Latest news with #India-Gulf
Indian Express
10-08-2025
- Business
- Indian Express
Daily subject-wise quiz : International Relations MCQs on Nagorno-Karabakh, BIMSTEC and more (Week 122)
UPSC Essentials brings to you its initiative of subject-wise quizzes. These quizzes are designed to help you revise some of the most important topics from the static part of the syllabus. Attempt today's subject quiz on International Relations to check your progress. 🚨 Click Here to read the UPSC Essentials magazine for July 2025. Share your views and suggestions in the comment box or at With reference to the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC), consider the following statements: 1. It is a connectivity project to develop infrastructure to enhance trade among India, the Arabian Peninsula, the Mediterranean region and Europe. 2. The Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) for the IMEC was signed in 2023 in New Delhi during the G-20 summit. 3. The IMEC comprises two corridors — India-Gulf and Gulf-Europe. How many of the statements given above are correct? (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None Explanation — India's National Security Council Secretariat hosted envoys and officials from the United States, UAE, Saudi Arabia, France, Italy, Germany, Israel, Jordan and the European Union, to discuss progress on the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC). — The IMEC was announced during the G20 Summit held in New Delhi in 2023 'to stimulate economic development through enhanced connectivity and economic integration between Asia, the Arabian Gulf, and Europe.' Hence, statements 1 and 2 are correct. — The IMEC comprises two corridors — India-Gulf and Gulf-Europe. Hence, statement 3 is correct. — Its eastern section would transport containers from India's western ports to the UAE, from where a high-speed goods railway will transport commodities across the Arabian peninsula (UAE, Saudi Arabia, Jordan) to Israel's port of Haifa. — The second leg will see cargo carried from Haifa to ports in Greece and Italy, from where Europe's well-established train networks would transport goods to their final destinations throughout the continent. — Overall, the IMEC is intended to reduce shipping time from India to Europe by around 40% compared to the Red Sea route. However, after the announcement, development has been minimal. Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer. With reference to the BIMSTEC, consider the following statements: 1. It includes countries of the Bay of Bengal region and seeks to act as a bridge between South and Southeast Asia. 2. The latest members to join BIMSTEC are Myanmar and Sri Lanka. 3. China has undertaken a massive drive to finance and build infrastructure in South and Southeast Asia through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in all BIMSTEC countries. How many of the statements given above are correct? (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None Explanation — BIMSTEC includes countries of the Bay of Bengal region and seeks to act as a bridge between South and Southeast Asia. Hence, statement 1 is correct. — Originally formed as BIST-EC (Bangladesh, India, Sri Lanka and Thailand Economic Cooperation) in 1997, it became BIMST-EC after Myanmar joined, and BIMSTEC in 2004 with Nepal and Bhutan. Hence, statement 2 is not correct. — It provides a common platform for countries in South Asia and Southeast Asia at a time when the SAARC is more or less defunct. While the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is seen as one of more cohesive groupings in the world, the lack of forward movement in the fraught India-Pakistan relationship has left few options for South Asian countries. Landlocked countries, Nepal and Bhutan, may also benefit from access to the Bay of Bengal as a result of better ties with BIMSTEC countries. — China is another key part of the equation. It has undertaken a massive drive to finance and build infrastructure in South and Southeast Asia through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in the last decade, in almost all BIMSTEC countries except Bhutan and India. Hence, statement 3 is not correct. — BIMSTEC could allow India to push a constructive agenda to counter Chinese investments, and the Bay of Bengal can be showcased as open and peaceful, contrasting with China's behaviour in the South China Sea. Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer. The nuclear weapons storage site at Coulport was in the news due to the release of low levels of tritium. The site is located in: (a) Russia (b) United Kingdom (c) Ukraine (d) Iran Explanation — Radioactive water from the UK's nuclear weapons storage site at Coulport was allowed to enter the sea after a series of burst pipes, according to official files obtained by The Guardian. — The Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa) found that the leaks, which released low levels of tritium into Loch Long near Glasgow, were the result of 'shortfalls in maintenance' by the Royal Navy. Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer. The dissolution of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) in December 1991 gave rise to: 1. Belarus 2. Russia 3. Kyrgyzstan 4. Tajikistan 5. Turkey Select the correct answer using the codes given below: (a) 2, 3 and 4 (b) 1, 2, 3 and 4 (c) 3, 4 and 5 (d) 3 and 4 only Explanation — The dissolution of the Soviet Union dismantled the ideological 'iron curtain' and paved the way for a new global order characterised by the rise of powers like India and China, exerting significant influence in global politics. — The dissolution of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) in December 1991 gave rise to 15 new republics. These included Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan. Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer. The region of Nagorno-Karabakh was in the news. It is located in: (a) Azerbaijan (b) Georgia (c) Armenia (d) Turkey Explanation — Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a US-brokered peace agreement that would boost bilateral economic ties after decades of conflict and move them toward a full normalization of their relations. — Armenia and Azerbaijan have been at odds since the late 1980s when Nagorno-Karabakh, a mountainous Azerbaijani region mostly populated by ethnic Armenians, broke away from Azerbaijan with support from Armenia. Azerbaijan took back full control of the region in 2023, prompting almost all of the territory's 100,000 ethnic Armenians to flee to Armenia. Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer. Daily Subject-wise quiz — History, Culture, and Social Issues (Week 120) Daily subject-wise quiz — Polity and Governance (Week 122) Daily subject-wise quiz — Science and Technology (Week 122) Daily subject-wise quiz — Economy (Week 122) Daily subject-wise quiz — Environment and Geography (Week 122) Daily subject-wise quiz – International Relations (Week 121) Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and stay updated with the news cues from the past week. Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.
Indian Express
10-08-2025
- Business
- Indian Express
How Israel's Gaza war has thrown future of IMEC up in the air
Earlier this week, India's National Security Council Secretariat hosted envoys and officials from the United States, UAE, Saudi Arabia, France, Italy, Germany, Israel, Jordan and the European Union, to discuss progress on the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC). The IMEC was announced during the G20 Summit held in New Delhi in 2023 'to stimulate economic development through enhanced connectivity and economic integration between Asia, the Arabian Gulf, and Europe.' The IMEC comprises two corridors — India-Gulf and Gulf-Europe. Its eastern leg will carry container traffic from India's western ports to the UAE, from where high speed freight railway will carry goods across the Arabian peninsula (UAE, Saudi Arabia, Jordan) uptil the port of Haifa in Israel. The second leg will see cargo being shipped from Haifa to ports in Greece and Italy, from where Europe's well-established train networks will take goods to their final destinations across the continent. Overall, the IMEC is expected to cut shipping time from India to Europe by about 40% when compared to the Red Sea route. But since being announced, progress has been limited. What are the corridor's ambitions? What are some key challenges it faces? And what is its future? Sound idea born in rare geopolitical window In September 2023, during India's G20 Presidency, the IMEC's conceptualisation and agreement was a testament to a remarkable period of stability in the Middle East. Years of conflict along ideological and geopolitical lines (Qatar-GCC, Iran-Saudi Arabia, Arab states-Israel) had given way to normalisation agreements and rapprochements that prioritised regional economic growth. The Arab normalisation with Israel, which Saudi Arabia was set to join, was yielding enough geo-economic gains for Arab states to overlook the Palestine question and perhaps even explore minilateral arrangements with Israel (on the lines of the I2U2 with India). This rare geopolitical window allowed India and its Middle Eastern, American, and European partners to envision a new corridor between India and Europe. The economic underpinnings of the idea remain firm. The EU is India's largest trading partner with bilateral trade in FY 2023-24 at $137.41 billion, and non-oil trade between India, the UAE and Saudi Arabia has increased significantly in recent years. The IMEC itself was meant to be more than a trade corridor. Its implementing partners would lay cables for 'electricity and digital connectivity', pipes for 'clean hydrogen export', to 'increase efficiencies, reduce costs, enhance economic unity, generate jobs, and lower greenhouse gas emissions.' From the perspective of trade facilitation and accessibility, the IMEC was meant to address several issues that continue to persist till date, including no corridor-wide tariff standardisation and low financial integration among corridor partners, lack of corridor-wide insurance, and widely differing port capacities. The ambitious