Dog daycare, boarding deaths prompt push to protect pets from negligence under Texas law
Pancho died in 2021 while under the care of a dog daycare business in Dallas. His family, Paul and Maria Mecca, have spent the last four years advocating for a change to Texas law that they believe will save other animals.
'My husband and I quickly learned there is a loophole in Texas law that allows pet service businesses to act with impunity by simply claiming negligence,' Maria told a Senate committee earlier this month. 'All they have to do is say 'I didn't mean to kill your dog.' No matter how egregious their actions may have been.'
House Bill 285 adds 'criminal negligence' to the Texas Penal Code as conduct that constitutes a criminal offense of cruelty to non-livestock animals.
The bill's author, Rep. Claudia Ordaz, D-El Paso, told her colleagues the goal is to provide families with a legal path to justice if their animal suffered harm because someone failed to use reasonable care.
'Under current law, families have limited recourse when their dogs or cats are injured due to such negligence. This bill seeks to ensure accountability and prevent those who act irresponsibly from endangering other pets in the future.'
For several years, KXAN investigators have fielded tips about dogs who passed away while in the care of boarding, grooming and training facilities. In many cases, no lawsuits are filed and few law enforcement records of the deaths exist, beyond initial reports.
When Brian Roby and Jordyn Hawkes lost their dog, Kali, last August, they said they quickly realized how few options they had.
'You know, what could we do? We could go to civil court and, 'Okay, your dog was worth $70. Here you go,'' Roby said, noting that pets are viewed as property under Texas law.
In August 2024, the couple planned their wedding and subsequent honeymoon out-of-state. They dropped Kali off to stay at an Austin-area boarding and daycare facility for part of that time. The facility's staff was supposed drop Kali off at Jordyn's father's house, where she'd stay for the rest of their trip, but she never made it home.
On the first day of their honeymoon, the newlyweds received a text alerting them that Kali had been rushed to an emergency veterinarian. KXAN investigators reviewed records from that medical provider, revealing Kali 'overheated in a daycare van.' She and another 3-year-old dog passed away.
Hawkes said through tears, when recounting that day, 'I just had this feeling like, she was right the whole time. She was right to be scared of the car.'
She added, 'I think the most shocking part of all this process has been just the lack of regulations that the state of Texas has [for the pet services industry].'
KXAN reached out to the facility in Kali's case, but it declined to comment.
'We were in the lobby of this hotel that we had just gotten married at the day before, and to have this, like, super high and this crushing low was…' Brian trailed off. He went on to say, 'The grief kept coming in waves. It still does, you know, randomly grab — grab a hold, and it's been tough.'
The couple began to connect with other families who have lost dogs and cats while in the care of pet services businesses — such as Katelyn Rohde.
Rohde lost Roland, who she refers to as her 'silly goose,' at a Texas dog daycare facility. Shortly after, she started a nonprofit in Roland's name, with the goal of raising awareness and pushing for change. She's worked with other experts and advocates to publish guides to help other pet owners, such as a Dog Daycare Evaluation Guide and the Roland & Friends Guide to Selecting and Finding a Dog Trainer.
'All this information is not intended to be like a black-and-white 'this is what you do,' but ultimately, for you to, kind of, think through what is most important for your dog — for your silly goose — so you can establish what is best for them in those situations,' she said.
Roland's Silly Goose Crew also launched a survey of pet owners', which showed 96% of respondents would be supportive or strongly supportive of Texas dog daycare facilities adopting more consistent safety, communication and transparency standards through regulation, voluntary safeguards or other measures.
'1% better is 1% better when you're starting from nothing,' Rohde said.
She said believes Pancho's Law is the first step.
As HB 285 worked through the legislative process, some people raised concerns about an exception in the law for veterinarians. A provision states that these medical professionals have a defense to prosecution for alleged conduct that occurs while performing their duties as licensed veterinarians or as a person assisting the veterinarian.
Some public commenters pushed back on that provision and asked lawmakers to hold medical professionals to the same standards as others under the law.
Ashley Morgan, with the Texas Humane Legislation Network, addressed these concerns in her testimony before a Senate committee, noting that people and veterinarians can still be prosecuted, particularly for knowing or intentional harm.
