Latest news with #ITAMForum
Techday NZ
a day ago
- Business
- Techday NZ
Oracle Java audits push firms to open-source, cost savings sought
A new global survey of 500 IT asset management (ITAM) and software asset management (SAM) professionals highlights the increasing financial burden of software licence non-compliance, with 27% of enterprises spending more than USD $500,000 annually to resolve related issues. The survey, conducted jointly by Azul and the ITAM Forum, reveals that Oracle Java remains a significant concern, as 73% of respondents reported undergoing an Oracle Java audit within the past three years. Nearly eight in ten organisations stated they have migrated, or intend to migrate, to open-source Java alternatives to manage risk and cost more effectively. Licence management complexities The research points to a shifting landscape shaped by hybrid cloud architectures and a growing inventory of business applications. These changes have resulted in more complex vendor terms, complicating compliance and visibility across teams. The report notes that many organisations face difficulties in tracking software usage consistently, whether in on-premises environments or across cloud platforms, which increases vulnerability during vendor audits and exposes organisations to financial penalties. The scope and responsibilities of ITAM and SAM functions have sharpened in response. Once viewed as straightforward asset tracking roles, these functions are now regarded as critical for safeguarding budgets, mitigating audit risks, and guiding key technology decisions within enterprises. Common compliance challenges Compliance and the management of excessive licensing were identified as the leading challenges by 37% of survey participants. In addition to the substantial financial outlay for resolving licence issues - which encompass audits, unexpected licence purchases, and penalties - participants cited complex software configurations as a major hurdle, with 25% reporting difficulties in tracking application usage across increasingly intricate systems. The survey found that 29% of respondents struggle to manage software usage information, especially when tracking across different teams or between on-premises and cloud infrastructures. Additional compliance and management challenges included aligning teams such as IT, software development, legal, and procurement (27%), resource constraints in handling compliance (24%), higher prices related to renewals and licences (24%), and coping with evolving vendor rules (23%). Self-managed audits and persistent difficulties The majority of organisations (74%) reported handling licence discovery and software audits primarily or entirely with internal teams. Despite this self-reliance, many face challenges in maintaining accurate records (26%), comprehending licensing terms (23%), and delivering precise compliance metrics (23%). The survey indicates that 81% of organisations conduct licence audits at least twice a year, with 25% doing so continuously. About a quarter of organisations experience regular financial penalties and legal actions, underscoring the operational and budgetary disruptions caused by audits. More than 30% of respondents noted that audits have led to significant operational disruptions, including unplanned budget impacts, a shift in vendor relationships, and stalled projects. Migration from Oracle Java Oracle Java licensing and audit pressures were a source of concern for 96% of those surveyed, with issues stemming primarily from Oracle's employee-based pricing model. Many companies are investing in new tracking tools, monitoring systems, and internal audit procedures to ensure they comply with licensing requirements or avoid needing Oracle licences altogether. In response, 79% of organisations have migrated, are migrating, or plan to migrate to open-source Java alternatives. Security and reliability were the main factors in this decision for 51% of those considering migration, while cost reduction and simpler compliance were cited by 42% and 40% respectively. Among organisations that had already completed migration, 57% highlighted security and reliability as their chief reasons. There was also a strong perception of financial benefit: 66% of respondents estimated potential savings of at least 40% compared to Oracle Java licensing costs. Only 1% believed that migration would not yield savings. Market dynamics and sector growth These findings emerge against a backdrop of sector growth, with the ITAM market expanding from USD $1.15 billion in 2019 to USD $1.49 billion in 2023. The SAM market subset is expected to grow at a 16% compound annual growth rate through to 2029, reflecting increased spending on software - now accounting for roughly 29% of total IT budgets - as well as the greater intricacy of cloud-based and virtualised licensing models and raised regulatory compliance requirements. "The results highlight a fundamental mismatch between the complexity of modern software licensing and the resources organizations rely on to effectively manage software compliance. ITAM and SAM professionals are becoming increasingly vital as organizations increasingly recognize that poor license management can result in significant financial penalties and operational disruptions. They must have the resources and executive buy-in to ensure compliance and successful license management," said Martin Thompson, founder of the ITAM Forum. "The data reveals a concerning trend where the increasing complexity of vendor licensing and pricing has turned routine upkeep into recurring six-figure compliance exercises. When 73% of enterprises have been audited and one in four now spends more than $500,000 a year cleaning up license issues, the cost of merely staying compliant with software licensing and pricing is unsustainable. Specifically, when it comes to the uncertainty of Oracle's ever-shifting Java licensing terms, organizations shouldn't have to burn ITAM resources, interrupt projects, or absorb surprise penalties just to run their applications. Moving to open-source alternatives lets them break free from the audit treadmill, regain budget and focus on delivering value," said Scott Sellers, co-founder and CEO at Azul.
