Latest news with #HouseBill1209
Yahoo
07-04-2025
- Health
- Yahoo
Washington restricts lethal chemical previously sold on Amazon
Gov. Bob Ferguson signs a bill on Friday, April 4, 2025. On Monday, he signed more legislation into law, including a bill to prohibit the sale of sodium nitrite. (Photo by Jacquelyn Jimenez Romero/Washington State Standard) If you or someone you know is struggling or in crisis, help is available. Call or text 988 or chat When a package from Amazon arrived at her Clark County home in November 2020, Michelle Vasquez-Stickley assumed it was art supplies for her 15-year-old son. She left it on his bed for him. The package instead contained sodium nitrite, a powder that can serve as a poison antidote and, used at low levels of purity, as a meat preservative. But at high concentrations, it can be lethal. Vasquez-Stickley's son, Tyler Schmidt, used 99.6% pure sodium nitrite to die by suicide weeks after the delivery. 'As parents, we do everything we can to protect our children, but how could I protect Tyler from something I didn't even know was a danger?' Vasquez-Stickley asked lawmakers in January. 'The reality is, my child couldn't walk into a pharmacy and purchase allergy medication without restrictions, yet he could buy a lethal substance online with no age verifications or warnings about dangers.' Schmidt is one of dozens who died by this method across the country. After many warnings, Amazon stopped selling the high-purity products in late 2022, while denying wrongdoing. In hopes of making that restriction permanent, Washington Gov. Bob Ferguson on Monday signed Tyler's Law, a prohibition on the sale of sodium nitrite at concentrations greater than 10%. The law has exceptions for businesses that use the product. Washington is now the fourth state to place limits on the substance, joining California, Colorado and New York. 'Tyler's law ensures no other Washingtonian can order the deadly poison online and have it shipped to their home,' Ferguson said. Sellers now have to label their sodium nitrite products, 'WARNING DANGER: Deadly if ingested. If ingested, seek immediate medical attention for intravenous administration of methylene blue. Ingestion of sodium nitrite, even in small quantities, causes severe methemoglobinemia, extreme pain, and imminent death. Keep out of reach of children.' Violators of the new requirements face a $10,000 fine for their first transgression, rising to $1 million for subsequent violations. The attorney general or private citizens can bring litigation to enforce the law. House Bill 1209 passed both chambers with bipartisan support. The law takes effect immediately. Vasquez-Stickley and Schmidt's family were on hand as Ferguson signed the bill Monday. 'This is the kind of thing that makes a difference,' Ferguson told them. 'And so I just so appreciate you having the courage to come together, to work with legislators, to work with their advocates, to bring this to public attention.' A similar measure has seen progress at the federal level, with legislation to ban the chemical's sale at high concentrations passing the U.S. House of Representatives before stalling in the Senate last year. Meanwhile, the state Supreme Court recently agreed to hear one of the several cases against Amazon from families of loved ones who died after ingesting sodium nitrite. An appeals court last year had dismissed that consolidated case, over four deaths from sodium nitrite purchased from the Seattle e-commerce giant. The judges ruled the company couldn't be held liable for intentional misuse of its products. Many other lawsuits against Amazon over this issue are also ongoing. After Tyler's Law passed the House, Vasquez-Stickley told KING 5 she hoped the bill would save lives 'and prevent other families from experiencing the profound loss we have endured.'
