court said that since the Supreme Court's order of May 7 records that the occupants are entitled to adopt appropriate proceedings in accordance with law, the High Court passed an order in the case of Ishrat Jahan on June 4, 2025, directed the DDA to file an affidavit in relation to the action to be taken and demarcation report within three for Petitioners submitted that they have lived here for a long time. They purchased it from the was also submitted that there is an order to demolish illegal properties on 2 bigha and ten biswa. There are 34 Bighas od land in khasra number 279. Not all properties are illegal Nihal Fatima and others, the DDA submitted no title documents. Documents were executed during the pendency and passing of the for the Petitioner submitted that they have been living there since 1980-82. The notices are generic, nothing specific. The documents were in Urdu and Farsi; they were translated later on. People have been living there for 30 the high court granted protection to some residents of Batla House who approached the High Court against the notices issued by the DDA.
Time of India
11 hours ago
- Politics
- Time of India
...HC reserves its order on petitions seeking stay on Batla House demolitions
New Delhi: Delhi High Court on Monday reserved its order on petitions seeking a stay on the demolitions in the Batla House area. Justice Tejas Karia wrapped up proceedings after hearing the arguments of the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and the individual petitioners who sought interim relief and protection. HC was dealing with several petitioners, including affected residents Heena Parveen, Jinat Kausar, Rukhsana Begam, and Nihal Fatima. Appearing for them, advocates Anurag Saksena and Sonica Ghosh urged the court to intervene and argued that the DDA issued a generic notice when there is no clear demarcation of properties that fall in the particular Khasra number under scrutiny for alleged illegal constructions. The counsels maintained that not all properties in the Khasra are illegal and sought time from the court to produce the necessary documents. The petitioners submitted they purchased the property from a builder and were residents of the area since 1980-82. They are in the process of obtaining the documents, which are in Urdu and Farsi and require translation. Opposing the plea, counsel for the DDA maintained that the properties are illegal. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo The counsel argued that the DDA is taking action following directions from the Supreme Court and gave time to the residents to furnish documents, but they failed to do so. The agency added that the land is illegally occupied as the encroachers failed to show title documents. Last week, in separate proceedings, HC stayed the proposed demolition of 11 properties in the same area after individual residents challenged the notices issued by the DDA. The petitioners argued that nine properties were outside the Khasra identified by the DDA yet were being targeted, while two premises fell within the Khasra number but are protected under the PM Uday Scheme. It was also contended that before taking action, the DDA didn't hear them. On June 11, the matter relating to demolitions by DDA in the area had reached HC in the form of a PIL but the court refused to grant any relief to AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan, saying that a general order of protection in a PIL of this sort was likely to jeopardise the case of individual litigants. The Supreme Court on May 7 ordered the DDA to demolish unauthorised structures in Khasra number 279, which is estimated to be around 2.8 bigha or 0.702 hectare along Muradi Road in Okhla village. |
India Gazette
15 hours ago
- India Gazette
Batla House demolition matter: Delhi HC reserves order on pleas challenging demolition notices
New Delhi [India], June 16 (ANI): The Delhi High Court on Monday reserved its order on pleas challenging notices issued for demolition of alleged illegal properties in Batla House area of Okhla in South East Delhi. Justice Tejas Karia reserved the order after hearing the arguments of counsel for the petitioners and the Delhi Development Authority (DDA). The bench was dealing with petitions moved on behalf of Heena Parveen, Jinat Kausar, Rukhsana Begam and Nihal Fatima etc. Advocates Sonica Ghosh, Anurag Saksena and Gurmukh Dass Kohli appeared for Heena Parveen and others. It was submitted that DDA has issued Generic notice, there is no clear demarcation of properties fall in Khasra Number 279. All properties are not illegal in this khasra. On the other hand, standing counsel for DDA opposed the pleas. The petitions are of June 6 and affidavits are of June 3. Counsel for Petitioners submitted that they are living here for a long time. They purchased it from the builder. It was also submitted that there is an order to demolish illegal properties on 2 bigha and ten biswa. There are 34 Bighas of land in khasra number 279. All properties are not illegal there. In the matter of Nihal Fatima and others, the DDA submitted that there is no title documents. Documents were executed during the pendency and passing of order. The counsel for petitioner submitted that they are living there since 1980-82. The notices are generic, nothing specific. The document was in Urdu and Farsi; they have got translated later on. Since 30 years people are living there. Earlier, the high court had already granted protection to some residents of Batla House who approached the High Court against the notices issued by the DDA. (ANI)