Techday NZ
16-07-2025
- Business
- Techday NZ
Open-source Java migrations rise as audits cost firms USD $500,000+
New research from Azul and the ITAM Forum has revealed that 27% of enterprises spend more than USD $500,000 annually addressing software licence non-compliance, as organisations face increased audits and consider open-source solutions to mitigate risks and costs. The joint global survey, which gathered responses from 500 IT asset management (ITAM) and software asset management (SAM) professionals across six continents, highlighted that 73% of enterprises have experienced an Oracle Java audit in the last three years. Nearly 80% have either migrated or plan to migrate to open-source Java alternatives, underscoring shifting priorities in software asset management. Compliance challenges A significant portion of survey participants, 37%, identified compliance and the management of excessive licensing as their chief challenge. Complex software architectures, particularly in hybrid cloud environments, have expanded the task of maintaining compliance and tracking usage. Twenty-five percent of respondents cited complex configurations as a barrier to effective tracking of application deployment and usage both on-premises and in the cloud. Other reported difficulties include aligning different organisational teams - such as IT, software development, legal, and procurement (27%) - as well as grappling with resource constraints (24%), rising prices for renewals and maintenance (24%), and uncertainty regarding evolving licensing rules or changes in vendor policy (23%). Audit processes and disruption Despite these challenges, 74% of respondents stated their organisations manage licence discovery and software audits primarily in-house. This self-reliant approach introduces its own set of difficulties, including maintaining accurate records of software use (26%), decoding complex licensing terms (23%), and generating accurate licensing compliance metrics (23%). Auditing is now a regular feature for many, with 81% of organisations conducting licensing audits at least twice yearly, and 25% reporting continuous auditing practices. A quarter of participants said their organisation faces frequent financial penalties and legal actions as a consequence of software licensing non-compliance. Audits carry operational and financial consequences, with more than 30% of survey participants noting unexpected disruptions, such as organisational disturbances, unforeseen budget impacts, decisions to change vendors, and delayed projects. Oracle Java pressures Licensing complexity is particularly pronounced with Oracle Java, according to the survey. Ninety-six percent of respondents expressed concern over Oracle's pricing and licensing policies, especially regarding the employer-based pricing model. The study noted a trend of organisations investing in new monitoring solutions and audit processes to ensure compliance and avoid Oracle licensing costs. Faced with these pressures, 79% of organisations have already switched from Oracle Java, are migrating, or intend to migrate to open-source Java alternatives. For those considering migration, the main motivations are security and reliability (51%), followed by cost reduction (42%) and simpler compliance (40%). Of those who have completed migration, 57% identified security and reliability as their leading concern. Participants anticipate notable cost savings by moving to open-source Java, with 66% estimating they could save at least 40% compared to Oracle Java licence costs. Only 1% expected not to see any financial benefit from such a transition. "The results highlight a fundamental mismatch between the complexity of modern software licensing and the resources organizations rely on to effectively manage software compliance," said Martin Thompson, founder of the ITAM Forum. "ITAM and SAM professionals are becoming increasingly vital as organizations increasingly recognize that poor license management can result in significant financial penalties and operational disruptions. They must have the resources and executive buy-in to ensure compliance and successful license management." "The data reveals a concerning trend where the increasing complexity of vendor licensing and pricing has turned routine upkeep into recurring six-figure compliance exercises. When 73% of enterprises have been audited and one in four now spends more than $500,000 a year cleaning up license issues, the cost of merely staying compliant with software licensing and pricing is unsustainable," said Scott Sellers, co-founder and CEO at Azul. "Specifically, when it comes to the uncertainty of Oracle's ever-shifting Java licensing terms, organizations shouldn't have to burn ITAM resources, interrupt projects, or absorb surprise penalties just to run their applications. Moving to open-source alternatives lets them break free