Latest news with #IlanGur
Forbes
21-06-2025
- Business
- Forbes
Silicon Valley's Leadership Lessons
Leadership lessons from Silicon Valley for future readiness Mature organizations lose their vitality. Complex organizations lose their responsiveness. Successful incumbent market leaders, because they are typically both mature and complex, lose their charm, and become endangered. Not surprisingly, there has long been a search for ways to restore vigor and zest to such organizations. Inevitably, when such discussions arise, the success of Silicon Valley is cited as an alternative example of both energy and imagination; of being able to move fast and change things in a big way. The recent DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) initiative is one such effort. The advertised idea was to learn from the 'new economy,' and apply those lessons learned to large, bureaucratic, government agencies. That this does not appear to have happened is probably due more to chaotic execution and the mischief of ideologues than to a failure in the promise of Silicon Valley as an organizing inspiration for the rest of us. Not entirely coincidentally, the UK's Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) is another example. Inspired, in part, by the American Defense Advanced Projects Research Agency (DARPA), which, established in 1958 in response to the Soviet Union's Sputnik, has continually played an influential role in Silicon Valley successes, ARIA's American born Ilan Gur sees his organization as a means of supporting UK innovation, which he refers to as a 'tightly wound spring that's ready to release'. What is it, then, about Silicon Valley that leads it to be seen as a source of managerial lessons for organizational success, and what might those lessons be? To answer these questions, I took the opportunity to interview an old friend and IMD colleague, Jim Pulcrano, engineer, entrepreneur, academic, and who for over 25 years has been an observer of Silicon Valley's inner workings, leading more than 80 executive explorations of the Valley in search of such lessons. What follows is a sense of what leadership lessons Silicon Valley might offer those of us who work in mature, old-economy, industries, and especially those of us associated with successful, incumbent, market-leaders, in such industries: Thinking Differently Jim Pulcrano: I think that the Silicon Valley lessons all begin with one word: '"urgency." Mature firms often become comfortable—they've grown strong, built moats, have big balance sheets. But that comfort is a trap. Silicon Valley thrives on discomfort. Everyone there is asking, 'What's next?' and 'How fast can I disrupt myself before someone else does?' Bill Fischer: And how does that urgency manifest itself? Pulcrano: Through relentless questioning. The best innovators don't start with answers—they start with better questions. What if we made a 10X improvement, not 10%? What if we killed our core product before someone else did? What if our future doesn't look like our past? Fischer: This is a dramatically different way of thinking than we typically see in more traditional organizations. Pulcrano: Revitalization requires daring and courage. Mature companies often cling to what worked in the past; the leaders usually built their legacies on products and systems that have outlived their utility and should be disrupted. In contrast, Silicon Valley is all about 'dream big or stay home.' It teaches us that innovation isn't about fine-tuning yesterday's model—it's about asking bold, even uncomfortable, questions. That culture of relentless curiosity that we hear about so often; it's gold. Fischer: So, it's about more than simply having a flashy R&D team? Pulcrano: Exactly. You need a network that nourishes innovation—not just exploits it. One important lesson is that in the Valley geographic proximity makes a difference. Everything is tightly packed together: venture capital, prototyping labs, universities, and legal experts. Ideas bounce around fast. That 'proximity stew' keeps innovation alive. For incumbents, the question becomes: how do we recreate that bubbling ecosystem internally? In a mature company, you've got to mimic that intensity. Create idea collisions. Flatten silos. Interest engineers in talking to marketers, finance to R&D. In Silicon Valley, the network is the superpower. People move freely—from startup to corporate, from VC to academia, then back. The real learning happens in the spaces between. Incumbents need to stop thinking in organizational charts and start thinking in ecosystems. Who do your innovators know outside your organization? What cross-pollination is happening? Who is the go-to person on X? Are you one of them? Leadership lessons Fischer: how different is the practice of leadership in such organizations? Pulcrano: First, leaders must normalize failure. In the Valley, failing fast and moving on is a badge of honor. Max Levchin, Elon Musk's Paypal cofounder, struggled with his first four startups struggled (and mostly failed). The fifth was PayPal. Most legacy firms? They'd have fired him after the second flop. Fischer: Failure becomes data? Pulcrano: Exactly. In the Valley, failure isn't the opposite of success—it's part of the process. That's a cultural shift. Leaders must model that by sharing their own missteps. Celebrate