Yahoo
01-04-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Oviedo, Sanford urge legislators to kill ‘horrendous' rural development bills
Elected leaders in two of Seminole County's largest cities — Sanford and Oviedo — are blasting proposed state legislation that would make it easier to develop the county's rural lands. 'They are certainly developer driven,' Oviedo Mayor Megan Sladek said regarding proposed Senate Bill 1118 and companion House Bill 1209, which would overturn many land development regulations, including some that have been in place for decades. On Monday, she joined fellow council members and Sanford commissioners in support of sending sharply worded letters to state legislators, calling on them to reject the bills. 'I would rather increase density in the city, where it is less costly to provide services than in rural areas. This is what our constituents have said they want,' Sanford Mayor Art Woodruff said before his city's commissioners also voted unanimously in opposition to the proposed legislation at a separate meeting. David Bear, president of the non-profit Save Rural Seminole, urged Oviedo and Sanford — whose borders either abut or are close to the county's rural boundary — to send the missives. He called the bills 'horrendous.' The proposed legislation 'doesn't automatically eliminate Seminole's [rural boundary] line. However, it makes the line functionally irrelevant through a Tallahassee approval process,' Bear said. A developer 'wouldn't have to come in front of a Seminole County board for a public hearing.' Established by voters in 2004, Seminole's rural boundary covers nearly one third of Seminole, much of it east of the Econlockhatchee River and Lake Jesup. Development densities within the boundary are mostly limited to one home per five acres or one home per 10 acres. Last November, Seminole voters overwhelmingly approved charter amendments to tighten the rules, requiring supermajority votes by county commissioners — or at least four votes on the five-member board — to remove and develop property within the boundary. The proposed Senate bill, filed by Sen. Stan McClain, R-Ocala, would wipe out the 2024 referendums. It would leave Seminole's 2004 rural boundary in place, but with a significant modification. Under the legislation, a developer's request to develop an agricultural enclave — land that abuts existing zoning for residential, industrial or commercial development — would not even require a public hearing, Oviedo officials said. Local governments have long been required by the state to have land development regulations — known as comprehensive plans — that can be amended only through public hearings before local boards, Oviedo City Manager Bryan Cobb said. But the proposed legislation 'says that doesn't matter. You will approve this [development] without any due process,' he said. In Orange County, the proposed Senate bill would undo two charter amendments approved by voters last year — one that created a rural boundary and another that limited annexations initiated by developers. The proposed bills have been a priority for the Florida Home Builders Association and Deseret Ranches, the real estate arm of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, which owns hundreds of thousands of acres of land spread across east Orange. The Senate bill was quickly approved in its first committee hearing last month. But as of Tuesday, neither bill has been scheduled for additional committee hearings. 'They would like to develop in the rural boundary,' Oviedo Council member Natalie Teuchert said of bill supporters. 'It disregards what voters voted on.' Sanford Commissioner Claudia Thomas was more blunt. 'Put it in all caps and in bold face,' she said in recommending how Sanford should write the letter in opposition.
Yahoo
20-03-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Florida legislators want to pave every rural spot left in the state
A farm in Central Florida, via Visit Central Florida I've spent some time this month cruising through Florida's remaining rural oases, places where there's still some green space amid all the asphalt. I've seen citrus groves and stands of timber, canopy roads and cattle pastures. When the madding crowd is driving you, well, mad, such places are a balm to the soul. And the folks I've talked to who live there would prefer them to stay that way. Yet if some development-mad Florida legislators have their way, these will all go on the endangered list. During our version of March Madness, the annual legislative session, there are two virulently anti-rural bills up for consideration, Senate Bill 1118 and House Bill 1209. The formal name of the bills is 'Land Use and Development Regulations.' I think a more accurate one would be 'Get Those Dang Farmers Out of Here So We Can Cram in More Cookie Cutter Houses!' These two bills would yank local control of development away from cities and counties across the state. The goal: Open up hundreds of thousands of agricultural acres to developers, with no chance for a review from those local governments and no way for the neighbors to object. The two bills are also about as anti-voter as Venezuela's Nicolas Maduro. They would overturn the decisions of an overwhelming majority in Orange and Seminole counties to impose a rural boundary on the development in their counties. The Orange County boundary was just upheld by an appeals court, by the way. 