from the audit treadmill, regain budget and focus on delivering value." Market growth The global ITAM market has experienced significant growth, rising from USD $1.15 billion in 2019 to USD $1.49 billion in 2023, representing a 6.9% compound annual growth rate. The SAM market subset is forecast to grow at 16% annually through 2029. Factors behind this expansion include the mounting proportion of IT budgets spent on software - averaging 29% - and increasingly complex licensing models due to cloud and virtualisation, alongside heightened regulatory compliance demands. The survey demonstrates that ITAM and SAM professionals are navigating an environment of escalating complexity and exposure, as the scope of asset management shifts from simple inventory control to a vital component of risk mitigation, cost control, and strategic technology decision-making.
Yahoo
16-07-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
New Azul and ITAM Forum Survey Reveals 1 in 4 Organizations Spend More Than $500,000 Annually Resolving Software License Non-Compliance
73% of enterprises have experienced an Oracle Java audit within the last three years and almost 8 in 10 organizations have migrated, or plan to migrate, to open-source Java alternatives SINGAPORE, July 16, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Azul, the only company 100% focused on Java, and the ITAM Forum, a global not-for- profit membership association for IT Asset Management (ITAM) professionals, today published the results of a joint global survey of 500 ITAM and software asset management (SAM) professionals. The results show just how costly software license missteps have become: 27% of enterprises now spend more than $500,000 each year fixing software-license non-compliance and Oracle Java continues to escalate as a top concern, with 73% having undergone an Oracle Java audit within the past three years and nearly eight in 10 saying they have migrated, or intend to migrate, to open-source Java alternatives to rein in risk and cost. Behind those numbers lies a growing challenge. Hybrid cloud architectures and an increasing inventory of applications have multiplied vendor terms, making it harder than ever to maintain compliance and visibility across teams. The survey confirms organizations struggle to track usage consistently, both on-premises and in the cloud, raising the stakes for audits and exposing costly gaps. In this environment, the scope and importance of ITAM and SAM functions, as well as the tools and processes they depend on, have shifted from simple asset tracking to a business-critical discipline that safeguards budgets, mitigates audit risk and guides strategic technology decisions. Organizations Struggle to Manage Software Licensing Compliance More than a third of survey participants say compliance, including the management of excessive licensing, is the top issue facing their organization (37%). In addition to the dollars spent each year resolving licensing issues – including audits, additional licenses and penalties – survey participants report that complex software configurations make tracking application usage more difficult (25%). Compliance requires knowledge of where the software is installed, what is running, and where the information is managed. ITAM/SAM professionals report that their organizations struggle to manage this information, especially when tracking software usage across teams or between on-premises and cloud platforms (29%). Additional challenges relating to managing software licensing and compliance include: Difficulty in aligning teams, including IT, software development, legal, and procurement (27%). Resource constraints to effectively manage license compliance (24%). Escalating prices, including renewals, additional licenses, maintenance, etc. (24%). Ensuring compliance with evolving licensing rules or vendor policy updates (23%). Most Organizations Handle Audits Internally, Yet Struggle with Accuracy, Resources and Repeated Disruptions ITAM/SAM professionals cite challenges with coordination, collaboration and organization in their efforts to track software inventory, yet 74% of survey participants say their organization manages license discovery and software audits primarily or entirely in-house. This self-reliant approach comes with difficulties, as organizations struggle to maintain accurate software usage records (26%), understand complex licensing terms and conditions (23%), and provide accurate licensing compliance metrics (23%). In addition, 81% of organizations perform licensing audits at least twice a year, with 25% conducting audits continuously. About a quarter report frequent financial penalties and legal actions against them. Survey participants also cite that software audits are highly disruptive, both operationally and financially. More than 30% report unanticipated results such as: Disruption