Latest news with #HouseBill139
Yahoo
26-02-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Idaho bill restricting absentee voting fails to advance out of committee
In this file photo from May 2021, an absentee voting drop box was available to voters outside Boise City Hall. (Otto Kitsinger for Idaho Capital Sun) A bill that sought to end no-excuse absentee voting for most Idahoans failed to advance out of the Idaho Legislature's House State Affairs Committee on Wednesday morning. House Bill 139 isn't officially dead. But the bill failed to advance after separate motions – one to advance the bill and another to hold the bill – both failed on rare tie votes. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX In order for the bill to become law, it would have to be brought back to the committee, advance on a majority vote, pass both the Idaho House of Representatives and Idaho Senate with a majority vote and not be vetoed by Gov. Brad Little. Idaho currently allows no-excuse absentee voting, which means any registered voter can request and cast an absentee ballot for any reason. About 15% of Idaho voters vote by absentee ballot, Idaho Secretary of State Phil McGrane said. During the most recent 2024 general election, 182,000 Idahoans voted by absentee ballot, McGrane said. Under House Bill 139, Idahoans would only be able to vote by absentee ballot if they were 65 or older, serving in the armed forces, serving a religious mission, have an illness, disability or hospitalization, have to work or attend university, are occupying a second home outside of the county where they are registered to vote, or if they live in a precinct that only allows mailed ballots. Rep. Joe Alfieri, R-Coeur d'Alene, sponsored the bill. Most of the people who spoke in a public hearing Wednesday at the Idaho State Capitol in Boise, including McGrane, testified in opposition to the bill. CONTACT US 'House Bill 139 would impose unnecessary restrictions on absentee voting, which is a secure, longstanding and essential method of voter participation,' Meridian resident Laura Miller told legislators. 'As a mother of young children and someone living with a chronic illness, I vote absentee in most elections. There are many reasons a voter may choose to vote absentee, but like many personal decisions, are not the government's business. What matters is that every legally eligible Idahoan has the freedom to vote in whatever way works best for them. Voting absentee is not a partisan issue. It is a matter of access.' Idaho County Clerk Kathy Ackerman also testified against the bill. If the bill passed, Ackerman warned that spouses and dependents of active duty military members serving away from home, people on vacation, people living in rural or remote areas, emergency responders who are suddenly called in unexpectedly on Election Day and many other people could be harmed by the bill because there are no exceptions for them if they cannot physically make it to the polls. Ackerman also said the bill would create additional work for county clerks, could confuse voters and be difficult to enforce. 'This is the third year I've spoken against eliminating no excuse absentee voting,' Ackerman said. Tim O'Donnell, who said he is a volunteer with the advocacy group Secure Idaho, said he supported the bill. He said voting by absentee ballot is unobserved voting. He also said absentee voting would be the easiest way to cheat an election. 'It is more secure to vote in person than it is by absentee,' O'Donnell told legislators. After Wednesday's meeting adjourned, House State Affairs Committee Chairman Brent Crane, R-Nampa, told the Idaho Capital Sun that the status of the bill is that it remains in his possession as chairman. Crane pointed out that Rep. Brooke Green, a Boise Democrat, was absent from Wednesday's meeting and vote. While Crane said he did not poll Green on the bill, he assumes she would have voted against it, which would have killed the bill. Crane said he would keep that in mind if a legislator sought to bring the bill back. Crane also said the committee would need to schedule and hold another public hearing if the bill is to be brought forward again for consideration. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
13-02-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Publishers sound off on journalism measures proposed in N.M. legislative session
Since the 1930s, Barbara Beck's family has owned the Roswell Daily Record in Southern New Mexico, best known for meticulously chronicling the UFO fever that first swept the region and then the nation as a whole in 1947. But she knows the challenges facing the print news industry today. "It's important that we protect and that we pay journalists a fair salary," said Beck, publisher of the Record. "It's kind of a struggle to be honest as a small, daily newspaper. But it's something I believe in and fight for every day." Several measures aimed at supporting members of the media have been introduced in the 2025 legislative session. Among them is a pair of bills from state Senate Majority Leader Peter Wirth, D-Santa Fe, that deal with a tax credit for news organizations in addition to a proposal to update protections for reporters' sources and communications. The bills favorable to media come after a Democratic lawmaker has backed off a proposed overhaul of New Mexico's public record law that critics warned would have an alarming effect on government transparency and accountability — and could potentially have an impact on how journalism is done in the state. Rep. Kathleen Cates, D-Rio