She told lawmakers that she sees the need for Pancho's Law regularly in her work as an attorney, when families come to her for help.
'I more often than not have to tell these people, 'There is nothing I can do for you,'' Morgan testified.
KXAN reached out to more than 20 pet service business owners and managers in the Austin area to get a sense of how they feel about the potential change, if the governor signs HB 285 into law.
The responses were mixed: a few raised concerns. One said, in part, 'While I am vehemently against any form of animal cruelty, at face value the threat of criminal prosecution for operating a kennel or grooming salon is nothing short of outrageous and would be a huge deterrent for these businesses to stay open.' They described thousands of owners of these facilities 'who often work 60+ hours a week, some just scraping by, and most of whom rely on the income of their business to live.'
Several business operators told KXAN they supported the law and welcomed more regulation in the industry to protect pets. One said, in part, 'Hopefully this bill will help hold 'bad apples' in the pet care industry— as well as individuals — accountable for mistreatment and generally negligent behavior. Caring for animals is a big responsibility and should be treated as such.'
Some facility operators were not aware of the proposal and said they would look into it; others declined to comment.
HB 285 passed the House of Representatives with 125 vote in favor and 5 votes against. It passed out of the Senate unanimously. The bill has been sent to the Gov. Greg Abbott for consideration. If he signs it into law, it would go into effect this September.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
4 hours ago
- New York Times
His Party Reeling, a Democratic Senator Tries a Message of Hope in Iowa
Since outperforming his party in Arizona and winning a heavily contested Senate seat last year, Ruben Gallego has pushed national Democrats worried about their electoral futures to absorb his advice: Reach beyond the voters you're comfortable with and make inroads with the ones you've left behind. With Congress in its August recess and his calendar open, he has followed his own guidance, taking his message to Iowa, where members of his party have lost considerable ground. A Marine veteran who spent 10 years in the House before winning his Senate race, Mr. Gallego, a 45-year-old Democrat, outperformed his party's presidential ticket in Arizona last year among key groups that it struggled with, particularly Hispanic voters and men. To hear Mr. Gallego tell it, his trip was meant to spread the lessons of his victory with Iowa Democrats, who have watched their state shift from political battleground to Republican stronghold but are hoping to pick up seats in next year's midterm elections. As Mr. Gallego traveled over three days to party fund-raisers, the Iowa State Fair and a town hall, he frequently cited his own victory in Arizona, a state where the electoral outlook for Democrats recently looked similarly challenging. 'Don't be afraid, and go to where they are,' Mr. Gallego said on Saturday ahead of a town hall in Davenport, a city of about 100,000 in eastern Iowa. Then he stood in front of a favorable crowd of about 200 Democrats receptive to his attacks against the Trump administration and the bill to cut taxes and spending that Republicans passed this year. Mr. Gallego acknowledged at several points that in this setting he was preaching to the choir rather than converting swing voters. But at a time when Republicans have found town halls and other public appearances to be politically risky, his willingness to take his message on the road was an early indication of how Democrats, demoralized and deeply divided between progressives and centrists, are trying to energize their voters and beginning to test out messages that can work for them in the midterms and the 2028 presidential election. 'There's no governing coalition until we start winning here,' Mr. Gallego said in an interview. 'And we know how to do it, I know how to get the message to do it. So I'm here to, most of all, encourage the Democratic Party, because they feel a little down right now here.' Any trip by an out-of-state political figure to Iowa, which until 2020 was an early-nominating state for Democrats, raises the question of a presidential run. Mr. Gallego repeatedly, though coyly, dismissed such speculation. But his visit offered signs that he was exploring how his political message and playbook might translate elsewhere. With his party deeply divided about how to recover from the 2024 election, which put the White House and both chambers of Congress in Republican hands, Mr. Gallego has cited his success as a path forward. On issues, he pointed to his stance on border security, tougher than those of other Democrats. On tactics, he noted that his campaign had shied away from staid political events in favor of more creative ways to directly connect with working class voters. On Friday morning, Mr. Gallego met with workers on the early-morning shift at a pork processing plant in Marshalltown, a visit he referred to during other Iowa stops. There, the senator, who grew up poor and often talks about having taken a string of working-class jobs, toured the facility and spoke to workers in English and Spanish about their concerns, he said. 