of operations across the entire organization. Unexpected budget impacts. Decision to change vendors. Stalled projects. Oracle Java Audit Pressures Drive Mass Migration The survey reveals acute Oracle Java licensing challenges – in addition to the high number of respondents who have experienced Oracle Java audits, 96% expressed concern about Oracle's pricing and licensing policies. Much of this stems from Oracle's employee-based pricing model for Java, which is forcing companies that do not intend to pay Oracle to invest in new monitoring systems, tracking tools and internal audit processes to ensure they have eliminated all Java instances that require an Oracle license. In response to concerns about Oracle's pricing and licensing policies, 79% of organizations have already migrated from Oracle Java, are actively doing so, or are planning to migrate to open-source alternatives. Those considering migration cited security and reliability as the primary drivers (51%), followed by cost reduction (42%) and simpler compliance (40%). Among organizations that have already completed migrations, security played an even larger role, with 57% citing security and reliability as their primary motivation. Cost savings from open-source Java alternatives are substantial, with 66% of survey participants estimating they could save at least 40% compared to Oracle Java licensing costs. Only 1% expect they would not realize any savings from making the switch. Growing Market Reflects Escalating Challenges The findings come as the global ITAM market has grown from approximately $1.15 billion in 2019 to $1.49 billion in 2023[1], representing a 6.9% compound annual growth rate. The SAM market subset is expected to grow at an even faster 16% compound annual growth rate through 2029[2], reflecting the complexity and importance of software asset management. Contributing factors include rising software expenditures (now accounting for, on average, 29% of IT budgets), complex licensing models driven by cloud computing and virtualization, and increasing regulatory compliance requirements. "The results highlight a fundamental mismatch between the complexity of modern software licensing and the resources organizations rely on to effectively manage software compliance," said Martin Thompson, founder of the ITAM Forum. "ITAM and SAM professionals are becoming increasingly vital as organizations increasingly recognize that poor license management can result in significant financial penalties and operational disruptions. They must have the resources and executive buy-in to ensure compliance and successful license management." "The data reveals a concerning trend where the increasing complexity of vendor licensing and pricing has turned routine upkeep into recurring six-figure compliance exercises. When 73% of enterprises have been audited and one in four now spends more than $500,000 a year cleaning up license issues, the cost of merely staying compliant with software licensing and pricing is unsustainable," said Scott Sellers, co-founder and CEO at Azul. "Specifically, when it comes to the uncertainty of Oracle's ever-shifting Java licensing terms, organizations shouldn't have to burn ITAM resources, interrupt projects, or absorb surprise penalties just to run their applications. Moving to open-source alternatives lets them break free from the audit treadmill, regain budget and focus on delivering value." About the Survey and Report Dimensional Research, a leading market research firm, administered the electronic survey from February 11 – March 3, 2025. ITAM Forum and Azul authored the report based on the survey results. The report data was compiled from a total of 500 IT Asset Management and Software Asset Management professionals across six continents who use Java. All respondents had direct software asset management responsibilities and were offered token compensation for their participation. To access the full ITAM/SAM Survey & Report, visit About The ITAM Forum The ITAM Forum is a global trade body for the advancement of the IT Asset Management industry. We are a not-for-profit membership organization, led by ITAM professionals for ITAM professionals. The ITAM Forum has two primary objectives: 1. To elevate the position of ITAM by sharing knowledge and best practices that focus on business value and aid to grow the profession. 2. To be the caretaker of the ISO 19770-1 certification scheme we brought to market in February 2023. Join us: About Azul Headquartered in Sunnyvale, California, Azul provides the Java platform for the modern cloud enterprise. Azul is the only company 100% focused on Java. Millions of Java developers, hundreds of millions of devices and the world's most highly regarded businesses trust Azul to power their applications with exceptional capabilities, performance, security, value, and success. Azul customers include 36% of the Fortune 100, 50% of Forbes top 10 World's Most Valuable Brands, 10 of the world's top 10 banks, and leading brands like Avaya, Bazaarvoice, BMW, Deutsche Telekom, LG, Mastercard, Mizuho, Priceline, Salesforce, Software AG and Workday. Learn more at and follow us @azulsystems. [1] Zion Market Research [2] Markets and Markets View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Azul Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
