
Publishers sound off on journalism measures proposed in N.M. legislative session
Since the 1930s, Barbara Beck's family has owned the Roswell Daily Record in Southern New Mexico, best known for meticulously chronicling the UFO fever that first swept the region and then the nation as a whole in 1947.
But she knows the challenges facing the print news industry today.
"It's important that we protect and that we pay journalists a fair salary," said Beck, publisher of the Record. "It's kind of a struggle to be honest as a small, daily newspaper. But it's something I believe in and fight for every day."
Several measures aimed at supporting members of the media have been introduced in the 2025 legislative session. Among them is a pair of bills from state Senate Majority Leader Peter Wirth, D-Santa Fe, that deal with a tax credit for news organizations in addition to a proposal to update protections for reporters' sources and communications.
The bills favorable to media come after a Democratic lawmaker has backed off a proposed overhaul of New Mexico's public record law that critics warned would have an alarming effect on government transparency and accountability — and could potentially have an impact on how journalism is done in the state. Rep. Kathleen Cates, D-Rio Rancho, indicated Wednesday her proposal, House Bill 139, would not be heard by a committee at her request.
She wrote in a text message the legislation was filed to "start discussion."
The media landscape in New Mexico is continuing to experience seismic shifts driven by an erosion in print advertising wrought by the arrival of the internet and a general decline in print subscriptions.
Industry woes extend well beyond the Land of Enchantment: The number of local news deserts expanded in the U.S. last year, with 127 newspapers shuttering, leaving nearly 55 million Americans with limited to no access to local news, according to a report from Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism.
Tax incentive for media
Senate Bill 110 — sponsored by Wirth — would create a refundable tax credit for local news organizations equal to 30% of the company's annual wages, according to a bill synopsis from the Legislative Finance Committee; the total amount news organization could claim in a year, under the legislation, would be capped at $4 million.
An analysis from the state Taxation and Revenue Department estimates the bill would cost the state $4 million annually beginning in the 2026 financial year if signed into law.
In the analysis, the Taxation and Revenue Department assumed there are 210 journalists in New Mexico, of which 45% work full time and have a median annual wage of $46,600, using occupation employment and wage statistics estimates.
Carol Clark, the owner and publisher of the Los Alamos Daily Post, said the 13-year-old publication has four reporters on staff currently — and they are all swamped. Clark said her publication and others could use the tax break.
"We are so busy in our newsroom, and we could definitely use another couple of reporters. But because of the state of the economy, we're holding back, being very conservative and careful," Clark said. "This would allow us to bring on a couple of additional reporters, which would expand the coverage we can provide our readers."
Senate Bill 111 — also sponsored by Wirth — creates a refundable tax credit for businesses that provide newspaper printing services for news organizations, with the credit based on the number of and wages paid to the employees of the printer.
Both bills are on Thursday's Senate Tax, Business and Transportation Committee agenda.
'State spying' measure
Titled the "Protect Reporters from Exploitative State Spying Act," House Bill 153 proposes updates to the shield law, which was last amended in 1973, to account for how reporting is done today.
'It updates and strengthens protections for journalists,' said Rep. Sarah Silva, D-Las Cruces, one of the bill's sponsors, during a committee hearing this week.
The legislation would make updates to account for technological advances in journalism by protecting reporters' electronic communications, such as email, from "state spying," according to a statement from Silva.
According to a Legislative Finance Committee analysis, the bill would prohibit a 'state entity,' defined as an agency in the executive branch or an administrative agency of the state with subpoena or other compulsory powers, to compel a journalist to reveal any information identifying a source or the contents of any communications or documents related to putting together or publishing a story.
The state entity would also be prohibited from compelling a cellphone carrier or other similar electronic communications service providers to provide testimony or any document stored on behalf of a covered journalist.
A decades-old state Supreme Court ruling does not permit the Legislature or governor from enacting laws related to rules of evidence in court, meaning only the judicial branch can do that, the statement from Silva said.
The New Mexico Supreme Court enacted its own press shield rule in 1982 that protects journalists' sources in proceedings in local and state courts; separate from the bill, Silva is working to formally request that the Supreme Court's Rules of Evidence Committee consider amendments to the shield rule, her statement said.
Media and transparency advocates said they supported the proposed measure.
"HB 153 is a bill that upholds the First Amendment right to freedom of the press. It will strengthen protections for journalists against compelled disclosure of confidential sources, which will enable journalists to report freely when whistleblowers and informants come forward," wrote Christine Barber, executive director of the New Mexico Foundation for Open Government, in an email.