'A lot of the people that aren't voting for Democrats or who voted for Trump, they just feel we're not there,' Mr. Gallego said. And so, he said, 'What we did is we went to them.' And he spent hours at the Iowa State Fair, long a 445-acre field test for politicians to shake hands and introduce themselves to voters, pose for now-standard photo opportunities and explore the boundaries of their gastrointestinal fortitude. Wearing a Marines baseball cap, Mr. Gallego was guided by local Democrats and had little in the way of spontaneous interactions. Still, in front of the cameras, he took on some longstanding political traditions: eating a hard-boiled egg on a stick, posing for a photo near the famous Iowa butter cow and flipping pork burgers over a hot grill in sweltering 90-degree heat. Mr. Gallego's Iowa jaunt was not the only indication that he is trying to play a prominent role in national Democratic politics. In May, he spoke at an a town hall in a swing suburban county in Pennsylvania, a critical battleground state. Later this month, he will attend events in New Hampshire, traditionally another state where presidential hopefuls road-test their campaign strategies. But his visit to the Midwest offered a taste of the headwinds that he and other Democrats might face in the midterm elections and beyond as they continue to debate profound questions about their political future. Though the people Mr. Gallego spoke to at the state fair and his town hall shared his desire to rebuild the Democratic coalition, the divisions within the party were at times on clear display. While decrying intense partisanship, some at the town hall called for a return to comity, while others encouraged Democrats to engage in more aggressive tactics. Ahead of Mr. Gallego's visit, the Institute for Middle East Understanding, a Palestinian advocacy group, made a small ad purchase criticizing him for missing a vote in which a majority of Senate Democrats voted to block the sale of some U.S. weapons to Israel. The conflict in Gaza has ripped open a rift within the Democratic Party that often maps along a generational divide. At Mr. Gallego's town hall, Taelor Denton, 31, one of the few younger voters in attendance, questioned him about that vote, saying it was 'hard for me to feel any kind of confidence' that Democrats cared about younger voters while ignoring their views on Gaza. Mr. Gallego, whose third child is 7 weeks old, said he missed the vote to be on paternity leave. But he said his position on the issue was still evolving, particularly in light of Israel's recent decision to expand its military campaign to take control of Gaza City. Afterward, Ms. Denton expressed disappointment, saying Mr. Gallego's answer proved that Democrats had considerable work to do to win back younger voters. 'We've just been severely disillusioned by the Democratic Party as a whole,' she said. 'I really have lost so much faith in it.' Though immigration has become a signature area in which Mr. Gallego has differentiated himself from his fellow Democrats, the issue scarcely came up at his town hall, which focused more on Republicans' cuts to Medicaid and other social safety-net programs. And the Iowa Democratic Party's materials at the State Fair suggested a willingness to retreat to safer ground, with signs focused on abortion, education and agriculture. Still, Mr. Gallego insisted his party could not ignore the issue. 'We should not only make sure you talk about it, you should talk about it like in an affirmative manner,' he said. As white, rural voters have shifted to Republicans in the Trump era, Democrats have been shut out of the Iowa governor's mansion since 2010, last won a Senate seat in the state in 2008 and lost all four House seats in the last two elections. But the decision by the national Democratic Party to demote the Iowa caucuses from their first-in-line position has fueled Republican arguments that their opponents don't value voters in the state. After the 2020 caucuses, which were plagued by organizational and technical issues on the part of Democrats, Mr. Gallego sent a profane social media post insulting Iowa and backing a calendar change. As he traveled across the fairgrounds on Friday, he was repeatedly heckled over that position by a small group aligned with Turning Point Action, an influential conservative group. 'Out of touch Democrat Ruben Gallego isn't here to fight for Iowans, he's fighting for his own political ambitions,' Emily Tuttle, a spokeswoman for the National Republican Congressional Committee, said in a statement. 'From mocking Iowa values to pushing policies that would destroy Iowa's economy, it's clear he doesn't understand or care about what matters to Iowans.' Mr. Gallego told reporters he regretted his comments. 'I'm a mature adult now,' he said. 'And what I said was, you know, dumb of me.' Mr. Gallego was not the first national politician to arrive this year. The Biden administration's transportation secretary, Pete Buttigieg, who won the Iowa caucuses among Democrats in 2020, swung by the state in May. Several Republicans have also taken part in political events in the state recently, including Senators Ted Cruz of Texas, Rick Scott of Florida and Rand Paul of Kentucky, and Governors Glenn Younkin of Virginia and Sarah Huckabee Sanders of Arkansas.
