25-03-2025
‘Undercover: Exposing the Far Right' Director on the Future of Political Doc Programming: ‘Selection of Films at Some Festivals Is Becoming Weaker'
In Havana Marking's documentary 'Undercover: Exposing the Far Right,' investigators from the organization Hope Not Hate use hidden cameras and fieldwork to track down and expose members of violent far-right extremist groups in the U.K. and the U.S.
One of those members is American Holocaust denier Mark Weber who is secretly recorded in the film telling a crowd of white men that, 'The question every American should ask himself is can whites and Blacks live in America in the same society on the basis of equality and mutual respect? Liberals would say, 'Well, of course, or we should.' Conservatives say, 'Well, it's a good idea, but it's going to take time until we reach that.' The answer is no. It's not going to happen. Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln both grappled with this question, and each of them concluded that it's not going to happen and the only answer is to remove Blacks from North America.'
More from Variety
Janus Metz on 'Rescue' and Saving Migrants in the Mediterranean With Partner Sine Plambech and Doctors Without Borders (EXCLUSIVE)
Chicago's Doc10 Lineup Includes Sundance Hits 'The Perfect Neighbor' and 'Predators' (EXCLUSIVE)
Sundance Documentary 'Predators,' an Exposé of 'To Catch a Predator,' Sells to MTV Documentary Films
The film centers on Patrik Hermansson, a senior researcher who infiltrated the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, and journalist Harry Shukman, who infiltrated far-right movements beginning in 2023 under Hermansson's guidance. Marking was given access to all of the footage Hermansson and Shukman collected over the course of two years. Marking is the first filmmaker in Hope Not Hate's 20-year history that was granted behind-the-scenes access to the org.
'It took a long time to gain the wider team's confidence,' Marking told Variety. 'I had to prove myself ultimately, and that took many months. The key thing was that they trusted me not to compromise their safety and the success of the mission. I took security seriously and understood the dangers involved.'
Last October, the BFI London Film Festival pulled the film from its lineup at the last minute over safety concerns.
'I think the film is exceptional and easily one of the best documentaries I have seen this year,' festival director Kristy Matheson told the Observer newspaper. 'However, festival workers have the right to feel safe and that their mental health and well being is respected in their workplace.'
The doc went on to premiere on the U.K. network Channel 4 and Danish television station DR. The film also screened at IDFA in November 2024 and is currently screening at Copenhagen's CPH:DOX in the Education section – UNG:DOX. While Marking doesn't think that anyone who is committed to the far right would watch her film, she believes that 'there are swathes of people in the middle who are being manipulated by this stuff, especially online, who could watch this documentary and realize how easy it is to be misled.'
Variety spoke to Marking in Copenhagen about the three years she spent making 'Undercover: Exposing the Far Right' and U.S. distributors' interest in the film.
Hope Not Hate gave you unprecedented access to their dangerous, undercover operations. How did that happen?
Marking: Originally, I was talking to HNH about a historical story, a straightforward past tense interview film. But every time I talked to (HNH founder and CEO) Nick Lowles, something extraordinary had just happened. He was being followed. His family was being harassed. The office was being hounded with hoax calls. It was a frightening time, and it suddenly seemed mad to be talking about something that took place 20 years ago: we agreed we had to start filming now. It was only six months later that Nick let me know they were also conducting an undercover investigation.
Did you ever feel in danger while making the film?
We knew right from the start this was a dangerous film to make. We follow three different storylines and there were differing levels of risk for each aspect. There were moments that we knew were risky in and of themselves: filming at extreme far-right rallies with no police presence, for example. Then, highlighting the illegal and obnoxious work of (far-right British agitator) Tommy Robinson has its own risks: he has form for harassing journalists he doesn't agree with and setting his legions of online fans against them. And then there were the legal dangers: one of our stories traces a million-dollar funding network back to Silicon Valley. Above all, though, the danger was that we might blow the cover of the HNH journalists or locations of their offices, etc. We had a huge number of protocols in place to ensure secrecy, using encryption, code words, and prioritizing meeting in person over using messaging apps. I also changed my appearance: not to be in disguise, just to blend in and 'disappear' on shoots.
The far-right in Europe and the U.S. don't try to hide their racism/intolerance/antisemitism – i.e., Britain's anti-immigrant rioters, Charlottesville's Unite the Right, Jan. 6 U.S. Capitol attackers. Why did you think it was necessary to make a film about how the far right operates behind closed doors?
Well, some of the far right are open about what they believe, but many aren't, and almost no one wants to admit how they are funded, or how they manipulate the narrative. We have layers here about what is said openly. Some might say they are anti-asylum-seekers in public, but refuse to admit they are racist, or they might say they hate Islam, but would never admit to anti-semitism, for example. When you go undercover, you see the true extent of the extremism, and importantly, the associations. Funding will often come from 'respectable' sources who would not openly want to be connected to those more vocal.
How did you feel about the London Film Festival's decision to pull your film?
We were shocked, confused, and devastated! It was beyond cowardly and has set a dangerous precedent. It was sad that they couldn't see why it was so politically important not to pull the film: for us, yes, but also for political films in general. We asked repeatedly for alternative ways to screen the film in the festival setting: different locations or different platforms, but they wouldn't entertain it. They selected the film in early June, so they had over four months to put a safety protocol in place before the festival in October.
Do you think that by pulling the film, the festival gave even more power to the far right?
Fear is its own form of censorship, and literally the only people to benefit from that decision were the far right. Anyone familiar with the work of American historian Timothy Snyder will recognize the concept of 'obeying in advance.' This was a perfect example.
Recently, Miami Beach Mayor Steven Meiner attempted to shut down the city's nonprofit art house cinema O Cinema following screenings of the Oscar-winning documentary 'No Other Land' because he thought it was anti-semitic. Meiner didn't get his way, but do you feel like we are heading in a direction where politicians and film festivals will censor political films?
Yes, for sure. It's already happened to us, and we can see that the selection of films at some festivals is becoming weaker. There are different reasons, and there may be some genuine fears, but there should always be ways to create safe spaces – even if it's virtual – to show political films. We believe in the right to watch films without the fear of intimidation and hope to ensure the resilience of the cinema industry for the long run.
What territories are you trying to sell to, and is there any hope that an American distributor will touch the film?
The film is selling very well to broadcasters in Europe and having a fantastic festival run. So far, we have had no bite whatsoever from the U.S. We can't believe the change in government hasn't had an effect on that.
'Undercover: Exposing the Far Right' is a Marking Films Inc/Tigerlily production, directed and produced by Havana Marking and Natasha Dack.
Best of Variety
The Best Celebrity Memoirs to Read This Year: From Chelsea Handler to Anthony Hopkins
New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week
Oscars 2026: First Blind Predictions Including Timothée Chalamet, Emma Stone, 'Wicked: For Good' and More