Beck, of the Roswell Daily Record, said she believes the bill contemplates sensible updates to the shield law in a digital era that presents new challenges around cybersecurity and surveillance.
"It's an important thing to do. With all of the hacking stuff going on, I know for our website we constantly have issues with hackers trying to get in," Beck said. "I think it's very important that we protect journalism."
The bill passed the House Consumer and Public Affairs Committee on a 4-2 vote on Tuesday following about 30 minutes of discussion. Some controversy broke out in the committee because Rep. John Block, R-Alamogordo, and Rep. Stefani Lord, R-Sandia Park, complained Lord was not given sufficient time to ask questions by committee chair Joanne Ferrary, a Las Cruces Democrat.
"It's very frustrating that, if I was a Democrat, I would have been able to ask the questions," Lord said. "But because I'm not, I'm not going to be able to get [to] them, so … I am absolutely voting no on this bill, because I don't know enough about it."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
26 minutes ago
- New York Post
Mikie Sherrill beats crowded field to become Democratic candidate for NJ governor
US Rep. and former prosecutor and Navy helicopter pilot Mikie Sherrill will be the state's Democratic nominee for governor in November after defeating five Dem opponents in Tuesday's party primary. Sherrill, 53, a mother of four and four-term congresswoman representing parts of Essex, Morris and Passaic counties, garnered an early lead in pre-primary polling in large part because of her impressive resume, which included a stint as a federal prosecutor. She tallied 34.6% of the vote when the Associated Press projected her to win at 8:39 p.m. ET. Advertisement Rep. Mikie Sherrill has won New Jersey's Democratic primary for governor. AP Photo/Heather Khalifa Sherill of Montclair beat out Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop, Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, US Rep. Josh Gottheimer, New Jersey Education Association union President Sean Spiller and former state Sen. Steve Sweeney for the nod. Fulop was netting 17.8% of the vote and Baraka, Gottheimer, Spiller and Sweeney all had less than 14% support when the race was called. Advertisement In addition to Sherill enjoying a solid polling lead heading into the primary, she also had won the support of much of the Garden State's Democratic Party apparatus. In Congress, Sherrill serves on the House Committee on Armed Services and its Select Committee on Strategic Competition between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party. She also is a member of caucuses including the Congressional Caucus for Women's Issues, the New Democrat Coalition and the Rare Disease Caucus. Her campaign centered around the affordability crisis in Jersey affecting everything from healthcare costs to grocery prices. She also regularly spoke out against the Trump administration as well as Elon Musk, accusing them of working to 'dismantle' social programs such as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. Sherrill pledged if elected as governor to work to lower prescription drug costs while requiring more transparency in healthcare pricing and directing the state's attorney general to go after practices such as price gouging, monopolies and insurers denying coverage. Advertisement Sherrill posing for photos with supporters at a 'Get Out the Vote' rally in Elizabeth on June 7, 2025. AP Photo/Heather Khalifa She also champions shared services for municipalities and school districts to help spread some of the cost around in an effort to lower property taxes and supports the expansion of the state's Child Tax Credit and Earned Income Tax Credit. The New Jersey gubernatorial election is scheduled for Nov. 4.