Fox News
4 hours ago
- Fox News
Summertime and the living is uneasy on Capitol Hill
Senate Republicans faced a choice recently: Remain in session and confirm more of President Trump's nominees, or finally abandon Washington for the vaunted August recess. Senators hung around – a little while – knocking out some of the President's nominees for administration positions. But not all. That drew the ire of some conservatives, Trump loyalists and President Donald Trump himself. Trump seethed at Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., for requiring the Senate to run lengthy parliamentary traps and incinerate valuable floor time to confirm even non-controversial nominees. The President finally unloaded on the New York Democrat in a digital coup de grace, telling him to "GO TO HELL!" It's notable that Trump has not yet met with Schumer or House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., during his second term. But then again, this is a two-way street. And Democrats remember multiple tumultuous meetings with Mr. Trump during the last time he was in office. It culminated in verbal grappling between the President and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif, and ended with Democrats abandoning the meeting after only a few moments. So, it's far from certain any such meeting would yield anything remotely productive. But back to the "August recess." First, it's important to establish that members of the House and Senate are not on "summer vacation." Sure, there are always some breaks to visit with family and friends. Lawmakers are people, too. But truly, this is not a "break." Lawmakers are always "on." Not everything they do is centered around Washington. Any congressman or senator worth their salt will tell you that spending time back in their home states or districts is just as important – if not more so – than what goes down on Capitol Hill. Meeting with constituents. Visiting businesses. Conducting town hall meetings. Stopping by local coffee bars. Breaking bread at diners. Chatting up the local press corps. Members also use this longer respite for political travel and fact-finding missions overseas. These "CODELS" – short for "Congressional Delegation" – are a critical function for lawmakers to build bridges with foreign leaders and make their marks on how the U.S. approaches the rest of the globe. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and former House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., have recently led groups on trips to Israel. At least one other major trip is booked for later this month. So, the "August recess" is not inherently a "bad" thing. It's an essential part of the job and probably one of the biggest misnomers in American politics. Still, many Americans simply dismiss August as a "vacation" for House members and senators, and it is a challenging optic for Congress. Which brings us back to the tension between staying in session to get "something" done and returning home. It's clear the Senate could have stayed in session to plow through more of President Trump's nominees. Schumer and other Democrats simply weren't going to relent and allow Republicans to confirm a slate of nominees "en bloc." That's where the Senate greenlights a large slate of nominees all at once and approves them either by unanimous consent or via voice vote. The Senate confirms the nominees all at once. The House certainly could have stayed in session to hammer out a few spending bills ahead of the deadline to fund the government by October 1. But here's a stark reality – especially for the Senate: Lawmakers and staff desperately needed a break. Period. Full stop. Since May, the Senate in particular has conducted multiple overnight, round-the-clock and weekend sessions. Not just a few. The Senate voted deep into the night or overnight on the Big, Beautiful Bill. Then the Senate was back for late-night sessions confirming nominees. Yes. This is the people's business. But the floor staff and support teams were exhausted. Senate leaders were mindful of that. And that's to say nothing of the lawmakers themselves. It's anecdotal, but lawmakers probably needed a break from one another, too. That makes them happier – and probably more productive when they return to Washington. But this still doesn't solve the political dilemma facing Republican senators with a substantial core of their party demanding they remain moored in Washington to grind out nominees. And it may not satisfy President Trump, either. There's lots of Senate talk now about "changing the rules" to accelerate the confirmation of nominees. One thing is for sure: the Senate won't change the "rules" to expedite the confirmation process. The Senate boasts 44 standing rules. It takes 67 votes to break a filibuster on an actual rules change. But what Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., could do is back the Senate into a special parliamentary posture where he can initiate a new "precedent" to confirm different types of nominees. That's a maneuver that late Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., executed to confirm some of former President Obama's nominees. The same with former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., to confirm Supreme Court nominees. "New precedents" in the Senate require some complicated parliamentary wrangling. But only a simple majority is necessary to make good on this gambit for nominees. So, it's easier and much more plausible than "changing the rules." To the lay person, a new "precedent" doesn't sound important. But there's a reason why the Senate only has 44 standing rules and a voluminous book of precedents. You can accomplish a lot in the Senate if you're able to concoct a new precedent. And note that it's not just Republicans who want to change the way the Senate does things for some lower-tier, non-controversial nominees. Some Senate Democrats have expressed interest in changes, too. There are only so many minutes and so many hours. Time is just as valuable to Democrats as it is to Republicans. Everyone on Capitol Hill knows that more long nights and overnight sessions await lawmakers in September and the fall as the Senate attempts to confirm additional nominees. That's to say nothing of avoiding a government shutdown in October. This is why Senate Republicans elected to stick around for a bit recently – and then call it a day. Or a month. After all, there is only so much time available in August.