'This is urban sprawl at its worst,' Lee Constantine, a former state legislator who's now a Seminole County commissioner, told me. 'You will not see a more egregious, one-sided bill.' Constantine is far from the only person who calls these bills awful. The president of the smart-growth group 1000 Friends of Florida, Paul Owens, wrote in an Orlando Sentinel op-ed that the bills 'read like a developer's Christmas list' because they'd 'wipe out limits against development on huge swaths of high-priority natural and agricultural land across Florida, doing irreversible damage to our environment, quality of life and economy.' I haven't seen so many environmental groups clamoring to defeat something since last year when Gov. Ron DeSantis tried to build golf courses in the state parks. When the Senate version came up in a committee this week, several senators said they were feeling the heat from all the people objecting. One joked that her phone was blowing up and her email was smoking. Yet when the meeting concluded, the committee approved the most hated bill of the session on a 5-3 party-line vote. One Republican senator explained that he was supporting it because he trusted the sponsor to fix whatever's wrong with the bill. Constantine scoffed at that. 'There is no fixing this nonsense,' he told me. Ironically, this is the year Senate President Ben Albritton says he wants to lead a 'rural renaissance.' These bills seem to be aiming for something different — a rural version of the Dark Ages. That's no surprise. The past six or seven years have been tough ones for Florida's rural residents, and not just because of all the hurricane damage. Big-money developers, aided by politicians from the governor on down, have painted a target on every green spot that's left, from the Panhandle to the Keys. Rural residents had to fight back when the governor and Legislature approved that trio of awful toll roads known as M-CORES. They've had to fight again when the one survivor of the M-CORES repeal, the Northern Turnpike Extension, took aim at the rural areas again. The people trying to wipe out the farms and ranches never seem to think about how important they are to the economy. There are 44,000 commercial farms in the state, and Florida agricultural products in 2022 rang up $8.88 billion in sales. Those open spaces provide benefits for the environment, too, such as allowing for recharge of the underground aquifer and habitat for important species such as panthers. Plus, of course, we humans need the food they produce — the corn, the beef, the milk, the strawberries, the melons, the tomatoes, and the oranges, to name but a few. Speaking as someone who often starts his day with some Florida OJ, I have to tell you that nothing produced by urban sprawl tastes nearly as good. Doesn't contain as much Vitamin C, either. That's why smart cities and counties have set up boundaries to protect these remaining rural spots from being wiped out by the fast-buck artists. Developers hate such boundaries. They'd like to play Ronald Reagan in Berlin and demand someone tear down those walls. But we need those walls. 'All of the South Florida counties have established an urban-rural boundary,' said Cragin Mosteller of the Florida Association of Counties, noting that the rural part usually includes the Everglades. When I asked for the worst parts of the bills, David Cruz of the Florida League of Cities pointed out the provision whereby a 7,000-acre 'agricultural enclave' can bypass all local zoning rules to be approved for development with a decision by an administrator — no public hearings or elected official votes needed. That leaves neighbors with no say in what happens next door to their property, he pointed out. Why don't their property rights count the same as everyone else's? These considerations are not hypothetical. Mosteller told me about the town of West Park, in Broward County. Some years ago, the town obtained an exemption from Broward's rural boundary. Suddenly, the door was open to building all over. 'Now it's one of the fastest-growing cities in the state,' she said. 'If this bill passes, that's what would happen in all the other rural boundaries, and the public would have no opportunity to have any input.' But shutting up the public is just what the bill sponsor wants. SB 1118 is sponsored by Sen. Stan McClain, who also happens to be — SURPRISE! — a homebuilder in Marion County. A 2004 story in the Ocala Star Banner reported that he builds 15 houses a year. McClain has 11 children and 18 grandchildren, which I think means he could stay busy just building homes for his own family. If his name rings a bell, it may be because a couple of years ago he sponsored a bill to stop anyone from talking about girls' menstrual cycles in elementary schools, even if the girls need to hear about it. Yes, the 'Don't Say Period' bill passed. But what McClain is really committed to is the homebuilding business. In fact, the Florida Home Builders Association website lists him as executive officer of the Marion County Building Industry Association. In all the stories on his much-hated anti-rural bill, McClain has dodged reporters seeking a comment. WKMG-TV, for instance, reported that it had 'reached out to McClain several times to speak to him about the bill, and he has