Rancho, indicated Wednesday her proposal, House Bill 139, would not be heard by a committee at her request. She wrote in a text message the legislation was filed to "start discussion." The media landscape in New Mexico is continuing to experience seismic shifts driven by an erosion in print advertising wrought by the arrival of the internet and a general decline in print subscriptions. Industry woes extend well beyond the Land of Enchantment: The number of local news deserts expanded in the U.S. last year, with 127 newspapers shuttering, leaving nearly 55 million Americans with limited to no access to local news, according to a report from Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism. Tax incentive for media Senate Bill 110 — sponsored by Wirth — would create a refundable tax credit for local news organizations equal to 30% of the company's annual wages, according to a bill synopsis from the Legislative Finance Committee; the total amount news organization could claim in a year, under the legislation, would be capped at $4 million. An analysis from the state Taxation and Revenue Department estimates the bill would cost the state $4 million annually beginning in the 2026 financial year if signed into law. In the analysis, the Taxation and Revenue Department assumed there are 210 journalists in New Mexico, of which 45% work full time and have a median annual wage of $46,600, using occupation employment and wage statistics estimates. Carol Clark, the owner and publisher of the Los Alamos Daily Post, said the 13-year-old publication has four reporters on staff currently — and they are all swamped. Clark said her publication and others could use the tax break. "We are so busy in our newsroom, and we could definitely use another couple of reporters. But because of the state of the economy, we're holding back, being very conservative and careful," Clark said. "This would allow us to bring on a couple of additional reporters, which would expand the coverage we can provide our readers." Senate Bill 111 — also sponsored by Wirth — creates a refundable tax credit for businesses that provide newspaper printing services for news organizations, with the credit based on the number of and wages paid to the employees of the printer. Both bills are on Thursday's Senate Tax, Business and Transportation Committee agenda. 'State spying' measure Titled the "Protect Reporters from Exploitative State Spying Act," House Bill 153 proposes updates to the shield law, which was last amended in 1973, to account for how reporting is done today. 'It updates and strengthens protections for journalists,' said Rep. Sarah Silva, D-Las Cruces, one of the bill's sponsors, during a committee hearing this week. The legislation would make updates to account for technological advances in journalism by protecting reporters' electronic communications, such as email, from "state spying," according to a statement from Silva. According to a Legislative Finance Committee analysis, the bill would prohibit a 'state entity,' defined as an agency in the executive branch or an administrative agency of the state with subpoena or other compulsory powers, to compel a journalist to reveal any information identifying a source or the contents of any communications or documents related to putting together or publishing a story. The state entity would also be prohibited from compelling a cellphone carrier or other similar electronic communications service providers to provide testimony or any document stored on behalf of a covered journalist. A decades-old state Supreme Court ruling does not permit the Legislature or governor from enacting laws related to rules of evidence in court, meaning only the judicial branch can do that, the statement from Silva said. The New Mexico Supreme Court enacted its own press shield rule in 1982 that protects journalists' sources in proceedings in local and state courts; separate from the bill, Silva is working to formally request that the Supreme Court's Rules of Evidence Committee consider amendments to the shield rule, her statement said. Media and transparency advocates said they supported the proposed measure. "HB 153 is a bill that upholds the First Amendment right to freedom of the press. It will strengthen protections for journalists against compelled disclosure of confidential sources, which will enable journalists to report freely when whistleblowers and informants come forward," wrote Christine Barber, executive director of the New Mexico Foundation for Open Government, in an email. Beck, of the Roswell Daily Record, said she believes the bill contemplates sensible updates to the shield law in a digital era that presents new challenges around cybersecurity and surveillance. "It's an important thing to do. With all of the hacking stuff going on, I know for our website we constantly have issues with hackers trying to get in," Beck said. "I think it's very important that we protect journalism." The bill passed the House Consumer and Public Affairs Committee on a 4-2 vote on Tuesday following about 30 minutes of discussion. Some controversy broke out in the committee because Rep. John Block, R-Alamogordo, and Rep. Stefani Lord, R-Sandia Park, complained Lord was not given sufficient time to ask questions by committee chair Joanne Ferrary, a Las Cruces Democrat. "It's very frustrating that, if I was a Democrat, I would have been able to ask the questions," Lord said. "But because I'm not, I'm not going to be able to get [to] them, so … I am absolutely voting no on this bill, because I don't know enough about it."