15-07-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
New Azul and ITAM Forum Survey Reveals 1 in 4 Organizations Spend More Than $500,000 Annually Resolving Software License Non-Compliance
73% of enterprises have experienced an Oracle Java audit within the last three years and almost 8 in 10 organizations have migrated, or plan to migrate, to open-source Java alternatives SUNNYVALE, Calif. & LONDON, July 15, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Azul, the only company 100% focused on Java, and the ITAM Forum, a global not-for-profit membership association for IT Asset Management (ITAM) professionals, today published the results of a joint global survey of 500 ITAM and software asset management (SAM) professionals. The results show just how costly software license missteps have become: 27% of enterprises now spend more than $500,000 each year fixing software-license non-compliance and Oracle Java continues to escalate as a top concern, with 73% having undergone an Oracle Java audit within the past three years and nearly eight in 10 saying they have migrated, or intend to migrate, to open-source Java alternatives to rein in risk and cost. Behind those numbers lies a growing challenge. Hybrid cloud architectures and an increasing inventory of applications have multiplied vendor terms, making it harder than ever to maintain compliance and visibility across teams. The survey confirms organizations struggle to track usage consistently, both on-premises and in the cloud, raising the stakes for audits and exposing costly gaps. In this environment, the scope and importance of ITAM and SAM functions, as well as the tools and processes they depend on, have shifted from simple asset tracking to a business-critical discipline that safeguards budgets, mitigates audit risk and guides strategic technology decisions. Organizations Struggle to Manage Software Licensing Compliance More than a third of survey participants say compliance, including the management of excessive licensing, is the top issue facing their organization (37%). In addition to the dollars spent each year resolving licensing issues – including audits, additional licenses and penalties – survey participants report that complex software configurations make tracking application usage more difficult (25%). Compliance requires knowledge of where the software is installed, what is running, and where the information is managed. ITAM/SAM professionals report that their organizations struggle to manage this information, especially when tracking software usage across teams or between on-premises and cloud platforms (29%). Additional challenges relating to managing software licensing and compliance include: Difficulty in aligning teams, including IT, software development, legal, and procurement (27%). Resource constraints to effectively manage license compliance (24%). Escalating prices, including renewals, additional licenses, maintenance, etc. (24%). Ensuring compliance with evolving licensing rules or vendor policy updates (23%). Most Organizations Handle Audits Internally, Yet Struggle with Accuracy, Resources and Repeated Disruptions ITAM/SAM professionals cite challenges with coordination, collaboration and organization in their efforts to track software inventory, yet 74% of survey participants say their organization manages license discovery and software audits primarily or entirely in-house. This self-reliant approach comes with difficulties, as organizations struggle to maintain accurate software usage records (26%), understand complex licensing terms and conditions (23%), and provide accurate licensing compliance metrics (23%). In addition, 81% of organizations perform licensing audits at least twice a year, with 25% conducting audits continuously. About a quarter report frequent financial penalties and legal actions against them. Survey participants also cite that software audits are highly disruptive, both operationally and financially. More than 30% report unanticipated results such as: Disruption of operations across the entire organization. Unexpected budget impacts. Decision to change vendors. Stalled projects. Oracle Java Audit Pressures Drive Mass Migration The survey reveals acute Oracle Java licensing challenges – in addition to the high number of respondents who have experienced Oracle Java audits, 96% expressed concern about Oracle's pricing and licensing policies. Much of this stems