Latest news with #HouseBill285
Yahoo
7 days ago
- General
- Yahoo
Dog daycare, boarding deaths prompt push to protect pets from negligence under Texas law
AUSTIN (KXAN) — Texas lawmakers overwhelmingly supported an effort to protect pets from negligence, known as 'Pancho's Law.' Pancho died in 2021 while under the care of a dog daycare business in Dallas. His family, Paul and Maria Mecca, have spent the last four years advocating for a change to Texas law that they believe will save other animals. 'My husband and I quickly learned there is a loophole in Texas law that allows pet service businesses to act with impunity by simply claiming negligence,' Maria told a Senate committee earlier this month. 'All they have to do is say 'I didn't mean to kill your dog.' No matter how egregious their actions may have been.' House Bill 285 adds 'criminal negligence' to the Texas Penal Code as conduct that constitutes a criminal offense of cruelty to non-livestock animals. The bill's author, Rep. Claudia Ordaz, D-El Paso, told her colleagues the goal is to provide families with a legal path to justice if their animal suffered harm because someone failed to use reasonable care. 'Under current law, families have limited recourse when their dogs or cats are injured due to such negligence. This bill seeks to ensure accountability and prevent those who act irresponsibly from endangering other pets in the future.' For several years, KXAN investigators have fielded tips about dogs who passed away while in the care of boarding, grooming and training facilities. In many cases, no lawsuits are filed and few law enforcement records of the deaths exist, beyond initial reports. When Brian Roby and Jordyn Hawkes lost their dog, Kali, last August, they said they quickly realized how few options they had. 'You know, what could we do? We could go to civil court and, 'Okay, your dog was worth $70. Here you go,'' Roby said, noting that pets are viewed as property under Texas law. In August 2024, the couple planned their wedding and subsequent honeymoon out-of-state. They dropped Kali off to stay at an Austin-area boarding and daycare facility for part of that time. The facility's staff was supposed drop Kali off at Jordyn's father's house, where she'd stay for the rest of their trip, but she never made it home. On the first day of their honeymoon, the newlyweds received a text alerting them that Kali had been rushed to an emergency veterinarian. KXAN investigators reviewed records from that medical provider, revealing Kali 'overheated in a daycare van.' She and another 3-year-old dog passed away. Hawkes said through tears, when recounting that day, 'I just had this feeling like, she was right the whole time. She was right to be scared of the car.' She added, 'I think the most shocking part of all this process has been just the lack of regulations that the state of Texas has [for the pet services industry].' KXAN reached out to the facility in Kali's case, but it declined to comment. 'We were in the lobby of this hotel that we had just gotten married at the day before, and to have this, like, super high and this crushing low was…' Brian trailed off. He went on to say, 'The grief kept coming in waves. It still does, you know, randomly grab — grab a hold, and it's been tough.' The couple began to connect with other families who have lost dogs and cats while in the care of pet services businesses — such as Katelyn Rohde. Rohde lost Roland, who she refers to as her 'silly goose,' at a Texas dog daycare facility. Shortly after, she started a nonprofit in Roland's name, with the goal of raising awareness and pushing for change. She's worked with other experts and advocates to publish guides to help other pet owners, such as a Dog Daycare Evaluation Guide and the Roland & Friends Guide to Selecting and Finding a Dog Trainer. 'All this information is not intended to be like a black-and-white 'this is what you do,' but ultimately, for you to, kind of, think through what is most important for your dog — for your silly goose — so you can establish what is best for them in those situations,' she said. Roland's Silly Goose Crew also launched a survey of pet owners', which showed 96% of respondents would be supportive or strongly supportive of Texas dog daycare facilities adopting more consistent safety, communication and transparency standards through regulation, voluntary safeguards or other measures. '1% better is 1% better when you're starting from nothing,' Rohde said. She said believes Pancho's Law is the first step. As HB 285 worked through the legislative process, some people raised concerns about an exception in the law for veterinarians. A provision states that these medical professionals have a defense to prosecution for alleged conduct that occurs while performing their duties as licensed veterinarians or as a person assisting the veterinarian. Some public commenters pushed back on that provision and asked lawmakers to hold medical professionals to the same standards as others under the law. Ashley Morgan, with the Texas Humane Legislation Network, addressed these concerns in her testimony before a Senate committee, noting that people and veterinarians can still be prosecuted, particularly for knowing or intentional harm. She told lawmakers that she sees the need for Pancho's Law regularly in her work as an attorney, when families come to her for help. 'I more often than not have to tell these people, 'There is nothing I can do for you,'' Morgan testified. KXAN reached out to more than 20 pet service business owners and managers in the Austin area to get a sense of how they feel about the potential change, if the governor signs HB 285 into law. The responses were mixed: a few raised concerns. One said, in part, 'While I am vehemently against any form of animal cruelty, at face value the threat of criminal prosecution for operating a kennel or grooming salon is nothing short of outrageous and would be a huge deterrent for these businesses to stay open.' They described thousands of owners of these facilities 'who often work 60+ hours a week, some just scraping by, and most of whom rely on the income of their business to live.' Several business operators told KXAN they supported the law and welcomed more regulation in the industry to protect pets. One said, in part, 'Hopefully this bill will help hold 'bad apples' in the pet care industry— as well as individuals — accountable for mistreatment and generally negligent behavior. Caring for animals is a big responsibility and should be treated as such.' Some facility operators were not aware of the proposal and said they would look into it; others declined to comment. HB 285 passed the House of Representatives with 125 vote in favor and 5 votes against. It passed out of the Senate unanimously. The bill has been sent to the Gov. Greg Abbott for consideration. If he signs it into law, it would go into effect this September. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