cross-Saudi/UAE railway meant to transit goods between the corridor's sea-legs was also significantly under-developed. However, these presented benign modality and sustainability challenges which could be mitigated through commitment and investment from all stakeholders. Indeed, in September 2023, participants explicitly agreed to meet within sixty days 'to develop and commit to an action plan with relevant timetables.' Less than a month later, the Middle East plunged into an unprecedented conflict that continues till date, and the intended stakeholder meeting never occurred. Gaza poses fundamental challenges The underlying economic logic of the IMEC remains. However, its challenges have evolved from reconcilable to fundamental. The single most important issue is Israel's increasingly unpopular war on Gaza, which has killed at least 61,000 people thus far. The IMEC's cornerstone is the 'Middle East-Europe' connection, between Jordan and Israel. Unlike in 2023, Jordan-Israel relations are presently at a significant low, and are worsening due to the Israeli-American push for Jordan to absorb more of the Palestinian population. Similarly, the potential for Saudi-Israel normalisation is much lower today than in 2023. Riyadh has doubled down on the need for Israeli concessions towards Palestine while Israel's appetite to concede a Palestinian state is at a historic low. In fact, Israel is presently focused on formally re-occupying and potentially re-settling the Gaza Strip, despite intensifying global opposition. The direct downstream impact of Israel's seemingly endless war is the worsening of even those challenges which could be mitigated through reconciled trade practices between stakeholders. For instance, while the Houthi attacks on Red Sea shipping (which carries the bulk of Europe's trade) vindicated the need for the IMEC as a more secure alternative, the expansion of Israel's war (into Lebanon, Yemen, Syria, Iraq, and with Iran) bodes high insurance premiums for any trade transiting the region. That said, the corridor remains vital for Israel even as it continues to hinder its implementation. For Israel, the IMEC represents the pinnacle of its economic integration into a region where it has historically fought for acceptance and recognition. In September, 2024, Benjamin Netanyahu held up a map at the UN showing states on the IMEC route as 'blessed' with those in Iran's Axis as 'cursed' — reflecting the IMEC's role as an invaluable adhesive to bind Israel with the Arab world, minus Palestine. While the western leg of the corridor is unlikely to materialise in the near future, the IMEC's eastern leg benefits from the strategic partnerships that India has forged with the Arab states. While India's economic and strategic relationship with the UAE has the most depth, India is Saudi Arabia's second largest trading partner and both states have had a strategic partnership since 2010. These partnerships have yielded several instruments to bolster connectivity. For instance, Riyadh and Abu Dhabi both also allow the use of UPI for fund transfers and remittance payments, improving the potential for digital connectivity along the IMEC route. Consequently, for India, progress on the IMEC corridor is very much possible. This is despite internecine issues between Arab states over trade modalities. The Saudi need to undercut the Emirati economic dominance of the region continues. For example, in 2021, Riyadh imposed new tariffs specifically on those GCC states that have 'free zones' offering preferential tax and customs treatments. Objectively, this is standard economic competition between two Gulf powerhouses competing for influence and investments. But for a broader corridor that requires a common vision, this is a strong hindrance. In the long term, for the IMEC to be realised in its originally envisioned form, a secure and stable Middle East is an imperative. This implies that if the IMEC was seen as the fruit of the region's unprecedented stability in 2023, the regional architecture that brought about this stability will have to be recreated. Since that architecture failed to endure, it is now evident that as long as principal issues such as that of Palestinian statehood are not addressed, any regional connectivity plan will inevitably be susceptible to renewed conflict. Global recognition of the unsustainability of Israel's war is now apparent with more Western states both recognising the Palestinian state as well as reconsidering the terms of their support to Israel. Germany's decision to halt weapons shipments that Israel can use in Gaza, in response to Israel considering a broader re-occupation of the Strip, is a case in point. Given both its scale and scope, the IMEC is essentially now a 'day-after' plan — waiting for the resolution of the Middle East's oldest conflict. Until then, efforts like the August meeting in New Delhi can only focus on modalities and trade facilitation, with implementation being contingent on conflict resolution. Bashir Ali Abbas is a Senior Research Associate at the Council for Strategic and Defense Research, New Delhi