from Oracle's employee-based pricing model for Java, which is forcing companies that do not intend to pay Oracle to invest in new monitoring systems, tracking tools and internal audit processes to ensure they have eliminated all Java instances that require an Oracle license. In response to concerns about Oracle's pricing and licensing policies, 79% of organizations have already migrated from Oracle Java, are actively doing so, or are planning to migrate to open-source alternatives. Those considering migration cited security and reliability as the primary drivers (51%), followed by cost reduction (42%) and simpler compliance (40%). Among organizations that have already completed migrations, security played an even larger role, with 57% citing security and reliability as their primary motivation. Cost savings from open-source Java alternatives are substantial, with 66% of survey participants estimating they could save at least 40% compared to Oracle Java licensing costs. Only 1% expect they would not realize any savings from making the switch. Growing Market Reflects Escalating Challenges The findings come as the global ITAM market has grown from approximately $1.15 billion in 2019 to $1.49 billion in 20231, representing a 6.9% compound annual growth rate. The SAM market subset is expected to grow at an even faster 16% compound annual growth rate through 20292, reflecting the complexity and importance of software asset management. Contributing factors include rising software expenditures (now accounting for, on average, 29% of IT budgets), complex licensing models driven by cloud computing and virtualization, and increasing regulatory compliance requirements. "The results highlight a fundamental mismatch between the complexity of modern software licensing and the resources organizations rely on to effectively manage software compliance," said Martin Thompson, founder of the ITAM Forum. "ITAM and SAM professionals are becoming increasingly vital as organizations increasingly recognize that poor license management can result in significant financial penalties and operational disruptions. They must have the resources and executive buy-in to ensure compliance and successful license management." "The data reveals a concerning trend where the increasing complexity of vendor licensing and pricing has turned routine upkeep into recurring six-figure compliance exercises. When 73% of enterprises have been audited and one in four now spends more than $500,000 a year cleaning up license issues, the cost of merely staying compliant with software licensing and pricing is unsustainable," said Scott Sellers, co-founder and CEO at Azul. "Specifically, when it comes to the uncertainty of Oracle's ever-shifting Java licensing terms, organizations shouldn't have to burn ITAM resources, interrupt projects, or absorb surprise penalties just to run their applications. Moving to open-source alternatives lets them break free from the audit treadmill, regain budget and focus on delivering value." About the Survey and Report Dimensional Research, a leading market research firm, administered the electronic survey from February 11 – March 3, 2025. ITAM Forum and Azul authored the report based on the survey results. The report data was compiled from a total of 500 IT Asset Management and Software Asset Management professionals across six continents who use Java. All respondents had direct software asset management responsibilities and were offered token compensation for their participation. To access the full ITAM/SAM Survey & Report, visit About The ITAM Forum The ITAM Forum is a global trade body for the advancement of the IT Asset Management industry. We are a not-for-profit membership organization, led by ITAM professionals for ITAM professionals. The ITAM Forum has two primary objectives: 1. To elevate the position of ITAM by sharing knowledge and best practices that focus on business value and aid to grow the profession. 2. To be the caretaker of the ISO 19770-1 certification scheme we brought to market in February 2023. Join us: About Azul Headquartered in Sunnyvale, California, Azul provides the Java platform for the modern cloud enterprise. Azul is the only company 100% focused on Java. Millions of Java developers, hundreds of millions of devices and the world's most highly regarded businesses trust Azul to power their applications with exceptional capabilities, performance, security, value, and success. Azul customers include 36% of the Fortune 100, 50% of Forbes top 10 World's Most Valuable Brands, 10 of the world's top 10 banks, and leading brands like Avaya, Bazaarvoice, BMW, Deutsche Telekom, LG, Mastercard, Mizuho, Priceline, Salesforce, Software AG and Workday. Learn more at and follow us @azulsystems. 1 Zion Market Research 2 Markets and Markets View source version on Contacts Media Contact for Azul: TrebleJim Cameronazul@