not responded to our requests.' I was curious to hear his reason for sponsoring this bill, especially since his campaign website says he believes government should 'not pick winners and losers with heavy-handed policies that favor one industry over another.' Yet here he is sponsoring a bill that would clearly favor his own industry over an agriculture industry that's so important to Marion County that they have a Farmland Preservation Area, created in 2005. That's why even his fellow Marion County Republicans oppose his bill. So, I tuned in this week to see what he'd say in the Senate Community Affairs Committee. Just out of curiosity, I first looked up who the chairman of that committee was and discovered it to be a fellow named — SURPRISE! — Stan McClain. Here's a funny thing about being chairman. While McClain was required to yield the chair while he talked about his bill, he could delay consideration to the last of the committee's agenda, after all the other bills had been discussed at length. That meant the committee didn't get to McClain's bill until near the meeting's scheduled end. As a result, any opponents who wanted to talk about what was wrong with it had only 30 seconds each instead of the usual, which is several minutes. As sponsor, though, McClain got much more time to lay out the reasoning behind his bill. 'The challenge of growth management is that people haven't stopped moving to Florida and it doesn't appear they're going to stop anytime soon,' he told his fellow committee members. 'How do we supply enough homes for people moving in?' Then he started rambling about 'inconsistent' regulations that 'merit discussion,' and insisted that this bill was all about 'trying to find a happy medium between growing and not.' Somehow McClain never got around to explaining why he thinks it's okay for the state to run roughshod over what a lot of local voters wanted. Nor did he explain why the Legislature should get more say in local planning decisions than the local elected officials. As one of the Democratic committee members, Sen. Jason Pizzo, told him, 'There's a lot of ickiness here.' One other thing Pizzo said really caught my attention. 'How are we not supposed to think this is not for one specific developer in Central Florida to expand into environmentally sensitive land?' he said. But he named no names. The Orlando Sentinel spelled out who he meant. 'The proposed state legislation is a priority for the Florida Home Builders Association as well as Deseret Ranches, the real estate arm of the Church of Jesus Christ Latter-Day Saints, which has lobbyists working on the bill,' the paper reported. 'Deseret Ranches owns hundreds of thousands of acres of ranch and swamp land spanning the eastern edge of Orange County, dipping into Osceola and Brevard.' Deseret is one of the largest calf-cow operations in the nation, but the company doesn't want it to stay a ranch. They've got development plans the likes of which Florida hasn't seen since 20 years ago, when the St. Joe Co. started converting its millions of acres of Panhandle pine plantations into vacation homes. 'Long-term blueprints outline development across an area spanning nearly 250 square miles,' Florida Trend reports. 'Those plans envision 220,000 homes, 100 million square feet of commercial and institutional space and close to 25,000 hotel rooms — almost as many as Walt Disney World has.' To aid its plans, Deseret tried to get Orlando to annex more than 50,000 acres of its land before Orange County voters could decide the fate of its rural boundary in a referendum, investigative reporter Jason Garcia noted in his 'Seeking Rents' substack. 'City leaders ultimately abandoned the annexation attempt, in part due to backlash from locals.' I put in a call to Deseret's influential Tallahassee lobbyist, Gary Hunter, to ask why his clients want to wreck the entire state just to get their revenge on the people of Orange County. For some reason he didn't get back to me. Perhaps he was busy herding legislators the way Deseret's cowboys herd cattle. In recent years, Florida's cities and counties have turned into the Legislature's favorite whipping boys, usually to benefit some major campaign contributor. In 2019, for instance, they blocked local government from passing tree protection ordinances. In 2021, when Key West's voters passed a referendum limiting cruise ships because of their pollution, the Legislature stepped in and blocked the referendum. In 2023, they passed a bill that prohibits local government voter referendums or ballot initiatives on land development regulation. Because of top-down dictates from the sneaky Legislature, local governments can't ditch fossil fuels to pick a less polluting form of energy, ban single-use plastic bags, forbid the sale of sunscreens that damage coral reefs, or promote the 'rights of nature' movement. But this bill that McClain is pushing — and that his fellow Republicans have been helping him push, despite such strong public opposition — is far worse than anything they've done before. It's absolute madness and deserves to be tossed out with the trash. But I bet if they do pass it, these flaming hypocrites will then go out on the speech-making circuit and claim they're 'small-government conservatives.' They'll say it with a straight face, too! SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