Politico
29 minutes ago
- Politico
Rep. Mikie Sherrill wins Democratic nomination for NJ governor
Democrats chose Rep. Mikie Sherrill as their nominee for governor of New Jersey, as the party attempts to defy odds by holding onto the governorship for a third term in a row. The Associated Press called the race just under an hour after polls closed. The four-term member of Congress prevailed in the crowded Democratic primary field on Tuesday to succeed term-limited Gov. Phil Murphy. She'll face Republican Jack Ciattarelli, setting up a high-stakes battle of two party establishment favorites. Both sides acknowledge that November's election will be competitive. Although the electorate does favor Democrats, it's been decades since Democrats have won the governorship three terms in a row in the Garden State. But in recent history, the candidate of the party opposite of the one that controls the White House typically wins the race for governor. Still, Republicans are emboldened by President Donald Trump's closer-than-expected loss in New Jersey last November, as well as the gains they've made to cut into Democrats' voter registration advantage. And Republicans argue it helps that they have a candidate with high name ID: Ciattarelli ran for governor two times prior and narrowly lost to Murphy in 2021.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fact check: Trump makes multiple false claims to the troops at Fort Bragg
President Donald Trump made a series of false claims to members of the military on Tuesday in a partisan and combative speech at Fort Bragg in North Carolina. Trump lied again about the 2020 election. He repeated a long-debunked story about a Minnesota National Guard deployment in 2020. He again distorted the history of his first administration's fight against the ISIS terror group. He revived a fictional tale about immigration during former President Joe Biden's administration. And he exaggerated the military's recruiting challenges under Biden. In addition, Trump made a series of vague assertions about the protests in Los Angeles for which he presented no evidence. Here is a fact check of some of his checkable false claims from the speech – plus a false claim he made in remarks about California at the White House earlier in the day. The 2020 election: Trump repeated his long-debunked lie that the 2020 election 'was rigged and stolen.' Trump legitimately lost a free and fair election to Biden. The National Guard and Minneapolis: While bashing Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, Trump revived a false story that CNN debunked nearly five years ago. Trump wrongly claimed that it was him, not Walz, who sent the National Guard to Minneapolis in 2020 amid the civil unrest that followed the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer. Trump said: 'I'll never forget in Minnesota: that city was burning down, Minneapolis, it was burning down, it was gonna burn to the ground, and he wouldn't call the guard. And I waited for a long time, and I called the guard, and I saved it.' In reality, publicly available evidence proves that Walz first deployed the Minnesota National guard more than seven hours before Trump publicly threatened to deploy the guard himself. While Walz was criticized by many Republicans and some Democrats for not sending in the guard faster, it is indisputable that Walz, not Trump, was the person who deployed the guard. You can read more here. Trump and the battle against ISIS: Trump repeated his regular false claim that even though 'they said it would take five years to defeat ISIS, we did in four weeks, four weeks.' The so-called ISIS 'caliphate' was declared fully liberated more than two years into Trump's presidency, in 2019, not 'in four weeks.' Military recruiting under Biden: Trump, boasting of the military's recruiting performance during his second administration, falsely claimed, 'Just think of this: six months ago, we couldn't recruit anybody to join the military. Nobody wanted to join. That was six months ago.' Even granting that words like 'nobody' can be used less than literally, it's simply not true that 'nobody wanted to join' the military at the end of the Biden administration. The ongoing uptick in recruiting actually began under the Biden administration. The Defense Department announced in October 2024, before Trump's second victory, that recruitment was up more than 12% in the 2024 fiscal year compared with the previous fiscal year; reported in October 2024: 'After years of negative recruiting news and headlines, all the military branches managed to eke out wins this year and meet their recruiting goals – largely aided by new programs and policies that allowed them to sign up recruits who would have been disqualified in previous years.' The Army, for example, added just over 55,000 recruits, up substantially from just under 45,000 in fiscal year 2022. Migrants, prisons and mental institutions: Trump made his frequent assertion that foreign countries deliberately placed prisoners and people with mental illnesses in the US as migrants during Biden's presidency. 'Many of them came out of prisons and jails – the most heinous people, they came from all over the world. They came from the Congo in Africa, they came from Asia, they came from the prisons of these places, they were put into the United States and allowed to stay here,' Trump said at one point. At another, he said, 'Their countries would bus them or drive them right to our border and say, 'Go in there. If you ever come back, we're going to kill you.'' Trump has never presented any evidence of any foreign government transporting their criminals to the US border under Biden. Nor has he corroborated his stories about foreign governments deliberately emptying prisons and mental health facilities to somehow facilitate migration to the US, which even his 2024 presidential campaign could not prove. His allegations about prisons in 'the Congo' have been rejected as baseless by independent experts, human rights organizations, and the governments of the Democratic Republic of Congo and the Republic of Congo. California, fires and water: At the White House earlier on Tuesday, Trump again wrongly asserted that the January wildfires in Los Angeles 'started because they wouldn't allow water into LA, they wouldn't allow water into California' – and added that he then turned water 'around,' and 'now we have billions of gallons of water flowing down.' None of this is true. First, nobody has broadly refused to allow water into Los Angeles or into California as a whole. Second, experts on California water policy and firefighting have repeatedly explained that there is no basis for Trump's claims that the January wildfires were caused by water being used for environmental protection in northern California rather than being sent to Los Angeles. Third, Trump did not actually send water to Los Angeles earlier this year. Rather, in what experts widely described as a waste and a stunt, he had about two billion gallons of fresh water sent from one part of California's Central Valley to another part of the valley in late January and early February.