14-02-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Montana Legislature advances differing visions for MEPA's future
Speaker of the House Brandon Ler, R-Savage, speaks during a press conference on MEPA legislation on Feb. 12, 2025. (Nathaniel Bailey for the Daily Montanan) The Montana Legislature on Wednesday advanced four Republican-introduced measures that will tweak and redefine environmental policies in the state. Two of the measures that change the Montana Environmental Policy Act — one in each chamber — passed with bipartisan support, while a third bill brought by the Speaker of the House skirted through on party lines. The suite of environmental bills are a response to district and Montana Supreme Court decisions in the constitutional climate change lawsuit Held v. Montana, which upheld Montanan's constitutional right to a 'clean and healthful' environment and said limitations on MEPA fly in the face of the framers' vision. But that lawsuit 'ignored common sense and handed down an agenda-driven ruling,' according to Speaker of the House Brandon Ler, R-Savage. 'Let's be honest. This isn't about climate This is about control,' Ler said at a Republican press conference on Wednesday. 'It's about shifting decision-making power away from the people, away from their elected representatives, giving it to judges and activists who have no accountability to the voters.' Ler is carrying House Bill 285, which he said would provide clarity and efficiency to MEPA. 'What was designed to be a procedural tool for transparency and information decision making process over the years has been twisted into something it was never meant to be,' Ler said on the House floor. 'This bill streamlines the MEPA process, eliminates unnecessary red tape, and reaffirms its true purpose — providing clear, accurate, balanced information about environmental impacts, not creating endless hurdles for responsible development.' The Speaker said the bill would not weaken the statute, but opponents in the chamber pushed back on that notion. 'I know that every single person in this body knows that both jobs and the environment are important to Montana, but it's a hard, nasty conversation to have,' said Rep. Marilyn Marler, D-Missoula. 'Where do you put the balance between jobs and environment? Different people will put it in different places.' MEPA, Marler said, provides a structured way, in law, to have the hard conversations and facilitate conflict resolution. 'Unfortunately House Bill 285 tries to take out the conflict by taking out half of the conversation,' she said. Ler's bill clarifies that MEPA does not carry any regulatory weight, and prohibits a state agency from withholding, denying, or conditioning a permit due to any findings from an environmental analysis. It passed the House 58-42 on party lines. Another MEPA bill that drew a broader coalition was House Bill 270, introduced by Rep. Katie Zolnikov, R-Billings. Her bill updates the language of MEPA to remove the parts invalidated by the Held decision, alters the process if someone fails to comply with the act, and prevents state agencies from acting beyond their purview. HB 270 passed unanimously out of the chamber. The House also passed House Bill 291, brought by Rep. Greg Oblander, R-Billings, with two Democrats joining all Republicans. The bill would prevent an agency from enacting stricter air quality standards at the local or state level than what is currently in place federally. 'If the federal government sets a standard, that's the bar. We're not going to let state agencies or local boards move the goal post,' Oblander said during the press conference. 'We've seen what happens when agencies are left unchecked. Businesses that meet every federal requirement are suddenly hit with additional layers of regulations from state or local entities, rules that do nothing to improve the environmental outcomes, but everything to drive up cost, delay projects and kill jobs.' House Democrats vowed to keep fighting for Montana's environment, specifically against Ler's proposal. 'Montanans expect us to defend their Constitutional right to breathe clean air and drink clean water, and that's exactly what House Democrats did today. We supported a common-sense bill that upholds that right while providing clarity for businesses and workers under MEPA. But some Republican politicians are determined to erode what makes Montana the last best place,' said Democratic Whip Jonathan Karlen of Missoula. 'We will continue to fight those efforts every step of the way.' On the Senate side, Sen. Wylie Galt, R-Martinsdale, got a 37-13 vote on his Senate Bill 221, which he described as a 'Goldilocks bill.' SB 221 aligns MEPA with the Held ruling and directs the Department of Environmental Quality to develop guidance on greenhouse gas emission assessments, while not stymying industry and development. During the floor debate on his bill, Galt's bill earned support from a handful of Democrats. Sen. Derek Harvey, D-Butte, said that while MEPA can help protect the state's environment, litigation over MEPA can adversely impact workers and unions. He said SB 221 helps 'strike this balance.' While the bill requires greenhouse gas emissions for fossil fuel projects, Galt said the bill contains a catch. 'These assessments are information only. They cannot be twisted into tools to deny permits or slap on burdensome conditions,' Galt told the press. 'No activist lawsuits, no bureaucratic overreach, just facts.'