intelligent risk-taking, not just polished outcomes. Nobody wants to fail, it's f**king awful, but if you're trying to do something new, whether it be the technology, the business model or some combination, failure is likely, so learn from it. Second, diverse thinking isn't a bonus—it's a baseline. The best decisions in VC firms often come after heated debates. The VC firm Greylock Partners has even studied this—their biggest wins were investments that triggered the fiercest internal arguments. So if your executive team always agrees, you're in trouble. Fischer: That's quite a departure from many boardrooms; it reminds me of the adage: 'polite teams get polite results.' Pulcrano: It is. And that leads to another principle: permissionless innovation. In the Valley, junior people prototype without asking for five layers of approval. Those prototypes could be products or sales models. Leaders should ask themselves: "Am I enabling action, or am I an obstacle?" Fischer: What does that look like in practice? Pulcrano: One example is Google X. When a moonshot project failed—after years and millions invested—the team that shut it down got a bonus. Why? Because they made the right call. They stopped something that wasn't going to work and freed resources for better bets. Does Culture Really Eat Strategy for Breakfast? Fischer: Peter Drucker famously told us that 'culture eats strategy for breakfast,' so I'm interested in what you think about organizational culture, and how important it is for success in Silicon Valley? Pulcrano: A few things about culture: First: optimism. Even when Silicon Valley Bank [SVB] collapsed, in 2023, the Valley shrugged and poured money into AI startups the next week. That attitude? 'What if it works?'—it's infectious. Second: role models. Everyone in the Valley knows someone who built something, or at least tried. That proximity to success makes ambition feel doable. Third: constructive promiscuity. At a typical Valley barbecue, people swap business cards before burgers. It's not impolite—it's expected. Fischer: Am I right in thinking that the way you see it in Silicon Valley is that a lot of culture is tactical? Pulcrano: In the Valley, it's curiosity and opportunity rolled together. Everyone is 'on the make' always, but everyone is also looking to help, invest, and collaborate. That ethos is powerful. But it can fade—especially as wealth accumulates, risk aversion creeps in, and firms become protectionist. What does the Future of Silicon Valley Look Like? Fischer: I'm in interested in how durable these lessons might be? Silicon Valley has dominated for over fifty years. But can it continue? What might the next fifty look like? Pulcrano: That's a provocative question. I'm optimistic, but cautiously so. Silicon Valley's strength has always been reinvention. Semiconductors, personal computing, the internet, biotech, social media, AI—wave after wave. Each time, it adapted. But now? Fischer: You're not convinced? Pulcrano: I'm seeing signs of incumbent behavior. Some of the giants—Google, Meta, Apple—are acting like the very firms they once disrupted. Risk-averse. Bureaucratic. More lawyers than engineers. That's worrying. Fischer: So, what would it take to stay relevant? Pulcrano: It needs fresh blood. And that's under threat. Immigration policies, visa restrictions—they're slowing down the global talent pipeline. Remember, 60% of the Valley's tech workforce isn't U.S.-born. Choke that off, and the Valley stops breathing. Fischer: So, the magic is in the mix? Pulcrano: Always has been. People come not just from Harvard and MIT, but from India, China, Nigeria, Slovenia. They bring their ambitions, the chips on their shoulders. That stew of dreams and hunger—that's Silicon Valley's secret sauce. Fischer: Can other regions replicate the magic of Silicon Valley? Pulcrano: Not exactly, but they can recreate parts of it. You need three ingredients: talent, money, and ideas, and they must come together efficiently. But it's the efficiency with which you mix them that makes the difference. Fischer: That efficiency being? Pulcrano: Access. In the Valley, the customer, the VC, the tech shop, the legal expert—they're all accessible within 30 minutes. You pitch an idea at breakfast, and prototype it by dinner. That's hard to reproduce in sprawling ecosystems or hierarchical, process-driven multinationals. Fischer: How can incumbents inside large firms imitate that? Pulcrano: Start small. Create internal innovation hubs where people are free to experiment. Kill bureaucracy. Protect intrapreneurs. Build a real network of mentors. Most importantly, ensure sharing and success are incentivized. If ideas stay locked in departments, or behind IP walls, you've already lost. Final Thoughts Fischer: This has all been very interesting! If you could leave our readers with one challenge—especially leaders in mature firms—what would it be? Pulcrano: Ask yourself: 'Am I creating a space where innovation is possible, or merely tolerated?' Then look around. If your team is afraid to disagree, if failure is punished, if new ideas die in PowerPoint—your culture needs rewiring. And, if you are wondering whether you need to go to California to do this: you don't. The Valley isn't a place—it's a mindset. You just need to think like a rebel—and surround yourself with others who will, too.