The Hill
6 hours ago
- The Hill
Freedom will keep the city lights shining
The other side of the pond dropped into a brief but sobering relapse into the dark ages. Spain and Portugal suffered a massive electricity shortage in April, plunging them into darkness. It is no coincidence that this occurred only days after the country announced that so-called renewable energy (solar, wind, hydro) had supplied all the country's electricity for an entire day. Before the total blackout, one of Spain's utility companies also boasted that solar and wind supplied 40 percent of the nation's electricity last year. The government's obsession with phasing out fossil fuels in favor of renewables is squarely to blame. We can only avoid Europe's energy fumble by allowing property owners and businesses the freedom to exercise their ingenuity to tap our vast natural resources, fossil fuels included, to keep the lights on. If the market demands fossil fuels to meet our energy needs, we should give businesses the freedom to meet that demand. As we develop, our energy needs will only increase. This means we cannot afford to keep energy resources locked in the ground. As Alex Epstein explains in ' Fossil Future, ' the physics of fossil fuels are especially cost-effective because they have high 'energy density' compared to renewables. Higher productivity ultimately leads to increased income, life expectancy, and higher population growth. In short, freedom to develop resources brings prosperity. Our recent history underscores the importance of giving people the freedom to unleash our natural resources. In the early 2000s, California suffered recurring power blackouts partly because it failed to build enough new power plants. In August 2020, California experienced mass blackouts, this time due to insufficient fossil fuel sources when renewable energy sources went offline. Our energy needs will only grow as we fuel the AI technology revolution, which requires massive amounts of electricity. But despite our growing energy needs, calls for stricter regulations on natural resource development and use have continued to increase. In 2009, the U.S. House passed a cap-and-trade carbon emissions bill that would have limited companies' carbon emissions. (The Senate never voted on the bill.) New York has passed a ban on fossil fuel cooling and heating systems in new buildings, effective 2029. And California seeks to ban the sale of gas-powered vehicles starting in 2035. And it's not just fossil fuels the government is going after; it's virtually all natural resource development. Take the federal government's 2012 decision to restrict timber harvesting in parts of Louisiana, purportedly to protect a frog that had not lived in the area for 50 years. Or consider the federal government's 2021 decision to abruptly limit the amount and types of trees in Alaska that timber companies can harvest after those companies had already invested significant time and money into developing their timber operations. The prescription to fix energy shortages is more freedom to develop natural resources, not more restrictions. Property rights create the necessary incentives for developers to invest in energy projects by providing them with certainty that the government won't shut down their project after they have spent time and money on it. For example, the Biden administration halted the Keystone Pipeline Project by denying the necessary permits. Although President Trump announced that he would reverse the decision and make obtaining permits 'easy,' the private developers who were once interested in the project have reportedly ' moved on.' President Ronald Reagan once called America a ' shining city on a hill.' We are a 'beacon,' he said, 'for all the pilgrims from all the lost places who are hurtling through the darkness, toward home.' The shining light we have long offered the world is freedom, including the freedom to use our bounteous natural resources. We will keep the city light shining as we embrace that freedom, even if the rest of the world goes dark.
