Latest news with #Institutions
Time of India
17 hours ago
- Business
- Time of India
IREDA raises ₹2,005.90 crore via QIP; issue oversubscribed 1.34 times
New Delhi: State-run Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Ltd (IREDA) has raised ₹2,005.90 crore through a Qualified Institutions Placement (QIP) of equity shares, the company said on Wednesday. The capital was mobilised by issuing 12.15 crore equity shares at a price of ₹165.14 per share, including a premium of ₹155.14 per share over the face value of ₹10. The issue price reflected a 5 per cent discount to the floor price of ₹173.83 per equity share. The QIP was launched on June 5 and closed on June 10. It received a strong response from qualified institutional buyers (QIBs), including insurance companies, scheduled commercial banks, and foreign portfolio investors. The QIP was oversubscribed with bids amounting to ₹2,005.90 crore against the base issue size of ₹1,500 crore, achieving a subscription rate of 1.34 times. IREDA's Board approved the allotment of equity shares to eligible QIBs in its meeting held on Tuesday. The proceeds from the issue are intended to strengthen IREDA's Tier-I capital base and enhance its Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), thereby improving its ability to finance renewable energy projects across India. 'The successful completion of this QIP in a short span after our IPO in November 2023 is a testament to the trust and confidence the investor community and the Ministry of New & Renewable Energy have reposed in IREDA,' said Pradip Kumar Das, Chairman and Managing Director, IREDA. 'This capital infusion will empower us to scale up our financing activities, enabling greater investments in renewable energy projects and accelerating India's transition towards a greener and sustainable energy future,' he added. Das also expressed gratitude to Union Minister for New & Renewable Energy, Consumer Affairs and Food & Public Distribution Pralhad Joshi, Minister of State for Power and New & Renewable Energy Shripad Naik, MNRE Secretary Santosh Kumar Sarangi, the Department of Investment and Public Asset Management (DIPAM), and the IREDA Board of Directors for their support and guidance. IREDA also thanked institutional investors and stakeholders for their continued support and reaffirmed its commitment to lead clean energy financing initiatives in the country.
Yahoo
01-06-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Gauzy Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:GAUZ) top owners are individual investors with 39% stake, while 22% is held by institutions
Gauzy's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public The top 9 shareholders own 52% of the company 22% of Gauzy is held by Institutions AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. If you want to know who really controls Gauzy Ltd. (NASDAQ:GAUZ), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 39% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. And institutions on the other hand have a 22% ownership in the company. Institutions will often hold stock in bigger companies, and we expect to see insiders owning a noticeable percentage of the smaller ones. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Gauzy, beginning with the chart below. Check out our latest analysis for Gauzy Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing. As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Gauzy. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Gauzy's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story. It would appear that 15% of Gauzy shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Ibex Investors LLC is currently the company's largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. With 6.8% and 6.6% of the shares outstanding respectively, Olive Tree V Limited Partnership and Infinity Holding Ventures PTE. Limited are the second and third largest shareholders. Furthermore, CEO Eyal Peso is the owner of 2.0% of the company's shares. On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 9 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones. While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time. The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO. Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group. We can see that insiders own shares in Gauzy Ltd.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$3.9m worth of the US$154m company. This shows at least some alignment, but we usually like to see larger insider holdings. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling. The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 39% stake in Gauzy. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders. It seems that Private Companies own 17%, of the Gauzy stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company. We can see that public companies hold 4.2% of the Gauzy shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership. While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Gauzy (including 1 which doesn't sit too well with us) . Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
29-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
With 71% ownership of the shares, Impala Platinum Holdings Limited (JSE:IMP) is heavily dominated by institutional owners
Institutions' substantial holdings in Impala Platinum Holdings implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price 51% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders Insiders have sold recently This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. A look at the shareholders of Impala Platinum Holdings Limited (JSE:IMP) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 71% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn). Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute. In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Impala Platinum Holdings. Check out our latest analysis for Impala Platinum Holdings Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices. We can see that Impala Platinum Holdings does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Impala Platinum Holdings' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters. Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Impala Platinum Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Public Investment Corporation Limited, with ownership of 18%. With 9.5% and 5.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, FMR LLC and Lingotto Investment Management LLP are the second and third largest shareholders. We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent. While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future. The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group. Our information suggests that Impala Platinum Holdings Limited insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around R115m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling. The general public-- including retail investors -- own 29% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders. It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Impala Platinum Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Impala Platinum Holdings . If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
25-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited's (SGX:O39) top owners are retail investors with 54% stake, while 23% is held by private companies
Oversea-Chinese Banking's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public The top 25 shareholders own 42% of the company 22% of Oversea-Chinese Banking is held by Institutions Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. To get a sense of who is truly in control of Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (SGX:O39), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 54% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. Meanwhile, private companies make up 23% of the company's shareholders. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Oversea-Chinese Banking. View our latest analysis for Oversea-Chinese Banking Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices. Oversea-Chinese Banking already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Oversea-Chinese Banking's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Oversea-Chinese Banking. Our data shows that Selat (Pte) Limited is the largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 4.2% and 3.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too. The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it. Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group. Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited in their own names. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own S$223m of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling. The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 54% stake in Oversea-Chinese Banking, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability. It seems that Private Companies own 23%, of the Oversea-Chinese Banking stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research. While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Oversea-Chinese Banking that you should be aware of. But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
18-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Institutions own 35% of K&F Growth Acquisition Corp. II (NASDAQ:KFII) shares but individual investors control 40% of the company
The considerable ownership by individual investors in K&F Growth Acquisition II indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy 52% of the business is held by the top 10 shareholders 35% of K&F Growth Acquisition II is held by Institutions Our free stock report includes 3 warning signs investors should be aware of before investing in K&F Growth Acquisition II. Read for free now. Every investor in K&F Growth Acquisition Corp. II (NASDAQ:KFII) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 40% to be precise, is individual investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk). And institutions on the other hand have a 35% ownership in the company. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about K&F Growth Acquisition II. See our latest analysis for K&F Growth Acquisition II Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index. K&F Growth Acquisition II already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see K&F Growth Acquisition II's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story. K&F Growth Acquisition II is not owned by hedge funds. K&F Growth Acquisition LLC II is currently the company's largest shareholder with 26% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 3.6% and 3.2% of the stock. We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held. While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it. I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions. Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Given we are not picking up on insider ownership, we may have missing data. Therefore, it would be interesting to assess the CEO compensation and tenure, here. The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 40% stake in K&F Growth Acquisition II. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies. We can see that Private Companies own 26%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company. While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for K&F Growth Acquisition II (2 are a bit unpleasant) that you should be aware of. If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