Yahoo
07-05-2025
- Science
- Yahoo
Real-world geoengineering experiments revealed by UK agency
Real-world geoengineering experiments spanning the globe from the Arctic to the Great Barrier Reef are being funded by the UK government. They will test sun-reflecting particles in the stratosphere, brightening reflective clouds using sprays of seawater and pumping water on to sea ice to thicken it. Getting this 'critical missing scientific data' is vital with the Earth nearing several catastrophic climate tipping points, said the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (Aria), the government agency backing the plan. If demonstrated to be safe, geoengineering could temporarily cool the planet and give more time to tackle the root cause of the climate crisis: the burning of fossil fuels. The experiments will be small-scale and rigorously assessed before going ahead, Aria said. Other projects in the £56.8m programme will model the impacts of geoengineering on the climate and research how it could be governed internationally. Geoengineering is controversial, with some scientists calling it a 'dangerous distraction' from cutting emissions and concerned about unintended climate impacts. Some previously planned outdoor experiments have been cancelled after strong opposition. However, given the failure of the world to stop emissions rising to date, and the recent run of record hot years, backers of solar geoengineering say researching the technology is vital in case an emergency brake is needed. The Aria programme, along with another £10m project, makes the UK one of the biggest funders of geoengineering research in the world. 'Decarbonisation is the first and best chance of avoiding these tipping points,' said Prof Mark Symes, the programme director at Aria. 'But the current trajectory puts us in danger of triggering some tipping points, regardless of what happens with net zero, so we do need to think about what we might do in that eventuality. 'The point of the programme is to explore and research as transparently as possible whether any of the proposed cooling approaches could ever be used safely,' he said. 'Life in the UK could become very difficult if any of these tipping points were triggered.' Ilan Gur, Aria's CEO, said: 'If science can show us that an elegantly designed spray of seawater can protect and preserve the incredible biodiversity of the Great Barrier Reef, isn't that something we want to understand?' The announcement was criticised by Prof Raymond Pierrehumbert at the University of Oxford: 'Solar geoengineering has enormous and troubling implications for global society. The UK funding sets a dangerous precedent for other governments to jump on the bandwagon [and] it is the height of folly to open the door to field experiments in the absence of any national or international governance.' Mary Church, at the Center for International Environmental Law, said: 'Solar geoengineering is inherently unpredictable and risks breaking further an already broken climate system. Conducting small-scale experiments risks normalising highly controversial theories and accelerating technological development, creating a slippery slope toward full-scale deployment.' Most geoengineering proposals aim to block sunlight reaching and heating the Earth's surface. However, solar radiation management (SRM) has the potential for serious unintended consequences, such as shifting rains vital to food production. Some private companies are already working on geoengineering; that makes building the scientific evidence base even more important, Gur said. The Aria-funded experiments include sending a weather balloon into the stratosphere above the US or UK. Milligram samples of non-toxic mineral dust will be exposed to the high-altitude conditions and then recovered to assess how the particles' properties change with time. Another three experiments will test how seawater sprays or electrical charges delivered by drones can seed tiny water droplets, making clouds over the oceans reflect more sunlight. One will expand current work over the Great Barrier Reef, which is in crisis because of global heating, and may reach 100sq km in scale, while another will take place on the UK coast. A fifth experiment will involve pumping water on to sea ice in Canada in winter, reaching up to one 1 sq km in scale. The water will freeze and preserve the ice sheet for longer in summer. Bright white ice reflects far more sunlight than the dark ocean revealed when sea ice is lost to warming waters. There will be an environmental impact assessment made public before any outdoor experiments take place and local communities will have been consulted. There is also an independent oversight committee as part of the approval process, Aria said, chaired by the leading climate scientist Prof Piers Forster and including members from India and Ghana. The Aria programme will also assess space reflectors, which are sunshades placed into orbit, using modelling to determine their feasibility. 'This is the most speculative of all the approaches we're funding,' said Symes. Volcanic eruptions naturally inject particles into the atmosphere and another project will fly drones through the plumes to measure the particles' effects. Seven modelling teams will investigate the impacts of geoengineering on climate and ecosystems, especially in developing countries, where about 85% of the world's population lives. There will be a further five teams working on ethics and governance to explore the wider societal implications of geoengineering, such as how any future deployment should be agreed and managed.
